ls32ssibm Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 Two girls I've dated previously. Obviously neither worked out. Girl A: Rarely initiated contact. Sometimes was difficult to get ahold of. Was never too enthusiastic about "us". Lasted 6 months. Attractiveness (I feel this is relevant) was about an 8/10. If she didn't have "plenty" of time (IE like 4-6 hours) wouldn't go on dates. Girl B: Wrote me frequent, lengthy texts. Very eager to go on dates. Would squeeze in seeing me in between her obligations. Lasted about 2 months. Girl was a solid 9/10. Point is, I never really understood why someone like Girl A would even bother seeing me if she wasn't really into me. Have you guys ever experienced this contrast?
Dallers Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 Simply: A Liked having you around as a back up and for entertainment when bored. B Was game on. 1
Woggle Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 Yeah and the minute I suspected it I cut things off.
MrCastle Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 Who cares about Girl A when Girl B was more interested + more attractive
Author ls32ssibm Posted September 9, 2013 Author Posted September 9, 2013 Who cares about Girl A when Girl B was more interested + more attractive Well yeah but Girl B ain't easy to come by. When it ended I felt that in the morning. 1
stillafool Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 Why did Girl B end it? She was so enthusiastic.
lino Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 Yeah I've been used as the time filler/stepping stone guy before several times. Girl who brought me to this site was the last one as I no longer accept such agreements. If after the first few outings a girl doesn't initiate or communicate with me as much as I do her I either stop talking to her or relegate her to a piece of ass.
Recommended Posts