Jump to content

What's your take on this?


Recommended Posts

Eternal Sunshine

Just wondering.

 

Say a woman A did a public presentation in a field that's not her area of expertise. She couldnt answer one of the questions and it just looked uncomfortable.

 

Woman A returns to our group and says something along the lines of "that was bad, next time I will make sure I do more background reading". Woman B says "oh you are going to present this again? Shouldn't you leave it to someone who is more of an expert?". Woman A said nothing and looked embarrassed. Woman B continued "I'm just looking out for our company's best interest. You shouldn't be presenting what you don't know".

 

While what woman B said was factually true, I still thought it was unnecessarily cruel.

 

Do you think woman B really did just have company's best interest at heart? Keep in mind that they are both at the same level of seniority.

 

I'm biased already so I'm curious of a third party opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The office world is definitely not for the faint of heart is it? I suppose woman A could have further acknowledged that presenting again without researching further would not be in the interests of the Company and that woman A is up for the challenge to represent all her colleagues and Company in the best light possible!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Author
Eternal Sunshine
OP, I'm betting you are Woman A. Right?

 

I am neither. I just always disliked woman B and liked woman A.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

i think woman B is right. let an expert do the next presentation and let woman A do research for another time. you can't risk another screw-up by A.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with newmoon. Woman A shouldn't be giving presentations until she knows the material.

Edited by a LoveShack.org Moderator
rude commentary redacted ~6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Woman B may have had the company's best interests in mind but I'm personally doubtful that any corporate personnel interaction exists that's not fueled in part by self interest/politics/gamesmanship/etc.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Woman B has a valid argument but woman A deserves a chance to redeem herself. If she is new to making company presentations then this has been a learning experience for her. Now she understands the importance of being prepared. Her presenting skills will get better with practice and I think she should be given the opportunity to prove herself.

 

Was this Woman A's first presentation? The company I work for wouldn't allow a first time presenter to go it alone. There would be a more experienced presenter assisting or just sitting in on the presentation to field unexpected questions. If this was woman A first attempt at a presentation she needs a second chance. If she can't pull it together then Woman B will be correct.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless B is in a position to decide who should make the presentation, she should have kept her thoughts to herself.

 

And even if B was in a position to decide, the conversation should have happened privately and more professionally.

 

Presumably, someone told/asked A to present in the first place and, if errors were made. A should be corrected and coached, not publicly humiliated.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

B is not being cruel, and A should not be embarrassed. She should continue to present things at every opportunity.

B gave herself away when she said she's just looking out for the company. That's bs, and a very childish thing to say. What is she, a shareholder? If she had just said "oh you are going to present this again? Shouldn't you leave it to someone who is more of an expert? You shouldn't be presenting what you don't know". That would have been straightforward, and so much better.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

While I think could have been said in a more positive way, it was good constructive criticism and woman A should have a better handle on things.

 

Not sure other's experience in the workplace but the higher up you go, the more blunt the feedback is. Gotta have tough skin and need to come prepared.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In the course of the exchange, note what I have highlighted and given potential "save" responses in bold:

 

 

Woman A returns to our group and says something along the lines of "that was bad, next time I will make sure I do more background reading".

 

Woman B says "oh you are going to present this again? Shouldn't you leave it to someone who is more of an expert?".

 

Woman A said nothing and looked embarrassed. Here was Woman A's best opportunity to stand up for herself with something like, "I have already invested time into this presentation and would look for the opportunity to learn more and become the expert in this area."

 

Woman B continued "I'm just looking out for our company's best interest. You shouldn't be presenting what you don't know". And Woman A could have countered, "I appreciate we all want was is best for the company, but I would like to look at this experience as a learning and growth potential for both me and the company if more than one person is expert in this topic."

Edited by CarrieT
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure other's experience in the workplace but the higher up you go, the more blunt the feedback is.

 

true.

 

however - this wasn't constructive criticism. it wasn't even a form of blunt feedback - it was straight up rude & unnecessary, especially because woman A knew how bad her presentation was and that she needs to do better.

 

it's super unprofessional.

 

Unless B is in a position to decide who should make the presentation, she should have kept her thoughts to herself.

 

And even if B was in a position to decide, the conversation should have happened privately and more professionally.

 

Presumably, someone told/asked A to present in the first place and, if errors were made. A should be corrected and coached, not publicly humiliated.

 

i agree with all of this.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience of attending work presentations when the presenter is stuck on a question, it's perfectly acceptable to redirect the question to someone in the audience who IS more knowledgeable- I've seen this happen multiple times, no one loses face and everyone else learns.

Woman B sounds like a know it all, woman A should have redirected the question to her.

Woman B was in my opinion very rude and unnecessarily snarky.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
While I think could have been said in a more positive way, it was good constructive criticism and woman A should have a better handle on things.

 

Not sure other's experience in the workplace but the higher up you go, the more blunt the feedback is. Gotta have tough skin and need to come prepared.

 

 

How is this constructive criticism?

"oh you are going to present this again? Shouldn't you leave it to someone who is more of an expert?". Woman A said nothing and looked embarrassed. Woman B continued "I'm just looking out for our company's best interest. You shouldn't be presenting what you don't know".

 

 

Constructive criticism is criticism that is given with the intent to help or improve. Usually it includes possible solutions or alternate methods. Woman B was criticizing Woman A but it definitely wasn't good constructive criticism.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, the farther up you move the more criticism you are going to get and minding Ps and Qs and asking pretty please with sugar on top doesn't happen.

 

Do I think that the feedback was well received? No of course not. But the core of the message is accurate. Definitely could have been said in a better manner.

 

I guess I am so used to similar criticism that playing with the big boys just toughen one's skin. If I had a nickel ever time an executive throws another under the bus, etc. I would be rich.

 

The boardroom is very similar to high school.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being correct and being respectful are very different, even in Corporate A. It could also be argued that B was not acting in the company's best interest either. One should build not tear down.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

truth be told - bullying is often presented as "constructive criticism" and something that should be accepted as normal... something you should just deal with & toughen up.

 

this wasn't criticism (let alone a constructive one) - this was person B trying to throw the person A under the bus -- because what is the best way to beat the competition? you aim for their confidence. what is the best way do that? shame... a VERY powerful feeling. that being said - person A should continue to do her work & ignore remarks like that in the future. if it happens again - she should respond accordingly.

 

i'd fire person B in a heartbeat for one thing - you shame your colleague in front of your company's COMPETITION & bring on the uncomfortable and negative atmopshere in a place where teamwork is essential? what an amateur.

Edited by minimariah
Link to post
Share on other sites
In my experience of attending work presentations when the presenter is stuck on a question, it's perfectly acceptable to redirect the question to someone in the audience who IS more knowledgeable- I've seen this happen multiple times, no one loses face and everyone else learns.

Woman B sounds like a know it all, woman A should have redirected the question to her.

Woman B was in my opinion very rude and unnecessarily snarky.

 

Even after 30 years working in my trade, I am faced with problems I have no answers for. I would have asked the audience for solutions. If that failed, I would ask the questioner to write down the question, research the answer and e-mail the answer to the audience members who signed an address sheet.

Edited by a LoveShack.org Moderator
Language
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Author
Eternal Sunshine

If I was in any doubt..

 

It was recently announced that a woman A got a promotion. Woman B made a nasty comment about it being "undeserving" :rolleyes::lmao:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...