Author burning 4 revenge Posted October 1, 2006 Author Posted October 1, 2006 I think I want to go to a firing range and feel sweat pouring down my brow as I climax over and over and over.....
Sand&Water Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 Burning_4_revenge, Yeah, I do. And I wish I could grow my hair out long, but it's thinning on top. I look in the mirror holding a handheld mirror and stare at my reflected mirror image of the crown reflecting in the mirror and I know if I had a gun in my pants your eyes will be mesmerized by the bulge. I'm sorry for your loss, B4R. Nice try, though. I know you are trying hard to fit in. Have you tried having sex, with gun in tow? [i hear it is satisfying] Sand&Water
norajane Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 I think I want to go to a firing range and feel sweat pouring down my brow as I climax over and over and over..... It doesn't work that way on the range. Remember what I said about calm, focus, and yoga? Maybe when you get home and have the delayed reaction.
Author burning 4 revenge Posted October 1, 2006 Author Posted October 1, 2006 Burning_4_revenge, I'm sorry for your loss, B4R. Nice try, though. I know you are trying hard to fit in. Have you tried having sex, with gun in tow? [i hear it is satisfying] Sand&Water That sounds bizarre and perverted. Is that a European thing?
Sand&Water Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 Burning_4_revenge, That sounds bizarre and perverted. Is that a European thing? Power, and sexuality are slip sides of the coin. Since, you observed that as bizarre and perverted, then guns are not for you. Cured! Sand&Water
Author burning 4 revenge Posted October 1, 2006 Author Posted October 1, 2006 It just sounded like some bizzare European psychological fetish. Here in America we usually hold the gun over the person we're having sex with.
RecordProducer Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 Are you offended by that new movie where Ali G plays a reporter from Yugoslavia?I don't know what movie you're talking about and to tell you the truth, I am not even interested to see it. I have so many things on my mind right now. But I am curious about what it's about. Can you tell me please? Also Yugoslavia doesn't exist anymore and it used to comprise several nationalities and religions so I might be offended or not, depending on what nationality was presented there as good or bad. But, believe me, I have my own stable views of my former countries of residence, my mix of nationalities, people, and politics overall. No one's opinion can really offend me. I am ME and in my own world I exist as ME, not as a part of a nation. I am a creative and thinking human being, I am above the "let's fight with the boys from the next street" type of things. P.S. How is this related to the original subject? P.S.S. AGAIN you are breaking the rules of privacy in public.
seven Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 b4r -- perhaps you should opt for a top of the line water pistol. It sure had a powerful impact over Tom Cruise! [remember the reporter that blasted him during the interview] And oh, the hair thing ... last week on the Rachael Ray show I think, there was a survey of when men start losing their hair and the majority of women don't care about it. I'm not trying to dismiss your feelings, just so you don't focus on it as much. Really though, real guns are bad news ... especially having them around if you're feeling down.
Guest Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 Are you offended by that new movie where Ali G plays a reporter from Yugoslavia? Not Yugoslavia. Kazakhstan.
jerbear Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 It doesn't work that way on the range. Remember what I said about calm, focus, and yoga? Maybe when you get home and have the delayed reaction. Just don't goto the airport with the same clothes!!! Remember to wash them, take a shower, change to something else or better yet; have designated sets for delayed reactions! :lmao: The kick from a firearm is quite fun and after firing a few, understood why having one as a deterent is great but deterents are only good if carried thru.
pricillia Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 You are skirting around the real issue. You gave your power away and refuse to take it back. Instead, you invested it in someone and left it with her. You could buy a cannon and it wouldn't change a thing. You want power? Go see a therapist and understand how to claim your own life back. As others pointed out, your impressions of the impressiveness of power are sadly skewed. People who think guns or large vehicles or acts of violence make them 'powerful' are buffoons - and the wise know it. Nobody respects the schoolyard bully. The United States is the focus of hate and ridicule throughout the world due to its behaviour. Another poster last night was blaming someone else for his own weakness in falling for some woman and remaining hooked on her even though she was bad for him. This is dysfunctional behaviour. It's entirely to you to fix - not with weapons or violence but with therapy, with learning the flaws of your own thinking, and with putting yourselves right. Yes this is true... however some people use therapy as a crutch and never get better so to speak, it is all for attention sometimes.
Guest Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 it is all for attention sometimes. And what would you call posts about buying guns, hating one's ex, etc? So what if people go for the sake of attention? At least they're dealing with someone who knows what to do about it rather than foisting their dysfunction on innocent bystanders.
pricillia Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 And what would you call posts about buying guns, hating one's ex, etc? So what if people go for the sake of attention? At least they're dealing with someone who knows what to do about it rather than foisting their dysfunction on innocent bystanders. some people can be strong when others can not, some people don't have the money to get therapy and some just don't want to. I have never thought about buying a gun(don't belive in them) the OP is just reaching out if you don't like it then don't read the post
riobikini Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 Here in this grassy, hilly little part of Tennessee, where there are still lots of woods, deer and other wild game- men still like to own guns. They were raised up owning them, even had them passed on as gifts from their fathers, grandfathers, or uncles. They were (and still are) given as birthday gifts or as a present to celebrate events that occur as a young man approaches certain "turning points" in his life. Guns, here, have always been a piece of personal property attached to some kind of significant meaning, mostly one having to do with the respect of the person it belonged to. For the most part, it's the rifles that get the most attention -handguns are certainly present- but they are, in most cases, perceived as less "presentation worthy" -except for those which were used in the military. The reason for that, probably has to do more with the traditional history of the region I live in than anything, and the fact that handguns were rarely the gun of choice for hunters, as far back as our history goes. I was given my dad's rifle after he passed away in a work-related accident when I was in my early twenties. It reminded me of him and our hunting trips that he would take me along on, when I was a very young girl. I later gave it to my brother, as he was my dad's only son, and I felt it more appropriate for him to have it. The smell of the gun -the oil on the wood and steel used to polish it- brought back memories of him sitting on the front porch carefully cleaning it. My dad was never a fool with his guns. He took safety issues seriously in regards to them, and taught each of us (all six of his children) the basic handling rules necessary as we grew older and was able to comprehend and follow his instructions. For myself, guns were a useful object that demanded careful thought, respect, and proper care -and were there to bring food to the table (squirrel, deer, and wild fowl -turkey, pheasant- still taste pretty good, to me) -and provide protection, if needed. And they were never mishandled by anyone. Now, in light of all that -to hear someone post such a confused and torn perception of the purpose for owning a gun- is not only disturbing, but it causes me a bit of anger, as well. The tone of instability, and the unpredictable-sounding torment I read from B4R's post is at the heart of the reason for a large portion of the, yet truly unsettled, debate over gun control. I do not believe our right to bear arms should ever be taken away -but B4R's post just amplifies *why* it is important for us to be more defining in the laws and criteria we develop (and more effort given to our endeavors already mandated for the thorough screening of applicants) in who should have access to owning them -and why. -Rio
stoopid_guy Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 Rio, I grew up the same way in NC, and still have a shotgun that belonged to my Grandfather. I have no fascination with them, maybe because there's no novelty there. Guns are simply finely made, powerful tools. Respect them? Heck yes, the same way I respect a chain saw, car, or any other tool that you could hurt yourself or someone else with. Folks who didn't grow up around them have a hard time understanding our attitudes toward them. There's also a tendency to blame them for crime by those who'd rather not blame the criminal.
riobikini Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 SG...APPLAUSE!!!for your commentary! Man -judging by your comments, in my opinion- you certainly do not measure up to your screen name you've given yourself. (Smile) Thanks! and Take care. -Rio
Guest Posted October 1, 2006 Posted October 1, 2006 There's also a tendency to blame them for crime by those who'd rather not blame the criminal. The point is that since there is little will or ability to control criminals, then it's sensible to keep weapons that can do major damage out of their hands. Yes, they could stab people rather than shooting them, but it's easier for someone to fight back against a guy with a knife than it is a guy with a guy. Being shot is way more likely to kill you than being stabbed. You could use the same argument against nuclear weapons 'gee, there's nothing wrong with them - just the people that use them' but you don't see anyone saying that there should be no control over who can own nukes. Unless you become able to control the minds of all humans to ensure that none of them ever use their weapons for evil reasons, the fallback is to control the distribution of the weapons. And yes, criminals can still get them illegally but if there are fewer weapons overall, then clearly there will be fewer for the criminals to steal. And the kind of mindset you've seen here as an argument for why this person should have a gun is exactly why he shouldn't. But it's highly unlikely that he'll be stopped. Prospective gun-owners are given forms to fill out. As if they wouldn't lie on the forms. DUH.
alphamale Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 This thread is funny. yes...its funny yet discombobulating at the same time. we don't know what B4R looks like or where he lives so we can allert the authorities. I really hope he doesn't shoot up a middle school or something. I'm quite distressed.
the_alchemyst Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 Nope. Especially since his picture is not in his profile, his location not told, and his real name really unknown. But I suppose the biggest reason for distress is knowing his undying seriousness in all matter. So, yes--let's find out so we can alert the authorities ASAP! EDIT: I think there's much funniness to this, actually.
Art_Critic Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 I really hope he doesn't shoot up a middle school or something. Wouldn't it be a stripclub in Fla ?..
magichands Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 there's nothing funny about any of this Guns don't kill people - bullets kill people. Do you care for steel erections?
alphamale Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 Guns don't kill people - bullets kill people. I thought it was "people kill people".....according to the NRA.
Recommended Posts