Els Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Definitely count me in with the 'brilliant men' girls. That's probably the only non-personality trait that I'm positively certain I have a 'type' for - have never been even remotely attracted to anyone without it. A certain sort of cynical humor and wit, as well as quiet introversion, are also likely part of the 'type'.
Emilia Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 I don't have a physical type as such - though love huge brown eyes on a guy, love it when they are expressive. In terms of personality/character, I like them bright and strong. I like it when they have their own mind, they don't just follow the sheep, when they are true to themselves and have strong moral fibre. As zengirl said as well, there is something off-putting about those that grew up having it easy and laid-out to them. I don't like precious, finicky types, they really get on my nerves
nessaaa Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 West Indians/Guyanese or trini- I like how they grew up.. Unlike most westernized men they didnt have everything handed to them. these guys are natural husslers and go getters. They have good work ethic and are strong like bull. Real men.
Author ThaWholigan Posted July 12, 2012 Author Posted July 12, 2012 West Indians/Guyanese or trini- I like how they grew up.. Unlike most westernized men they didnt have everything handed to them. these guys are natural husslers and go getters. They have good work ethic and are strong like bull. Real men. Black or Indian? I am both Guyanese and Trini, but I am predominantly black on my dad's side (St Lucia). I have Amerindian and Portuguese ancestry, but far back. Get why you say that, there is a different ethic depending on how they were raised. I have a Trini friend who is exactly as you describe.
nessaaa Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Black or Indian? I am both Guyanese and Trini, but I am predominantly black on my dad's side (St Lucia). I have Amerindian and Portuguese ancestry, but far back. Get why you say that, there is a different ethic depending on how they were raised. I have a Trini friend who is exactly as you describe. Doesn't matter black or Indian, just as long as they grew up right. They tend to appreciate the little things in life most ppl take for granted, it's so cute. Plus I like how they can teach me about my own culture since I'm half Indian myself but I'm half European and was raised mostly by that side. Guys raised here are spoiled pussies, no offense. I can tell in your face that u got Guyanese and trini in you
FitChick Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Based on experience, I know my type. I avoid dating out of that range generally. It wouldn't be fair to the guy if I were not attracted to him. I don't date because I am bored or want a free meal.
Mme. Chaucer Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 I've never really had a "type." Whatever it is that I've really responded to in boys & men is evidently intangible. It's not physical characteristics, that's for sure, though I need a big attraction. That seems to come with the "energy" or whatever it is I have always gone for.
Eternal Sunshine Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 I've never really had a "type." Whatever it is that I've really responded to in boys & men is evidently intangible. It's not physical characteristics, that's for sure, though I need a big attraction. That seems to come with the "energy" or whatever it is I have always gone for. Would you say there are no similarities between men you went for (in either looks or personality)?
Lonely Ronin Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 My type is kind, confident, outgoing, athletic, intelligent, adventures, & attractive. unfortunately, I've come to realize women like this are transitory in my city. They live here for a few months to a year or two, and then move to a larger city with more culture, & things to do. God I need to find a new job ...
january2011 Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 (edited) I've been attracted to all sorts of guys and even a handful of women. The guys tended to be introverts, intelligent, knowledgeable, competent and good with words. The women tended to be extroverts. I'll admit that good looks will turn my head initially, but what makes me want to know more is that person's behaviour and how I feel when I'm with them. There's also something in their eyes when we look at each other - something within us resonates and there's an unspoken closeness and mutual understanding in the initial "getting to know each other" stages. Having said that, I've tended to date and be in relationships with guys who are ethnically Asian or partly Asian (Chinese, Vietnamese, Malaysian, Filipino), whether born in Asia or on another continent. Mutual attraction doesn't seem to go anywhere with any other guys or the women. Which is a shame, because sometimes the attraction was very strong and almost unbearable to the point of being able to "hear" my heart beating when I was around them and wanting to "jump their bones." Edited July 12, 2012 by january2011
jesslm_x0 Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 There is a pretty specific look that catches my attention in pictures, out in public, etc.; however, I am attracted to a much larger range of types when it comes to dating. I tend to find dark hair, rasta-like style, dreads, tattoos, etc. to be the most attractive. My friends have described the guys I find the most attractive to look "homeless" , but as you can guess they are generally pieces of crap who are going nowhere in life. With that being said, as long as there is something cute about the guy to keep my attention, their personality can easily get me hooked. My boyfriend now isn't my physical type at all. He's small with dirty blonde hair and blue eyes, but I find him so irresistible. So I guess I only have a type when it comes to simple day to day physical attraction to strangers. If that makes sense.
Mme. Chaucer Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Would you say there are no similarities between men you went for (in either looks or personality)? Not in looks - yes in personality and "type" of person. I only can go for a person who looks at things in a very skewed way (as I do - though their way can be completely different) and who has an irreverent sense of humor. Think outside of ANY box. Be creative. Have an internal life. They had to have an "edge" or even a hint of dangerousness. That got harder for me to find once I became a "straight edged" clean and sober person, but evidently I found one. As I matured, personal accountability (surprise, surprise) and a strong sense of gratitude became key, too.
sally4sara Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Looking back the only real constant was dark hair. With experience came a lot of learning what I don't want out of a partner. I did end up with a good idea of mandatory qualities I was looking for: highly intelligent, able to appreciate dark and absurd humor, inventive, very self sufficient, with a strong sense of social justice, concern for others before worrying about what they get out of any situation and the ability to see at least as much good in the world as they notice the bad.
curlygirl40 Posted July 13, 2012 Posted July 13, 2012 I think if I had to describe what she looked like, I would say a cross between Jada Pinkett and Hilary from Fresh Prince. Like the girl in your avatar?? I have a type. Or so my friends say. But yet I'm open to the fact that I could fall for someone who doesn't fit that 'type'. My type is rough around the edges, blue collar construction type guy. Some facial hair, drives a pick up truck. You know, like Mike Rowe. LOL (sp?) The last guy I fell for was architect dude. Clean cut, a little quiet. But sneaky funny and amazing in bed. Oh, did I say that out loud? So I'm open to the fact that I might not know he's my guy when I first lay eyes on him. I'm back to looking again. Match guys beware. LOL
Eclypse Posted July 13, 2012 Posted July 13, 2012 I've always had a thing for slim blonde girls. Cute face is the most important thing though. I don't think someone who is really tall or really short would be my "type" although I would certainly have no aversion to dating them. The girls I've fallen for generally tend to fit that sort of description, although I've fallen for some brunettes really hard. Basically the one constant has always been slim. That is probably the only dealbreaker for me. For me the most beautiful girl in the world and the benchmark to which I compare all is Emma Watson. Particularly in this pic here http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ijfnzUHAqtI/TnH_QKy5PuI/AAAAAAAAAeY/VuwZVH7tuZ0/s1600/Emma-Watson-Wallpapers-HD-4.jpg Personality-wise: She has to be kind. That is the most important. She should also be easy to talk to, as well as intelligent. I don't dig bimbos all that much. I'd prefer her to not be a party girl, as I am not really a party boy. Basically we need to be able to get along and when we have silences they must not be awkward. But really, all this shouldn't be too hard to achieve should it?
counterman Posted July 13, 2012 Posted July 13, 2012 My ideal type would be a girl similar to Alison Brie. She would be brunette, slim and height between 5'2" and 5'5". These girls are just the ones I find myself most attracted to. I don't know why but it just is. I've gone out with different girls though and have been attracted to range
El Brujo Posted July 13, 2012 Posted July 13, 2012 I know what type I'm attracted to, but unfortunately such women have certain traits that are discouraged in my culture and downright forbidden in some (authority figures in those cultures are afraid their subjects will start getting ideas).
irin Posted July 13, 2012 Posted July 13, 2012 I know what type I'm attracted to, but unfortunately such women have certain traits that are discouraged in my culture and downright forbidden in some (authority figures in those cultures are afraid their subjects will start getting ideas). sounds interesting care to explain ive never heard such a thing?
Recommended Posts