Jump to content

Cheating means that you don't love your partner the way you're supposed to?


While the thread author can add an update and reopen discussion, this thread was last posted in over a month ago. Want to continue the conversation? Feel free to start a new thread instead!

Recommended Posts

Posted

You have an interesting perspective. The funny thing is that my wife and I both agree on what happened. But, I guess it always makes it more interesting when you put your own perspective on the story.

  • Like 1
Posted

Road...you are absolutely correct and i don't call it a ons...i call it an affair.

 

In reality what i did ...what i call it...what john calls it...what you call it...doesn't change what it is or what i did.

It does not minimize it...it is what it is...betrayal.

 

I cheated on my husband.

Posted
You have an interesting perspective. The funny thing is that my wife and I both agree on what happened. But, I guess it always makes it more interesting when you put your own perspective on the story.

 

 

 

May good things keep coming to your marriage.

Posted
May good things keep coming to your marriage.

 

Thank you very much, I appreciate it!

  • Like 1
Posted

Do not dismiss the male predator so lightly. Most of the men who have replied to this thread still do not understand the basic differences between men and women.

There is a class of men who get their highs from seducing married women. They could care less about single women. Their ultimate is to screw another man's wife.

For you fishermen, have you ever noticed how there are a few people who can catch fish, when everybody else on the lake can't get a bite. It is not luck. It is because they have studied their prey. Just like that fisherman, they have studied their prey and not only know but have practiced all of the right moves.

Like a wolf can tell which is the weakest and the most vulnerable in a herd, they too can pick out the most vulnerable.

Too many people fall back on the word "Choice". Once they have worked their magic, the vulnerable woman does not have a choice.

  • Like 2
Posted

One of the guys my wife cheated with was a ONS. Any other BH's on here who's wife had a ONS? If there are, I'm sure they will agree with me that there is nothing that destroys trust worse than a ONS. I mean, if your WW is such a slut that she'll hook up with any old guy at any old bar - then who the hell is your wife? How can you believe it was just this one time? How many were there in the past? How can you trust her anytime she leave's the house?

 

Let's not try to judge just what kind of infidelity is "worse" than another kind. Cheating is cheating, betrayal is betrayal - why try to tell someone they don't hurt as much because it wasn't a "real" affair.

  • Like 5
Posted
Too many people fall back on the word "Choice". Once they have worked their magic, the vulnerable woman does not have a choice.

 

2.50, you're a straight shooter and I normally agree with your thoughts.

 

But this is like a bad Lifetime movie. Were this true of my spouse, I'd have reservations about being married to someone so weak minded. I've been in the entertainment and service business for decades and have met and worked closely with some dazzlingly beautiful, smart, witty women. Other than the one I married, not one has "worked their magic" on me. Maybe love for your spouse and commitment to marriage is a superpower...

 

Mr. Lucky

  • Like 3
Posted
Do not dismiss the male predator so lightly. Most of the men who have replied to this thread still do not understand the basic differences between men and women.

There is a class of men who get their highs from seducing married women. They could care less about single women. Their ultimate is to screw another man's wife.

For you fishermen, have you ever noticed how there are a few people who can catch fish, when everybody else on the lake can't get a bite. It is not luck. It is because they have studied their prey. Just like that fisherman, they have studied their prey and not only know but have practiced all of the right moves.

Like a wolf can tell which is the weakest and the most vulnerable in a herd, they too can pick out the most vulnerable.

Too many people fall back on the word "Choice". Once they have worked their magic, the vulnerable woman does not have a choice.

Not so sure about your one-sided gender portrayal. My husband would claim that he was prey, that he was the one hit on and seduced and so what? It doesn't touch my heart one bit, nor would it if it were a woman. Besides, I'm considered a "vulnerable woman" in some ways—easy to trick, gullible, guileless, innocent, generally clueless. It was nothing for my husband to gaslight me into dismissing an 'almost' ONS I accidentally found out about and then never mentioning it again for 30 years or to deny his awareness of other women's attraction to him.

 

But when it came to inappropriate advances, flirting or sexual innuendos, I ALWAYS knew when my 'inappropriate' radar was buzzing. Always. I've moved away or stopped engaging with many a sympathetic look or word from a good-looking friend or associate. I didn't think twice about it or pat myself on the back nor think I'm so unique either.

 

Just as the importance of this behavior doesn't warrant exaggerated attention, neither does the behavior you describe deserve the blame for causing an affair.

  • Like 4
Posted
Do not dismiss the male predator so lightly. Most of the men who have replied to this thread still do not understand the basic differences between men and women.

There is a class of men who get their highs from seducing married women. They could care less about single women. Their ultimate is to screw another man's wife.

For you fishermen, have you ever noticed how there are a few people who can catch fish, when everybody else on the lake can't get a bite. It is not luck. It is because they have studied their prey. Just like that fisherman, they have studied their prey and not only know but have practiced all of the right moves.

Like a wolf can tell which is the weakest and the most vulnerable in a herd, they too can pick out the most vulnerable.

Too many people fall back on the word "Choice". Once they have worked their magic, the vulnerable woman does not have a choice.

 

 

There are lots of women who act like this as well ( predatory) but that does not for one second mean that the "victim" has no choice in the matter. Unless the person was suffering from some sort of mental illness and was incapable of making decisions, or they were drugged or under the influence of way too much alcohol, at no time did they not have a choice.

 

It more a case of the "victim" being open to cheating that it is any sort of skill on the part of the "predator".

  • Like 4
Posted

Every person has the "choice" to cheat. Most people have the opportunity at some point in their lives to "cheat".

 

Sometimes When a person is in the right circumstance, in the right frame of mind, in the right situation, with the right opportunity....they make the "wrong" choice....and "cheat"

 

Some people set out to cheat....they look for it....and i would venture to say...most likely those people could be serial cheaters.

 

Some men and women enjoy the hunt, they enjoy taking what does not belong to them, they enjoy conquering and winning. I believe that my om displayed this kind of personality. I still made the ultimate choice to cheat..it is 100% on me. VBM has stated the same kind of circumstance surrounded his wife's affair. The om by his description displayed very similar traits to my om. His wife is 100% responsible for her choice to cheat. Predator? Player? I suppose we could call some folks that....and in the end it really doesn't matter what we call those kind of people that search out married women and men just for the game of destroying a family and taking what does not belong to them....

 

Is anyone a victim? I dare say everyone who has been touched by infidelity is a victim of some sort. a person harmed, injured, or killed as a result of a crime, accident, or other event or action. By definition...even the "cheater" can be a victim....the "crime" was their own choosing...but they suffer none the less.

 

The undertone of many discussions here many times implies that "cheaters" are bad people. I would argue that we are not bad people..we are infallible people who made terribly bad choices in life. We did evil things...but we are not evil. Sometimes the discussion is centered around the fact that many here seem to believe that "cheaters" are genetic mistakes. I think all of us has been given the freedom of choice....and unfortunately sometimes even good people make really bad choices.

 

Wives and husbands of cheaters..Betrayed spouses...unfortunately are unfairly punished because of the choices their spouses have made. "cheating" imho...is the ultimate form of betrayal. But there certainly are cheaters who understand the pain they have caused and are willing to help heal their spouse from the wounds they have caused.

 

IMHO...an affair of any kind is horrific. We sometimes try to pigeon hole and evaluate infidelities and measure them. It is impossible...because infidelities affect each of us differently.

 

It is like comparing childbirth from woman to woman. How can i possibly say giving birth to my child was more painful than another woman giving birth to her child? We both suffered the same thing...child birth....and none of them is easy...and sometimes the child isn't willing to comply quite so easily and we feel like we take two steps forward and one step back in expelling the child...and it hurts like hell....but how do we measure one childbirth to the next? We can't. And while each childbirth is similar...each is different. Every woman's body is different..yet similar. Even when the same woman...gives birth to each child...each birth is different...because she is not giving birth to the SAME child at the SAME time...under the SAME circumstances.

 

So infidelity is infidelity...and they all hurt...but each one is different because they involve different people. you can warn others and tell them how your infidelity affected you. You can tell others how you handled the situation....but be mindful that not all of us is equipped to handle infidelity in the same manner.

 

Sometimes...divorce is the only answer for us. We just cannot possibly deal with the infidelity any other way.

 

Sometimes ...reconciliation is the answer and sometimes we try but it just doesn't work and divorce becomes the best choice....

 

and sometimes everything clicks into place and all the hard work pays off and reconciliation is successful.

 

The question asked here is can the cheater love their BS the way they are supposed to? and my answer would be...they can love their BS...but if they are loving them the way they are supposed to love them...they will not cheat.

  • Like 2
Posted

It doesn't say "can they"

 

It asks

 

"Do they"

 

 

Of course people are capable of doing many things - but do their actions show that they do?

Posted

The actual title of the thread is

 

Cheating means that you don't love your partner the way you're supposed to?

 

there is no can they or do they

 

it is actually a statement with a question mark

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The various aspects of partner responsibility in the infidelity process have been well discussed in other threads and can continue to be discussed in those threads.

 

This thread is about the wayward spouse, by cheating, indicating they don't love their partner the way they're supposed to. Additionally, the thread starter has stated aspects of their own experience as a betrayed spouse to work here. As an infidelity forum thread, the primary thrust of discussion shall be the thread starter's personal affair experience. If other, we'll move this to GRD and continue a more general topical discussion there.

 

I came to this thread due to a review of a moderated member's post which was, after review, straying from the topic and I noted a number of other late posts also doing so. Hence, let's return to the topic or move on. Making each thread an argument about who's responsible is not the purpose nor mission of LoveShack. Thanks in advance for heeding this moderation directive!

Edited by William
'of' not 'or' LoveShack
  • Like 2
Posted

VBM, YOU are the one living in YOUR experience. Therefore, I believe that YOUR view of the situation in which you live every day is the most valid. Especially considering that it is YOUR life it impacts. I believe you when you say that you are capable of holding your wife accountable AND realizing the OM was a cad.

  • Like 1
Posted

Urban dictionary top definition of "true love".

A bit idealistic and naive yes, but does this sound anything like the love of a cheater? :confused:

 

true love

Love.

Love is the greatest gift God ever gave man.

Love is not wanting to go anywhere without her.

Love is not caring what other people think about the two of you.

Love is when you feel depressed and sickly when you're not with her. You feel like your life has no meaning or purpose without her. And that if she wasn't holding your hand you would float away to heaven from where she came.

Love is caring for her physically and emotionally. It's telling her everyday, anytime, anywhere, anyhow, for no just reason that you love her.

Love is telling her u want to spend the rest of your life with her.

Love is wanting to marry her even tho ya'll haven't been dating that long. That you would do anything and everything for her. It's the feeling that you would give up everything just to see her smile or look into her beautiful eyes or hear her soft, soothing voice.

Love is pure happiness.

Love is the feeling you get when all you have to do is think of her and it brings a smile to your face and a yearning to your heart. Love is not being able to think about nething but her.

Love is having the sweetest dreams about her and waking up with a smile on ur face.

Love is an overwhelming feeling of pure bliss when the 2 of u kiss.

Love is wanting to hold her in ur arms till the end of time.

Love is wishing ur time with her never ends, that your lips would be locked together forever, that she'd be in ur arms till the end of time, that u could cuddle with her for all of eternity.

Love is being helplessly and deeply in love with her and knowing your love for her and your feelings for her will never change/end.

Love is the world, the world is love, and she is the world to me...

Urban Dictionary: true love

Posted
Urban dictionary top definition of "true love".

A bit idealistic and naive yes, but does this sound anything like the love of a cheater? :confused:

 

Not while they are cheating, no. I do not think anhone denies this. BUT that does NOT mean they never were and never will be capable of love.

 

Redemption exists whether some choose to believe in it or not. Period.

Posted
Urban dictionary top definition of "true love".

A bit idealistic and naive yes, but does this sound anything like the love of a cheater? :confused:

Urban Dictionary's "top" definitions are determined by popular vote, so this definition, submitted by Urban Dictionary reader 'Sabes' on Nov. 15, 2004, received 7,325 readers' thumbs-up (= 1.9 @ day). Unfortunately his exuberant proposal to his beloved at the end —I Love Elizabeth L. With All My Heart And Soul From Now To The End Of Time. I Love You Elizabeth! Will You Marry Me? I Never Wanna Lose You SweetHeart. I Am Soooo Deeply In Love With You!!!!— implies a lack of experience, rendering his definition unsuitable to assess my WH's love while he was cheating on me.

 

I find Urban Dictionary's 'top definition' of "love" more useful—

nature's way of tricking people into reproducing
since two of my H's affairs followed the births of my first two children. This definition was submitted by Anonymous on April 7, 2003 and received 82,649 thumbs-up (and only 20,652 thumbs-down) or 18.9 votes @ day as of today.

 

I would guess both definitions fall a bit short for the majority of LS readers.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

For the record, I support elaine's implied suggestion that "love" should be defined for this context. So what would "the way you're supposed to" love look like? Would it look the same for the cheater? How or why is it different for the cheater?

 

To be fair (though there have admittedly been times that I wasn't), I would say most definitely it has to be different. There's too much other stuff the WS and BS are trying to juggle while attempting to love each other the "way you're supposed to." With all the fallout discussed, maybe it's valid to give the cheater a break on expectations. I've benefitted from reading Mrs. Adams' and Lion Heart's insights into the emotional hurdles the WS must overcome to get back to a semblance of normalcy and stability IN ORDER to give and receive love (especially noteworthy since LH is the BS). I frankly do not know. Lion Heart's description of how she and her WH negotiate the present and future while trying to make what they have the best they can with respect and even more skepticism sounds pretty good to me and helped me give my WH a begrudging margin.

Edited by merrmeade
  • Like 1
Posted

In my own affair, the thread title was certainly apt, accurate and demonstrably supported by my transparent actions with the person in front of my spouse. However, I can't speak for cheaters in general since, one, cheating involves deception and that's a milieu separate from my experience and, two, I can't read their minds. I only know what was in my mind at the time and it certainly wasn't love in any healthy sense.

  • Like 1
Posted
In my own affair, the thread title was certainly apt, accurate and demonstrably supported by my transparent actions with the person in front of my spouse. However, I can't speak for cheaters in general since, one, cheating involves deception and that's a milieu separate from my experience and, two, I can't read their minds. I only know what was in my mind at the time and it certainly wasn't love in any healthy sense.
How do you mean the thread title "was certainly apt, accurate and demonstrably supported by [your] transparent actions"?
Posted
I only know what was in my mind at the time and it certainly wasn't love in any healthy sense.

 

Couldn't say it any better than this so will bow out of this thread.

 

VBM, hope you find contentment and happiness in both marriage and life...

 

Mr. Lucky

Posted

I think that most couples go through seasons where, let's be honest, one or the other partner is NOT loving the way they are supposed to. However, I think that when someone continues in that mindset, allows neglect or resentment to take root, AND they make the choice to have an affair during that time, it just creates horrible havoc. With my middle child, I had terrible post-parten depression. There is no doubt that for a few months I most certainly did not love my husband the way I was supposed to. However, it was only for a season. The man or woman who gets so caught up in their career or education that they make the choice to put their spouse on the back burner, assuming they'll get over it and it is part of their job to deal with it, they are NOT loving their spouse the way they are supposed to.

 

The thing with an affair is, that person just took a difficult season and pretty much burned the field.

  • Like 2
Posted
In my own affair, the thread title was certainly apt, accurate and demonstrably supported by my transparent actions with the person in front of my spouse. However, I can't speak for cheaters in general since, one, cheating involves deception and that's a milieu separate from my experience and, two, I can't read their minds. I only know what was in my mind at the time and it certainly wasn't love in any healthy sense.
Sorry to be so dense but the two concepts are not usually simultaneous and your explanation is brief.

 

If not carhill, can someone clarify for the syntactically challenged here? He's saying that he was transparent but did not feel "love in any healthy sense" for his spouse or SO, right?

 

Or is the first "my transparent actions" facetious?

Posted
How do you mean the thread title "was certainly apt, accurate and demonstrably supported by [your] transparent actions"?

The demonstrated actions were contrary to any prior demonstrated or agreed to commitments of love and fidelity, hence were not loving my spouse the way I was 'supposed to' and had freely agreed to.

 

While such actions/words might be more nebulous or explained away in the case of surreptitious or deceptive affairs, mine were out in the open and transparent and without ambiguity. I think my exW would agree. She experienced a lot of hateful stuff and there was no ambiguity on my part about it. She even had the benefit of advance notice so there was no ambiguity about what was coming next.

 

I think the specificities of our particular milieu were addressed quite well in MC and, as is nearly universal, are specific to us, hence another person or marriage could have a completely different dynamic, result and forensic analysis. Extrapolating, another person's viewpoint on love could find them loving their partner how they believe they're supposed to and having other 'loves' to go along with that primary love. What's happening here is that we, as LS members and/or societal members, are offering opinion and/or making judgments regarding others from our perspectives, in general. Those judgments and/or perspectives are non-binding. My experience over the decades with MW's underscores this, how each marriage, affair, and person is different. Yep, I can make value judgments, sure. They're vaporware. You think those people care? Not one whit. They do what they do. It works!

Posted
Sorry to be so dense but the two concepts are not usually simultaneous and your explanation is brief.

 

If not carhill, can someone clarify for the syntactically challenged here? He's saying that he was transparent but did not feel "love in any healthy sense" for his spouse or SO, right?

 

Or is the first "my transparent actions" facetious?

 

One, the thread isn't about my affair many years ago so necessarily any descriptions wlll be brief and relevant to the topic.

 

Two, 'transparent', for the purposes of discussion, means exactly that, interactions with my affair partner in full view of, or presence of, my now exW. She saw us interact, had the ability to interact, and did interact with the person independently, she was privy to phone calls, she could read my e-mails.

 

Transparency, the word, was something I learned to use in MC. In action, it means open and obvious without any facets of obfuscation nor deception.

×
×
  • Create New...