ReluctantRomeo Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Lindya, that was excellent! But you forgot the rest of the day. Here's a start: 17:00 Log onto Loveshack and share the results of the day and the wisdom gained. The enlightened will agree, more feminazi's will be routed.
lindya Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Lindya, that was excellent! But you forgot the rest of the day. Here's a start: 17:00 Log onto Loveshack and share the results of the day and the wisdom gained. The enlightened will agree, more feminazi's will be routed. 18.30 Take a brief coffee break and idly doodle diagrams of furious female faces encased in stocks. Read Lindya's post. Tighten lips, shake head sadly, google "witchcraft" and "emasculation" and discover the following... During the great European Witch-hunts of the twelfth through eighteenth centuries, males were concerned that witches had special powers for imposing emasculation upon selected targets. The handbook used as the encyclopedia of witch hunting was the MALLEUS MALEFICARUM (Witches Hammer) by the Dominican Inquisitors Kramer and Sprenger, which addressed this very real concern. The treatise was commissioned by Pope Innocent VIII in 1486, and printed in numerous editions. It seriously warned that "...witches collect male organs in great numbers, as many as twenty or thirty members together, and put them in a birds nest, or shut them up in a box, where they move themselves like living members, and eat oats and corn...". A witch told a afflicted male "...to climb a certain tree, and that he might take which he liked out of a nest in which there were several members. And when he tried to take a big one, the witch said: You must not take that one...because it belongs to the parish priest."! The Church, together with the Protestant sects, used this manual as the basis to safeguard male hegemony, and to persecute mostly women suspected of witchcraft. Some estimates have pointed to over a million suspected witches being executed over a five hundred year period. Vow to self that self's dick will only sow wild oats. Never shall it be imprisoned in a box and fed them.
Becoming Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 :lmao: Now this alone, L and RR, was worth signing on for this a.m.! Thanks for :lmao: :lmao: Now where'd I put that box . . . .
SmoochieFace Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 If someone was *mad* at me all the time I'd tell 'em to find a shrink and deal with it. Getting laid too can also help. I can give 'em directions to the nearest whorehouse if they so desire. Sometimes chronically *mad* people need to just have a whopping mind-blowing orgasm every so often. Good for the body and soul.
Outcast Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 If someone was *mad* at me all the time Some people have zero self-awareness; find themselves blameless in every situation even though the objective observer would say that they are nowhere near beatification. I look askance at people who claim the other person is always to blame.
SmoochieFace Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 Some people have zero self-awareness; find themselves blameless in every situation even though the objective observer would say that they are nowhere near beatification. I look askance at people who claim the other person is always to blame. But what IF it REALLY is the *mad person* who has the issue? Come on now... don't tell me that there aren't people who are just chronically angry at other people and the world in general. My X-supervisor is like that. She just walks around with a scowl on her face and snaps at people over the most silly things. When I asked her to check over some of my work she got all pissy and fruited. Am I at fault for her pissiness?
Mz. Pixie Posted March 1, 2006 Posted March 1, 2006 A day in the life... 9.00am morning coffee and toast. Exercise one. Splitting. Idealisation of a favoured object, in order to isolate, belittle and damage the perceived persecutory object. An exercise best conducted with the aid of a suitable news item in the morning paper. Ideally, there will be a story involving an eminently sensible female judge sentencing someone's nagging wife to 35 years hard labour in the salt mines. 10.30am Exercise two. Self-fulfilling prophecy. Point out to various female colleagues the various flaws "most women" possess. Keep doing it until you've angered them into revealing the full extent of their inner foulness, thus proving every argument ever put forward about feminists being vile man-haters. 12 noon. lunch followed by a short walk along a lakeside. Preferably with a male colleague who was mugged and beaten by 4 armed and drunken lesbians yesterday evening. If there happen to be any women around, try pushing them into the lake to see what happens. The good ones will sink to the bottom, but you'll find that most women will swiftly emerge at the water's surface spluttering and shouting obscenities. This is a sign of evil magick. Maketh ye old sign of the cross, then hold the witch's head under water as demonstrated by Sir Michael of Douglas in Fatal Attraction. 3.30pm Exercise three. Several hours spent googling the words "Andrea" "Dworkin" "feminazi" "innocent man" and "emasculation". Re-enter the battle against so-called strong women with renewed vigour and purpose. Excellent!
Outcast Posted March 2, 2006 Posted March 2, 2006 But what IF it REALLY is the *mad person* who has the issue? Come on now... don't tell me that there aren't people who are just chronically angry at other people and the world in general. Sure there are. But I want to judge people for myself, not based on someone else's words. My ex said his ex-wife was chronically angry and mean. I didn't believe him. Until I heard his side of a conversation one day in which he barely spoke three words (very civil ones) and I could hear her shrieking across the room. I was subsequently subjected to the same treatment by her. But he had ADHD and I think a touch even of Aspie and often totally misunderstood what people said to him. He thought other people were mean or critical who were not.
SmoochieFace Posted March 2, 2006 Posted March 2, 2006 But he had ADHD and I think a touch even of Aspie and often totally misunderstood what people said to him. Well, nothing there that can be misunderstood about the shrieking nut. That's quite cut and dry to me. He thought other people were mean or critical who were not. Oh, I am guilty of being that way! Still am! Hey, I've always believed that people in general dislike me. I guess that is a result of not having friends, social circles, etc. *shrugging*
Recommended Posts