2.50 a gallon Posted October 9, 2014 Posted October 9, 2014 Quality over quantity. I'm guessing around #25, when it came to pure sex, was quality plus, the best ever, so far ahead of the pack there is no second place. And that put me on the path to finding a partner that equaled her.
salparadise Posted October 9, 2014 Posted October 9, 2014 That if you take 1,000 hookups, 80% of them will be from guys who are 9+, 18% or so will be the 8's, and a couple of 7's but nobody below. In contrast, the distribution of women can be represented by a relatively flat curve. This is, of course, purely hypothetical. That's a good hypothesis, I believe– consistent with what I've read on evolutionary theory, the Kinsey surveys, and observed in life. About 95 percent of women are eager to breed with about 5 percent of men. Those 5 percent can get laid where most men can't get a drink of water, and they can be extremely picky and still get plenty of sex. The majority of men have to work their asses off, make do with less attractive women, and a good portion are simply not granted access no matter what. There is something inherent in that small percentage of men that triggers women's drive, and when that happens the motivation is amazingly strong. My number is below the age/2 threshold. I believe my phukability quotient is probably one tier below that small percentage of men who are in high demand. I was married for 23 years, during the years I was the most attractive, and I turned down a lot of opportunities. If I added the number of svelte women who gave me the green light during that time I'd definitely be above said threshold. They didn't seem to care that I was married, or it may have even added to the appeal. I think this is one of the most interesting aspects of human behavior. It never fails to piss people off to hear that they are predictable and behaviors are predetermined to a degree, as opposed to the illusion of being in control and exercising free will over all of their choices. 1
insert_name Posted October 9, 2014 Posted October 9, 2014 How do you think we found the quality!!? By kissing a fair few frogs? 1
xxoo Posted October 9, 2014 Posted October 9, 2014 Count me in the waaayyyy under column. I lucked out and found quality early 3
Donate Posted October 9, 2014 Posted October 9, 2014 Not many partners. But the ones I had I banged often....for example me and one female dates for about 2 years and had sex 3times/day on average. I lost 20lbs out first year together ....lol 1
BlueIris Posted October 9, 2014 Posted October 9, 2014 OKC asks this question: "Divide your age by 2. Have you had sex with at least that many people?" It's interesting, when I plug that question into my normal OKC search pattern, only 21 women answered "yes," about 70 answered "no," and hundreds didn't answer. My answer is "no." at my age, that would be 25 women. I'm five short My answer's "no" but I'm disappointed. I didn't expect to feel that way. I'm 54, so my number should be 27+1. That's the way I see it.
todreaminblue Posted October 9, 2014 Posted October 9, 2014 i dont understand the necessity of that question to be answered or the reason why it is important......i am honest with guys when i date them if they are after numbers ...i cant give them one and i tell them why.....deb 1
Tayken Posted October 10, 2014 Posted October 10, 2014 @OP.....are you asking people about bf/gf, STR, LTR, ONS, FWB? Fair to say most won't particular want to share those college, holiday, work, club, OLD dates where clothes came off moments as part of the statistics
MissBee Posted October 10, 2014 Posted October 10, 2014 OKC asks this question: "Divide your age by 2. Have you had sex with at least that many people?" It's interesting, when I plug that question into my normal OKC search pattern, only 21 women answered "yes," about 70 answered "no," and hundreds didn't answer. My answer is "no." at my age, that would be 25 women. I'm five short No. (ten characters)
Author Kid_Charlemange Posted October 10, 2014 Author Posted October 10, 2014 i dont understand the necessity of that question to be answered or the reason why it is important. Then my suggestion would be to not respond. I see lots of posts on LS that don't interest me. Instead of posting "this thread doesn't interest me," on every one of them, I move on to one that does. Logical, yes? 1
Recommended Posts