Mr Spock Posted March 19, 2005 Posted March 19, 2005 One could see how the constant re-interation of someone's opinion against a person's post that isn't even really adressing it could be frustrating.
moimeme Posted March 19, 2005 Posted March 19, 2005 The point was that the characteristic of God is that He is unknowable. People didn't seem to be getting it. Sometimes if someone appears to not have comprehended a point, the pointmaker will try a couple different ways of expressing it in case the first wasn't clear. Nothing wrong with that.
Mr Spock Posted March 19, 2005 Posted March 19, 2005 Nothing wrong at all. Just can see how it would be considered irritating or frustrating.
d'Arthez Posted March 19, 2005 Posted March 19, 2005 Originally posted by moimeme The point was that the characteristic of God is that He is unknowable. God is Unknowable. Which can lead to either mysticism, or a negative "theology." Every discussion about God is a form of idolatry.
Recommended Posts