edgygirl Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 Dating is such an ambiguous term, or more precisely has a wide range of meanings. I wouldn't say women over 40 are not worth dating, indeed I have dated more than one and it was fine. I thought the idea is that they are worn out biatches. And only great for sex: Women that age are great for sex, but I wouldn't consider one for an LTR. The phrase "attractive confident woman" is a red flag though. It's usually code for "worn out bitch" Although I believe you're over 40?
123321 Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 I thought the idea is that they are worn out biatches. And only great for sex: Sex can be part of dating, I just wouldn't ever consider marrying or getting serious with one.
Mme. Chaucer Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 I'm an attractive, confident, worn out bitch! Yeah!
Feelin Frisky Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 I read that the "Olympic Village" is a non-stop orgy. It's supposed to be hush hush but being a world class athlete and interacting with so many people at their absolute peeks breaks out into some care free stuff. Emergency orders had to be made for condoms at at least one Summer Olympics as all were used in short order.
LittlePrince Posted December 24, 2012 Posted December 24, 2012 It seems a lot of men are willing to pay, and pay a lot, to "date" this woman. 60 something men need love too.
stillafool Posted December 24, 2012 Posted December 24, 2012 I honestly couldn't care less about what younger men think about older women. I am not sure why younger men in this board keep slamming older women and want so hard to prove how they are unworthy of a normal healthy relationship, are just good to be used for sex, or so. We can read right through why you feel what you feel as we've been your age a few years ago, in case you forgot. It seems to come out of immaturity and ignorance as someone pointed out in another post. And it's offensive. Although it doesn't change anything in my life. Get a grip people. Go hunt 20 yo and let us be. We come here for constructive advice, not to hear juvenile comments of people who don't have a clue about life yet. I think they do it to lower womens self esteem. They want to "keep us in our place" so to speak. Very much like the conversations that declare women shouldn't date around in their 20's because no one will want to marry them when they get in their 30's. It's only said to make women feel bad about having a high sex drive as that is only for men, don't cha know. I think the men that have these thoughts can't date or have sex with who they want to date so they take it out on all women. Their bitterness is glaring. 2
stillafool Posted December 24, 2012 Posted December 24, 2012 Sex can be part of dating, I just wouldn't ever consider marrying or getting serious with one. Wow, well why lower yourself to have sex with one. Aren't there enough 20 year olds to sex? 1
edgygirl Posted December 24, 2012 Posted December 24, 2012 I think they do it to lower womens self esteem. They want to "keep us in our place" so to speak. Very much like the conversations that declare women shouldn't date around in their 20's because no one will want to marry them when they get in their 30's. It's only said to make women feel bad about having a high sex drive as that is only for men, don't cha know. I think the men that have these thoughts can't date or have sex with who they want to date so they take it out on all women. Their bitterness is glaring. Wow. You said it all. That's exactly what I feel when they rant here. It's amazes me to see that we still live in wannabe-patriarchal times, even with these 20 year old guys and the things they say here. (Only when it's convenient for them, of course). The difference is the world changed and unfortunately they can't control us anymore with these futile mental games
123321 Posted December 24, 2012 Posted December 24, 2012 Wow, well why lower yourself to have sex with one. Aren't there enough 20 year olds to sex? I wouldn't say it's lowering, really. If she seems like the right woman at the time then give it a try.
123321 Posted January 3, 2013 Posted January 3, 2013 The last time I was single I dated a few 30-somethings and while the date itself was fine at the end of the night when she was hinting around about how long her drive home was I just didn't have the desire to take it there. The luster had sort of worn thin by then I guess, and I could see that if I went to the next step it was gonna be a river of crap, and I am not doing that for a saggy piece of tail. So I bailed. In the old days, or even a decade ago, I would have been after that but now I prefer the ease and high payoff of something a little fresher for that amount of work.
edgygirl Posted January 3, 2013 Posted January 3, 2013 if I went to the next step it was gonna be a river of crap, and I am not doing that for a saggy piece of tail. So I bailed. I prefer the ease and high payoff of something a little fresher for that amount of work. Oh don't worry. No hurt feelings. I suspect if they were half-brained 30-something women they also weren't interested in a 40s saggy-ass lazy women-hater man either. In fact with so many cougar hunting fresh men we can do better than that 2
Mme. Chaucer Posted January 3, 2013 Posted January 3, 2013 The luster had sort of worn thin by then I guess, and I could see that if I went to the next step it was gonna be a river of crap, and I am not doing that for a saggy piece of tail. So I bailed. In the old days, or even a decade ago, I would have been after that but now I prefer the ease and high payoff of something a little fresher for that amount of work. You know … I think you're smart and usually I respect what you have to say around here, and agree with a lot of it - but that was profoundly offensive. I am not saying that because I fall into the "saggy piece of tail" category, either. If I fell into the "something a little fresher" category I would be just as disgusted. 1
xxoo Posted January 3, 2013 Posted January 3, 2013 I am not saying that because I fall into the "saggy piece of tail" category, either. If I fell into the "something a little fresher" category I would be just as disgusted. Seriously! I question the mentality of young women who date men who would say things like that. I had much higher standards when I was young and "fresh". 2
SteveC80 Posted January 3, 2013 Posted January 3, 2013 When womens start getting a good amount of cellulite is when i start to check out
Mme. Chaucer Posted January 3, 2013 Posted January 3, 2013 Seriously! I question the mentality of young women who date men who would say things like that. I had much higher standards when I was young and "fresh". It's all about meat, dude! 2
truth_seeker Posted January 3, 2013 Posted January 3, 2013 It comes down to the woman. What does she look like? Does she have sex appeal? She have her life together? You're attracted to who you're attracted to. Age is irrelevant. 2
123321 Posted January 3, 2013 Posted January 3, 2013 You know … I think you're smart and usually I respect what you have to say around here, and agree with a lot of it - but that was profoundly offensive. I am not saying that because I fall into the "saggy piece of tail" category, either. If I fell into the "something a little fresher" category I would be just as disgusted. Just practicing my shock jock skilz.
123321 Posted January 3, 2013 Posted January 3, 2013 When womens start getting a good amount of cellulite is when i start to check out Well there's cellulite the stuff most women have and cellulite the visible vomit inducer. If I take both hands and mold and squeeze and press just right I can get a dimpling effect out of just about any woman I've dated, but when they are just walking around there's no visible dimples, which is all that really matters on that topic for me.
edgygirl Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 Well there's cellulite the stuff most women have and cellulite the visible vomit inducer. If I take both hands and mold and squeeze and press just right I can get a dimpling effect out of just about any woman I've dated, but when they are just walking around there's no visible dimples, which is all that really matters on that topic for me. :::: Are you serious? Dude, get a life. I am terribly sorry for the women you manage to trick into your bed.
123321 Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 :::: Are you serious? Dude, get a life. I am terribly sorry for the women you manage to trick into your bed. Trick? Most of my relationships have lasted over a year, I guess it's some sort of really effective trick.
nofool4u Posted February 12, 2013 Posted February 12, 2013 Women over 40 not worth dating? In some ways, I think women over 40 are the only ones that ARE worth dating. 2
2sure Posted February 12, 2013 Posted February 12, 2013 You know, I'm way over 40 and I'm fine with it...I mean, everyone with any luck will reach way way over 40. Anyway, clearly no one should pursue or date or partner with anyone they aren't attracted to. Isn't that common sense? No one wants you to date fat people, short people, gay people, brunettes, or Asians if you don't want to right? And it's the same for people above or below your preferable age range. But why is it that some males here...younger and not so young...feel the need to disparage, mock, and insult the physical appearance of women over a certain age? Why is that OK? Why especially....do they seem to feel the strong need to do so? Because this is yet another entire group of women who although you think beneath you...have also rejected you? Either way, it's ridiculous because men age so much more brutally than women...I mean the hair starts thinning in college on many. And that's nothing but...you guys make it sound like you are running, physically repulsed, away from women over 40. No one is chasing you .
charlietheginger Posted February 13, 2013 Posted February 13, 2013 It seems a lot of men are willing to pay, and pay a lot, to "date" this woman. Worth dating ? Or worth fooking? Big difference
Recommended Posts