PinkSapphire Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 Not reading all the posts to see if it has been pointed out yet, but those measurements/sizes don't even make sense. For instance, the first girl's measurements sound almost exactly like me; only I have a big butt and pretty decent stomach (don't we all wish we were perfect? It's not, but objectively it is close). I am a size 4. No way on any planet is that fictional lady a size 10. Nowhere. So, this post is silly, it's not even close to anything real. Where did you find these women who somehow defy math and physics?? Also, what everyone else said, looks and personality weigh in much greater than a bunch of measurements of a lot of, basically, what seems a lineup of way above average bodies.
iris219 Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 Breast-Waist-Hips Ideally most men want the numbers to look like this: Large-Small-Large Hip sizes in the upper 20s are slim to average, 30 to mid 30s are considered curvy, high 30s to 40+ is Kardashian level Here is a point of reference Mila Kunis | Chickipedia You can search by different sizes. No. This shows how little men know about women's measurements. But that's OK! Models have hips around 34. Anything less then that would be well below average and difficult to achieve, unless the women was 5 foot and very, very petite. Mila is tiny and not curvy and I guarantee her hips are at least 32.
MrCastle Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 No. This shows how little men know about women's measurements. But that's OK! Models have hips around 34. Anything less then that would be well below average and difficult to achieve, unless the women was 5 foot and very, very petite. Mila is tiny and not curvy and I guarantee her hips are at least 32. Aww shoot, you're right. I was uh confusing uh...hips, with another body part i that area. If we're talking about the other area, my measurements are accurate
Author Teen20girl Posted July 15, 2013 Author Posted July 15, 2013 She never told me her dress size. I just calculated it here. CalcTool: Dress size calculator If your measurements are 36-28-37 and you're 5'7" tall according to this calc and many other findings you're about an 8 with the measurements alone but including the fact that she's tall makes her a 10 that was my estimation. Like I said she has a good size butt. But not too big at least for me. And her stomach isn't six pack perfect but I prefer it. She's softer not a rock hard body which is a turn off. Not reading all the posts to see if it has been pointed out yet, but those measurements/sizes don't even make sense. For instance, the first girl's measurements sound almost exactly like me; only I have a big butt and pretty decent stomach (don't we all wish we were perfect? It's not, but objectively it is close). I am a size 4. No way on any planet is that fictional lady a size 10. Nowhere. So, this post is silly, it's not even close to anything real. Where did you find these women who somehow defy math and physics?? Also, what everyone else said, looks and personality weigh in much greater than a bunch of measurements of a lot of, basically, what seems a lineup of way above average bodies.
PinkSapphire Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 (edited) well, in real life, it just does not make sense. When I try on clothes, 6's are way too big ever single time. Those are my exact measurements, and I cannot get anything bigger than a 4 to stay on my body. Also, it looks baggy and stupid on me. That has to be a 4. The 5;6" girl who is 124? Def no bigger than a 2 unless she somehow has much larger measurements than you are reporting. Maybe even a 0, as the other girls have to be that you listed. Only the girls with D and DD cup sizes are at all larger, and that is solely due to their breasts. An even more pressing question, how do you possibly know their measurements? Seems you are a dude, no way they let you know this. Most girls don't even know, and I assumed you had to be a teen girl based on your obsession with size (every girl goes through it while her body is changing. It's scary, so you measure and compare obsessively to assure yourself you are okay and normal. But a dude??? you have problems, bro). This is just such a strange scenario, and that these girls are actual beings that exist.... Also, not to be biased or anything, but I'd take the 5'7" one hands down. The personality you describe is the most attractive, and if she looks just like me? obvi, I like it. Bring her over please Edit: oh, and her being taller would actually make her smaller, not larger; it just works all strange like that. Measurements don't change, so it has to be. It says I should be an 8 (my waist is 27, so I was wrong about being exact same size). When I put on an 8 irl, it just falls right off, no way it will stay on without wittling it down to a 4; no idea, man. Edited July 15, 2013 by PinkSapphire forgot to add
Author Teen20girl Posted July 15, 2013 Author Posted July 15, 2013 On other sites from what I'm reading 5'7" and 130 something lbs makes you around a 6-8. It's probably height plus your build could just be smaller idk. I'm just going by the research on the subject. Also I've seen her in a bikini. She's built similar to the third girl. Except she doesn't have a rock hard body type like the third and has perfect boobs. Basically she's more feminine. I was just estimating. Anyhow I think I've made my decision up. My first option is her. If it doesn't work then I guess the third. Second girl will always be my best friend though. I was just wondering what people thought generally when it had to do with attractive women. Well the second girl I actually have been friends with her way back since we were kids. She was complaining to a friend that the 0 barely fit because her friend gave her a dress for a special occasion she had knowing she was a lot taller than her. People always tease her for looking like katy perry which she hates. I simply looked up katy Perry's measurements and minimized what I thought she would likely be. And it's kind of obvious well is when she was at least younger that she was a D cup very skinny and had no ass so my guess would be 32D-24-32. I already know her weight and weight since she's been trying to work at putting on more weight. How did I know the third girl? I found it on her mm profile. That was easy. She claims to be a size 6. I can calculate it and it seems to be correct. Honestly if petit girls like the second girl can wear a 0 I'd think she'd fit a bigger size. Size 6-10 sounds shapely womanly. She's definitely built like a woman not a child. The second one is built like a child and is the reason she fits a 0 I believe. Based off the second girl I estimated the size the fourth girl would be especially since I know her height. She looks like the second girl waist down and she'sore top heavy and bigger with basically no waist and ginormous boobs. She's a definite example of an apple I'm pretty sure she's a DD if the second girl's a D cup.
Recommended Posts