Are there any women here that don't get attached after sex?

[reaver]

I don't think you can make that statement unless you dismiss women who have posted in this thread prior

 

I said in general. In general does not mean 100% of women.

 

In my life, most women think its bad. Some dont, but they arent the majority for sure.

[Emilia]

General consensus. Common sense. Practical wisdom. Ancient knowledge. Your Great Grandmama. Etc. Take your pick.

 

So instead of having your own opinions you rely on others to create them for you?

[Emilia]

You are in fighting form today...and every day. Try cooling off before you post. Allow yourself time to think out your posts instead of just reacting and being driven by anger.

 

I'm trying to teach you posting decorum child

[Emilia]

I said in general. In general does not mean 100% of women.

 

In my life, most women think its bad. Some dont, but they arent the majority for sure.

 

But they are not the majority in this thread so why do you say 'general'?

[reaver]

You are in fighting form today...and every day. Try cooling off before you post. Allow yourself time to think out your posts instead of just reacting and being driven by anger.

 

I dont have a problem with women who want attachment before sex, but your statement saying you SHOULD be attached before sex is judgmental. Everyone is allowed to make their own choices, telling people what they "should" do is condescending and immature. Id leave Emilia alone

[carhill]

Just curious if I am a weirdo.

 

IMO, no. Sexual styles vary. I've met numerous women in life who have a similar perspective and was married to one. I learned a lot about 'going crazy' and 'sport fµcking' from her, anecdotally. All these women who don't get attached after sex are having sex with men who don't get attached after sex, presuming hetero, so it works out. Women have been 'going crazy' and 'sport fµcking' since long before I was born so I doubt it's anything new or exciting. If it works for you and reflects who you are, it's you. Go with it.

[Emilia]

Then Professor profess the goods attained by someone who has sex with one they don't care about.

 

Why? You only go after 'general consensus'. Why do you care about people who have their own mind and their own opinion? It's of no use to you.

[reaver]

But they are not the majority in this thread so why do you say 'general'?

 

General is a word where its definition does not involve one thread on one love website.

 

For now on instead of saying "in general" I will say "in the real world" if that will help clear up any confusion.

[Ninjainpajamas]

This feels more like a feminist movement/woman empowered type post here than actual reality.

 

If you're a male reader viewing this post, this is going to be highly confusing and contradictory to what you will generally experience in the real world.

 

Whether women are attached just because of the act of sex or not should be irrelevant for you, the results will speak for themselves.

 

So try not to let this get into your head and start crossing the wiring as this is some new revolutionary period in time where human nature has changed just because it's 2013.

 

Take it as some women are more guarded/selective with trust and their emotions than others, but don't expect being intimate with a woman to absolutely change nothing, women cannot even see at times the changes within themselves.

 

Carry on LS with the arguing

[ThaWholigan]

My FWB is one such woman. Its not weird IMO, its only weird to people who have preconceived ideas about sex in my own observations.

 

Usually the sex has to be really really fantastic before such women get attached . Sometimes even then......

 

Everyone is different.

[BluEyeL]

Well, I don't have personal experience, as I only had one long term sex partner so far, but logically, I think it is possible for a woman not to get attached after sex if:

1. She doesn't like the guy that much to begin with, so she's kinda using him mechanically.

2. Sex is not great.

3. Not sure about this one, but if she had a lot of experience doing casual sex, maybe it gets easier not to get attached.

 

I understand though that when sex is good, oxytocin makes females bond in general. Now, maybe some lack this hormone.

 

I might be insecure, but if I like someone, I'm in danger to be attached even from kissing/touching. But I think it's the damn oxytocin most of the time, unless that hormone is a myth )

[Emilia]

Don't be jealous of my bedrock of support when you don't have a grain of sand to stand upon.

 

Then as the child I shouldn't be teaching you it.

 

Ah another religious one. That explains it

[reaver]

This feels more like a feminist movement/woman empowered type post here than actual reality.

 

If you're a male reader viewing this post, this is going to be highly confusing and contradictory to what you will generally experience in the real world.

 

Whether women are attached just because of the act of sex or not should be irrelevant for you, the results will speak for themselves.

 

So try not to let this get into your head and start crossing the wiring as this is some new revolutionary period in time where human nature has changed just because it's 2013.

 

Take it as some women are more guarded/selective with trust and their emotions than others, but don't expect being intimate with a woman to absolutely change nothing, women cannot even see at times the changes within themselves.

 

Carry on LS with the arguing

 

Spoken like a true woman hater/user.

[Emilia]

This feels more like a feminist movement/woman empowered type post here than actual reality.

 

If you're a male reader viewing this post, this is going to be highly confusing and contradictory to what you will generally experience in the real world.

 

Whether women are attached just because of the act of sex or not should be irrelevant for you, the results will speak for themselves.

 

So try not to let this get into your head and start crossing the wiring as this is some new revolutionary period in time where human nature has changed just because it's 2013.

 

Take it as some women are more guarded/selective with trust and their emotions than others, but don't expect being intimate with a woman to absolutely change nothing, women cannot even see at times the changes within themselves.

 

Carry on LS with the arguing

 

Of course your highness. I keep forgetting we are all retarded compared to the self-awareness that is in you and the wisdom thrown at our feet from your high horse.

 

* sips tea *

 

[Emilia]

Spoken like a true woman hater/user.

 

Masked in 'sophistication'

[SmileFace]

Spoken like a true woman hater/user.

Why didn't I get that from his post? shrugs

 

I kind of like that I am able to look as sex seperate from a whole.

Only because do you hear the crap that women deal with when they get attacted to a guy.

Straight crazy.

[ThaWholigan]

You find a belief in ghosts and goblins as the impetus behind every posting don't you?

So LittlePrince. Was this your fallback account from yesteryear?

 

[Emilia]

So LittlePrince. Was this your fallback account from yesteryear?

 

 

I think this one is a different one. Younger

[SmileFace]

So LittlePrince. Was this your fallback account from yesteryear?

 

Only reason I don't think it is LittlePrince is because he isn't bothering me. Sometimes I like to feel special too.lol

[reaver]

Why didn't I get that from his post? shrugs

 

I kind of like that I am able to look as sex seperate from a whole.

Only because do you hear the crap that women deal with when they get attacted to a guy.

Straight crazy.

 

Most of his posts hate on women.

[Treasa]

Oh you are 14? Me too. Want 2 cyber lulz?

 

Nope to both. kthxbai

[SmileFace]

Players don't age well like crackwhores jonesing for another hit they can't afford. That's what your life turns into when you don't have solid support beneath your feet but constantly shifting sands.

But I like sand -_-

 

See I talked too fast.

[SmileFace]

Most of his posts hate on women.

I just think his posts are raw.

I don't agree with half of them and won't read the other half since they are too damn long.

However I don't see him a women hater.

I think he actually give a good insight on what some guys are reallly thinking.

Not that I agree but I can appreciate it.

[reaver]

I just think his posts are raw.

I don't agree with half of them and won't read the other half since they are too damn long.

However I don't see him a women hater.

I think he actually give a good insight on what some guys are reallly thinking.

Not that I agree but I can appreciate it.

 

He generalizes. Thats my problem with him.

I know many men that dont think the way he does.

People on this site assume everyone else thinks the way they do. Maybe its because they dont work in a people profession like I do. When I was younger I was prone to generalizing but after meeting thousands of people and getting to know their personal lives, I have now figured out generalizing is not accurate.

 

Ironically, I know quite a few men that get attached to almost all the women they screw. Go figure.

[SmileFace]

Just don't get washed out with it when the tide comes.

Trying not to