FrostBlaze Posted March 6, 2014 Posted March 6, 2014 (edited) Everyone has their own scale from 1 to 10 i guess, based on looks. I was wondering what your scale is like and what it would generally mean. 1 to 4 Ugly 5- Friends, looks nice, but it's not giving me any sensation 6- Might Date, Fairly attractive, well groomed Etc. Just want to see what people's standards are like and what they expect. I really like them average lookin gals , i tend to go for them instead of the hot ones. What i mean by that, is that i fall in love with the average ones mostly. Edited March 6, 2014 by FrostBlaze
peruano99 Posted March 6, 2014 Posted March 6, 2014 She has to have beautiful eyes, a nice smile, and most of all, a great personality. I personally like a girl with athletic bodies and nice curves as well. I try very hard to not fall in love easily.
pteromom Posted March 6, 2014 Posted March 6, 2014 I do not have a "looks scale". It's always been about connection. If I made a connection with a guy, I would give it a shot. If the connection grew and I liked what I was learning about him, I'd keep seeing him; if not, I'd break it off. I've dated guys who would be considered ugly by most people, and guys who could have modeled, and everything in between. I admit I don't get rating people. If a guy (or woman) is a 9, that doesn't mean he/she will be compatible with you. I guess if you are rating celebrities or people on the street where all you want them for is looks... 1
jba10582 Posted March 6, 2014 Posted March 6, 2014 Average looks is fine for a woman, I care much more about an age range of the female having some maturity, as I want kids, just not RIGHT now. So a female that is about 23-27 is the most valuable to me. if someone thought a girl I was dating was ugly I would LOL at them for saying anything because I could care less.
ThaWholigan Posted March 6, 2014 Posted March 6, 2014 Find the scale to be a tad juvenile so have never used one. As much as I like a good analysis, my attraction to someone isn't really quantifiable so I don't bother attempting to do so. A better question would be what your type is 1
Author FrostBlaze Posted March 6, 2014 Author Posted March 6, 2014 (edited) I don't personally use a scale, i like you or i don't like you. JUst figured most people do so i made the topic, have seen it's quite popular on the internet, this whole scaling business. As to what my type is, not sure yet, haven't dated enough . But i like them crazy, childish just for the fun factor, not immature/drama queens T_T, had enough of those. Has to love cuddling and touching, i like them cute and with a dirty mind. Not be lazy? can't find a exact word for what i am thinking in my own language... Whatever, there's a whole list. Edited March 6, 2014 by FrostBlaze 1
Lernaean_Hydra Posted March 6, 2014 Posted March 6, 2014 (edited) Find the scale to be a tad juvenile so have never used one. As much as I like a good analysis, my attraction to someone isn't really quantifiable so I don't bother attempting to do so. Yes, this, exactly! A better question would be what your type is I don't have a scale, and come to think, I don't have a "type" either. It's just whether or not I find you attractive. And that could be based on a number of things ranging from how you dress to what you smell like. Actually, scent is a pretty big deciding factor for me. Seriously, I've been more attracted to an average looking workman in dirty blue Dickies who happened to smell like he had bathed in the nectar of the gods (though, it might've just been Old Spice ) than I have my handsome neighbor who wears nothing but finely tailored suits. Edited March 7, 2014 by Lernaean_Hydra
peruano99 Posted March 7, 2014 Posted March 7, 2014 Yeah either she is attractive or she is not; but if the woman is an attractive girl with a horrible personality, and the other is an average looking woman with a beautiful personality, then I'll take the one with a beautiful personality because honestly looks fade when you get older; your personality can stay the same. 1
Recommended Posts