sally4sara Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I'd bet my penis that she is 10x more attractive than you are anyway. Even so, I doubt she'd go around calling you names like that. No one here is interested in your penis. And no, she is not 10x better looking than me so there goes your non-interesting penis! I'd have to look like Old Gregg for her to be 10x better looking than myself. Are you old enough to be on this site?
ella23 Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I said YOU DON'T KNOW that I don't pursue women. It was assuming I don't pursue women. It was a statement you made with no care as to if it was a factual statement. I could be a talent scout and pursue women for their physical appearance. And THIS is rat faced TO ME. http://www.topnews.in/light/files/Penelope-Cruz300.jpg You're right, she does indeed look rat faced in that photograph, but she's still stunning.
Stockalone Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 When you said none of the women previously mentioned were in anyway ugly - I pointed out Sandra Bernhard because she is harsh looking but had enough of a sexy vibe and nice body to get a spread in Playboy. Making her - whether you deem her so or not - ugly/sexy. That's an interesting opinion. Especially considering how you worded your previous post. How about Sandra Bernhard? She is ugly sexy to me.... That really sounded like a question to me. If you had told me that an appearance in Playboy is an irrefutable fact that a woman is sexy, I wouldn't have bothered with a reply. Nothing I said after that was a point I was trying to make solely unto you. Sorry if you thought I was still posting for your eyes only...... I still don't understand the point of your post, whether it was merely meant as explaining your own taste, or if it was addressed at me. But yes, given that you are a woman listing female celebrities I assumed your posts were directed at male posters and asking for their opinion of those women you mentioned.
sally4sara Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 You're right, she does indeed look rat faced in that photograph, but she's still stunning. And that is all I said about the woman - she looks good one minute and not so good the next.
TheLoneSock Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 No one here is interested in your penis. And no, she is not 10x better looking than me so there goes your non-interesting penis! I'd have to look like Old Gregg for her to be 10x better looking than myself. Are you old enough to be on this site? On the contrary, several women are interested in it. And not just the ones I know in person: http://www.loveshack.org/forums/t206062/ Oh she's not? I bet... Someone dislikes biological superiority
tami-chan Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I think cw states Cruz is beautiful....but like most of us, we have good days and bad days and some bad pics.... I think somebody missed the point of this thread....this is about UGLY but SEXY people.....Sandra Bernhardt is definitely UGLY...but apparently some people find her sexy....hey now, to each his (or her) own My take: Benicio del Toro! ugly but oh so sexy
sally4sara Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 That's an interesting opinion. Especially considering how you worded your previous post. That really sounded like a question to me. If you had told me that an appearance in Playboy is an irrefutable fact that a woman is sexy, I wouldn't have bothered with a reply. I still don't understand the point of your post, whether it was merely meant as explaining your own taste, or if it was addressed at me. But yes, given that you are a woman listing female celebrities I assumed your posts were directed at male posters and asking for their opinion of those women you mentioned. To be put in Playboy means you are thought to be attractive. I think Sandra Bernhard looks harsh with a good body and a sexual vibe. That is just my opinion. You have a different opinion. The fact that she was given a cover and full spread in Playboy means your opinion was not recognized by all. So she qualifies as sexy ugly. I am able to judge a person mal or female as sexually attractive because I do find both genders attractive. I am not interested in a romantic relationship with another woman despite having dated a couple women short term.
sally4sara Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 On the contrary, several women are interested in it. And not just the ones I know in person: http://www.loveshack.org/forums/t206062/ Oh she's not? I bet... Someone dislikes biological superiority Dude, all you've done by linking YOUR story as proof is make me that much more convinced that you're some high school boy. Seriously - I don't care. Its okay, I don't have to care.
D-Lish Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I think Penelope is hot, even in that picture link! I had my first sexual stirring after seeing David Bowie in Labryinth:confused: I still find him sexy. I think David Letterman is also sexy:eek: The only star I never got the hype about is Jennifer Aniston- however I have changed my mind in recent years, she seems to get more beautiful with age.
burning 4 revenge Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I said YOU DON'T KNOW that I don't pursue women. It was assuming I don't pursue women. It was a statement you made with no care as to if it was a factual statement. I could be a talent scout and pursue women for their physical appearance. And THIS is rat faced TO ME. http://www.topnews.in/light/files/Penelope-Cruz300.jpgso youre saying youre gay then..
Stockalone Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 To be put in Playboy means you are thought to be attractive. I think Sandra Bernhard looks harsh with a good body and a sexual vibe. That is just my opinion. You have a different opinion. The fact that she was given a cover and full spread in Playboy means your opinion was not recognized by all. So she qualifies as sexy ugly. It goes without saying that my opinion is the only one that matters to me when we are talking about I personally find attractive. I also think that a Playboy cover is not a convincing argument. I also never claimed that my opinion is or even should be universally accepted as the only opinion. We'll have to agree to disagree about Sandra Bernhard. I am able to judge a person mal or female as sexually attractive because I do find both genders attractive. I am not interested in a romantic relationship with another woman despite having dated a couple women short term. Fair enough. I am not trying to judge attractiveness objectively. I just think it is weird for a woman to tell men what kind of women are sexy. I'd find it equally weird if a man told women what kind of man should be considered sexy.
homersheineken Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Who are some celebrities you find attractive simply because of their personalities, talent, intelligence even if they don't qualify as physically attractive? I'll start: 1) Thom Yorke. Yeah he looks like an embryo, but I'd totally date him because of his insane talent. He also seems like a good person. And British accents are hot. 2) Neil Young. The way he shreds on the guitar is orgasmic. And he also seems like a really good person. Neil Young shredding on a guitar?? :laugh: He is one of the worst guitar players I've ever heard. So sloppy and uncoordinated. That said, he's one of my favorite artists
Hot Carl Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I think Shadowplay is ugly-sexy I don't completely agree with you.
Woggle Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I don't recall her name but the lead singer from the Yeah Yeah Yeahs has a certain appeal.
homersheineken Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I don't recall her name but the lead singer from the Yeah Yeah Yeahs has a certain appeal. Yeah. And any girl that plays guitar gets an extra +2 or +3 on sexiness.
TheLoneSock Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I think Penelope is hot, even in that picture link! No doubt! Plus, her accent and her sexy attitude in most of her movies make her hot, not just her looks. You know, those non-physical reasons the OP wanted us to talk about.
sally4sara Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 so youre saying youre gay then.. Yes absolutely! I'm as gay as you are willfully stupid. Add to the list of ugly sexy is lots of these folks: http://seehere.blogspot.com/2006/08/celebrities-without-makeup.html This guy was voted one of the sexiest men alive: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Franz I think ewww but hey.... And I'm going to add a vote for Chrissy Hynde as the model the singer from the Yeah Yeah Yeahs so desperately wishes she was. They both remind me of Shelley Duvall.....
cognac Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Penelope Cruz, Renee Zellwegger, those ugly broads Women showing how picky and elitist they are in physical looks, they're far more perfectionist than men are. it's pretty scary. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder shriek the choir of ladies here, just as long as the people the beholder is eyeing are all objectively good looking.
silverfish Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Penelope Cruz, Renee Zellwegger, those ugly broads Women showing how picky and elitist they are in physical looks, they're far more perfectionist than men are. it's pretty scary. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder shriek the choir of ladies here, just as long as the people the beholder is eyeing are all objectively good looking. If women really cared about looks that much, they would be lesbians. The female form is much more attractive to the eye than the male - thats just the way it is....women are beautiful to look at - much more so than men. Even women enjoy looking at other women, so get over it .... Men are attractive, and its much more subtle and to do with smell, body language, demeanor, persona, character....does this make men more shallow than women? Surely not? Women can find an ugly but talented man very attractive, men can find a beautiful but dull/ unintelligent woman attractive....there will always be people at the bottom of the heap. I know plenty of men who think Bjork is beautiful (cant see it myself although I like her music). But then I fancy the hell out of Jarvis Cocker.....
cognac Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 If women really cared about looks that much, they would be lesbians. The female form is much more attractive to the eye than the male - thats just the way it is....women are beautiful to look at - much more so than men. Even women enjoy looking at other women, so get over it ....[/Quote] The only reason it seems this way is because women are more outspoken about thinking other women are beautiful. If men were to do this, immature morons would call us gay or the object of our praise would feel uncomfortable. Sure I am obviously only attracted to the female form sexually, but in terms of aesthetic, physical perfection, the representation of values I love (honor, strength, pride, sacrifice) in physical sense, are all represented in the masculine form. The masters of perfect beauty and aesthetic (proved by mathematicians and scientists btw, yes there is an equation for almost universal beauty), the Ancient Greeks and later Romans would disagree with you completely, they believed the pinnacle of all Aesthetic was centered around masculinity, and feminine beauty was second: http://images.chron.com/blogs/aboutchron/archives/greek%20sculpture.jpg Men are attractive, and its much more subtle and to do with smell, body language, demeanor, persona, character....does this make men more shallow than women? Surely not?[/Quote] Then why are so many women hopelessly in love with random movie stars? Is the beauty of men like Brad Pitt, Hugh Jackman and Pierce Brosnan is really subtle :lmao::lmao: Women can find an ugly but talented man very attractive, men can find a beautiful but dull/ unintelligent woman attractive....there will always be people at the bottom of the heap.[/Quote] Right I'm sure James pattinson (the vampire) or whatever his name is , is in MENSA! What talents does Jason Statham have? Women find dumb and stupid men who are hot just as attractive as men find women in the same boat. IF you are disagreeing you are just lying. The only way women get around this is by pretending some guy who looks like Fabio but wears glasses is ugly.
silverfish Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 The only reason it seems this way is because women are more outspoken about thinking other women are beautiful. If men were to do this, immature morons would call us gay or the object of our praise would feel uncomfortable. Sure I am obviously only attracted to the female form sexually, but in terms of aesthetic, physical perfection, the representation of values I love (honor, strength, pride, sacrifice) in physical sense, are all represented in the masculine form. The masters of perfect beauty and aesthetic (proved by mathematicians and scientists btw, yes there is an equation for almost universal beauty), the Ancient Greeks and later Romans would disagree with you completely, they believed the pinnacle of all Aesthetic was centered around masculinity, and feminine beauty was second: http://images.chron.com/blogs/aboutchron/archives/greek%20sculpture.jpg Then why are so many women hopelessly in love with random movie stars? Is the beauty of men like Brad Pitt, Hugh Jackman and Pierce Brosnan is really subtle :lmao::lmao: Right I'm sure James pattinson (the vampire) or whatever his name is , is in MENSA! What talents does Jason Statham have? Women find dumb and stupid men who are hot just as attractive as men find women in the same boat. IF you are disagreeing you are just lying. The only way women get around this is by pretending some guy who looks like Fabio but wears glasses is ugly. I have no idea who most of the men you mention in your post are. I don't like Pierce Brosnan myself - he looks your atypical inbred upperclass English tosser to me....slightly gay looking (sorry Pierce / Piers )... I dont know any women who are 'hopelessly in love' with random movie stars either...maybe they fancy them but come on..so what? I have dreams about Graham Coxon from Blur sometimes..I'm not in love with him, but he is pretty hot. Thats 2 men with glasses now hmmmm - shallow as feck me eh?
cognac Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I have no idea who most of the men you mention in your post are. I don't like Pierce Brosnan myself - he looks your atypical inbred upperclass English tosser to me....slightly gay looking (sorry Pierce / Piers )... I dont know any women who are 'hopelessly in love' with random movie stars either...maybe they fancy them but come on..so what? I have dreams about Graham Coxon from Blur sometimes..I'm not in love with him, but he is pretty hot. Thats 2 men with glasses now hmmmm - shallow as feck me eh? HA Ha Ha ha I'm sure all the guys you've dated have all been ugly short brilliant talented guys, and the guys you reject are all good looking , dumb, and full of themselves guys.
Recommended Posts