udolipixie Posted August 4, 2012 Posted August 4, 2012 He can´t buy prostitutes it´s illegal. (At least where i live and if you have to buy prostitute to get sex you are weird.) Why does the guy have to lower his standards while the girl hasn ́t? she has it easier, because of more options for sex. With your thinking...... ****ing a tree would be success. Whether prostitution illegal or not doesn't stop people from doing it and where I live prostitution is illegal and there's quite a stigma yet it's fairly common. The guy has to lower his standards because he doesn't have options readily available as again if the guy you were talking about was attractive or appealing enough he'd have options readily available. She doesn't have it easier as they both have the options of using the options available and lowering standards. Nowhere in my thinking do I state, suggest, or imply sex with objects would be a success unless you're pulling a strawman from my lowering standards option.
maybealone Posted August 4, 2012 Posted August 4, 2012 The guys are NOT ugly many of them are even above average who are interested in her. It's possible that you are not the best judge of what women find attractive in a man. Also, is this guy asking that woman (or women like her) out? Or is he asking out hotter women?
mortensorchid Posted August 4, 2012 Posted August 4, 2012 This depends, how old are we talking here? If you are in high school, 18 and a virgin that's a different story than being a 40 year old virgin, right?
Failboy Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 Whether prostitution illegal or not doesn't stop people from doing it and where I live prostitution is illegal and there's quite a stigma yet it's fairly common. The guy has to lower his standards because he doesn't have options readily available as again if the guy you were talking about was attractive or appealing enough he'd have options readily available. She doesn't have it easier as they both have the options of using the options available and lowering standards. Nowhere in my thinking do I state, suggest, or imply sex with objects would be a success unless you're pulling a strawman from my lowering standards option. I can't believe you are seriously claiming that buying prostitutes and escorts is the same thing as being able to choose from hordes of people who actually want you. That is probably the dumbest thing I have read all week.
Mme. Chaucer Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 It's possible that you are not the best judge of what women find attractive in a man. Also, it's possible that you are not the best judge of what constitutes an excellent thread.
Els Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 I know this is really bad, but whenever I see a thread started by you, the first sentence that comes to mind is 'omnomnom, your tears are delicious...'. 3
udolipixie Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 I can't believe you are seriously claiming that buying prostitutes and escorts is the same thing as being able to choose from hordes of people who actually want you. That is probably the dumbest thing I have read all week. Nowhere do I state that prostitutes and escorts are the same as choosing someone who actually wants you. I stated prostitutes and escorts are an option just as choosing someone who wants you is an option. Stating X is an option and Y is an option isn't stating X and Y are the same thing. Amusing lack of reading comprehension and show of projection and intrepretation.
Failboy Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 Nowhere do I state that prostitutes and escorts are the same as choosing someone who actually wants you. I stated prostitutes and escorts are an option just as choosing someone who wants you is an option. Stating X is an option and Y is an option isn't stating X and Y are the same thing. Amusing lack of reading comprehension and show of projection and intrepretation. Don't try to cloud your BS behind semantics. What you said is beyond inflammatory. You said they were on equal ground, which is beyond ridiculous on various levels. The fact that you now even get all arrogant and spiteful about it further shows your despicable personality. What you are saying is like saying Brad Pitt and some homeless kid in Africa are on equal ground because they both have options. It is beyond disrespectful and shows your total disregard of what many decent men actually have to go through when it comes to dating.
udolipixie Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 Don't try to cloud your BS behind semantics. What you said is beyond inflammatory. You said they were on equal ground, which is beyond ridiculous on various levels. The fact that you now even get all arrogant and spiteful about it further shows your despicable personality. What you are saying is like saying Brad Pitt and some homeless kid in Africa are on equal ground because they both have options. It is beyond disrespectful and shows your total disregard of what many decent men actually have to go through when it comes to dating. I thought I got amused not arrogrant and spiteful though bit curious to what did saying my post was the dumbest thing you read say about your personality. That's not semantics that's logical reasoning to me as stating two things are options isn't stating they're the same thing. Nowhere did I state prostitutes/escorts are on equal ground to choosing someone who wants you I stated the guy and gal are on equal ground not the options. What I'm saying is not like saying Brad Pitt and an African homeless kid are on equal ground because they both have options and your comparisn is a strawman as the two generally don't have all or most of the same options available to them. What I'm saying is a guy and gal are on equal ground because they both have the option of dating someone who wants them, prostitutes, escorts, and mail order brides. Notice how both the guy and gal have the same options available to them and likely to have all or most of them available to them as the first is the only one they have little control over.
Failboy Posted August 7, 2012 Posted August 7, 2012 I thought I got amused not arrogrant and spiteful though bit curious to what did saying my post was the dumbest thing you read say about your personality. That's not semantics that's logical reasoning to me as stating two things are options isn't stating they're the same thing. Nowhere did I state prostitutes/escorts are on equal ground to choosing someone who wants you I stated the guy and gal are on equal ground not the options. What I'm saying is not like saying Brad Pitt and an African homeless kid are on equal ground because they both have options and your comparisn is a strawman as the two generally don't have all or most of the same options available to them. What I'm saying is a guy and gal are on equal ground because they both have the option of dating someone who wants them, prostitutes, escorts, and mail order brides. Notice how both the guy and gal have the same options available to them and likely to have all or most of them available to them as the first is the only one they have little control over. You get way too technical about my quote because you know it's the only way to wriggle out of this. Obviously I know those things aren't the "same", just like the color blue and the color purple aren't the same. Nothing is the same, unless it is actually the same. So when someone uses this word in a matter of camparison, it's not to be taken literal by default. That is obvious and you know this, dude. Stop trying to wriggle yourself out of the argument at hand. If you want to get so super duper technical about the exact words someone said, I could easily hand your behind to you at that, too. Because at the end of your initial post you stated this: " It's not a fact that 'female = easier dating' as likely it depends on the person as most likely a good looking guy has it easier than an ugly or average gal." Using your "basic logical reasoning", I'd say that this is a contradiction to your initial claim. Because in this case, the ugly or average gal could just get a callboy, whereas the good looking guy would have to choose one of his options. Which, according to you, means they are on the same ground as they both have options and none of them has it any easier. See how stupid that is? The OP's point is absolutely correct, women hold all the cards in dating unless they want to date someone way out of their league. It's a documented empirical fact that very average girls can get with the hottest guys if they are determined enough, whereas many very decent men just can't get any. This is a prime reason why prostitution even exists. If women had it as hard as men when it comes to getting ONS or Dates, there would be way more manwhores than there are. But my main problem with you is not your logic, it is your lack of empathy that disgusts me to the core. It's like saying Donald Trump and some homeless guy are on the same ground because whereas Donald Trump can choose from his hordes of houses and yachts, the homeless guy can choose from all those bridges and curbs. They both have options and plenty of them. Technically true? Yes. Fair? Not by a long shot.
Failboy Posted August 7, 2012 Posted August 7, 2012 (edited) Women tend to hve a better shot at a desireable option than men do when it comes to finding a partner. It's just true. Just because men can pay prostitutes or the likes of Brad Pitt can get desirable partners easier than some fugly broke girl can makes no difference. Edited August 7, 2012 by a LoveShack.org Moderator
SincereOnlineGuy Posted August 8, 2012 Posted August 8, 2012 I don´t know freaking 1 female virgin. It doesn't matter how lame your personality is you can still get laid and a date if you are at least average and use make up. One of my female friend is slightly above average with out make up....she has hordes of guys talking to her, she just has to choose. (average personality). Then on the other hand i know a guy who is male 6.5-7/10 and he is a virgin. (average personality). Who has it easier? they are both almost as good looking and have similar personality. This is a FACT again? FACT. This crap has nothing to do with "dating".
Meg717 Posted August 8, 2012 Posted August 8, 2012 Lolo Jones - American track star..FEMALE 30yrs old - reportedly still a virgin.
Recommended Posts