Algermas Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Then that's not a date. I would call that a hang-out. Keep trying. You won't change me. Oh I know I won't. Im just calling your father out for being a sexist and you for being an escort. Do you let men know in advance that you expect to be compensated for your companionship? It'd be a bit unethical not to.
Feelsgoodman Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 That's really just a really thinly veiled prostitute rhetoric women use. Men need to man up and be the ones asking women out, then the people who do the asking need to pay. I always laughed at this concept. Only a woman could come with such circular 'logic'.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 That's really just a really thinly veiled prostitute rhetoric women use. Men need to man up and be the ones asking women out, then the people who do the asking need to pay. Tee hee but im totally a strong and independent woman, all I need is his wallet.How about if I were to switch turns on the second date or so and pay? But... once again you assumed too fast thinking I'm only after his wallet.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Oh I know I won't. Im just calling your father out for being a sexist and you for being an escort. Do you let men know in advance that you expect to be compensated for your companionship? It'd be a bit unethical not to.And you should let women in advance know about your lack of dating etiquette and no-class personality.
Algermas Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 How about if I were to switch turns on the second date or so and pay? But... once again you assumed too fast thinking I'm only after his wallet. Or you could just stop using men as mealtickets and pay your own bills, radical concept in 2012, I know.
Algermas Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 And you should let women in advance know about your lack of dating etiquette and no-class personality. I always establish a fixed rate with all of my escorts.
Feelsgoodman Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 And you should let women in advance know about your lack of dating etiquette and no-class personality. Personally, I think it's you who has no class. Only a low-class person would feel entitled to another person's money. Classy people simply don't act that way.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Or you could just stop using men as mealtickets and pay your own bills, radical concept in 2012, I know.So what if it's 2012???
Algermas Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 So what if it's 2012??? Paying for a date was appropriate in a time when women didn't make any money because they were glorified baby incubators. In 2012 women have all the rights men have as they so enjoy telling us all day every day and they have jobs, make their own money. Why should men spend theirs so you can keep yours? I'll treat a woman like a lady once she cleans my socks, has dinner on the table within 20 minutes of me coming home from work and when she stays home to take care of our children.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 (edited) Personally, I think it's you who has no class. Only a low-class person would feel entitled to another person's money. Classy people simply don't act that way.Once again, I can careless about jewelry or expensive place. I'm not asking for that. That's would be the real definition of a woman going for the wallet. One tiny mention of your lack of dating manners and immediately we have to hear the word gold-digger or I'm already in the ''after his money'' category. So basically if you don't even try any effort I'm suppose to be happy and never say anything?? But you guys are going to extremes. What's next? Just walking around and sitting in the grass? Taking a girl in a place invested with mosquitos but still expecting her to stick around? Taking her to a crappy fast food restaurant and still complain about a $1 she didn't pay? Edited July 3, 2012 by samsungxoxo
Feelsgoodman Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Once again, I can careless about jewelry or expensive place. I'm not asking for that. That's would be the real definition of a woman going for the wallet. One tiny mention of your lack of dating manners and immediately we have to hear the word gold-digger or I'm already in the ''after his money'' category. So basically if you don't even try any effort I'm suppose to be happy and never say anything?? But you guys are going to extremes. What's next? Just walking around and sitting in the grass? Taking a girl in a place invested with mosquitos? Taking her to a crappy fast food restaurant and still complain about a $1 she didn't pay? If it's a matter of principle for you, why can't it also be a matter of principle for men? Maybe we don't like the idea of being treated as wallets, regardless of how much the date costs. Ever think of that? Or are you so self-centered that you can only see things from your perspective?
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 If it's a matter of principle for you, why can't it also be a matter of principle for men? Maybe we don't like the idea of being treated as wallets, regardless of how much the date costs. Ever think of that? Or are you so self-centered that you can only see things from your perspective?Well maybe I don't like the idea of getting treated like one of his buddies or ''just another man''. Only guy I would give permission to treat me like a buddy would be my childhood male friend.
Algermas Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Well maybe I don't like the idea of getting treated like one of his buddies. Only guy I would give permission to treat me like a buddy would be my childhood male friend. Maybe he doesn't like the feeling of having to pay for the priviledge of your presence.
Feelsgoodman Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Well maybe I don't like the idea of getting treated like one of his buddies. Only guy I would give permission to treat me like a buddy would be my childhood male friend. Now you're just grasping at straws. Your suggestion that a woman can only be treated as either a prostitute or a buddy is, quite frankly, insulting to normal women.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Maybe he doesn't like the feeling of having to pay for the priviledge of your presence.Maybe I don't like his attitude either.
Algermas Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Maybe I don't like his attitude either. Of course you don't, you think a working girl should be compensated for her time.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Now you're just grasping at straws. Your suggestion that a woman can only be treated as either a prostitute or a buddy is, quite frankly, insulting to normal women.That's how it apparently is. There seems to be no middle ground.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Of course you don't, you think a working girl should be compensated for her time.Comparing work to a date!!! Wow talk about logic...
Algermas Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Comparing work to a date!!! Wow talk about logic... Dating apparently is work for you, why else would you demand compensation for your time?
Feelsgoodman Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 That's how it apparently is. There seems to be no middle ground. Only in your warped vision.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Dating apparently is work for you, why else would you demand compensation for your time?Dating isn't mandatory while work is (there are supervisors, managers, etc). You can get fired from your job for being late frequently or doing nothing and it takes a while to find another position. Dating is an invitation.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Only in your warped vision.That's the same I think with you guys into the ''I asked her out but she still has to pay'' mentality. I see it as a warped vision as well too.
Algermas Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Dating isn't mandatory while work is (there are supervisors, managers, etc). You can get fired from your job for being late frequently or doing nothing and it takes a while to find another position. Dating is an invitation. We've been over this. The whole he invited me so he has to pay is such a thinly veiled excuse for prostitution a 5 year old could see through it.
samsungxoxo Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 We've been over this. The whole he invited me so he has to pay is such a thinly veiled excuse for prostitution a 5 year old could see through it.No it's common sense. If it was me invitating the man, then it would be me paying. Simple as that....
Recommended Posts