ascendotum Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Kathy There are litterally millions, tens of millions of men in China who, due to the non-existence of tens of millions of chinese women will never find one woman that way. What should they do? This is why the PR of C is largely turning a blind eye to prostitution there. Imagine the number of 'hard luck harrys' complaining about how hard it is to get a gf over on the chinese versions of LS. Link to post Share on other sites
ascendotum Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Legalizing it will not protect a prostitute from harm. She will still be abused by customers and by the men who "break her in" for the customers. It is not an act of love to encourage legalizing prostitution. That would be enabling a destructive lifestyle. The act of love comes from encouraging the prostitute to leave a destructive lifestyle, which is what Jesus did in the case of prostitutes he encountered. You really have a sinister view of brothels in the modern countries. By working in a legal brothel the woman has the ability to buzz for security. There was a stink in one brothel I know of when it was discovered that site had ceiling cameras setup in rooms which was supposed to be for security purposes. The places have locked front doors and cctv. A customer just can’t beat + sodomise a girl and then just crawl out the window or stroll through the foyer and out an open front door. Where I live women are free to contact brothels to apply to work whatever shifts suit them, and they are free to leave the premises at the end of their shift to go home. They are free to leave the job when they want and free to report the establishment to the police if they feel they were mistreated there. What is your definition of "break her in". Do you think brothel owners inject new girls with heroin and rape her and keep her locked up till she hooked and willing to do whatever acts they say for the customers??? Absolutely for some women it has been a destructive lifestyle, but for the more savvy + mercantile women its been a stepping stone to a better standard of life. Link to post Share on other sites
MaxNoob Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 That passage means that God condemns homosexuality, as is His right as the creator. That passage is saying that God will put them to death if there is no repentance, whether that is during their earthly life, or whether that is in the afterlife. Their life, without repentance, will be lost. One might consider that AIDS is a curse that God has put on that lifestyle to punish it. That's entirely possible. Whether you think that's unjust or inhumane, or whatever, it is God's right to judge and condemn that which He finds sinful. Yeah too bad AIDS has killed 14 million children who were not yet aware of their sexuality. The Bible tells us that demons are responsible for disease, and it took us nearly 2000 years to realize that's not true. Jesus cured a few deaf and blind people, but didn't bother to tell us that disease is caused by bacteria and viruses. Link to post Share on other sites
Wolf18 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) Yeah too bad AIDS has killed 14 million children who were not yet aware of their sexuality. The Bible tells us that demons are responsible for disease, and it took us nearly 2000 years to realize that's not true. Jesus cured a few deaf and blind people, but didn't bother to tell us that disease is caused by bacteria and viruses. That is mostly in the poorest African nations and transferred from mother to infant. I take the Bible as a metaphor, I prefer other philosophies to it (the new testament seems a bit humanistic and annoying at times) but can appreciate some aspects of its wisdom. Yes bacteria and viruses spread AIDS, but let's put away the PC nonesense here: HIV in first world nations is mostly a disease of homosexuals and drug addicts. In third world nations sodomy without condoms is to blame. Getting HIV through vaginal sex is very difficult, for it to spread sexually you actually have to violently sodomize someone so blood and other fluids combine. It's quite disgusting and just another argument against the insanity of the homosexual lifestyle. Edited October 28, 2011 by Wolf18 Link to post Share on other sites
Emilia Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) Getting HIV through vaginal sex is very difficult, for it to spread sexually you actually have to violently sodomize someone so blood and other fluids combine. It's quite disgusting and just another argument against the insanity of the homosexual lifestyle. Actually this is incorrect in parts of the third world at least. In Africa dry sex is widely practiced where men focus on friction and women use various types of ingredients to keep their vagina dry including washing powder (no I don't know how practical that is, I didn't wish to delve into it further). This is why HIV is spread to women so widely. Also, rape is very common in the developing world, in many countries it isn't even recognised as a crime, for a woman to get torn is common. In places like Zambia (where I lived for a year and a half) the expression used is 'deflowering' when a young girl loses her virginity often to a relative. Edited October 28, 2011 by Emilia spelling Link to post Share on other sites
AHardDaysNight Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Kathy, you just make all your arguments invalid by saying that gay people deserve to die because of their sexuality! Let me ask you, are you a member of the Westbro Baptist Church? Because you seem to be spewing the same crap they do! Link to post Share on other sites
Mrlonelyone Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 ya'll are terribly misinformed above about HIV and AIDS. 1.) HIV AIDS is not hard to spread by vaginal sex. It's hard for a man to get it via vaginal sex, but not for a woman to catch it from a man via vaginal sex. He shoots is fluids into her afterall. http://www.avert.org/hiv-african-americans.htm To date, over 230,000 African Americans have died of AIDS - nearly 40 percent of total deaths - and of the more than 1 million people living with HIV in the United States of America today, almost half are black.1 And yet, as a racial group, African Americans represent just 13 percent of the US population.2 The estimated lifetime risk of becoming infected with HIV is 1 in 16 for black males, and 1 in 30 for black females, a far higher risk than for white males (1 in 104) and white females (1 in 588).3 In Washington D.C, which has the nation’s highest district HIV prevalence (3 percent), three-quarters of those infected with HIV are African American.4 According to the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, African Americans "comprise the greatest proportion of HIV/AIDS cases across many transmission categories, including among women, heterosexual men, injection drug users, and infants."5 So why are black Americans so disproportionately affected by AIDS in America and how do black Americans themselves view the epidemic? And what is being done to limit the number of new cases of AIDS being identified in clinics across the country? 2.) HIV did not originate from God to kill the wicked or whatever racist* homophobic thing someone said. It evolved from a virus found in Chimps. Not green monkey's. http://www.avert.org/origin-aids-hiv.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_AIDS 3)The gay communities aids epidemic was due not to the kind of sex, but to the rampant promiscuity of the 70's and early 80's. Gay sex was seen as free of long term consequences between unsentimental men. Attachment free unprotected sex meant that transmission of disease was very possible. *Since by now everyone in the world knows how rampant this is in Africa. Link to post Share on other sites
Floridaman Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Kathy, you just make all your arguments invalid by saying that gay people deserve to die because of their sexuality! Let me ask you, are you a member of the Westbro Baptist Church? Because you seem to be spewing the same crap they do! Hold on, there. She didn't say she wished all gay people die, nor does she hold that view. Nor does that passage say God "wishes" gays die, but that is the punishment, according to scripture. Link to post Share on other sites
Mrlonelyone Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Hold on, there. She didn't say she wished all gay people die, nor does she hold that view. Nor does that passage say God "wishes" gays die, but that is the punishment, according to scripture. Yes she did. http://www.loveshack.org/forums/showpost.php?p=3698648&postcount=672 That passage means that God condemns homosexuality, as is His right as the creator. That passage is saying that God will put them to death if there is no repentance, whether that is during their earthly life, or whether that is in the afterlife. Their life, without repentance, will be lost. One might consider that AIDS is a curse that God has put on that lifestyle to punish it. That's entirely possible. Whether you think that's unjust or inhumane, or whatever, it is God's right to judge and condemn that which He finds sinful. Link to post Share on other sites
AHardDaysNight Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) Hold on, there. She didn't say she wished all gay people die, nor does she hold that view. Nor does that passage say God "wishes" gays die, but that is the punishment, according to scripture. EDIT: Whoa, FloridaMan, sorry for the attack (if you saw it.) It's cold, the heater in the house isn't working, and I'm in a terrible mood. Anyway, correction: The Bible can be interpreted many ways. The Church I go to has homosexual believers, and no, we don't believe that they're sinning. There are many divisions of Christianity, and not all are against homosexuality. Edited October 28, 2011 by AHardDaysNight Link to post Share on other sites
AHardDaysNight Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I'm sorry, Kathy and Florida. We can get into a religious argument on homosexuality, and never agree. Let's agree to disagree on this. What this has to do with prostitution, I don't know. As far as I know, homosexual escorting is something that happens far less than straight escorting! Link to post Share on other sites
Tony Posted October 28, 2011 Senior Moderators Share Posted October 28, 2011 It was fun...and now the final curtain! Thanks to all who participated. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts