movinon05 Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 So 2 weeks ago you filed a protection from abuse (pfa) against parker, then dropped it because of a letter, and now what you have with him blows all others away? Sounds so f'ing romantic. I want a yummy relationship like that. No, you've got that all wrong. I'll leave it to peacelove to explain.
Lonestar Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 No, you've got that all wrong. I'll leave it to peacelove to explain. No, I don't. Here's the thread http://www.loveshack.org/forums/t107382/
movinon05 Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 No, I don't. Here's the thread http://www.loveshack.org/forums/t107382/ I apologize! I was not aware of that thread. I got my information elsewhere. Hmmmmm.
Freedom Now Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 Told ya something wasn't quite right.....
frannie Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 Violence against both women..? "I love you to death" - nice sentiment.
2sunny Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 yep, notice they "both" ran away as soon as they were called on the mishap????
Romeo Must Die Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 LOL, I knew this thread was bullsh*it before I even read it, but NID beat me to it. Ha Ha Ha... suckers!
pricillia Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 I am speachless about all of this...And tired too....hmmmmm
Freedom Now Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 I'm with you Romeo. I thought the same as you and NID but didn't want to post it. When I caught the slip up, then I knew it was a ruse. Yes, some of us are smarter than the average bear!
pricillia Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 I'm with you Romeo. I thought the same as you and NID but didn't want to post it. When I caught the slip up, then I knew it was a ruse. Yes, some of us are smarter than the average bear! Is parker, peace love and peace love parker or is it the other way around?
Freedom Now Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 Parker IS peacelove. They are one and the same. A woman.
norajane Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 Parker IS peacelove. They are one and the same. A woman. And I believe peacelove's story sounds very similar to that of reneet, who is no longer posting.
pricillia Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 I just don't understand why anyone would do that? Pretend to be someone else
Freedom Now Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 Oh my God. Norajane, I have been saying that very same thing for months! This is unbelievable.
frannie Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 Hard to say whether or not they're two people posting, or one person pretending to be both people in this relationship, but I do believe the situation exists. After all, it's a MM who's left his wife and has been living with someone for seven years without getting divorced. Like I said in my earlier post, that isn't fair (in my mind) to either woman. Now it seems that he's not only uncommitted but violent too..? That fits, as far as I am concerned. I don't think it's necessarily a hoax, because I've read situations like this before. If it is, it's not unusual. But then I didn't see a happy ending with the way they were presenting it earlier. He was still married to someone else!
pricillia Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 I vaugely remember a post I think it was from Peacelove and she was upset because MM had drank to much is that what lead up to the abuse
Freedom Now Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 Frannie, I believe the situation is true, just that the posters are the same person. No, I don't think the whole story is a hoax, just the two posters. "They" are a woman.
frannie Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 Frannie, I believe the situation is true, just that the posters are the same person. No, I don't think the whole story is a hoax, just the two posters. "They" are a woman. Could be. Although people get sign-ins messed up all the time when two people are using the same computer.
Freedom Now Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 True. But NoIDidn't posed her questions to HIM, and SHE answered. I thought that was weird.
pricillia Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 I believe that parker232 and peacelove are infact two different people... I do not think that a person would try to impersonate another in this fashion, unles for kicks but I don't see it. If you search Parker232 this is the only post that was started by him. But it does make it confusing for the rest of us when one is answering under anothers sign in name.
Freedom Now Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 I disagree. Is it not coincidental that peacelove posted on another post that she is leaving LS now? I don't know.....I am standing by the belief that they are the same person.
pricillia Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 August 22nd 2006 at 1:22 pm she posted on seeing a married man Quote by Reenet We call each other all day long. He tells me that he doesn't have the $$ to hire an atty. There's the marital property, a house at the shore, a boat & 60,0000 of debt. I guess that's why she hasn't filed. Maybe staying married has it's perks. she abbreviated attorney atty and I think this is one in the same. I thought about changing my name but feel pricilla suits me... so maybe she should have told us this? or maybe she was just trying to start fresh?
pricillia Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 Protection from abuse order was served I was wondering if I definately need legal assistance for my court date this Thursday. I cannot afford an atty & legal aid has no one available to attend court with me. I am the plaintiff & I am very scared to do this. Scared to walk in on my own. Please advise. Thank you. __________________ Peace, Love & Bobby Sherman! and this was the post that was mentioned above. atty is abbreviated... so you are right it could possibly be
norajane Posted December 31, 2006 Posted December 31, 2006 A ****-stirrer by any other name, is still a ****-stirrer. Mind you, I have no problems if someone wants to stir ****. But they will get called on it eventually, and can't expect a lot of sympathy for doing so.
Recommended Posts