Why most men think that girls who had few/many One Night Stands were generally 'used'

August 12, 2015

Well, make a poll for single guys, you will see the results, what I said is valid for most but not ALL men. also, I hate guys who use girls only for sex, for me they r full of insecurities and bs.

Oh, "most."

Call Gallup.

In re. "all (or most) men will have sex with a hot escort" poll:

http://prostitution.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=004119

Edited August 12, 2015 by BlueIris

August 13, 2015

Well listen, I don't know how old are you, but you seem quite immature, just because you don't agree with my point of view which was expressed in a very professional manner, you don't need to use words as a misogynistic , which may be you don't even know the full meaning of, since it definitely doesn't apply to me or my logic.
Just because I don't agree with your opinion, I don't call it : stupid, shallow, immature, feministic etc. Just chill out Your answers speak volumes about yourself.

The spirit of the word misongynistic means to demean women. To imply that men can spread their seed far and wide but a woman with more than a handful of partners is less than and damaged goods is pretty demeaning.

I am a middle aged woman. I have tried to be kind. But basically what I keep hearing is "men Have to spread their seed and have no control over their urges, while women just be meek and pristine, they don't really need sex, and if they sleep with a lot of men something MUST be wrong with them:

I find that double standard to be somewhat backward, and the posts suggest I am not alone in that assessment.

I am certain you believe you know many things about me.

August 13, 2015

Well, I'm sorry but no man will refuse sex with a hot escort, but they will never build a life with her. Come on, seriously :D That's reality. There are many reverse cases where women apply this thing to men. Not in a sexual way though. What's wrong with that?

You have now changed the rules I see. First it was regular women who slept around, now you are talking about escorts. Which is it? Or do you assume all women who do not wait for marriage so men can have a "clean" woman must be hookers?

August 13, 2015

The spirit of the word misongynistic means to demean women. To imply that men can spread their seed far and wide but a woman with more than a handful of partners is less than and damaged goods is pretty demeaning.

I am a middle aged woman. I have tried to be kind. But basically what I keep hearing is "men Have to spread their seed and have no control over their urges, while women just be meek and pristine, they don't really need sex, and if they sleep with a lot of men something MUST be wrong with them:

I find that double standard to be somewhat backward, and the posts suggest I am not alone in that assessment.

I am certain you believe you know many things about me.

I believe it's equal for both.. If you feel the need to share your body with someone who means nothing to you on a regular basis then there's an issue, male or female. It's too diverse a subject though. Some people need the closeness of sex but not the rest, because of past hurt. Some people need an ego boost and think meaningless sex is the answer. Some people think being 'needed' for sex is a substitute for actually being wanted for anything else; it's a confirmation of being desired.

I always assume that somebody who needs to have sex with multiple people they feel nothing for have their own issues to contend with even if they feel they are happy doing so.

It's pointless anyway,. Good sex only comes with knowing somebody and their body and being able to hit their hot spots through knowledge of their inner being, you don't find these things out in one night.

August 13, 2015

Oh, "most."

Call Gallup.

In re. "all (or most) men will have sex with a hot escort" poll:
Percentage of Men (by Country) Who Paid for Sex at Least Once: The Johns Chart - Legal Prostitution - ProCon.org

Well, obviously that study is simply and absolutely incorrect, as it does not support OP's carefully constructed thesis and studied conclusion.

I've had numerous one-night stands. None of the men I've been with has been bothered by the fact...mostly, because it's not really any of their damned business what I did years/decades before I met them.

All of my one-night-stands were "used" for sex; if they weren't being "used" for sex, they wouldn't have been one-night-stands. Neither of us minded be "used", as that was sort of the purpose of the exercise...hence, the term.

August 13, 2015

I believe it's equal for both.. If you feel the need to share your body with someone who means nothing to you on a regular basis then there's an issue, male or female. It's too diverse a subject though. Some people need the closeness of sex but not the rest, because of past hurt. Some people need an ego boost and think meaningless sex is the answer. Some people think being 'needed' for sex is a substitute for actually being wanted for anything else; it's a confirmation of being desired.
I always assume that somebody who needs to have sex with multiple people they feel nothing for have their own issues to contend with even if they feel they are happy doing so.
It's pointless anyway,. Good sex only comes with knowing somebody and their body and being able to hit their hot spots through knowledge of their inner being, you don't find these things out in one night.

Personally, I actually agree with this. I agree that someone who jumps from bed to bed meaninglessly has something in them they need to address. But I feel that way for BOTH genders, not that guys get a pass because of their "male urges" and women are "damaged".

August 13, 2015

I'm a man and have been a man my entire life, meaning I have more information about how other men think than most women here, my job also requires meeting lots of new people and talking with them. I know how MOST men think,

But how? Are you srsly saying that bc you meet lots of new ppl at your job and talk to them, that qualifies you to speak for all mankind?

I don't need to make a poll.

You said we needed to conduct polls to verify your assertions ....good to know that's only sth we need to do, not you.

I'm just telling you the reality, go ask them if you don't believe me, I don't have to convince myself in something I already know haha

Of course you don't, you need to convince us. For the same reasons I already mentioned and you ignored.

If you don't agree, it's fine, just don't kill the messenger. I believe no matter how many partners you had, you can't compare this to my hanging out with lots of guys, , men circles , man talk during my entire life.

I'll ask a third time - how does "hanging out with lots of guys, men circles, men talk during your entire life" qualify you to speak for everyone? As a reminder, when you make assertions, you say "ALL men think x/y/z," not "the men I know think x/y/z." Do you honestly think your limited circle of exposure represents all men everywhere or even a fraction of them?

August 13, 2015

haha okay Sherlock, hold on a sec here haha
I'm honest and I love women. Not sure about your theory, kind of generalizing much. One view doesn't make me have flaws on all other areas in my life lol. Most men if asked would say : I want to be with many women as possible and I prefer my wife to have as little as possible. Ask them. Make a poll. Let me know.

I do value women and women being used by men for sex only doesn't have anything to do with my respect towards women. You never met a scenario where a woman wanted a serious relationship, but the guy fooled her a and used her for sex only? That's not being used? Get a reality check Sherlock.

One of my favorite sayings... "We pass for what we are. Character teaches above our wills. Men imagine that they communicate their virtue or vice only by overt actions, and do not see that virtue or vice emit a breath every moment."

You think you are very clever. But your real feelings about women can't be hidden for long.

As for your 'scenario'... I blame the liar, if there is any blame to be passed. I don't blame men or women who are dating or even effing in good faith... even if I don't happen to share their particular values.

If you are so concerned about women being 'used', perhaps you should direct your, um, concern, toward your fellow 'men' that don't have enough integrity to seek out women who share their values and feel the need to lie.

Men unconsumed by the Madonna/whore dilemma don't share your concerns. The fact that you do is your problem alone to struggle with. As much as you might think that most men share it, they don't. Only the integrity challenged ones do. Maybe it's time you change your circle of acquaintances, and realize that your actions are connected. You can't be a hypocrite in one area of your life without it bleeding into other areas of your life. Whether you know it or not. Others know it and can see right through you.

August 13, 2015

Well, I'm sorry but no man will refuse sex with a hot escort

This tells us all we need to know about where you're coming from - YOU would never refuse sex with an escort. There are plenty of men who wouldn't sleep with a prostitute, not even if offered a 90% discount! (Pro tip: these men are also the ones most likely to attract the women with few partners, if that's what they want)

August 13, 2015

Dude, unless you apply the same standards to yourself as you apply to your potential partner, you will run the risk that she will have a pb with your attitude towards women and will next you without a second glance. Women can do that now, you know... And don't flatter yourself, you're not in the majority; some ppl actually don't care either about their partner's past, and some just don't let it be an issue - that's when feelings are involved tho, not when debating a theory in the showers after footie with the boys...

August 13, 2015

This tells us all we need to know about where you're coming from - YOU would never refuse sex with an escort. There are plenty of men who wouldn't sleep with a prostitute, not even if offered a 90% discount! (Pro tip: these men are also the ones most likely to attract the women with few partners, if that's what they want)

HAHA, Just to clear out few details.

It's not just an escort it's a very super hot escort and it's FREE.

Men naturally would want to have a one night stand with a FREE HOT GIRL, but wouldn't want relationship because of her 500+ partners before her. One thing that stops men from sleeping with escorts is they have to pay for it, which spoils the sex, another the really hot ones are very expensive. Sex with these people is also very low quality usually. But a high level hot escort for free, men would bang that without a second thought. Not ALL of course, 80% of single MEN may be. You keep changing my point and keep twisting everything for whatever reason, you made me worse than the devil for me pointing out how male sexuality works on a basic level? hahahaha. What do I expect anyway.....Only women answering here, cheers.

And the entire point of the entire post was the figure out why men think that girls who had many partners are sluts it's not my opinion it's a mass opinion among men, live in delusion and deny it, not my problem. Why did you even attack me about my own understandings, am not looking for psychotherapist here, Ok I have a double standard, I didn't ask for help or to change it, you keep attacking me, I didn't attack any of you. Something is wrong here...Get a glass of fresh water, fresh air, and stop spamming and attacking on personal level, seriously. You are so out of point. This topic turned into let's attack him and prove him he's wrong and stupid coz he offends women. Bs, I was genuinely interested why MEN find promiscuous GIRLS SLUTS. THAT'S IT. My own personal opinion doesn't EVEN MATTER. The original post is different of course, but it's the regarding the same topic and you get the sense.

p.s.

HERE: DOUBLE STANDARDS, READ : http://thoughtcatalog.com/christine-stockton/2014/12/i-asked-a-nice-guy-how-many-guys-a-girl-can-sleep-with-before-shes-a-slut/

Go attack them as well.

http://www.whydoguys.com/why-do-men-sleep-around-with-lots-of-different-women/

https://singlesisterspeak.wordpress.com/2010/01/25/why-do-guys-sleep-with-so-many-women/

http://therawness.com/why-its-worse-for-women-to-sleep-around/

http://winteryknight.com/2013/12/30/woman-who-slept-with-18-guys-shocked-that-no-one-wants-to-marry-her/

Edited August 13, 2015 by gen66

August 13, 2015

HERE: DOUBLE STANDARDS, READ : I Asked A ?Nice Guy? How Many Guys A Girl Can Sleep With Before She?s A Slut | Thought Catalog

Go attack them as well.

Why Do Men Sleep Around With Lots Of Different Women?

https://singlesisterspeak.wordpress.com/2010/01/25/why-do-guys-sleep-with-so-many-women/

Why Women Are Called Sluts When They Sleep Around, But Men Aren?t | The Rawness

Woman who slept with 18 guys shocked that no one wants to marry her | WINTERY KNIGHT

These are blogs/ opinion pieces, not a poll or research papers. They are therefore no more or less valid than the opinions given on this thread. IRL, you will find men who will accept their partner's sexual past or not care at all bc other things are more important to them; there might not be blogs written about that, but these guys do in fact exist whether or not they themselves have slept around. I personally know of a few, and there'll be more - they might not deem it necessary to disclose their or their partner's sexual history openly.

August 13, 2015

I know there are guys like that, people are all different, men and women, even if I love the woman a lot, I may disregard her past even she was with 50+ guys, it all depends. However, what's important is note that out of for example, out of 1000 guys, 200 will be completely okay with it, 800 would have a gut feeling to stay away from such a woman for a long term relationship. That's all. It's really a complicated issue with many variables and factors.

August 13, 2015

I know there are guys like that, people are all different, men and women, even if I love the woman a lot, I may disregard her past even she was with 50+ guys, it all depends. However, what's important is note that out of for example, out of 1000 guys, 200 will be completely okay with it, 800 would have a gut feeling to stay away from such a woman for a long term relationship. That's all. It's really a complicated issue with many variables and factors.

I can't take your example seriously bc it isn't substanciated or evidence-based, but I agree with your last sentence; when feelings are involved, anything is possible .

August 13, 2015

This tells us all we need to know about where you're coming from - YOU would never refuse sex with an escort. There are plenty of men who wouldn't sleep with a prostitute, not even if offered a 90% discount! (Pro tip: these men are also the ones most likely to attract the women with few partners, if that's what they want)

I noticed in the link from BlueIris that in Cambodia, 80% of men claim to have paid for sex. Do you suppose that men in Cambodia are fundamentally different than other men? Maybe it has more to do with access and stigma. Also, the chances of seeing an escort are significantly increased by an unhappy marriage. So give a guy a bad marriage and he is suddenly a different person? I don't think so.

This also caught my eye

"While earlier studies with methodological limitations have found 69% (Kinsey et al., 1948) to 80% (Benjamin and Masters, 1964) of American men to have engaged in commercial sex, more recent studies with representative sampling have found much lower - but still substantial - rates in the range of 15% to 20%...

I would bet this is related to military service and not just methodology. Back when most men served in the military, I would bet that most men saw prostitutes. I grew up hearing about all of the prostitutes in Vietnam and overseas from guys who were in the military. I don't think I ever met one who didn't claim to have at least gotten a $5 bj at some point.

My experience recently has been that some men who had never considered the idea, immediately liked it when they found out about my activities. I have a friend whose wife is dying and he is constantly reminding me that eventually he will want me to show him how this works. There was another man whose wife died about 8 years ago. As soon as he learned of my play, he was on the internet looking up escorts. Apparently the idea of seeing escorts never occurred to him before. In my case it was like a bolt out of the blue. I had never even imagined myself doing something like this. I literally had to hold a gun to my own head before it occurred to me.

So I think it has a lot more to do with circumstances than anything. Given the right circumstances, I think most men would see an escort. There are good reasons why it is the oldest profession.

Edited August 13, 2015 by Robert Z

August 14, 2015

Thing is, we know exactly why SOME men think that girls who had few/many one night stands were 'used'. We don't need it explained. Double standards have existed forever.

I had a ONS when I was younger. Despite your assumptions, HE was the one who wanted a relationship with me. If anyone was 'used' it was him. But see, I don't like treating human beings as disposable (male or female). I realized right then and there that having ONS was entirely possible for me as a woman. No problem. But I made a conscious decision to avoid them for pragmatic reasons that have nothing to do with your slut-shaming agenda.

I avoid them because I don't want to hurt others or be hurt... and IMHO, knowingly having ONS just isn't smart. But that's me. I apply that same judgment to men. I can be friends with men who have slept with lots of women, but I'd never knowingly date one... and I have lots of ways of weeding out the ones who try and conceal their true selves. It's not that hard.

... Through my own experience, I learned that some men get hurt with ONS too, and that women are perfectly capable of having sex just for fun. The most important thing is finding someone who shares your values. Actively looking for someone who is mismatched in values is a recipe for disaster in the long run.

I get it that integrity challenged men feel the need to 'conquer' women who haven't made the same choices he has. But that's only because he's integrity challenged... not because he's a man. *shrug*

Edited August 15, 2015 by a LoveShack.org Moderator
Topical content retained

August 14, 2015

I noticed in the link from BlueIris that in Cambodia, 80% of men claim to have paid for sex. Do you suppose that men in Cambodia are fundamentally different than other men? Maybe it has more to do with access and stigma. Also, the chances of seeing an escort are significantly increased by an unhappy marriage. So give a guy a bad marriage and he is suddenly a different person? I don't think so.

I can't read her study right now, but I really doubt it was 80%, unless there was a very biased sample taken (say, single guys above 40 yo, who are also wealthy). Many Cambodians barely have enough money to ensure that they don't go hungry that night.

But I do agree that access and stigma changes things, just not the way I suspect you think it does. In countries and cultures where premarital sexual relationships and especially women who sleep around are stigmatized, there will be very few women who are interested in having casual sex. Men who want sex but not relationships, and don't have anything going for them that will enable them to access that small supply of casual sex, will usually have no option but to pay a prostitute, even if they would have preferred a FWB or ONS instead. Again I doubt it's 80%, but it's likely to be higher than that of liberal countries where more women are open to casual sex. An interesting thing to note is that the double standard that the OP is pushing in this thread is the cause of this.

FTR, here prostitution is legal so there is complete unhindered access, and there isn't much stigma, and yet brothels still don't exactly have customers lining out the door. I'm sure they do get some customers to survive and pay rent, but they aren't anywhere in the top grossing businesses. This is because there is a liberal and egalitarian view of sex here, where women aren't vilified for having had many past partners, so the men and women who want it are able to engage in casual sex much more frequently and easily.

August 14, 2015

I'm not really sure where the topic has gone but, I dated a girl in Uni who had a lot of ONS or two-week relationships (let's say 20 guys a year - it was a bit more actually). The thing with that situation was that a lot of her friend group consisted of these guys and it was somewhat demeaning continually meeting people who had slept with her (added to that, they would try again, quite often).

Of course we were in love and etc. etc. So, the relationship went on for a while, but a really telling day was when I went to go play some 5 v 5 soccer and when I showed up I realized that more than half of the people there had ****ed my gf. It didn't change the relationship but I remembered that it was a pretty ****ty feeling.

I tried to explore that feeling but I couldn't really find what it was rooted in beyond: "being with her isn't special". So, after that whole relationship ended, I decided to avoid being serious with girls who are like that.

It's a little bit different than what OP began posting about, but I can see where he is coming from. I don't think I have any issues with a girl having ONS and I don't really get the idea of "used" but the point that it wasn't "special" was really driven home when I started meeting all of these guys.

In fact, initially I thought that a promiscuous lady said "I only want to be with you" for that reason it was quite special, but it was the opposite of that. On topic though, I couldn't care less about if a girl has had ONS or not, but I certainly don't want to keep meeting those guys or be in a relationshp where they're perpetually circling like hungry lions.

Edited August 14, 2015 by DJOkawari

August 14, 2015

I'm not really sure where the topic has gone but, I dated a girl in Uni who had a lot of ONS or two-week relationships (let's say 20 guys a year - it was a bit more actually). The thing with that situation was that a lot of her friend group consisted of these guys and it was somewhat demeaning continually meeting people who had slept with her (added to that, they would try again, quite often).

Of course we were in love and etc. etc. So, the relationship went on for a while, but a really telling day was when I went to go play some 5 v 5 soccer and when I showed up I realized that more than half of the people there had ****ed my gf. It didn't change the relationship but I remembered that it was a pretty ****ty feeling.

I tried to explore that feeling but I couldn't really find what it was rooted in beyond: "being with her isn't special". So, after that whole relationship ended, I decided to avoid being serious with girls who are like that.

It's a little bit different than what OP began posting about, but I can see where he is coming from. I don't think I have any issues with a girl having ONS and I don't really get the idea of "used" but the point that it wasn't "special" was really driven home when I started meeting all of these guys.

In fact, initially I thought that a promiscuous lady said "I only want to be with you" for that reason it was quite special, but it was the opposite of that. On topic though, I couldn't care less about if a girl has had ONS or not, but I certainly don't want to keep meeting those guys or be in a relationshp where they're perpetually circling like hungry lions.

Exactly, I know that feeling. What I'm mostly interested in is why if you reverse the situation it wouldn't matter. Your gf wouldn't feel exactly the same way if she meets 5 girls who slept with you, she would feel other emotions, jealousy may be etc but not exactly what you felt. That's why women don't care about how many girls their guys slept it, it wouldn't make the sex less special for her wheres with guys is the opposite.

So, the question we need to ask is, why when you sleep with a promiscuous girl it feels that the sex is not that special and when girls sleep with a promiscuous men, they would never feel that. With the girls, the less partners they had the more precious they are, virgin being the most precious and special. This is how man instinctively (not logically) feel about the situation.

I'm just wondering why is that? I gave my theories above why, but was attacked lol

Edited August 14, 2015 by gen66

August 14, 2015

I certainly don't want to keep meeting those guys or be in a relationshp where they're perpetually circling like hungry lions.

Yes, this is where I'd draw the line. I don't care much about her past unless it is indicative of very different values. Knowing a couple of past lovers isn't a problem, especially if they have moved on to new relationships.

What was actually more annoying was constantly being approached by women and their babies when we were out in town. My then-gf had her fingers in far, far more women than I ever did, but she was a midwife and it was just work to her.

August 14, 2015

Exactly, I know that feeling. What I'm mostly interested in is why if you reverse the situation it wouldn't matter. Your gf wouldn't feel exactly the same way if she meets 5 girls who slept with you, she would feel other emotions, jealousy may be etc but not exactly what you felt. That's why women don't care about how many girls their guys slept it, it wouldn't make the sex less special for her wheres with guys is the opposite.
So, the question we need to ask is, why when you sleep with a promiscuous girl it feels that the sex is not that special and when girls sleep with a promiscuous men, they would never feel that. With the girls, the less partners they had the more precious they are, virgin being the most precious and special. This is how man instinctively (not logically) feel about the situation.
I'm just wondering why is that? I gave my theories above why, but was attacked lol

Absolutely not true, IMO. Too many generalizations. I don't know any women who would agree with this statement. We refer to them as man-whores and we do not respect them or desire them as partners.

August 14, 2015

Absolutely not true, IMO. Too many generalizations. I don't know any women who would agree with this statement. We refer to them as man-whores and we do not respect them or desire them as partners.

Agreed x1000

I have never known any woman looking for a relationship, who would find a man-whore an attractive proposition, quite the opposite.

A ONS, or casual maybe, but nothing serious, unless she is desperate or a man, any man.

Where on earth gen66 gets the idea a woman wouldn't feel like another piece of meat to a man-whore, defies sense.

It can hardly be seen as "special", if she is just another notch on his bedpost, and looking around at all his exes, doesn't make a woman feel great either. Why would anyone think that wouldn't matter to a woman?

"Oh great. He's been with her, and her, and her, and her, and her, and her and her..."

Ugh!

But the myth keeps rolling on...

Truth is, it is more about justifying male slvttish promiscuity, as if it is "normal" and women just need to put up and shut up, than the reality of the situation.

August 14, 2015

So, the question we need to ask is, why [...] when girls sleep with a promiscuous men, they would never feel that.

The answer is that this statement is not true. In fact some of us wouldn't even BE sleeping with promiscuous men because they aren't attractive to us.

Edited August 15, 2015 by a LoveShack.org Moderator
Topical content retained.

August 14, 2015

Agreed x1000
I have never known any woman looking for a relationship, who would find a man-whore an attractive proposition, quite the opposite.
A ONS, or casual maybe, but nothing serious, unless she is desperate or a man, any man.

Where on earth gen66 gets the idea a woman wouldn't feel like another piece of meat to a man-whore, defies sense.
It can hardly be seen as "special", if she is just another notch on his bedpost, and looking around at all his exes, doesn't make a woman feel great either. Why would anyone think that wouldn't matter to a woman?
"Oh great. He's been with her, and her, and her, and her, and her, and her and her..."
Ugh!

But the myth keeps rolling on...

Truth is, it is more about justifying male slvttish promiscuity, as if it is "normal" and women just need to put up and shut up, than the reality of the situation.

See, exactly, you said it, let's examine your words. She wouldn't feel okay if she is another notch on his bedspot or wouldn't treat her special. That's all, it's not about the number of women before her as long as he treats her nice and makes her feel special and is it with her and she is sure that she is not another notch on his bedspot. It's all fine.

Now, for a men, no matter how the woman treats him(of course it matters but that's not the point), what would matter and make her special or not is just purely the number of previous partners, if she has less he would feel special, if she has 78 and he is 79, he wouldn't feel special. Where was if my girlfriend is number 79 but I do treat her special and she knows it, she wouldn't mind 78 girls before her. That's the difference.

Exactly same situation, a girl is treated nicely/respected/treated like a princess but she meets another 5 girls in a club her guy has been with and they had ONS, she wouldn't give a single f , as long as the guy treats her well.

Same situation for a guy, even if the girl treats him like a god, he meets 5 of her previous partners on a football game where they had ONS with the girl, he would feel bad, that she gave it so easily to so many guys. That's the difference I'm trying to point out.

August 14, 2015

The answer is that this statement is not true. In fact some of us wouldn't even BE sleeping with promiscuous men because they aren't attractive to us.

Well from my observations, the biggest players get the most girls, for sex at least. After the sex, girls easily get attached, try to change him not to be a player, this is what happens. At least with a bit younger immature girls. But it doesn't matter, if the woman is not experienced, on a primal level, this is what happens. They are attracted to players. Now, if she knows that she wants only a serious relationship, and has experience that she can't change these guy, she would avoid them of course. But that's irrelevant for the main idea of the post.

Where as guys on a primal nature level are not attracted to girls who give it easily. The more she holds, the better, the hunter awakes in the guy's nature and it feels good. See? That's the difference.

Also a woman who feels chased by a guy, feels like a real woman, she feels great, I know how women feel and think, I have enough experience. Women love to be chased, makes the feel special. If a girl chases a guy, he would feel weird. It's like a hunter is chasing a hunter, not interesting. That's nature. The more we follow our basics instincts the more attraction there is. The more a guy is a player the more attracted the girls are to him sexually. The more a girl holds and denies sex, the more attracted the guy is. It's simple as that.

Why don't you deny it? Deny that you like it to feel chased by a guy who you like? The more you hold it the better you feel, it's in your nature. Deny it please, say when you like a guy the more he chases you the less woman you feel.

Edited August 15, 2015 by a LoveShack.org Moderator
Quote edited for content.

Sign In

Why most men think that girls who had few/many One Night Stands were generally 'used'

Recommended Posts

BlueIris

autumnnight

autumnnight

Zagan

mrldii

autumnnight

jen1447

RedRobin

Els

PrettyEmily77

gen66

PrettyEmily77

gen66

PrettyEmily77

Robert Z

RedRobin

Els

DJOkawari

gen66

central

Timshel

elaine567

Els

gen66

gen66

What's New

My Activity Streams

More...