Girls and women all around the world fake having boyfriends and fake kiss in public

[CaliforniaGirl]

4 hours ago, Wiseman2 said:

Wow . You can tell they are virgins from photo shopped pics?

Yes, because the V watermark on their foreheads can't be removed. Marker is looking for a way around that as we speak.

On a more serious note, OP...does this have personal relevance for you? It seems like it might, or you wouldn't feel this passionate against it. You'd kind of just blow it off. Did an ex or someone you're into do this?

[CaliforniaGirl]

4 hours ago, user114 said:

Wiseman2 you sound like you have downsyndrome from the replies you make. Part of it is due to the many weird, numerous, random, nonsensical emojis. I'm questioning whether or not I should even talk to you as a normal non-mentally challenged person anymore, but I'll still write out this reply.

My pictures reveal that I am in fact not a virgin at all. They are not photoshopped. I have no idea what you are talking about with your question.

Are you an expert in genetic disorders as well as Photoshop?

You don't dare go there with insulting intellectual disabilities. Don't try it, bud. Sit. Down.

That aside, nobody is THIS freaked out by anything unless that something is seriously personal, so what made you THIS angry (and abhorrent) as regards "photoshopping" people together (???) ? Are you going to answer that question?

[lana-banana]

Are my wedding photos photoshopped too? I could've saved so much money!

[CautiouslyOptimistic]

4 hours ago, user114 said:

No, from evidence from photoshop that they gave me.

Evidence who gave you?  Can you share so we know what to look for or it is top secret?

[mark clemson]

Indeed. Possibly it's some sort of conspiracy? And so the evidence is closely guarded.

Perhaps all women from around the entire world are single and virgin and have been photoshopping their dates, marriages, BFs, etc into their pics since the advent of the internet?

Naturally, this would all have been done to deny OP and other upstanding men of true virtue their rightful opportunities to date and, uhm, "de-virginize" them.

Seems plausible, although I DO wonder where they got the pics of their "kids"....

[CautiouslyOptimistic]

9 minutes ago, mark clemson said:

Seems plausible, although I DO wonder where they got the pics of their "kids"....

Shutterstock?

[GorillaTheater]

Awesome thread. Two thumbs up.

[smackie9]

Or they do it for fun, or maybe it's just a fantasy or they are closet lesbians. You are reading too much into it.

[lurker74]

People, stop feeding the troll. Yes, it's fun but trolls get indigestion. 

[basil67]

4 hours ago, ccas93 said:

here you go, I think this topic is better posted here: https://incels.co/forums/inceldom-discussion.2/

Well that's a place I don't want to visit again     

[user114]

8 hours ago, mark clemson said:

Interesting.

Would you mind elaborating a bit  on how it is that your pictures reveal that you're not a virgin? I find myself a bit curious about how that would work.

People who know about this photoshop thing would be able to tell that the girl that is in my profile picture, I actually had sex with. I am also clearly touching her. My white polo t-shirt is being wrinkled against her breast. The people in the picture (me and my girlfriend) do not have "rough edges" against the background. The silhouette of our figures match the background. They are not abruptly cut off. There is no evidence of photoshop "fine tuning" where you can tell a human hand went through and "traced" out a person to paste onto a background of their choosing. Those fake boyfriend pictures that I'm talking about look like a girl made it for a high school project. You can tell it was done by a female too, it has that kind of "perfection" to it. If you went to school you would know what I'm talking about. Neat handwriting, consistency, but not done "10/10" masterfully well, because these are normal people who I am talking about not photoshop wizards who have a career in this. These pictures pass very convincingly. Who would bother to look close? Especially since the girls/women in the pictures are so alluring to begin with. 

[user114]

What you really need to look for is the pressing of the skin. If the partner's skin is not being pressed (depressed) and bump is formed (like a water ripple only with skin), then the girl/woman is not touching the other person in the photo. This goes for real life too. If you look closely at couples in real life, you will see this is true for those who I am talking about. What's funny is that the people in real life look like photoshop pictures too, when it looks like they are touching each other, the edges of their bodies look very sharp, high contrast. 

[user114]

8 hours ago, CautiouslyOptimistic said:

Evidence who gave you?  Can you share so we know what to look for or it is top secret?

I'm romantically involved with a lot of girls/women. They showed me personally how they did it, their original files. I also am friends with the "fake boyfriends" that they used for the pictures. I went to school with them.

[user114]

8 hours ago, CaliforniaGirl said:

Are you an expert in genetic disorders as well as Photoshop?

You don't dare go there with insulting intellectual disabilities. Don't try it, bud. Sit. Down.

That aside, nobody is THIS freaked out by anything unless that something is seriously personal, so what made you THIS angry (and abhorrent) as regards "photoshopping" people together (???) ? Are you going to answer that question?

I am actually, but in that case I was just playing around. I've been on leave from Cornell University doing a research project into the cause of autism. I am friends with people who have down syndrome.

I'm not freaked out, angry or abhorrent.

[CautiouslyOptimistic]

1 hour ago, user114 said:

I'm romantically involved with a lot of girls/women. They showed me personally how they did it, their original files. I also am friends with the "fake boyfriends" that they used for the pictures. I went to school with them.

Oh, so you're saying some women do this, not all.  It sounded in your original post that this was a universal thing.

[CautiouslyOptimistic]

1 hour ago, user114 said:

What you really need to look for is the pressing of the skin. If the partner's skin is not being pressed (depressed) and bump is formed (like a water ripple only with skin), then the girl/woman is not touching the other person in the photo. This goes for real life too. If you look closely at couples in real life, you will see this is true for those who I am talking about. What's funny is that the people in real life look like photoshop pictures too, when it looks like they are touching each other, the edges of their bodies look very sharp, high contrast. 

Are you autistic?  I recently watched an interview with an autistic man and his mother and his mother was explaining that he literally sees everything in animation.  

[CaliforniaGirl]

1 hour ago, user114 said:

I am actually, but in that case I was just playing around. I've been on leave from Cornell University doing a research project into the cause of autism. I am friends with people who have down syndrome.

I'm not freaked out, angry or abhorrent.

Why are you asking the Photoshop question?

[jspice]

10 hours ago, lana-banana said:

Are my wedding photos photoshopped too? I could've saved so much money!

Were you a virgin? Which people in your pictures would be photoshopped? Bride or groom? 
What about the guests? You could’ve added a bunch of people to make it look like you’re popular. 
We need to see the pictures to judge. 

[CaliforniaGirl]

2 hours ago, user114 said:

People who know about this photoshop thing would be able to tell that the girl that is in my profile picture, I actually had sex with. I am also clearly touching her. My white polo t-shirt is being wrinkled against her breast. The people in the picture (me and my girlfriend) do not have "rough edges" against the background. The silhouette of our figures match the background. They are not abruptly cut off. There is no evidence of photoshop "fine tuning" where you can tell a human hand went through and "traced" out a person to paste onto a background of their choosing. Those fake boyfriend pictures that I'm talking about look like a girl made it for a high school project. You can tell it was done by a female too, it has that kind of "perfection" to it. If you went to school you would know what I'm talking about. Neat handwriting, consistency, but not done "10/10" masterfully well, because these are normal people who I am talking about not photoshop wizards who have a career in this. These pictures pass very convincingly. Who would bother to look close? Especially since the girls/women in the pictures are so alluring to begin with. 

Just...who would even think about it to this extent?

[CaliforniaGirl]

10 hours ago, lana-banana said:

Are my wedding photos photoshopped too? I could've saved so much money!

Hard to say. Is she smiling off into the distance while your 6-foot arms curl lovingly around her waist?

In the background behind your arms do you see three of the same waiter?

[basil67]

5 hours ago, CaliforniaGirl said:

Just...who would even think about it to this extent?

Someone who has no life to speak of

[Wiseman2]

What if the photos were airbrushed?

Can you still tell if they are virgins?

What if their clothes are wrinkled? ?

[introverted1]

17 hours ago, mark clemson said:

Seems plausible, although I DO wonder where they got the pics of their "kids"....

Watch "Jane the Virgin" to see how it's done.

[user114]

11 hours ago, CautiouslyOptimistic said:

Are you autistic?  I recently watched an interview with an autistic man and his mother and his mother was explaining that he literally sees everything in animation.  

I'm not autistic. I have no mental disorders.

[user114]

10 hours ago, CaliforniaGirl said:

Why are you asking the Photoshop question?

There is no information on the internet about this. It is almost a universal thing. I want at least one person to admit that they know this online. This is an international thing, I travel a lot.