rglove Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 What makes for an Attractive Lady!!! I follow this formula; PRETTY FACE SMALL + WAIST BIG HIPS =ATTRACTIVE LADY For a lady to be attractive or considered attractive, it starts, first, with a pretty face, one that is seemly and aesthetically pleasing. Secondly, body dimensions must be considered, the proportional ratio of the waist compared to the hips and the chest, the subtracted difference of the waist from hips and waist from chest. The measurement of the waist must be at least 8” smaller than that of the chest and 10” smaller than measurement of the hips. As far as the actual sizes of each, the chest/bust measurement can’t be smaller than 32” and optimally not smaller than 34” and the hip measurement can’t be smaller than 32”, as well, with the same optimum of not smaller 34” and the measurement of the hips can’t exceed 42” and as far as the waist measurement is concerned, it shall not exceed 30” within the proportional scale. So if you have an appealing, pretty face and a proportional body, within the bust to waist to hip measurement ratio, than you are, indeed, an attractive lady. With the female body and physical attractiveness, it’s not a matter of size but more a matter of the Female’s proportions, of how her body is physically laid out. The key is not in her weight, per say, but more in the distribution there of, as for as it concerns an aesthetically pleasing body. And a beautiful face, always, is a plus and no doubt makes the grade!!! For figuring body type there are two established formulas the WHR or waist-to-hip ratio, which the previous kind of speaks to and the BMI or Body Mass Index. These are formulas used to calculate and figure out ones body types. By using these formulas you can figure out your weight class i.e. if your weight and body type falls under Average, Underweight, or Overweight. Body Mass Index BMI) is based on weight and height, while Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR) is based on just that the ratio between the waist and the hip. And if you were to factor BMI and WHR in the consideration of a females attractiveness, along with the fore mentioned guidelines, to be considered a highly attractive female, she’d would have to have a (BMI) Body Mass Index not higher than 23 (of 23 or lower) or a (WHR) Waist to Hip Ratio of .75 or less (not exceeding than .75). How to find your (BMI) Body Mass Index: Body Mass Index can be calculated using pounds and inches with this equation BMI ={Weight in Pounds/(Height in inches) x (Height in inches)} x 703 Devide your total body weight by the square of your height in inches than multiply that by 703 and you have your BMI. For example, a Female who weighs 127 pounds and is 5 feet 4 inches tall has a BMI of 21.79. [127 lbs. divided by (64 inches) x (64 inches) x 703 = 21.79] ---------------------------------------- How to find your (WHR) waist-to-hip ratio: 1. Use a tape measure to find the circumference of your waist at its narrowest point when your stomach is relaxed. Waist: inches 2. Measure the circumference of your hips at their widest (where your buttocks protrude the most). Hips: inches 3. Divide your waist measurement by your hip measurement. Waist/hip = Waist-to-hip ratio. Note; A WHR of 0.8 or less is considered healthy for a woman and a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 is considered normal 18.5 or less for a female is considered to be underweight and a BMI of 26 or more is overweight or into an unhealthy range. (The higher your BMI the greater your health risk.) ------------------------- I would love to have your opinions, whether you agree or disagree with me and with my stated opinion, as to what makes for an attractive female. Our standards of attractiveness for females has been a long debated topic, and I decided to weigh in on it, but not only weigh on it but to set a formulated standard for it. And as I've weigh in on the topic, I want to see you do the same. Agree with me disagree with me, I don't care, just let your voice be heard, on what you think, whether the formula works and is fair or doesn't work and is unfair. Does my formula, theory, hold water or doesn't it. What's your opinion??? -------------------------- Beauty Resource; The Science of Female Physical Beauty Parts 1 & 2: anniesrichards.tripod.com/beauty.htm
Barby Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 Lame Lame Lame...attractiveness maybe but can such shallowness lead to a lasting relationship?
savethedrama4allama Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 1. Who cares? 2. Is the formula for attractive man: amount of money in wallet / 401k assets x number of years in college + length of penis? Good lord. Everything is in the eye of the beholder. It is evolution's guarantee that we can all find a mate.
tiki Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 Originally posted by savethedrama4yrmama Is the formula for attractive man: amount of money in wallet / 401k assets x number of years in college + length of penis? LMAO! Love doesn't have to be based solely on body shape. What an insult. It's definitely a shallow way of thinking. I have big hips, huge knockers, a ghetto ass and I can love just as much as your 'perfect' gal.
Weird Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 what makes for an attractive lady is a brain and a good personality.
alphamale Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 intelligent and sexy in the same pkg. but it is hard to find sometimes.
Stone Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 Confidence makes an attractive lady, nothing else
LiveLoveLaugh Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 Originally posted by savethedrama4yrmama 2. Is the formula for attractive man: amount of money in wallet / 401k assets x number of years in college + length of penis? Drama, you beat me to it!
alphamale Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 Originally posted by Stone Confidence makes an attractive lady, nothing else I have to disagree...I know some very confident women that are not attractive physically at all. My friend's wife is very confident and intelligent but she weight about 250 lbs and very few men would find her physically attractive. ...ooh yeah, and she is not that nice a person either
HokeyReligions Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 ROTFLMAO! Whatever floats your boat! No one can tell someone else what is attractive. We each view beauty uniquely. What looks good to me, might not look good to you and vice versa. There is no right or wrong, beauty or attractiveness is not an absolute. This whole post just tickles me!
Leikela Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 rglove, Do you measure all your potential girlfriends with a measuring tape before you consider dating them? You have a lot to learn buddy. If you're single, it's apparent why.
Author rglove Posted December 21, 2004 Author Posted December 21, 2004 I would agree with you that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and individual taste do vary, but the stated theory here is not about individual taste, but is more a medium of those taste, a generalization of peoples taste, factoring in what we have been physiologically wired to respond to as men, and factoring in general taste and physiological research, a basic theory was formulated, as to what makes for a highly attractive female. Truth is, on the whole, most of us do respond very favorably to a pretty face and well-proportioned body. Yes, there are individual variations, as far as what people respond favorably to. Some like them fat, some like them skinny, some like a face that is not so pretty, but that still does not take away from the fact that a pretty face – one that is symmetrical and aesthetically pleasing – is attractive, and as far as the body, body type, is concerned this I’d say is only a basic guideline. The fact is there are exceptions to these guidelines, to the stated theory. There are plenty of women, who don’t meet the proportional dimensions ratio that are indeed attractive, but the fact is most of these women are graced with aesthetically pleasing, pretty faces. And again, what was done here was to take the bases of a pretty face and add what would be a visually pleasing body. What this allows for or at least, was intended to allow for was a spectrum of body types from fit to thick. It was meant to be inclusive of the average body type, slim body type, and slightly overweight body type. It is about how the overall package looks and what looks good, overall, to the masses. It is and only is a generalization of what we find visually pleasing, and although all might not find one meeting these visual criteria’s attractive, most of the masses, generally, do!!! I would agree that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but not everybody has a beauty that most would want to behold, and therefore, cannot be considered “Highly Attractive!!!” Tiki, Big Hips + Ghetto Booty is just fine. In fact, I let a Ghetto Booty, - Shapely, Round, and High-sitting of coarse- It’s got to have aesthetic appeal, but like Sir Mix a Lot said, “I like ‘Big Butts’ and I can not lie,” but there is such a thing as too big. Anyway, concern my post, what I posted was, is just a guideline to attractive, and is not all about weight but more so over body structure. As I said in the post, it's not a matter of weight, of how much a female weighs, but more the distribution, thereof. It not the overall body weight that matters, but more so, how the body is laid out. Grossly overweight is no good, but to the other side of the spectrum Grossly underweight is no good either. It's all about natural feminine curves. A well maintained, well kept, plus size woman looks better than an anorexic woman any day!!! The formula should read; PRETTY FACE SMALL + WAIST BIG + HIPS =ATTRACTIVE LADY Apologize for mix up!!!
quankanne Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 whoever buys into that is buying a crock of poop! besides, in the dark, it's the personality that shines through, not a person's looks. i.e., what's inside is more important than what's outside.
alphamale Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 Originally posted by quankanne besides, in the dark, it's the personality that shines through, not a person's looks. i.e., what's inside is more important than what's outside. this is totally true QUANKANNE, but exactly how much time do you spend with other people in the dark? assuming there is no power outage.
Barby Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 For your retarded theory shouldn't it be?? PRETTY FACE+SMALL WAIST+BIG HIPS=ATTRACTIVE LADY Instead of.... PRETTY FACE SMALL + WAIST BIG + HIPS =ATTRACTIVE LADY Even the way you worded your retarded piggish sad shallow theory doesn't make sense....
Adunaphel Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 I read some theories about the key to female-to male actractiveness being in the waist-hips proportion. It was indicative of the fertility of the female, and it was -generally- different in women who had , or had not, already given birth to children. I'd have to look up at the sources, and I'm too lazy to do so right now, anyway it was stuff written by some evolution biologists/anthropologists. I guess it could make some sense (but being a female myself, I can't say if those theories worked for me), and, sceptical as I might have been about them, they were really interesting to read. And they *did* make some sense, speaking from a biologist's perspective. There was also something about the factors that determine "actractiveness" of a woman's face. Saying that a pretty face makes a girl more attractive does not mean really anything - well, it does not mean anything people don't know already What is interesting is : what makes a face attractive? (or "pretty"?) I read that it was all about simmetry of facial features. Also, some physical features seem to be more attractive to people who come from certain environments/areas of the world. I'll check your website, your post made me curious. Thanks for sharing.
Naive Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 Originally posted by Barby For your retarded theory shouldn't it be?? PRETTY FACE+SMALL WAIST+BIG HIPS=ATTRACTIVE LADY Instead of.... Even the way you worded your retarded piggish sad shallow theory doesn't make sense.... You got him Barby!!!!
Barby Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 Originally posted by naive_2001 You got him Barby!!!!
ThumbingMyWay Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 hhmmm....I am attracted to ALL kinds of women. I think all women are attractive in there own way. Wether its priecing eyes or the shape of there elbow. Seriously though....looks do matter...but that is not really important. I think if you connect on an emotional level...the looks dont matter. But I like a Sense of humor, confidence, feet on the ground, secure inner self, caring personality and just plan fun to be around, i am more attacted to the "energy" they put out there.......but big tits are nice too...hahahahaha....ok ok, typical male. I am blessed to have my wife, truly blessed. She is VERY attractive, assertive and has a great sense of humor...and the energy she expells...its simple perfectiton that is mesmorizing to me...and everyone esle she knows/meets both male and female....even chicks dig my wife
LiveLoveLaugh Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 ok, have to add... I don't think it can be lumped into one thing. I think real attraction is when you see something in another person that makes you want to get to know them. Attitude, confidence, pleasant personality paired with a great laugh, sense of humor, can make someone attractive even if they are not what you would consider "your type" in the beginning. unless this post is intended research on purely physical attraction, then I have to admit, I am a very attractive woman, and I sure like that little kind of rush I get when when I see a really good looking guy and we lock eyes for a moment...it's fun i'm so bad just though of a new post
Weird Posted December 21, 2004 Posted December 21, 2004 the funny thing about people who go on and on about physical appearance...looks fade. I can show you a ton of women who when in their 20s looked good physically but as they aged they lost their looks, especially after they had children. Also, don't many people get so used to what a person looks like that it doesn't matter after a while? You can look at a face/body so much before you get "bored/used" to it...you can spend years talking to a person and never get bored because the discussion can always different. I feel pity for those who judge the opp sex just on looks and ONLY look for/date the trophy girl/guy...usually they end up fugging themselves over but hey, I guess they can always brag to their buddies how they dated such a "hot" person. I have friends who have done that and I just roll my eyes when I hear it. I'll take the girl who is avg looking that has a great personality, and brain, which means intelligence/common sense and who also is mature any day over the girl who may be a hot piece but lacks substance. Sure she may be fun for a little while but eventually her empty head and lack of any personality would bug the hell out of me.
Author rglove Posted December 21, 2004 Author Posted December 21, 2004 "Can’t a brother have a dyslexic moment or two, Damn?" To those who disagree with the stated theory, the guidelines laced out, what do you think makes "Physically attractive"? Now, I will admit there are many non-physical qualities that enhances ones value and likeability and those qualities I can also make a long laundry list of, such as; Charm, A Sparkling Personality, Intellect, Class Sophistication, Self Confidence, Style, Femininity, Genteelness, Elegance, Guile, Effervescence, Grace, Refinement, Kindness, A Positive Attitude, A Free-Spirit, Substance of Soul, but my question is, as far as the physical, in your opinion - if you disagree with my theory - then, what makes attractive, in your eyes, your mind!!! ps. For me, as far as it concerns a female, I want it all. I want someone whom I find physically pleasing, who can mentally stimulate me, and who has a special spirit, or to say it simply Looks, Intellect, and Substance of soul. Look for upcoming post "Rules of Compatibility/ Attraction!!!"
Recommended Posts