kaylan Posted May 8, 2012 Posted May 8, 2012 (edited) I'd probably not take MSN Careers as a best source...A pharmacist making more than a lawyer and CEO....REALLY??? very poor stats I think !! Lol @ your knowledge of the American workforce. Firstly, thats Msn dot Careerbuilder dot com. CareerBuilder being one of, if not THE top job site on the internet. Check their sources if youd like since you seem to doubt them. Given the professional connections and financial resources careerbuilder has to obtain data, I trust their findings. Secondly, MANY lawyers are not raking in cash hand over fist. Law is a super competitive field and my dad is a defense attorney, so I know this first hand. There are sooooo many lawyers competing to get cases in NY and its much harder if you are in private practice working for yourself and not with a firm. And if by chance the company is a public traded company that doesnt make lots of cash, the CEO wont make as much as what Americans think the typical CEO makes because you must pay shareholders first. Lastly, do you realize how many small businesses exist in this country? The CEO title is not only for super rich executives of fortune 500 corps. Realize that many business owners and execs may not rake in the cash you think they will because they have to pay off their employees, all their bills, and their taxes first. Edited May 8, 2012 by kaylan
LittlePrince Posted May 8, 2012 Posted May 8, 2012 Maybe they are considering people who work for giant pharmaceutical companies pharmacists and not just the guy or gal behind the counter at your local drug store.
Author LondonS Posted May 8, 2012 Author Posted May 8, 2012 Lol @ your knowledge of the American workforce. Firstly, thats Msn dot Careerbuilder dot com. CareerBuilder being one of, if not THE top job site on the internet. Check their sources if youd like since you seem to doubt them. Given the professional connections and financial resources careerbuilder has to obtain data, I trust their findings. Secondly, MANY lawyers are not raking in cash hand over fist. Law is a super competitive field and my dad is a defense attorney, so I know this first hand. There are sooooo many lawyers competing to get cases in NY and its much harder if you are in private practice working for yourself and not with a firm. And if by chance the company is a public traded company that doesnt make lots of cash, the CEO wont make as much as what Americans think the typical CEO makes because you must pay shareholders first. Lastly, do you realize how many small businesses exist in this country? The CEO title is not only for super rich executives of fortune 500 corps. Realize that many business owners and execs may not rake in the cash you think they will because they have to pay off their employees, all their bills, and their taxes first. I work in Investment Banking and fly to US like 8 times a year if not more....and I am still not so convinced about these stats. Just like CEO can be of a big or a small org, a pharmacist cant work in any size of a setting....strange
SteveC80 Posted May 8, 2012 Posted May 8, 2012 The only people who complain about looks being important are people who get rejected for their looks..Those of us attractive enough to get what we want dont complain.. I love the fact i was and am able to slepe with very beautiful women who get me so hard and worked up into a frenzy with their face body curves and whole package.. Id hate it if i couldnt get soeobdy i was physcially attracted to at all..sex would suck if i coulfn't even get it up for a women.. 1
FrustratedStandards Posted May 8, 2012 Posted May 8, 2012 I knew someone like you would bite on this...tbh, I thought most people who went to college took notice of just how many more man there were in majors that typical earned more, while there were more women in majors that earned less. Check these links out, and if you want more Ill be glad to provide. MSN Careers - 25 best-paying jobs for women - Career Advice Article Jobs In Nursing And Teaching: Why Do Women Choose To Earn Less? | The Latest | LearnVest - Where life gets richer Also, if you care to do a little googling yourself, try this; Look up the average salary for teachers, social workers, the arts, secretaries, nurses, etc. Then look at the high percentage of women in these positions. Part of the reason there are less men in some fields is because many guys feel the societal push to earn a lot of money....and also because many dudes dont want to do something that is considered "womens work" Now take this post in which you are trying to prove a point, and apply to how I am wrong in thinking that a woman should want a man to pay for a date. Here you are convincing me that men make more, yet in AAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLL my other threads you complain about men having to pay for dates. Hmmm...
FrustratedStandards Posted May 8, 2012 Posted May 8, 2012 the only people who complain about looks being important are people who get rejected for their looks..those of us attractive enough to get what we want dont complain.. i love the fact i was and am able to slepe with very beautiful women who get me so hard and worked up into a frenzy with their face body curves and whole package.. Id hate it if i couldnt get soeobdy i was physcially attracted to at all..sex would suck if i coulfn't even get it up for a women.. exactly!!!
Nistan Posted May 8, 2012 Posted May 8, 2012 The dating world is like what constituted as medical treatment 500 years ago. alot of superstition and ooga booga. And this was because nobody knew WTF they where doing. Alot of house cures, like garlic between your toes, was quite common. Also blaming the victim, the sick, for being possessed or being an evil person that have been cursed by god was common also. I can see the same things happening in the dating world. What society needs is an authorative voice in what makes attraction tick. Just like we have with the medical field. Somebody that can tell us, point by point, how to have a good lovelife. How to change what you are attracted too to suit your plans. Example: You want to find a longterm partner. The experts tell you that you should have this wide of spread in what you find attractive and help you calibrate for that. And They also tell you what you should look for to make yourself as attractive for the likeminded prospective partner. Not very exciting perhaps, but Judging by these kind of boards, people are just about fed up with excitement and want definitive answers to their problems. Funny thing is, this sensible outlook on dating already have a prototype in the kink community. They need to be very honest with what they like and disslike. Thats a start. But i want it to bee more comprehensible.
Author LondonS Posted May 9, 2012 Author Posted May 9, 2012 The only people who complain about looks being important are people who get rejected for their looks..Those of us attractive enough to get what we want dont complain.. I love the fact i was and am able to slepe with very beautiful women who get me so hard and worked up into a frenzy with their face body curves and whole package.. Id hate it if i couldnt get soeobdy i was physcially attracted to at all..sex would suck if i coulfn't even get it up for a women.. Strongly Disagree....I started this thread and I look very good, have money AND I can date who I want as well....!
LittlePrince Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 The only people who complain about looks being important are people who get rejected for their looks..Those of us attractive enough to get what we want dont complain.. I love the fact i was and am able to slepe with very beautiful women who get me so hard and worked up into a frenzy with their face body curves and whole package.. Id hate it if i couldnt get soeobdy i was physcially attracted to at all..sex would suck if i coulfn't even get it up for a women.. So why are you here stud? 2
SteveC80 Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 So why are you here stud? For one im voyeuristic and am curious about others.I have no problems getting women but i am not one who wants a relatinship with them iim trying to figure out why thats the case with myself But not everyone on here is an ugly outcast /social retard who cant attract and have a normal conversation with a women sorry to burst your bubble
LittlePrince Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 For one im voyeuristic and am curious about others.I have no problems getting women but i am not one who wants a relatinship with them iim trying to figure out why thats the case with myself But not everyone on here is an ugly outcast /social retard who cant attract and have a normal conversation with a women sorry to burst your bubble The rest are here due to relationship drama typically.
Recommended Posts