pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 The fact that women do not depend on men financially does not change the maths in anthropology... Males have a different sexual drive that women do.. Actually sex is the only big difference between men and women... I already told you that I don't approve man sluts either... I just telling you that up to my eyes the standard is not the same you like it or not. Ok...dont date slutty women. This is not that hard. You will have a much easier time finding an inexperienced woman than a woman trying to find an inexperienced man. If you have a preference there is nothing wrong with that. But I will tell you as a woman, finding a man who doesnt act like a slut is HARD
Author ThaWholigan Posted November 28, 2012 Author Posted November 28, 2012 Since you said your brothers have visited prostitutes and have encouraged you to do the same, I'm kind of surprised your brother would dump a girl because she's been with two guys before. That's quite a double standard he has going. No, this is a different brother. The brothers I was referring to were the ones who lived at my dads (and I'm fairly certain one of them hasn't). There was only one brother who actually went to see escorts and he was probably the main one who encouraged me. This one was the one who lived with me and basically said to do what I want.
Meatballsmom Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 "Here is another way to look at it. I had a male roommate several years ago who occasionally had one night stands. He was picky about who he got into a relationship with so he had dry spells where he would do this. . . ." I am suspicious of the roomates story. Picky: A way to make him look good for his failure to find sex. Think about it a young man, producing large amounts of testosterone, has occassional one night stands, with no repeat performances? And then blames it on the sluts? Or maybe his single performance was so poor that once was enough for them and he never got an invite back. Take my word for it if he was any good between the sheets they would be pounding on his door.
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 "Here is another way to look at it. I had a male roommate several years ago who occasionally had one night stands. He was picky about who he got into a relationship with so he had dry spells where he would do this. . . ." I am suspicious of the roomates story. Picky: A way to make him look good for his failure to find sex. Think about it a young man, producing large amounts of testosterone, has occassional one night stands, with no repeat performances? And then blames it on the sluts? Or maybe his single performance was so poor that once was enough for them and he never got an invite back. Take my word for it if he was any good between the sheets they would be pounding on his door. I dont really care if he was good in bed...doesnt change the fact he believes in the double standard walking around all entitled thinking he is a slut but will make a good boyfriend and assuming all women who do the same would make a bad girlfriend. Hypocritical
Author ThaWholigan Posted November 28, 2012 Author Posted November 28, 2012 Ok...dont date slutty women. This is not that hard. You will have a much easier time finding an inexperienced woman than a woman trying to find an inexperienced man. If you have a preference there is nothing wrong with that. But I will tell you as a woman, finding a man who doesnt act like a slut is HARD It's not that hard. Take your manhate somewhere else .
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 It's not that hard. Take your manhate somewhere else . I live right outside of New York City. It is hard.
aed Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Hmmm...I see very few men who are raging manwhores past their college years that turn out to be good long term boyfriends and husbands...but I keep an open mind that some exist. A guy who is willing to stick his dong in any hole that is willing is someone who is selfish, lacking self control and impulsive. I dont write off men that do it sometimes, but a guy who does it alot has these qualities. You think these qualities make good for a LTR? I once dated a guy who had 30 ONS in one year and lied to me about it because I said I cannot take a raging manwhore seriously. Some casual sex is fine but if you go on a rampage for a long period of time I will write you off. I found out about it...turns out I was right- he was a very impulsive, entitled, selfish person. He will have difficulty being a long term relationship with anybody who doesnt have low self esteem. This science you talk about doesnt exist. Females now have the option to not have to marry because we no longer depend on men financially. I know tons of women who go against your stereotype. Also, there are men out there who dont have to work to get laid...kaylan is right- its not as hard as you think it is. Men who believe in this double standard are either entitled or insecure. The double standard comes from the different biological between the 2 species. Question: before birthcontrole would the majority of woman have slept with less or more men than now? In equal relationships girl chooses boy. That men have a double standard in this, is because we are wired different then women and we dont have a chemical that changes or hormones. That allot of guys find it difficult to handle when a girl out numbers them dramaticly is just nature and not nurture (what femminist tries to make us believe). That we deal with it and think it is normal is nurture. Also that slight minority of men sleep with dramaticly high amount of women is also the result. Second i agree that being extremely promiscuous wont be good for anyone in a ltr, because you will experience sex les intimate! I think the ONS are very important because it will show her short terms decision making. When some had 50 ons being drunk in one year, how will she change her behaviour when she is with me? And not getting drunk anymore is a very naive solution.
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 (edited) The double standard comes from the different biological between the 2 species. Question: before birthcontrole would the majority of woman have slept with less or more men than now? In equal relationships girl chooses boy. That men have a double standard in this, is because we are wired different then women and we dont have a chemical that changes or hormones. That allot of guys find it difficult to handle when a girl out numbers them dramaticly is just nature and not nurture (what femminist tries to make us believe). That we deal with it and think it is normal is nurture. Also that slight minority of men sleep with dramaticly high amount of women is also the result. Second i agree that being extremely promiscuous wont be good for anyone in a ltr, because you will experience sex les intimate! I think the ONS are very important because it will show her short terms decision making. When some had 50 ons being drunk in one year, how will she change her behaviour when she is with me? And not getting drunk anymore is a very naive solution. You could not be more wrong. Men emit oxytocin after sex like women do. I dont like men that use evolution to excuse their selfish behavior- dont even get me started on that. You know women are biologically wired to prefer a man with resources/status? Tired of seeing men use evolution as an excuse yet bash women for being golddiggers...cant have it both ways boys. If you want women to evolve past their evolutionary tendencies- evolve past yours...unless you think its okay for men to be less evolved than women Off to tell my 6'2, black, Ethiopian co worker that I cannot trust him because I am evolutionarily wired to do so...he enjoys it when I say hes a tree compared to me. Ill have to add its nothing personal, because Im doing it for the safety of the other white people around me. People that pick parts of evolution to justify their behavior = same type of people that use 20% of the Bible to justify their behavior yet conveniently ignore the other 80% that doesnt benefit what they want out of life Edited November 28, 2012 by pbjbear 1
meandmyself Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 You could not be more wrong. Men emit oxytocin after sex like women do. I dont like men that use evolution to excuse their selfish behavior- dont even get me started on that. You know women are biologically wired to prefer a man with resources/status? Tired of seeing men use evolution as an excuse yet bash women for being golddiggers...cant have it both ways boys. If you want women to evolve past their evolutionary tendencies- evolve past yours...unless you think its okay for men to be less evolved than women Off to tell my 6'2, black, Ethiopian co worker that I cannot trust him because I am evolutionarily wired to do so...he enjoys it when I say hes a tree compared to me. Ill have to add its nothing personal, because Im doing it for the safety of the other white people around me. People that pick parts of evolution to justify their behavior = same type of people that use 20% of the Bible to justify their behavior yet conveniently ignore the other 80% that doesnt benefit what they want out of life Evolution is not an excuse is a reality... Without those sex patterns the species would disappear.. By the way you are the one that uses evolution as an excuse, we use anthropology which is the science that studies human being, his evolution and his behavior... It is certain that a male and a female have different perceptions and ways of approach sex (Actually I think sex is the only big difference between a Man and a Woman physically and sociology)
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 (edited) Evolution is not an excuse is a reality... Without those sex patterns the species would disappear.. By the way you are the one that uses evolution as an excuse, we use anthropology which is the science that studies human being, his evolution and his behavior... It is certain that a male and a female have different perceptions and ways of approach sex (Actually I think sex is the only big difference between a Man and a Woman physically and sociology) If evolution is reality then why did you ignore everything else I wrote? Are you racist? Do you think women should be/are acceptable to be golddiggers? If someone uses evolution as an excuse and genuinely believes in ALL things evolution has done to human behavior...then I think they are a bit weird, but I wont flack them for it. However, men dont do this...they pick and choose that which will benefit them. I do NOT agree with this. Dont you dare try to tell me I am. I pay for myself on dates and the last 2 men I dated were unemployed for half the time we dated. Using evolution as an excuse to be a d*** (No, nowadays the species would not dissapear...you do realize the situation most humans live in today's world is radically different than 99% of human existence) and blaming women for using their evolutionary tendencies is hypocritical and convinces me more most men on this planet are inherently SELFISH Anthropology has shown women do better with men that have higher income. Get over yourself. I highly doubt you're against this American propaganda that a woman should work and not expect a man to take care of her financially. What I tell ladies I meet about dating...Men want to have their cake and eat it too and use every excuse in the book to justify this behavior Edited November 28, 2012 by pbjbear
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 (edited) Evolution is not an excuse is a reality... Without those sex patterns the species would disappear.. By the way you are the one that uses evolution as an excuse, we use anthropology which is the science that studies human being, his evolution and his behavior... It is certain that a male and a female have different perceptions and ways of approach sex (Actually I think sex is the only big difference between a Man and a Woman physically and sociology) This post actually makes me giddy. I majored in Sociology and Anthropology and took over 4 classes in Evolutionary Psychology. I am not a know it all, I know jack **** about alot of stuff, but I can guarantee you are WAY in over your head with me when discussing this stuff. Anybody who has taken an anthropology course and paid attention knows it is about many different types of groups. Did you know there are cultures in which women are allowed to have many husbands and its perfectly acceptable? Did you know there are many cultures where men are the more caring and nurturing ones and women are warriors? Not many anymore because industrialization is taking over but there have been cultures like this in the past. The biggest one you will HATE...many cultures ENCOURAGE women to be slutty and experiment and think this is an important part of life and good for finding a steady mate...oh god...you wont be able to handle that! Dont ever move to Europe...you will explode from woman hating! Anthropology goes aginst evolution in the way it describes how people ADAPT. You are telling me women have ADAPTED their evolutionary tendencies yet men should not ADAPT. Just admit what you are- a selfish person. I have found having a rational reasonable argument with men like you is pointless....funny how women get flack for being irrational Edited November 28, 2012 by pbjbear
meandmyself Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 If evolution is reality then why did you ignore everything else I wrote? Are you racist? Do you think women should be/are acceptable to be golddiggers? If someone uses evolution as an excuse and genuinely believes in ALL things evolution has done to human behavior...then I think they are a bit weird, but I wont flack them for it. However, men dont do this...they pick and choose that which will benefit them. I do NOT agree with this. Dont you dare try to tell me I am. I pay for myself on dates and the last 2 men I dated were unemployed for half the time we dated. Using evolution as an excuse to be a d*** (No, nowadays the species would not dissapear...you do realize the situation most humans live in today's world is radically different than 99% of human existence) and blaming women for using their evolutionary tendencies is hypocritical and convinces me more most men on this planet are inherently SELFISH Anthropology has shown women do better with men that have higher income. Get over yourself. I highly doubt you're against this American propaganda that a woman should work and not expect a man to take care of her financially. What I tell ladies I meet about dating...Men want to have their cake and eat it too and use every excuse in the book to justify this behavior Mmm it is sad to see how you miss read and miss use what I have said... I don't think evolution has anything to say about who pays the bill, evolution has nothing or very little to do with races and colors (just preparation for different weathers and environments), you don't know me so don't dare to call me racist... I don't hold anything against anyone but their acts... Anthropology has a much dipper meaning than for a woman to look for men with better incomes but even when you may not be influenced by it is a fact that counts for many woman... without needing to behave or be a gold digger.... Anthropology is the science that has study our behavior since we ever exist and has established patterns (you like it or not). I agree that how the world it is today some of those patters are not a necessity for the human race to survive.. but it was at one time and therefore it is still written in our DNA. We men approach sex in a different way than you women do... is not an insult, it is a reality... we have been DNA created to plant our seed in any willing female (that is called instinct). Of course we also have something called intelligence that help us to differentiate from the animals and allow us to control those instincts, but they are there and is a part of us that we need to fight every day, women in the contrary have have in their DNA to be selective on who they chose to mate (again it is an instinct, not an obligation) therefore it is so difficult for us to accept that a woman has slept with many people ( I guess it is more a male issue than a female one) we feel less special to be with a woman who has chosen to give herself to anyone who had a nice word making us feel more a beta male than an alpha male that we all aim to be. I am sorry for the extension of what I wrote down but I wanted to let you know what are the basics in anthropology for this topic... Having said that, your man hating actitud is bothering me... have we really been that bad to you? Or are you trying to justify promiscuity because you have felt on it?
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Mmm it is sad to see how you miss read and miss use what I have said... I don't think evolution has anything to say about who pays the bill, evolution has nothing or very little to do with races and colors (just preparation for different weathers and environments), you don't know me so don't dare to call me racist... I don't hold anything against anyone but their acts... Anthropology has a much dipper meaning than for a woman to look for men with better incomes but even when you may not be influenced by it is a fact that counts for many woman... without needing to behave or be a gold digger.... Anthropology is the science that has study our behavior since we ever exist and has established patterns (you like it or not). I agree that how the world it is today some of those patters are not a necessity for the human race to survive.. but it was at one time and therefore it is still written in our DNA. We men approach sex in a different way than you women do... is not an insult, it is a reality... we have been DNA created to plant our seed in any willing female (that is called instinct). Of course we also have something called intelligence that help us to differentiate from the animals and allow us to control those instincts, but they are there and is a part of us that we need to fight every day, women in the contrary have have in their DNA to be selective on who they chose to mate (again it is an instinct, not an obligation) therefore it is so difficult for us to accept that a woman has slept with many people ( I guess it is more a male issue than a female one) we feel less special to be with a woman who has chosen to give herself to anyone who had a nice word making us feel more a beta male than an alpha male that we all aim to be. I am sorry for the extension of what I wrote down but I wanted to let you know what are the basics in anthropology for this topic... Having said that, your man hating actitud is bothering me... have we really been that bad to you? Or are you trying to justify promiscuity because you have felt on it? Oh you are so very wrong. Women are biologically wired to prefer men with resources, Money is a recent invention. For 99% of human existence, women have depended upon men for protection and survived more (and their children were more likely to survive) when they mated with a guy who had resources. Resources did not mean money, resources meant food, shelter, goods. Status can also attain these things...thats why women are evolved to prefer men like this. Your ignorance is very convenient. Telling me these arent facts is hilarious...I suggest taking a course in evolutionary psychology and coming back and telling me what you think. If I am to follow your logic- I should have never dated a man who is unemployed when I was a student myself when I had options available to date men who could take me out and pay for me all the time...because it is not in my DNA
meandmyself Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 This post actually makes me giddy. I majored in Sociology and Anthropology and took over 4 classes in Evolutionary Psychology. I am not a know it all, I know jack **** about alot of stuff, but I can guarantee you are WAY in over your head with me when discussing this stuff. Anybody who has taken an anthropology course and paid attention knows it is about many different types of groups. Did you know there are cultures in which women are allowed to have many husbands and its perfectly acceptable? Did you know there are many cultures where men are the more caring and nurturing ones and women are warriors? Not many anymore because industrialization is taking over but there have been cultures like this in the past. The biggest one you will HATE...many cultures ENCOURAGE women to be slutty and experiment and think this is an important part of life and good for finding a steady mate...oh god...you wont be able to handle that! Dont ever move to Europe...you will explode from woman hating! Anthropology goes aginst evolution in the way it describes how people ADAPT. You are telling me women have ADAPTED their evolutionary tendencies yet men should not ADAPT. Just admit what you are- a selfish person. I have found having a rational reasonable argument with men like you is pointless....funny how women get flack for being irrational Well where to beguine with... first at all, I am Spanish (Europe) but I live in The Netherlands (Europe). I understand that in some cultures female promiscuity is encouraged but they are as you well know the minority (exceptions). If you have study Anthropology and sociology you should know that you can draw a pattern by an exception... that is basic... I actually studies finance so way to go there but I have some interest on the topic but I seriously doubt that you have studied Anthropology because you would have understood my point from the beginning and you would never would use generalizations as saying that all men are men whores... etc...
aed Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 You could not be more wrong. Men emit oxytocin after sex like women do. I dont like men that use evolution to excuse their selfish behavior- dont even get me started on that. You know women are biologically wired to prefer a man with resources/status? Tired of seeing men use evolution as an excuse yet bash women for being golddiggers...cant have it both ways boys. I don't think there is anything wrong for women to go after or be attractive to high status men and choose the most weathly one if they are in that position. But there is a difference between golddigging and being attractive to the one how is most resourced. Example Bill Gates (was a high school nerd) and married a very attractive and high social women. Do you think that she (with her MBA etc) would be married to him if he was just an pizza boy? There is also anna Nicole Smith: she married a 93 year old billionaire. From evolutionairy prospective this relationship has no meaning. And they problably couldn't have sex with out viagra etc. (see the difference) If you want women to evolve past their evolutionary tendencies- evolve past yours...unless you think its okay for men to be less evolved than women I always believed women are more evolved then men . But hey mabey im just a pussy People that pick parts of evolution to justify their behavior = same type of people that use 20% of the Bible to justify their behavior yet conveniently ignore the other 80% that doesnt benefit what they want out of life I don't use it to justify behavior, i use it to explaine behaviors. Second of all we human's are not only driven by biology.
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 (edited) Well where to beguine with... first at all, I am Spanish (Europe) but I live in The Netherlands (Europe). I understand that in some cultures female promiscuity is encouraged but they are as you well know the minority (exceptions). If you have study Anthropology and sociology you should know that you can draw a pattern by an exception... that is basic... I actually studies finance so way to go there but I have some interest on the topic but I seriously doubt that you have studied Anthropology because you would have understood my point from the beginning and you would never would use generalizations as saying that all men are men whores... etc... Never once stated ALL men are whores. Said it is hard to find one who isnt. Bad logic- you are saying I should accept your evolutionary excuses because they are prevalent 90% of the time. Well if you look at the stats about sexual experience among men and women, you find there are more inexperienced women than men and I expect if they did a study now there would be an even smaller amount of men who arent very experienced. "understood my point from the beginning" You point does not make logical sense. Men who use evolution as an excuse have no ****ing idea what they are talking about. Keep trying to convince me I should accept living in a world where I am supposed to be more evolved than you. THIS ATTITUDE is what is wrong with our society today among many other things. Any man who says its fine to be less evolved and more selfish- get the **** over yourself. Edited November 28, 2012 by pbjbear
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 I don't think there is anything wrong for women to go after or be attractive to high status men and choose the most weathly one if they are in that position. But there is a difference between golddigging and being attractive to the one how is most resourced. Example Bill Gates (was a high school nerd) and married a very attractive and high social women. Do you think that she (with her MBA etc) would be married to him if he was just an pizza boy? There is also anna Nicole Smith: she married a 93 year old billionaire. From evolutionairy prospective this relationship has no meaning. And they problably couldn't have sex with out viagra etc. (see the difference) I always believed women are more evolved then men . But hey mabey im just a pussy I don't use it to justify behavior, i use it to explaine behaviors. Second of all we human's are not only driven by biology. This is not a prevalent attitude in the US today. Men hate golddiggers overall. The only men that dont are ones that get tons of casual sex with them
Author ThaWholigan Posted November 28, 2012 Author Posted November 28, 2012 Never once stated ALL men are whores. Said it is hard to find one who isnt. Bad logic- you are saying I should accept your evolutionary excuses because they are prevalent 90% of the time. Well if you look at the stats about sexual experience among men and women, you find there are more inexperienced women than men and I expect if they did a study now there would be an even smaller amount of men who arent very experienced. "understood my point from the beginning" You point does not make logical sense. Men who use evolution as an excuse have no ****ing idea what they are talking about. Keep trying to convince me I should accept living in a world where I am supposed to be more evolved than you. THIS ATTITUDE is what is wrong with our society today among many other things. Any man who says its fine to be less evolved and more selfish- get the **** over yourself. Well you did state that "men are incapable of love" - logic dictates you think all men are whores. Do you actually hate men or something?
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Well you did state that "men are incapable of love" - logic dictates you think all men are whores. Do you actually hate men or something? I think perhaps my definition of love is different than the love many men think of. Most people use that word too lightly. I actually say men dont seem to be capable of "true love" for that reason. Ive learned ThaWholigan that you are one of the few men that dont fit stereotypes. I know some are out there. But dont try to convince me youre the norm
meandmyself Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Never once stated ALL men are whores. Said it is hard to find one who isnt. Bad logic- you are saying I should accept your evolutionary excuses because they are prevalent 90% of the time. Well if you look at the stats about sexual experience among men and women, you find there are more inexperienced women than men and I expect if they did a study now there would be an even smaller amount of men who arent very experienced. "understood my point from the beginning" You point does not make logical sense. Men who use evolution as an excuse have no ****ing idea what they are talking about. Keep trying to convince me I should accept living in a world where I am supposed to be more evolved than you. THIS ATTITUDE is what is wrong with our society today among many other things. Any man who says its fine to be less evolved and more selfish- get the **** over yourself. Well the fact that there are more inexperienced women than men actually proofs my point of normal male vs female behavior. I am not going to keep this discussion because it is clear we have a very different way of seeing things. I am not trying to be selfish or to justify anything ... nature is wise and we are how we are for a reason. Having said that I don't hate women as you stated in a previous post, I actually admire women and how they have fought for every and each right... What I have said is that I am not attracted to promiscuous women, they are not attractive for me at all and I would never willingly date one... When I look to my girlfriend I see the closes thing in the world to an angel... I doubt (in my case) I could feel the same way if I know she had screwed with half of my town population.... You deviate by trying to justify women promiscuous activity on males approach to sex... that is just a lame justification, that is all what I am going to say.. I feel your bitterns about men and is sad..
Author ThaWholigan Posted November 28, 2012 Author Posted November 28, 2012 I think perhaps my definition of love is different than the love many men think of. Most people use that word too lightly. I actually say men dont seem to be capable of "true love" for that reason. Ive learned ThaWholigan that you are one of the few men that dont fit stereotypes. I know some are out there. But dont try to convince me youre the norm I could easily say that quite a few women use that word just as lightly, there are many examples of that. Both genders are as good and as bad as each other.
aed Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 This is not a prevalent attitude in the US today. Men hate golddiggers overall. The only men that dont are ones that get tons of casual sex with them That is because the women who sleep around expect the same thing from a man now what they did 200.000 years ago. And most of them won't keep that man. Because they are just easy laid. When a woman like that settles with a man in her own peergroup. She expects him to protect her, take care etc (all the biology apply here) Yet, a man feels stupid as this point because that woman is a very high risk to settle with (overall we are attracted to virgins etc, because of the high change of the babies be the man's own). 200.000 years ago a women like that would have died. No one would have taken responsibilty for her (probably those women wouldn't have existence)
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Well the fact that there are more inexperienced women than men actually proofs my point of normal male vs female behavior. I am not going to keep this discussion because it is clear we have a very different way of seeing things. I am not trying to be selfish or to justify anything ... nature is wise and we are how we are for a reason. Having said that I don't hate women as you stated in a previous post, I actually admire women and how they have fought for every and each right... What I have said is that I am not attracted to promiscuous women, they are not attractive for me at all and I would never willingly date one... When I look to my girlfriend I see the closes thing in the world to an angel... I doubt (in my case) I could feel the same way if I know she had screwed with half of my town population.... You deviate by trying to justify women promiscuous activity on males approach to sex... that is just a lame justification, that is all what I am going to say.. I feel your bitterns about men and is sad.. I am forever ever more going on dates and when men dont pay for me say "its in my nature. I am this way for a reason. You deviate by trying to justify cheap men activity...if I were to choose you to mate with, my offspring are better off with a man that pays for me all the time" I will write a book on the reactions I will get to this. I HATE DOUBLE STANDARDS. Keep ignoring the evolutionary evidence you dont believe in where all the facts are there but you wont want the world to exist in that way
pbjbear Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 I see how you came to hate man.. so when i don't agree with you or I have a different point of view I don't use logic and I am an ignorant? Ok, discusion is over.. you really proof my point... usually the person who calls ignorant someone else is to cover their own shortcomings... Have a nice day and hope you are going to be happy being so "right" and "Wise" I dont hate you. But you are not rational. You really prove MY point. Men that use evolution as a cop out and IGNORE the rest of it (keep living in your dreamworld where women are wired a certain way about income) and actually TELL ME scientific studies out the wazoo are WRONG about WOMEN's evolutionary tendencies... S e l fi i s h Keep ignoring my RATIONAL points of argument. And continue to call me IRRATIONAL. Its funny. Do you not see the contradiction? Cant have it both ways dear.
aed Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 I am forever ever more going on dates and when men dont pay for me say "its in my nature. I am this way for a reason. You deviate by trying to justify cheap men activity...if I were to choose you to mate with, my offspring are better off with a man that pays for me all the time" I will write a book on the reactions I will get to this. I HATE DOUBLE STANDARDS. Keep ignoring the evolutionary evidence you dont believe in where all the facts are there but you wont want the world to exist in that way What facts that you come up with? and what is he ignoring?
Recommended Posts