Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 (edited) ...............A similar post is already posted. Edited December 22, 2012 by Brit
Angel Heart Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 I've tried 'OKCupid' and found out the men are only on it for a quick fling; looking only for one thing. You may want to ask yourself what you are looking for in the online dating world as you explore the options.
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 Well, I do well for myself, I would like to find someone that would fit generally well with my family, outgoing, happy, friendly, very successful, enjoys the finest of wines and knowledge of fine wine and dining, wordly.
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 May seem like alot to ask, but have you come across these sorts on dating sites?
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 Oh, and important, quick wit and a sense of humor.
Angel Heart Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 I haven't and if you ever find such a site, please let me know. 1
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 I haven't and if you ever find such a site, please let me know. Ha ha! I am going to look today, but I thought I read somewhere and not sure, but there are some sites that may require a 1000 or so to join and you can be matched perfectly.....not too sure but if anyone knows of a reputable site that I just described, please indulge us with the info.
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 I believe I have read bad things about OKCupid, the men treat it like Adult F*ck a Finder.......
sweetkiwi Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 First i tried pof. I attracted the clingers and the pervs. Okcupid same story. I do much better dating IRL than i ever have virtually. But being an English speaker here is hard to get around dating wise. I don't live in a major city and i think I've given up on dating Italians because we're simply incompatible on the most basic of levels. Italian men are for fun. Not love.
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 Has anyone tried the Wealthymen sites or are they a bunch of wanna bes or complete mental cases?
rocketman122 Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 I've tried 'OKCupid' and found out the men are only on it for a quick fling; looking only for one thing. You may want to ask yourself what you are looking for in the online dating world as you explore the options. But I will say the same of many woman on jdate. as well there are many desperate single woman dying to get married and have children. all the ages are there but im specifically talking about those ages 33-42. they tried to convince me to have children with them and some of them were very nasty and judgmental because I dont want children. So I can say the same about women. not all that. its very easy to point but its just the same on the other side. I know from women that there was a potential 5% of the men who were truly looking for a SLTR. I am in that 5%. thats why I had a lot of success. 1
FitChick Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 If you're in the UK you might want to check out Spice something or other. It's like a meetup -- lots of fun activities that you'd never consider doing on your own, some quite adventurous. I wish I lived in the UK because it looks like a fun way to meet people.
Brunettie Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 Match.com is really good. I didn't really like eharmony though.
edgygirl Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 Hm. I am on jdate. Come on, be light on our tribe women. I find it funny that when a woman is looking for a LTR and is in a certain age bracket, men see her as "desperate". Is a guy who wants a LTR desperate? If her clock is ticking, because biologically we are in disadvantage, is it fair to make such generalization? How would you feel in our shoes? I might be really wanting a relationship, but believe me, I prefer to remain single than to be with someone incompatible. And so do most Jewish women I know. So the desperation point seems like forcing it a bit. I think that's the main problem with JDate actually. Most guys of a certain age freak out as they think all women there are "desperate". wth. Judaism is very family centric yes, so only because they tried to convince you to have children you don't have to say they were "nasty". It's natural instinct and valid. As it's valid for you not to want it. It's called dating and testing the waters to see what each other want. I hear it all the time from Jewish guys that the girls are nasty and I am not sure the problem is with the girls. But I will say the same of many woman on jdate. as well there are many desperate single woman dying to get married and have children. all the ages are there but im specifically talking about those ages 33-42. they tried to convince me to have children with them and some of them were very nasty and judgmental because I dont want children. So I can say the same about women. not all that. its very easy to point but its just the same on the other side. I know from women that there was a potential 5% of the men who were truly looking for a SLTR. I am in that 5%. thats why I had a lot of success.
edgygirl Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 hmm... why were you judging me for wanting a doctor exactly? When in fact I don't even care for money beyond providing for a family? Funny. I can't believe there is a site like this. For real? What kind of sane men would sign up? Has anyone tried the Wealthymen sites or are they a bunch of wanna bes or complete mental cases?
edgygirl Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 They say eharmony is better for finding LTR. Why didn't you like it? The limited matches thing? Never been there. Match.com is really good. I didn't really like eharmony though.
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 hmm... why were you judging me for wanting a doctor exactly? When in fact I don't even care for money beyond providing for a family? Funny. I can't believe there is a site like this. For real? What kind of sane men would sign up? I never judged you for wanting to date a doctor, but for the mere fact you made this fact seem as if it was a major factor of the post, when it had very little to do with the issue at hand. I have dated men of various prestigious levels, and in the end, after you take off all the exterior BS, they are in fact, simply men. You need to base your decisions on that alone. I have always stuck to you can be equally happy with a wealthy man as you can a poor one. I have gone through the dynamics of dating 1 or 2 lower bracket men and they clashed with my family and it was a disaster on both sides. The lower bracket immediately resenting the luxuries and for some reason the conversation amongst them all did not go very well, and was beyond compatible and ended up being a nightmare.
edgygirl Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 Okay... So you're saying that it is a major issue for you for the guy to have money, as it wouldn't go well with your family? Or is it the interior, "simply men" that matters and we have to base the decisions on that alone? I'm confused. As for me, I tried to convey a whole picture of the guy I am interested in, including his profession, as I like people to get the whole picture so they are better able to help me. Also because for some reason it's the 4th doc I am in touch this year which is funny to me. Oh well. Good luck on wealthymen. I never judged you for wanting to date a doctor, but for the mere fact you made this fact seem as if it was a major factor of the post, when it had very little to do with the issue at hand. I have dated men of various prestigious levels, and in the end, after you take off all the exterior BS, they are in fact, simply men. You need to base your decisions on that alone. I have always stuck to you can be equally happy with a wealthy man as you can a poor one. I have gone through the dynamics of dating 1 or 2 lower bracket men and they clashed with my family and it was a disaster on both sides. The lower bracket immediately resenting the luxuries and for some reason the conversation amongst them all did not go very well, and was beyond compatible and ended up being a nightmare.
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 Okay... So you're saying that it is a major issue for you for the guy to have money, as it wouldn't go well with your family? Or is it the interior, "simply men" that matters and we have to base the decisions on that alone? I'm confused. As for me, I tried to convey a whole picture of the guy I am interested in, including his profession, as I like people to get the whole picture so they are better able to help me. Also because for some reason it's the 4th doc I am in touch this year which is funny to me. Oh well. Good luck on wealthymen. I do not understand what is confusing, dynamics amongst lower and higher class mingling is not the same as, making decisions of a man's thought processes based on he is the board of this and is this......when it comes to disorders, issues, and personal problems, you cannot make them exceptional and ignore them based on their profession. You seem to base your self worth on, this is the 4th doc I am in touch with? And? It does not seem to have led you anywhere, but in a rut with a man who needs to seek counselling....but we already covered that and you are happy with the circumstances. Plus, you told me to look at your history and i have, and you mentioned you have slept with over a 100 men, I should be asking you advice about men in retrospect to that alone......
edgygirl Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 What is confusing is that you said that the only thing that we should base our interest in someone is the interior, "simply men", and then you post you are going to a dating site for wealthy men. I do not base my worth on the profession of the men I date. I like interacting with men who I consider extremely intelligent, yes. Which is a valid reason to get interested in someone. I never said I slept with a 100 men. I thought you said you had a good reading comprehension, including for scientific papers. So my posts should not be that difficult to understand, right? I think it's forbidden by forum rules not to stay on topic. So we better stop this. Good luck! I do not understand what is confusing, dynamics amongst lower and higher class mingling is not the same as, making decisions of a man's thought processes based on he is the board of this and is this......when it comes to disorders, issues, and personal problems, you cannot make them exceptional and ignore them based on their profession. You seem to base your self worth on, this is the 4th doc I am in touch with? And? It does not seem to have led you anywhere, but in a rut with a man who needs to seek counselling....but we already covered that and you are happy with the circumstances. Plus, you told me to look at your history and i have, and you mentioned you have slept with over a 100 men, I should be asking you advice about men in retrospect to that alone......
Lonely Ronin Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 I never said I slept with a 100 men. not in this thread you didn't. http://www.loveshack.org/forums/general/general-relationship-discussion/362991-why-modern-women-intimidated-strong-men-3.html#post4464708 If you mean dated 100 men, you should probably say dated, because where I'm from "been with" is synonyms with slept with.
edgygirl Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 Fair enough. I dated around 100 men, in between LTR, ex husband and ONS and simple dates that went nowhere. Which is probably not that much for my years dating. I hear people go on 4 dates a week which would make it seeing 208 people in one year only. As you might know, English is not my main language so what I say gets misinterpreted sometimes, but mainly my fault because of my English. Thanks for pointing out, I find it very sensible of you, Ronin. not in this thread you didn't. http://www.loveshack.org/forums/general/general-relationship-discussion/362991-why-modern-women-intimidated-strong-men-3.html#post4464708 If you mean dated 100 men, you should probably say dated, because where I'm from "been with" is synonyms with slept with.
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 not in this thread you didn't. http://www.loveshack.org/forums/general/general-relationship-discussion/362991-why-modern-women-intimidated-strong-men-3.html#post4464708 If you mean dated 100 men, you should probably say dated, because where I'm from "been with" is synonyms with slept with. I've dated over a 100 guys, yes. How many I've had sex with? Ah, not telling a religious f*** like you, sorry. You may find a way to throw stones at me over the internet! lol. And this, you were being honest, AND you said in the other post you are open minded and loose and to look at your post history, which I did, and now you seem upset. I am trying to understand where you are coming from when asking advice on posts.
edgygirl Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 (edited) Yes I am not telling... so what? Do I have to? Hmm are you judging me? Why? Do I owe you something by any chance? You are old fashion, good for you. I am not, good for me. We're all happy. I am not upset. I was pointing out that the things you say seem not that congruent with your beliefs. You are the one who seemed upset for me asking. I've dated over a 100 guys, yes. How many I've had sex with? Ah, not telling a religious f*** like you, sorry. You may find a way to throw stones at me over the internet! lol. And this, you were being honest, AND you said in the other post you are open minded and loose and to look at your post history, which I did, and now you seem upset. I am trying to understand where you are coming from when asking advice on posts. Edited December 22, 2012 by edgygirl
Author Brit Posted December 22, 2012 Author Posted December 22, 2012 You keep changing your story, it went from well over a hundred to just a hundred, over a hundred and religious F*cks would throw stones if they knew how many you have slept with, and now you are intermingling it with ONS....etc. I gave you props for being honest and now you are backpeddling. I have explained my stance numerous times and you are not getting it.
Recommended Posts