So what does this mean about my sexuality?

[justanotherday32]

If anyone could explain this. I was just reading about Stone lesbians and studs. And this is a similar thing about me. So I am basically attracted to men right only attracted to men but you know when I started out with my sexuality very young gone I was only attracted to men in the way that a lot of dominant people are attracted to men so think of like a gay man who's a top that was me pretty much. Only I'm female so I have female parts but that's my preference sexually to engage with men generally. So when I was in my teens I always thought that that was what I was only into and then when I turned 18 I realized that was not true.

 

 

 

And that there were some men who could open up the site to me that would want to be with a man and the traditional heterosexual way you know heterosexual intercourse. With me being receptive instead of the other way around which was mainly my interest. With men so that was basically how it was. No I started I guess specifically thinking that okay so this is what defines my sexuality. Is the men who can flip that switch in me to have that interest. It's just an accommodating factor. The accommodating factor is like basically a melting Factor as well. Who were saying that use that definition in that case it definitely does feel like melting for me. Because my normal context is topping. But then my interest in men that actually call set effect it is a melting effect. If it is that I'm actually attracted to men even if I don't want to engage in the traditional types of activity but other stuff then I feel like aren't I just basically attracted to most men? Cuz most men I would have an interest in doing the other thing with. Outside of traditional heterosexual sex. It's only a select few and then the f*** you are always kind of jacked up. It seems like that they're always some kind of problem. Sometimes it's not that big of a deal like baby there an alcoholic or something they're just not a good doer or whatever. But other time just like really really really bad where they're like homeless crazy and like chaotic and like obsessed with virgins and like just crazy. The first one that I encountered was like that. By the way when I was 18.

 

 

And everybody called him Michael myers. Because he was so much like Michael Myers character. Only difference was his name wasn't completely that. Basically. Which was another reason why we called him Michael Myers because it was pretty close but I would have these constant like sex dreams about him. And things like that. As basically the traditional type of situation. But not completely like even in those cases it's not me being very submissive I'm being pretty dominant for a woman. Is just that it's not my typical my preference is to top I know pretty interesting or a different since I am a woman. And was born a woman. But yeah so specifically I never really even understand what it means. Or what that energy means and men. It's almost like a primal thing. But it definitely deserves any interest in topping as much as just wanting to engage and that can be in any way. Including traditional heterosexual sex. You know what I'm saying. So I guess my question is. Does this mean that I'm attracted to most men? And also another question is what does it mean that men with that energy are able to flip the switch for me? What is that? It's not like there are dominant or aggressive towards me by the way. If someone's aggressive it actually definitely put to my wall up basically. It's usually people who do not ever show any aggression towards me. Can someone explain these two aspects.? And it's interesting also how come I initially use the term melting before I knew that this was a term that people use in the LGBT community. I'm not gay by the way. I'm straight. But it's just interesting