Gebidozo Posted Wednesday at 05:39 AM Posted Wednesday at 05:39 AM 10 minutes ago, Trail Blazer said: However, if an OP's position is being invalidated even after multiple clarifications, and people intend to respond with judgement and conflation of other testimony from previous threads, then this forum's utility will be rendered redundant. I really don’t think my comment was judgmental. Also, I wouldn’t call the acknowledgment of the previous testimony “conflation”. How can it be conflation if it helps to shed light on your situation? Also, I fail to see how anything I said can be seen as invalidating your position. Your position is that you aren’t interested in that woman in any way. I believe that you believe that. And I repeat that, in that case, the sooner you stop being preoccupied about her motivations, the more convincing your statement will be. That is exactly what I would have said to my buddy if he kept asking me and strangers on the internet about why “a crazy broad he’d hooked up with” contacted him. Quote
Author Trail Blazer Posted Wednesday at 12:47 PM Author Posted Wednesday at 12:47 PM 7 hours ago, Gebidozo said: I really don’t think my comment was judgmental. Also, I wouldn’t call the acknowledgment of the previous testimony “conflation”. How can it be conflation if it helps to shed light on your situation? Also, I fail to see how anything I said can be seen as invalidating your position. Your position is that you aren’t interested in that woman in any way. I believe that you believe that. And I repeat that, in that case, the sooner you stop being preoccupied about her motivations, the more convincing your statement will be. That is exactly what I would have said to my buddy if he kept asking me and strangers on the internet about why “a crazy broad he’d hooked up with” contacted him. This is why these forums can be tricky to navigate at times. Nothing I said was referring to your post. I had absolutely no issue with anything you said at all. My response to you was about others who posted before you. Quote
ExpatInItaly Posted Wednesday at 07:03 PM Posted Wednesday at 07:03 PM 13 hours ago, Trail Blazer said: The fact that this should be a mutual feeling, but clearly isn't because she decided to message me, is quite puzzling. This has happened to me a few times over the years, with men from my past resurfacing out of the blue. In my experience, people who do this when they are in another relationship are usually just looking for some temporary attention. Maybe they've had an argument with the current partner, maybe the partner hasn't been so present, maybe they just always like imagining there's someone in their fan club...it usually isn't more than that. 1 Quote
Alpacalia Posted Wednesday at 11:40 PM Posted Wednesday at 11:40 PM (edited) People have different reasons and you'll never know why if you don't answer. I guess that's the tricky part. I wouldn't say it's the hook that curiosity and our need for "closure" gets caught on because I've had several old BF's that I broke up with from my past reach out and I've responded. Not because I have had this deep-seated longing for them but it's a chance to catch up as mature adults and see how someone you once cared about turned out. Plus, I do enjoy the fact, if I'm being honest, ...that it's an ego boost. There, we can say it. It feels good to be remembered. It's a validation that you made an impression, that you mattered in someone's narrative. It's a little psychic nod that says, "Yep, you were a significant chapter." As long as they don't talk about our past relationship I'm okay with it. "How's your career?" "Seen any good movies?" "How's your family?"—with someone who has the maturity to keep it there. But you know, with absolute certainty, that a conversation with this woman will not stay in the safe, neutral present. How could it? Your entire shared history is a minefield of intense, unstable, and sexual energy. There is no platonic common ground to retreat to. The second you acknowledge her, you are acknowledging that past. Edited Wednesday at 11:45 PM by Alpacalia 1 Quote
IrinaM Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago On 11/16/2025 at 6:17 PM, Trail Blazer said: But, yeah. The poor dude is being treated like a schmuck. He seems besotted with her, from the SM posts, he's not short of a dollar (if that rock on her finger is anything to go by). He bought her a new BMW coupè. It's kinda sad. Why do you think their relationship is "sad?" Why do you think her current SO is "being treated like a schmuck?" It kinda seems like you're devaluing her here. Why? Quote
Gebidozo Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 3 hours ago, IrinaM said: It kinda seems like you're devaluing her here. Yeah… I noticed that too. The OP keeps emphasizing that she was a “crazy broad” and that his relationship with her was almost nothing, “less than f*** buddies”. This seems to be like a serious downplaying of something that nevertheless appears to greatly occupy the OP’s mind. 1 1 Quote
ShyViolet Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago On 11/26/2025 at 12:20 AM, Trail Blazer said: I have absolutely no interest in this woman. I don't know how to make that position any more clear. Human behavior has always had me curious, though, and I guess it was more like a "WTF does she want!? Help me understand!" I'm not sure what insight you thought we could give you. We're not mind readers and we would only be guessing based on nothing if we tried to speculate as to why she messaged you. Hence, if you truly want nothing to do with her then it's unclear what the point of this post was. Unless on some level, even if you weren't consciously aware of it, you got satisfaction out of reliving the experience though telling the story of your fling with her. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.