Nicomis Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 According to all the women in this site AND in dating sites I am useless/worthless just because i dont mind being in a entry level low job all my life. I dont understand that thinking. But it just goes to show that Women don't really like men. They just wanna be with men who are of one kind. Men who talk a specific way, Men who live the in some specific way. like "A Professional making so and so money, who has time and money to do luxurious traveling and all this activities and stuff. Who can stimulate me intellectually" COme on! What do men ask of women? Nothing much! Most men just want a woman who is decently slim and pretty(which most are) and they don't care about what kind of job they do. For example i used to get 300$ a week in my temp job. So what? that's enough for me to live. ANd then the woman does her work. and gets her own money in her job so why would she care about how much money i make if i'm fine with it? Brother, I really do feel your pain about the lofty expectations of most of the women out there. Even the ones that clearly don't meet their own standards. BUT settling for living like that doesn't put you in a position to do anything except sit at home online and look at women on POF who think that they deserve Brad Pitt when they look like Roseanne. I work 2 jobs, and raise a kid by myself, so my daughter and I can live better. Women aside, finding a passion, and setting career goals is healthy for you. Happiness is not having a boss, and getting a fat check. I have been financially well off, and I have been $300 a week, and trust me $300 a week sucks. Do it for you, and then you can pick and choose the women.
HoneyBadgerDontCare Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 I have never met a woman that had monetary demands of a man . Simply that he had a decent job. Then there are others that don't care about a job at all. Both of these examples are women who know what is really important in life and it isn't $$$. But to find a supermodel with these qualities makes your friend a very lucky man indeed. No. He's not lucky. He's VERY good with women. He's had many women like this. When this one realizes he isn't serious about her and leaves him, he'll just find another.
HoneyBadgerDontCare Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 That's depressing to hear. And to think she knows about this. Are you really calling that a success story? I can't help but to think that former super model just couldn't get any more desperate. In the context of OP's thread, yes, I call it a success story. My friend's lifestyle isn't for me though. I'm EXTREMELY ambitious (so much so that it actually turns women off). So I could never be that guy. I don't even talk about things I'm passionate about with girls I date anymore. They know I have them, but I don't go into detail about it with them. The details are left for my friends that feel the same.
ltjg45 Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 No. He's not lucky. He's VERY good with women. He's had many women like this. When this one realizes he isn't serious about her and leaves him, he'll just find another. So he's a momma boy AND a player? Joy. 1
HoneyBadgerDontCare Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 So he's a momma boy AND a player? Joy. Yeah, basically. The ladies don't seem to mind though. I've never met anyone in my life that does better with women than him. Never. No one even close.
jma500 Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 No. He's not lucky. He's VERY good with women. He's had many women like this. When this one realizes he isn't serious about her and leaves him, he'll just find another. You are right he isn't lucky he is a user. I rescind my praise. 1
ltjg45 Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Yeah, basically. The ladies don't seem to mind though. I've never met anyone in my life that does better with women than him. Never. No one even close. All of that talent that could have been put to better use. *sigh* I will write that down along with the other things on the "Many Reasons Why I'm Depressed" list.
KatZee Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Those aren't mutually exclusive. Say you won $50 million after taxes. House and warehouse lets say combined $1 million (for example). You could live pretty comfortably for years. Including vacations and a nest egg for retirement. If I won $50 million after taxes, I sure as S.HIT wouldn't be buying a warehouse to sit in 8 hours a day. 2
PhillyDude Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Tons of woman are looking the total package and don't realize when they find this WONDERFUL MAN he will be having sex with multiple women anyway LMAO
fortyninethousand322 Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 If I won $50 million after taxes, I sure as S.HIT wouldn't be buying a warehouse to sit in 8 hours a day. Well neither would I. I'd go travel the world. Build a wooden ship (like a huge "ship of the line" style ship) and be the first person to circumnavigate the globe, or something. It was a hypothetical about pretending to have a job.
Eddie Edirol Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Exactly. I dont understand all these College/Career women who think just cause i dont have a fancy job that I'm s**t. SO what if we can't do hobbies that Cost money. There is traditional hobbies that cost nothing. Example, story telling. Singing. Chanting. Exercise. And you can always be creative and make things by hand. Today's women think that you can only live HIgh tech. People in the past lived fine(and still do..for example TRIBES) in simplicity. Ha! You MUST have done some research about what women want, because you are spouting exactly the opposite of the type of person that they want to be around. As if youre trying to keep them away. No ambition, no selectivity with mates (what mates?) Cheap, no passion, boring as hell, nothing interesting about you whatsoever. There is a middle ground you know. Do the exact opposite of all this, and you'll be beating them off with a stick. Instead of just beating off yourself....
Author quietGuy13 Posted March 16, 2013 Author Posted March 16, 2013 Ha! You MUST have done some research about what women want, because you are spouting exactly the opposite of the type of person that they want to be around. As if youre trying to keep them away. No ambition, no selectivity with mates (what mates?) Cheap, no passion, boring as hell, nothing interesting about you whatsoever. There is a middle ground you know. Do the exact opposite of all this, and you'll be beating them off with a stick. Instead of just beating off yourself.... So are you saying That women DO IN FACT just want guys who are money worthy and can do fancy high tech hobbies or traveling and all that. That women do not like simple life? yeah then. that's what i said. It's the truth. Take any College Graduate Woman and she has that same kind of mentality. "Wanna travel to Hawaii" "Wanna travel to europe" "Wanna go out and have fancy dinner at some fancy restaurant" It's about time to stop this. Women just want that kind of money life. Guys are you with me?
Lonely Ronin Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 It's about time to stop this. Women just want that kind of money life. Guys are you with me? No not at all, because you're dead wrong.... People that are well off and used to a certain life style want someone similar to themselves. It doesn't matter if you're a man or a woman, it's about dating someone you have things in common with. 1
KatZee Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 (edited) It's about time to stop this. Women just want that kind of money life. Guys are you with me? I'm not sure if you're living in the REAL world just yet, but if you're not you're going to be rudely awakened by the fact that it costs MONEY and tons of it to live. It has nothing to do with "omg I want tons of cash and a husband that makes 6 figures so I can go buy shoes and purses and eat at 5 star restaurants every single night!" There are definitely women like that, but I'm not like that, but even I know that it costs a lot to live comfortably. Especially where I live which is NYC. I'm on a $47k salary and the only person I can take care of is MYSELF. Not a husband, not a kid. No one other than me. The costs of gas, the price of food at the supermarket, bills, rent, insurance, a cell phone. Just BASIC living is damn expensive and I'm going to date someone who can hold his own as well. Not someone who's comfortable making $300 per check... and the only thing that would pay for is the groceries. And yes, I won't apologize for wanting to live a comfortable life. For not having to worry if me, a future child or my husband fell ill unexpectedly. Or if we wanted to plan a family vacation. Or have to worry that I couldn't provide my child with something they wanted. It even costs thousands of dollars to DIE. Sit on that one. Edited March 16, 2013 by KatZee 2
ltjg45 Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Or have to worry that I couldn't provide my child with something they wanted. I agree with everything you said EXCEPT this. One of the biggest issues we have in the U.S. is that parents is spoiling children. This is how we have to deal with entitled, spoiled brats thinking that everything should be given to them without question. This is why President Obama (also knows as the Welfare President) has a 2nd term of office. How glorious it is for us. The only things a male and a female need to worry about is their own needs and what their children NEEDS, not what they WANT. If a child WANTS something, they (just like anyone else) can go out into the real world and earn it. That should not be counted towards the overall expenses of standard living. 1
Krieger Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 If I won $50 million after taxes, I sure as S.HIT wouldn't be buying a warehouse to sit in 8 hours a day. i would turn it in to 500 million so my kids kids kids kids kids....................................... will never have to work a day in there life.
KatZee Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Where did I say anything about spoiling a child? I most certainly wasn't spoiled and given EVERYTHING I wanted when I was younger. But did my parents occasionally give me things I wanted that were affordable? You betcha they did. And it has not made me some spoiled person who doesn't know how to work and earn for myself. It's up to the parent to teach their child the importance of money and how to save, and how to spend wisely. That doesn't mean they can't occasionally give a child some "wants." And I'm sorry, a 5 year old child can't go into the world and work for his/her wants. 1
ltjg45 Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Where did I say anything about spoiling a child? I most certainly wasn't spoiled and given EVERYTHING I wanted when I was younger. But did my parents occasionally give me things I wanted that were affordable? You betcha they did. And it has not made me some spoiled person who doesn't know how to work and earn for myself. It's up to the parent to teach their child the importance of money and how to save, and how to spend wisely. That doesn't mean they can't occasionally give a child some "wants." And I'm sorry, a 5 year old child can't go into the world and work for his/her wants. A 5-year old doesn't need anything other than a book to start reading/learning, the clothes on his/her back, the shoes on his/her feet, and food/water and a lot of sleep to help it stay alive. And MAYBE some toys to keep it entertained but I doubt it is necessary by any means. Any more than that is strictly a luxury the child can do without. 1
Krieger Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 i could never be stuck working an entry level i need a challenge. I envoy the Op in that way I could never be OK with so-so. If your happy then that fine it works for you .
KatZee Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 A 5-year old doesn't need anything other than a book to start reading/learning, the clothes on his/her back, the shoes on his/her feet, and food/water and a lot of sleep to help it stay alive. And MAYBE some toys to keep it entertained but I doubt it is necessary by any means. Any more than that is strictly a luxury the child can do without. A child doesn't need toys. A child also doesn't NEED books. To survive, a child would need food, shelter, clothing. Do you think children in poverty stricken Africa have books and toys? I don't find one thing wrong with giving a child a "want" on special occasions. Especially if I can afford it. I will be proud, and so happy that I'm financially able to do that. 3
PhillyDude Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 OP i agree that a woman shouldn't be concerned with career growth but you shouldn't want to be in a entry level job all your life. I;m talking about for YOU not for some woman making demands. Wouldn't you want to make more money 2 or 4 years from today? I agree that as long as you are able to pay rent, bills, save money, and go out to enjoy yourself, then that's all that matters 1
ltjg45 Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 I don't find one thing wrong with giving a child a "want" on special occasions. Especially if I can afford it. I will be proud, and so happy that I'm financially able to do that. It does if they start to expect it. It doesn't take much to start a chain reaction that can't be stopped. All they need is that one small taste. That is why I'm being so strict on it. Parents doesn't realize just how little it takes before the child gets addicted to it. To add to this: I saw a very young child (looks like he is 2) that was crying non-stop at the public bus station for like 15-20 minutes despite the mother was holding him, trying to rock it to sleep, etc etc. He didn't stop crying until a police man came over and gave him a piece of a peppermint. The child is spoiled already and he's only 2-3 years old. This is no laughing matter.
Eddie Edirol Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 It's about time to stop this. Women just want that kind of money life. Guys are you with me? LOL! Dude whaddya gonna do, picket women in the streets in protest? It'll just be you and the homeless guys, because even women who themselves have no ambition - dont want guys with no ambition. When you do protest, please send pictures. 2
PhillyDude Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 LOL! Dude whaddya gonna do, picket women in the streets in protest? It'll just be you and the homeless guys, because even women who themselves have no ambition - dont want guys with no ambition. When you do protest, please send pictures. Is that because a woman with no ambition has a "golden vagina"
ChessPieceFace Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 $300 / week is barely scraping by, and you won't be able to retire or deal with any big expenses (medical, etc.) And that's just for you, alone. I don't think it's unreasonable for a woman to expect more than that for the simple fact that you could never support a family on that. Regardless of the lies and nonsense that spew out of the pinhead idealists, human nature is what it is, and most women want a provider. If you harbor resentment for that alone, or think that alone is unreasonable, "you're gonna have a bad time." 1
Recommended Posts