I Want To Know Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Ladies, Let's have it... Honest opinions only. How biased are you against fat guys? Do they hold any appeal whatsoever? Can a fat guy be sweet, honest, caring, funny and every other quality u hold dear yet still not get any play? I'd like HONEST answers, no PC stuff. Let the opinions fly please. I always hear that women don't place a premium on looks but I think that's B.S.
Naive Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 I am going to be honest, I am more attracted to a guy with meat than a puny looking guy. Also, I much rather have a fat guy who is sweet and treats me like a princess than a skinny a**hole!!!!
LittleMiss Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 I agree with Naive. Most of the guys I've been with had some meat on thier bones. I like them that way. I just don't feel that right with a skinny guy. Although, my baby's daddy was real skinny. Sex was kinda akward cause he was so thin. He was skinnier than me. That will never happen again. So, for me I would definately date a pugy guy as long as he was nice and treated me with respect.
laRubiaBonita Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 i do not like to be bigger than the guy i am with. so my propsects have to be at least 5'11 and over 170lbs.
Linlin Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 I prefer a bigger, burley guy over a skinny little guy. I don't want to weigh more than anyone that I date. I don't know if I would date anyone who was obese though. I guess because I wouldn't necessarily be attracted to them in the first place and therefore probably not talk to them and get to know their personality. Just MHO.
tokyo Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by I Want To Know Ladies, Let's have it... Honest opinions only. How biased are you against fat guys? Do they hold any appeal whatsoever? Can a fat guy be sweet, honest, caring, funny and every other quality u hold dear yet still not get any play? I'd like HONEST answers, no PC stuff. Let the opinions fly please. I always hear that women don't place a premium on looks but I think that's B.S. I do not feel necessarily attracted to people that are overweight. I might appreciate them as friends, but I doubt that they will ever evoke any romantic feelings in me. I'm sure though that a lot of other women don't mind and as far as I have seen most posters said they prefer someone with a little bit of meat to someone who is skinny (honestly, I also don't really like the skinny guys).
alphamale Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 well from a male perspective.... I could stand to lose 25 lbs or 35lbs to be in tip-top shape and I've never had any problem getting above avg looking women who are pencil-thin. My last girlfriend was a size 2. It has more to do with personality, confidence and the amount of $$ you make ( ) but being quite heavy as a man would probably turn off most women.
HokeyReligions Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 I have always preferred larger men. My husband is large and he doesn't like the way he looks, and feels that he is totally unattractive and that I am prejudiced because I love him, but honestly, I think he is very attractive. He thinks he should be built like some of the action hero movie stars we see today, but I would rather hold and love a man with some fat under his skin than rock-hard muscles any day. Some women prefer it, some don't. I think a lot has to do with age too -- our tastes change as we get older, sometimes dramatically. When I was a teeny-bopper I loved guys with long hair. But as I got older and actually started dating I found that I preferred men with short hair, and bald men. I'm lucky, I married a fat bald man!
blind_otter Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 I like a guy to be fit, like - i definatley don't like rolls of pudge or anything like that. BUT, I like a little buddha belly. That said, I also like a nice firm butt. All the guys I have dated or am really attracted to usually have some kind of sport they do as a hobby (b-ball, biking, soccer, football, etc.) I am a small person, though, I am petite and short, so, I don't like to be overwhelmed by biggness.
tokyo Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by alphamale My last girlfriend was a size 2. 2??? I'm a bit confused now. Last time I looked it up I was a size 6 and I know I am small. You very seldom find clothes in size 4, so if you want size 2 you would have to go shopping in the kid's department. Were you talking about different sizes, because if not, all these girls were really really anorexic. How much is it in centimeters?
tiki Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by kooky 2??? I'm a bit confused now. Last time I looked it up I was a size 6 and I know I am small. You very seldom find clothes in size 4, so if you want size 2 you would have to go shopping in the kid's department. Were you talking about different sizes, because if not, all these girls were really really anorexic. How much is it in centimeters? The sad thing is kook, a lot of gals here look like that. Many wear a size zero. I can't fit my leg into that....lol. Reminds me of a twelve year old. Anyway, I like a man with meat. I have meat and curves, I want a man that'll outweigh me for sure. My first husband was 6' and 125#. Now, my husband is like 6' 230 pounds or something. Sad, I don't even know how much he weighs.
Moose Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 I prefer my guys to be girls........seriously though, I'm 5'11" and 160lbs., with a little budda belly starting to form, (Time to get that summer six pack back, if that's even possible anymore). So it looks like I don't have a snowballs chance in hell to go out with the pretty ruby........ I have been told I'm too skinny though. I don't get it, there are plenty of women who prefer thin men. I think it's just a matter of preference.
Moose Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by kooky 2??? I'm a bit confused now. Last time I looked it up I was a size 6 and I know I am small. You very seldom find clothes in size 4, so if you want size 2 you would have to go shopping in the kid's department. Were you talking about different sizes, because if not, all these girls were really really anorexic. How much is it in centimeters? Mrs. Moose is a 2, and she does shop in the kid's department....she has no choice.
EnigmaXOXO Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Let the opinions fly please. I always hear that women don't place a premium on looks but I think that's B.S. I think physical attraction (if mutual) can kick-start the chemistry between two people initially. After all, that's the first thing you notice about someone when you see them for the first time from across the room. Of course, what each individual finds attractive all comes down to personal taste and preferences. However, once you get past all the superficial 'visual' stuff, what a person has going on inside is eventually what makes or breaks the attraction. It's simply a personal observation, but I've noticed (in my experience) that the more attractive the person is (sometimes), the less well-rounded and interesting they seem to be. The terms Himbos and Bimbos comes to mind. It's almost as if the most attractive people have relied on their looks for so long that they've never had to do any of the 'inside' work. However, I have found myself on several occasions developing crushes on guys who might not be considered among the top ten when it comes to physical prowess. It wasn't an immediate knock-your-socks-off chemistry, but something that developed over time once getting to know that person and coming to admire 'who' they were as a person. Although I can't explain it, the more beautiful I find the person to be on the 'inside'…the more attractive and visually stimulating they become to the eye. Go figure? Perhaps this might also explain why I could care less whether or not my current partner lost all his hair or gained extra weight. Initially, if I didn't find him so physically appealing (if he were obese) it might have taken me a little longer before wanting to rip all his cloths off. Just being honest. But now that I've come to love 'who' he is, it matters little what he looks like now or what he'll look like in the future. I'll still want to curl up up in his arms and stay there for the rest of my life so long as he remains they same loving, caring person that I've grown to love.
laRubiaBonita Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by Moose I prefer my guys to be girls........seriously though, I'm 5'11" and 160lbs., with a little budda belly starting to form, (Time to get that summer six pack back, if that's even possible anymore). So it looks like I don't have a snowballs chance in hell to go out with the pretty ruby........ I have been told I'm too skinny though. I don't get it, there are plenty of women who prefer thin men. I think it's just a matter of preference. haha! Moosey, i am sure i would let you under the velvet rope, as you are at the cut off mark. i am 5'8, and hopefully will stay under 150. FYI~ i can only evet find skinny-mini clothes when i shop, like 0's and 2's.....my thigh is probably bigger........ but clothes sizes mean nothing...just depends on what brand you are wearing.
alphamale Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by EnigmaXOXO It's simply a personal observation, but I've noticed (in my experience) that the more attractive the person is (sometimes), the less well-rounded and interesting they seem to be. thanks for pointing out the obvious ENIGMAXOXO
IhavenoFREAKINclue Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 My ex was almost 300 lbs, and I'm 130! Fat guys don't bother me. Its the sex that does. Girls can only be on top to prevent squishage. And fat guys have small penis' so you cant really do it doggy style.
laRubiaBonita Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by EnigmaXOXO It's simply a personal observation, but I've noticed (in my experience) that the more attractive the person is (sometimes), the less well-rounded and interesting they seem to be. i disagree, i think you are seriously generalizing...... i have met more blah ugly people, than i have fun interesting Not-ugly people. i say not-ugly, cause, maybe they are not drop-dead gorgeous folks, but they are not butt ugly either. i would think the butt-ugly people would be less interesting , maybe meaner, more pessimistist Because of the fact that they are uglier than the norm. sure they maybe really smart, cause they do nothing very social and read all the time...... but can they interact with others well, are they resentful? I am sure you looks play a great deal in determining how you are treated and responded to by other, which in turn will affect how you treat others, how you respond....
tanbark813 Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by tiki My first husband was 6' and 125#. Damn. I'm 5'6" and 150lbs. That guy must have been skinny as a rail.
EnigmaXOXO Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 thanks for pointing out the obvious ENIGMAXOXO I'm UGLY and MEAN! Which is why I've never had trouble landing or keeping my guys. I either frighten them away or scare them into submission! I find it works in my favor either way. Fat guys don't bother me. Its the sex that does. Girls can only be on top to prevent squishage. And fat guys have small penis' so you cant really do it doggy style. Good point about the "squishage." I never even considered that body size might get in the way of a healthy sex life.
tiki Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by tanbark813 Damn. I'm 5'6" and 150lbs. That guy must have been skinny as a rail. Yes, he was. His highest weight ever was almost 130#. When he had his heart surgery, his weight dropped and he looked REALLY sick then. But he was rail thin, and it hurt when we got busy...his knees were knobby and stuff. P.S. I think penises generally look smaller on heavier men, just like they look larger on skinnier men.
blind_otter Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by laRubiaBonita Originally posted by EnigmaXOXO It's simply a personal observation, but I've noticed (in my experience) that the more attractive the person is (sometimes), the less well-rounded and interesting they seem to be. i disagree, i think you are seriously generalizing...... i have met more blah ugly people, than i have fun interesting Not-ugly people. i say not-ugly, cause, maybe they are not drop-dead gorgeous folks, but they are not butt ugly either. i would think the butt-ugly people would be less interesting , maybe meaner, more pessimistist Because of the fact that they are uglier than the norm. sure they maybe really smart, cause they do nothing very social and read all the time...... but can they interact with others well, are they resentful? I am sure you looks play a great deal in determining how you are treated and responded to by other, which in turn will affect how you treat others, how you respond.... I'm a bitch!
laRubiaBonita Posted April 5, 2005 Posted April 5, 2005 Originally posted by blind_otter I'm a bitch! And a Fun one at that!
moimeme Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 Although I can't explain it, the more beautiful I find the person to be on the 'inside'…the more attractive and visually stimulating they become to the eye. Go figure? I'm exactly the same Good point about the "squishage." I never even considered that body size might get in the way of a healthy sex life. I seem to have a max weight support structure of about 210 lbs. Beyond that, breathing becomes difficult.
Recommended Posts