Kid_Charlemange Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 OKC asks this question: "Divide your age by 2. Have you had sex with at least that many people?" It's interesting, when I plug that question into my normal OKC search pattern, only 21 women answered "yes," about 70 answered "no," and hundreds didn't answer. My answer is "no." at my age, that would be 25 women. I'm five short 1
Divasu Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 All I know is I'm more then four times shorter than you and that you're, uh, 45?
michellew Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 For me it would be more like "multiple your age by 2!". 5
Jules Dash Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 Occasionally I consider sitting down and trying to come up with that number then I come to my senses and think it is better not to. 3
Author Kid_Charlemange Posted October 8, 2014 Author Posted October 8, 2014 I got to thinking about this question while viewing the results of this poll on the dating section, as I believe that the 9+ guys get asked out quite often (or at least hit upon), while the answer for the 7's and below might well be zero. This coincides with my theories on Tinder hookups. That if you take 1,000 hookups, 80% of them will be from guys who are 9+, 18% or so will be the 8's, and a couple of 7's but nobody below. In contrast, the distribution of women can be represented by a relatively flat curve. Well, a picture is worth a thousand words (or a million bytes). This is, of course, purely hypothetical. My observations are that most women will either go home with a super attractive guy or just go home alone. While even the most attractive men will, to use a vulgar expression, "work their way down" until they find someone willing to hook up. This idea is of course supported by our genetic code, as well as that of a lot of other mammals: The females want the best genes for their offspring, and won't settle for anything less, while the males want to spread their genes as far and wide as possible.
TheBladeRunner Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 OKC asks this question: "Divide your age by 2. Have you had sex with at least that many people?" It's interesting, when I plug that question into my normal OKC search pattern, only 21 women answered "yes," about 70 answered "no," and hundreds didn't answer. My answer is "no." at my age, that would be 25 women. I'm five short Oh man "KidC"......I've had more.....I am such a tramp! You made my night with the math! There is still hope.....and I'm NOT what woman would say is "attractive". 1
MrNate 2.0 Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 Deciding if I should put this popcorn in the microwave or not... Yeah, I'm putting it in there. 6
evanescentworld Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 I'd have to be 14 to give an accurate answer and that's just not a very good thought....
Dork Vader Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 (edited) You want the truth? I lost track around 50. If I had to guess any place between 125-170 women. Yes that is sex (not oral), no I did not pay for any of it. Just made out with? North of 600. Am I honest with women I date.. Yes... Have I gotten STD's? Yes. Am I proud of any of it? No, I was not trying to, it just sort of happened. I would trade every single sexual experience I've ever had to have ONE lasting relationship and experience true love. I did make it to 150 women or so w/o getting anything serious. Ironically I thought I met the woman I'd marry and she gave me HSV-2. Yes I know I got it from her. I had not had sex in nearly 2 years, only had 3 partners befor her all I used protection with and NONE of the 3 have it. Before that it had been 8 years or so w/o sex. I'm full of nothing but regret. Edited October 8, 2014 by Dork Vader 1
Author Kid_Charlemange Posted October 8, 2014 Author Posted October 8, 2014 I would trade every single sexual experience I've ever had to have ONE lasting relationship and experience true love. I hear that. Thanks for the info. That's some personal stuff, and it takes guts to write that out in public. Respect. 3
somedude81 Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 Nope, since I'm at less than 10 women, I've still got quite a ways to go until I get 16.5. I'm assuming the .5 is oral Though looking back, I would be perfectly fine if my number was just 1, my ex girlfriend. Nobody else before her mattered.
singsparkles Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 I think the whole "divide the number by 2" thing really only qualifies for women who sleep around a lot. I'm 25 years old and I've had exactly 9 partners as I've kept track!
Andy_K Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 I'm over now, but I was on target a year ago! Need to find someone to be with for several years to redress the balance now. 1
ltjg45 Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 Hmmm.... I am 28. So my record is currently 0 out of 14. So, it is easy to say, "No".
georgecostanza Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 I think the whole "divide the number by 2" thing really only qualifies for women who sleep around a lot. I'm 25 years old and I've had exactly 9 partners as I've kept track! No, it counts equally for men and women. My number is pretty much the same as my age.
ThaWholigan Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 I'm at 2 out of 13! Not a great conversion rate
isisisweeping Posted October 8, 2014 Posted October 8, 2014 OKC asks this question: "Divide your age by 2. Have you had sex with at least that many people?" It's interesting, when I plug that question into my normal OKC search pattern, only 21 women answered "yes," about 70 answered "no," and hundreds didn't answer. My answer is "no." at my age, that would be 25 women. I'm five short I have not but I would not answer that question so that I wouldn't get any idiots who actually care about such things. It would suggest we were not compatible to me if they did care and liked that I had a "low" number. Early 30's.
Recommended Posts