akashalestat Posted June 10, 2006 Posted June 10, 2006 How can anyone really say they are "in love" with a specific person. For example, they are really only "in love" with the anticipation of the emotions they are addicted to. Because, the same person, or the other, could fall out of favor [or love] the next week by not complying. My goodness, does that not change the landscape of our emotional outlook on personal needs and identities...
Magister Posted June 10, 2006 Posted June 10, 2006 If I understand you correctly, you're saying the love isn't an actual connection/bond between two people, but more of a way that someone justifies being around someone who is nice to them...? Sounds saner and less mystical than the other theories.
lovernotafighter Posted June 10, 2006 Posted June 10, 2006 in the scope of my world...yes indeed it would infact change the landscape if for me that were true. sadly it's not...and I say sadly because I am trying to fall out of love and can't,and I hate it. my love doesn't 'comply' and leaves me little room for anticipation of any kind of anything from him...so why do I love him? who knows,I can't wrap my mind around it,therefore the only explaination is this mysterious profound 'in love' stuff I never wanted but hell if I can shake it...it's like a disease..I wish for a cure. :-(
Recommended Posts