blind_otter Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Yeah, maybe you should increase your age range. YEAH!
jerbear Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Yeah, maybe you should increase your age range. YEAH! :lmao:
TUDOR Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Where can I meet men in their mid-70s? Would that be GILFs.
alphamale Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Where can I meet men in their mid-70s? at the local nursing home or cemetary
jerbear Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Where can I meet men in their mid-70s? Arizona Florida Pennsylvania California Oregon Lookup snowbirds!
Author KittenMoon Posted April 4, 2006 Author Posted April 4, 2006 Haha- where can I meet guys in their mid-70s, terminal, and stinking rich! Ok, I'm just in a bit of a panic mood today. I feel like I lost my match when I lost my ex, even with all his problems, and I'm not looking forward to trying to meet people. I've never had to before- I didn't date much in highschool and in college my ex and I feel for each other hard within the first month I was there. AND I keep thinking- what kind of idiot tosses ME aside?! (inability to approach people not withstanding, I don't have much of a confidence issue)
kitten chick Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 I'm sorry but if you can't meet men in their mid-20's NOT looking for a commitment then there's something wrong. If they really do not exist where you live then come to NY, this place is swarming with them.
TUDOR Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 (inability to approach people not withstanding, I don't have much of a confidence issue) People that are not good at approaching others do well to make themselves approachable. If you give off an approachabe vibe then you will get approached. Doesn't mean you have to display yourself half naked in a bar either.
alphamale Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 If you give off an approachabe vibe then you will get approached. Well TUDOR....I don't care how "approachable" some fat and ugly chick looks....there's no way I'm gonna approach.
jerbear Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 I'm sorry but if you can't meet men in their mid-20's NOT looking for a commitment then there's something wrong. If they really do not exist where you live then come to NY, this place is swarming with them. I might be there working in Wall Street; granted not mid-20's... Pretty much any large city has pluses, Philly has more arts, NYC has everything, LA, SD, California ditto, etc... I even considered going to Ireland to find me a nice redhead. If there is a will there is a way. So far you have some will.
Author KittenMoon Posted April 4, 2006 Author Posted April 4, 2006 I'm sorry but if you can't meet men in their mid-20's NOT looking for a commitment then there's something wrong. If they really do not exist where you live then come to NY, this place is swarming with them. It's really mainly that my social circle has become severely reduce over the past year- the economy of my area isn't great for new grads and a lot of my friends moved away or went to grad school. Those remaining are mainly couples either married or engaged. It sucks- gotta make new friends! Grr. If I moved to NYC, which I don't intend to, I'd be up to my neck in friends, and thusly new guys to meet. Now its time to put in work on my "approachable" vibe.
alphamale Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 I even considered going to Ireland to find me a nice redhead. yes JB, a nice redhead with a fiery temper who will beat you into submission
jerbear Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 yes JB, a nice redhead with a fiery temper who will beat you into submission hate when that happens! :lmao:
TUDOR Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Well TUDOR....I don't care how "approachable" some fat and ugly chick looks....there's no way I'm gonna approach. Not that I dissagree with you, but for every big girl there is a big guy needing some loving too or maybe a guy that has big girl fetish.
kitten chick Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Just keep in mind that Boston is generally a very very young city when you go out.
jerbear Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Well TUDOR....I don't care how "approachable" some fat and ugly chick looks....there's no way I'm gonna approach. Marilyn Monroe was size 14 in her day. She was normal but "big" compared to today's standard.
kitten chick Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 oops, meant to post that on the boston thread. darnit jerbaer, why do you have to be so on top of these posts?
alphamale Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Marilyn Monroe was size 14 in her day. She was normal but "big" compared to today's standard. Ms. Monroe was not what I would call "fat and ugly". Think 300+ lbs with a face like a pizza pie
Author KittenMoon Posted April 4, 2006 Author Posted April 4, 2006 Marilyn Monroe was size 14 in her day. She was normal but "big" compared to today's standard. Marilyn was a size 14 then- until the designers revised clothing sizes when people started to obsess about their weight. She would have probably worn a size 10 today. You can see this happening still- while a girl might normally wear size 8 clothing when she shops at Sears, if she were to buy something really designer it might only be a size 6. Fight the conspiracy!
kitten chick Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Marilyn was a size 14 then- until the designers revised clothing sizes when people started to obsess about their weight. She would have probably worn a size 10 today. You can see this happening still- while a girl might normally wear size 8 clothing when she shops at Sears, if she were to buy something really designer it might only be a size 6. Fight the conspiracy! Very true KM. I just heard on the news the other day that there is a woman lobbying to get standardized sizes so that you would be the same size in every clothing line. ...kind of off topic
alphamale Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Very true KM. I just heard on the news the other day that there is a woman lobbying to get standardized sizes so that you would be the same size in every clothing line. ...kind of off topic I don't think this will happen KM. At least not any time soon. In about 10 years you'll see 300 lb women wearing size 2. And skinny rail women will be wearing size negative 20. There will be no standardization of sizes because then women would have to face reality. And we cannot have that!
jerbear Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Ms. Monroe was not what I would call "fat and ugly". Think 300+ lbs with a face like a pizza pie Mrs. Pizza the Hut! (like from Spaceballs)
kitten chick Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 So you don't think men vanity size either alpha? And for the record I don't think it will happen either. Just found it interesting that there was someone trying to lobby for it.
blind_otter Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Of course men are vain. About different things, though. Thus, hairplugs exist, but yet you can see a fat hairy man with hairlugs walking around shirtless. It seems ironic to me, but who am I anyways? A 92 year old transsexual named Ernesto.
Recommended Posts