prfrogkisser Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 If you have sex right away, it may not lead to an LTR. If you don't have sex right away, it may not lead to an LTR. If having sex with someone too soon makes you somehow cheapened or used, does that not also make HIM cheapened and used? After all, he slept with you too! If you have sex right away, and he doesn't want a relationship, he wouldn't want a relationship even if you made him wait 5 dates before having sex (although he might wait up to 5 dates to have sex with you if you're hot). The bottom line is that if you're comfortable having sex with him, enjoy it. If it leads to a LTR, great, if not, then hopefully it was good sex. Well said:) Anything can happen. Life is like a box of chocolates you never know what you are going to get.
blind_otter Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 and we all know the hottest girls are the ones messed up in the head If you want to be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife. So from my personal point of view, get an ugly girl to marry you. A pretty woman makes her husband look small And very often causes his downfall As soon as he marries her then she starts Doing the things that will break his heart But if you make an ugly woman your wife Then you will be happy for the rest of your life An ugly woman cooks meals on time She'll always give you peace of mind So if your friends say you have no taste Go ahead and marry anyway Though her face is ugly her eyes don't match Take it from me she's a better catch
blind_otter Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Are you serious??? I have seen two weenies (not counting those on TV) and the larger and thicker one belongs to the handsome, tall guy..... Well, I was wondering if that was just zebra... (please do tell me if you were only joking. ) I've been with A LOT more than 2 weenises. A lot. And that's my experience. I'm just saying. Superfine guys have thin weenises. It's a fact. The prettier the face, the smaller the dick.
alphamale Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 The prettier the face, the smaller the dick. that's rediculous! that's like saying the prettier a woman's face the smaller her tits.
tinktronik Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 that's rediculous! that's like saying the prettier a woman's face the smaller her tits.Thats what implants are for Alpha.
TUDOR Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 How fast we ended up in the sack has never influenced the degree to which I like or respect a woman. In fact I think I may have more respect for the ones that can say I want this and take it then they ones that want it but fight it because they fear what I will think or other's will think. Life is short, play often, play hard but most importanly play by what ever rules work for you and don't worry about what every onr elses rules or opinions on it are.
alphamale Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 How fast we ended up in the sack has never influenced the degree to which I like or respect a woman. it has for me....if I can get her into the sack quickly then so can any other guy. any anyways, research has shown that, in general, the more attractive the woman the longer she holds out to give up the booty.
Guest Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 That depends on how hot the guy is. I know a woman who is a living barbi doll. And if you cut down trees for a living or shoot up steroids on your way to the gym every day she'll be all over you by the second date.
tinktronik Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 it has for me....if I can get her into the sack quickly then so can any other guy. any anyways, research has shown that, in general, the more attractive the woman the longer she holds out to give up the booty.You see Alpha this doesn't always hold true. Women can be funnily discriminatory in this way , I'm attractice , and there's plenty of guys I went out with that I never slept with , some guys I slept with sooner some later , but only if I really was interested in something did I just go for it .So no not any guy can get a woman into bed qickly , just the ones she decides on.It furthers your old theory and knocks this one down.Stick to the older one it was better.
TUDOR Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 it has for me....if I can get her into the sack quickly then so can any other guy. any anyways, research has shown that, in general, the more attractive the woman the longer she holds out to give up the booty. I think this could be argued in that how fast you can get her into bed is not just a reflection of her willingness to give it up but also your ability to make her want to or your "game" so to speak. If you know you have no game and not all that good looking and she goes to bed with you right away, then safe to say you are not the first. But I also like to think it isn't just the girl and that as a man I have the ability to make them feel comfortable enough to do so, that I am desirable enough for them to want to, etc. And the more attractive the female and how long she holds out has a lot to do with her ability to be more selective then say a much less attractive woman that will just take what she can get.
kitten chick Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Why is it even a question of respect? Isn't it a double standard that it's ok for the guy to jump into bed with someone but not for the girl?
tinktronik Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Why is it even a question of respect? Isn't it a double standard that it's ok for the guy to jump into bed with someone but not for the girl?Just b/c you call it a double standard doesn't mean it dosn't exist .
kitten chick Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Just b/c you call it a double standard doesn't mean it dosn't exist . I know it exists, I'm asking why
TUDOR Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 I can't really look at a girl in bad light for going to bed with me fast if I was there too. I don't have double standards like that. But if I were to wonder if she was always this easy then I'm pretty sure she is thinking the same thing of me. Double standards are always going to exist though and not everyone will look at it the same.
kitten chick Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Well I guess I'm just wondering why it's so terrible if a girl sleeps around. Is it an issue of morals or fear of cheating or some other issue? Is it because society has it engrained in our heads that women should be all pure and virginal? I'm just curious, I don't sleep around for my own personal reasons but I don't think it's a big deal if a woman does.
TUDOR Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Well I guess I'm just wondering why it's so terrible if a girl sleeps around. Is it an issue of morals or fear of cheating or some other issue? Is it because society has it engrained in our heads that women should be all pure and virginal? I'm just curious, I don't sleep around for my own personal reasons but I don't think it's a big deal if a woman does. Honestly I don't think its a big deal either. I have mine own colorful past so I can't hold it against a woman if she does too. But I also think experience counts for a lot, a woman that hasn't been shy about unlocking her sexual desires, needs, wants....those are usually the best when it comes to sex. They know what they want and take it. It's a win, win. Virgins are not a turn on at all for me, I have never wanted any part of that. I'll take a woman with a list that knows what she is doing over some intact cherry any day!
prfrogkisser Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Why is it even a question of respect? Isn't it a double standard that it's ok for the guy to jump into bed with someone but not for the girl? Interesting.. Men who sleep with a lot of women are the Pimps, Players and are seen as "the MAN" ( feeding that man ego) but then when women do the same they are called sluts, easy and whores. Just wondering... 1. Does this include PORN STARS? Do they get respect at all? 2. Some men get offended when women use them for sex (believe it) 3.Tables are turned because the times have changed. I believe women have more power now sexually. We can pick and choose and for that we get morally judged:mad:
TUDOR Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 We can pick and choose and for that we get morally judged:mad: Mixing morals with sex can greatly decrease one's fun factor! Which is why I keep them seperate.
kitten chick Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Honestly I don't think its a big deal either. I have mine own colorful past so I can't hold it against a woman if she does too. But I also think experience counts for a lot, a woman that hasn't been shy about unlocking her sexual desires, needs, wants....those are usually the best when it comes to sex. They know what they want and take it. It's a win, win. Virgins are not a turn on at all for me, I have never wanted any part of that. I'll take a woman with a list that knows what she is doing over some intact cherry any day! I appreciate your thoughts but I wasn't really expecting that from you. I mean you ended up with the one who made you wait a few months and you've said before on the board that she's not as experimental as you would like her to be. I don't mean this offensively in anyway, I was just surprised when I read your post. I'm glad that there are some men that think this way, even though I personally would be screwed since I don't sleep around. I think it's important for a woman to express her sexuality in any way that she feels comfortable. It's nice that there are some men that will accept that even if it means she has a lot of experience.
tinktronik Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Mixing morals with sex can greatly decrease one's fun factor! Which is why I keep them seperate. I love you for that .
TUDOR Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 I appreciate your thoughts but I wasn't really expecting that from you. I mean you ended up with the one who made you wait a few months and you've said before on the board that she's not as experimental as you would like her to be. I don't mean this offensively in anyway, I was just surprised when I read your post. I'm glad that there are some men that think this way, even though I personally would be screwed since I don't sleep around. I think it's important for a woman to express her sexuality in any way that she feels comfortable. It's nice that there are some men that will accept that even if it means she has a lot of experience. The wife was certianly no sexual diva but she still knows what she is doing when she wants it and was by no stretch even close to a virgin. The waiting wasn't about the sex as much as it was she had been hurt in her previous relationship and really didn't want to get involved, the waiting was about me getting her to let he guard down and give me a chance. And for me it wasn't just about the sex with her, I was willing to deal with her emotional issues from being hurt before going forward because I knew there was more to her she wasn't showing. Did I like the wait....hell no, but in the end I followed my instinct and it was worth it. But sometimes its just about the sex and you don't want to wait.
Cecelius Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Wow, I've been gone from here for a while. Here is a nice general question for you guys. You've probably heard the saying in my title meaning that if you give in to carnal desires and have casual sex with a guy that he won't respect you. Is there truth to this? If you hung out with a girl who was fun and end up having sex with her do you immediately strike her as a possibility for actual dating and such? Is she relegated to the class of booty call from which she can never escape? These questions are applicable for either sex. What do you think? Probably. I may respect that she engages in casual sex and expects nothing more than that -- but it was "casual" -- I'm not going to wake up the next day and think anything more than that about her, since she hasn't really justified more or indicated by her actions that she's looking for more. Just as no girl wants to marry to dude who is confessing his love for her after the first date, few men are interested in pursuing something with someone who gives it up that easily.
alphamale Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Isn't it a double standard that it's ok for the guy to jump into bed with someone but not for the girl? it is a double-standard KC...but that is the way it is, accept it. Men don't like women who are loose and women don't like women who are loose. And...men don't come home pregnant. Jeez man.
tinktronik Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 it is a double-standard KC...but that is the way it is, accept it. Men don't like women who are loose and women don't like women who are loose. And...men don't come home pregnant. Jeez man.If my man came home pregnant , I would make him have an abortion.
blind_otter Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 Just as no girl wants to marry to dude who is confessing his love for her after the first date, few men are interested in pursuing something with someone who gives it up that easily. I dunno bout all THAT. I'm just saying. Maybe like lil kim, I have the ill na-na. I doubt that, though. Or maybe, people like you would never be attracted to women like me, and the men who are attracted to women like me tend to have similar attitudes about sex?
Recommended Posts