Guest.G Posted August 26, 2006 Posted August 26, 2006 Hello. Would people give me some insights on their pacing scheme? For me, I would see a less attractive guy more often whereas my 'man of my dream' less often. For example, if I am seeing a guy rating 8/10 (1o the best, 0 the worst) on my scale I would see him twice a week, whereas a 10/10 once a month. It just require too much mental energy and preparation for me to see someone I admire so much. Maybe that's why I feel more comfortable settling with a guy with a lower score. Is this the same case with guys?
stoopid_guy Posted August 26, 2006 Posted August 26, 2006 So, the less often you see a guy, the more it means you're attracted to him? No, us guys just aren't that confusing... But seriously, you say the more attractive ones require more effort. I'd say put the same amount of effort into all of them. If they're worth spending time with, they're worth spending time with. JMO, but if they require "too much mental energy and preparation," that makes them un-attractive. Find someone you're comfortable with being yourself, someone who appreciates the "every day" you.
britchick Posted August 26, 2006 Posted August 26, 2006 I think you are putting to much thought into this. Surely, if you like someone, you want to see more of them? If it takes alot of mental energy to get prepared to see someone - I would say they are the sort of men you think you should be with rather than ones that you want to be with. I agree with Stoopid Guy (I always do), wouldn't you want to be with someone that you feel comfortable with?
Recommended Posts