Negative Nancy Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Is it ? I don't know what is so "sexy" about a French accent, seriously. In my opinion it's the gayest sounding accent in the world, especially when the men speak it. If a French male talked to me like that, I would dry up faster than a cactus in the desert.
ThatDudeXO Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) People need to stop over analysing. The guys posting are just jealous, like I am. This guy is obviously a sexual magnet which is something every male poster here would love to be. So do your thing ES, get your groove on. My only concern is 1. You usually don't do this and 2. When you're sleeping with someone extremely attractive, you are more than likely going to catch some sort of feelings from them. Which are 2 things that could hurt you by banging this dude. I just don't want ES to get hurt by this and I'm happy that she's able to come off a rough break up and bag a hottie already! You go girl! Edited March 26, 2012 by ThatDudeXO 1
ThaWholigan Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 People need to stop over analysing. The guys posting are just jealous, like I am. This guy is obviously a sexual magnet which is something every male poster here would love to be. So do your thing ES, get your groove on. My only concern is 1. You usually don't do this and 2. When you're sleeping with someone extremely attractive, you are more than likely going to catch some sort of feelings from them. Which are 2 things that could hurt you by banging this dude. I just don't want ES to get hurt by this and I'm happy that she's able to come off a rough break up and bag a hottie already! You go girl! I actually agree you know And I'll add: With regards to wanting to be a sexual magnet, it is not as if this cannot be done to oneself. Hell, If I lived on a proper diet, went to the gym 4 times a day and did all that **** that models do, I could be one . So guys, if you want the kind of admiration this guy is getting, work on that and you'll probably get it 1
kaylan Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) You don't seems to know reading comprehension very well. Dear I wouldnt talk about read comprehension if I were you. I know many guys would sleep with a gal they found unattractive or had little attractive for. In fact I make use of the words last resort and grenade for fellow friends for such gals. I put "Many guys wouldn't sleep with a gal they found unattractive or had little attraction for."Yes, you said many, and I also said many. Your point? I was providing the other side of things. Which basically means that your earlier post about what some guys do, is not an end all be all statement. Especially when many men sleep with women they dont find attractive just for the sake of getting off. Its highly prevalent. If I thought many guys wouldn't sleep with a gal they found unattractive or had little attraction I would but most guys wouldn't do such a thing. If I thought no guys would sleep with a gal they didn't find unattractive or had little attraction for I would put no guys would do such a thing.And where did I say your assertion was completely wrong? And where did I make any statements about what you think? I never said any thing like that. I even started my statement with "And"...so please dont make insinuations about what I meant. I was actually adding onto what you were say. So how about you read better yourself next time. Like I said, I was simply providing the obvious truth men know about how some guys view sex, and I was providing the other side of things from a male perspective. Seeing as I am male and know plenty of men, and also because men are more honest with each other than with women, I think what I said has plenty of merit. Anyways, you cant say "many folks do this" and then expect people to surmise that "many people also do the opposite of this". If you do not state the latter, why would people be expected to draw such a conclusion? Thus I provided that alternate conclusion...feel me? Also, given how many men there are out there, saying "many" doesnt mean much on either side of the coin since "many" can be 1% of the male population and still be a lot of people. So allow me to amend my previous post. I believe the majority of men would have sex with a woman they found unattractive if they really wanted to get off Edited March 26, 2012 by kaylan
BetheButterfly Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 :bunny: V. excited. Met him in a night club and am pretty sure he only wants a fling. That's fine by me, I am too emotionally drained for anything else anyway. We didn't have sex yet but....chemistry is off the scale. OMFGOMFGOMFG he is the most physically perfect specimen I have ever laid my eyes on. He is 25, 6"2' with a body of a greek god (6-pack and everything), deep olive skin, black hair and the biggest green eyes I have ever seen. He is pretty much perfect. He is witty, fun and has the sexiest accent. We are texting all day long. Just livin' in the moment Well, I am happy for you and sad for you at the same time. I'm happy in that you are temporarily happy. I'm sad because after it's over, the thought might cross your mind about why it couldn't be a long-term relationship instead of a fling. Anyways, although looks are important, what is most important is the heart, because there are very handsome people who can be very ugly inside, and there are very common-looking people who are gorgeous on the inside (their personality/soul/spirit) I encourage you to look at this man's heart (soul/spirit), instead of just his body. From my experience, the best sex I have is with my husband, for the following reasons: 1. His heart (soul and spirit) are drop-dead handsome. 2. He loves me. 3. I love him. 4. Even though he is indeed handsome, I know that if anything happened to his physical body, I would still love him, because my love for him is not dependent on his physical body, but on his heart (soul/spirit) 5. I'm pretty, but i know without a doubt I'm not drop-dead gorgeous. However, I am so grateful because I know my husband will love me even if I am no longer as pretty, which inevitably will happen one day. (not all people use surgery in order to try to prevent growing old.) Also, I know if something happens to me, he will still love me and not abandon me. Don't you want that kind of love? Why settle for less? Just curious.
udolipixie Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Dear I wouldnt talk about read comprehension if I were you. Yes, you said many, and I also said many. Your point? I was providing the other side of things. Which basically means that your earlier post about what some guys do, is not an end all be all statement. Especially when many men sleep with women they dont find attractive just for the sake of getting off. Its highly prevalent. My point was that it was a bit irrelevant to provide the other side of things as I didn't attempt to portray my statement as the end all be all or negate/diminish the other side of things that many men do sleep with women they find unattractive or have little attraction towards. So taking my comment and stating the other side saying women don't really seem to know men at all was a bit inapplicable there to me. And where did I say your assertion was completely wrong? And where did I make any statements about what you think? I never said any thing like that. I even started my statement with "And"...so please dont make insinuations about what I meant. I was actually adding onto what you were say. Egh.. Where did I claim you said my assertion was completely wrong? Where did I claim you were making statements about what I think? I was stating that if I thought this other side didn't existed I wouldn't have phrased my statement in the way I did. Nothing about you making statements about what I think. Seems you're doing the insinuations about what I meant. So how about you read better yourself next time. I really think you'd be best suited to take that advice yourself. Like I said, I was simply providing the obvious truth men know about how some guys view sex, and I was providing the other side of things from a male perspective. As I said in my response to you my statement wasn't diminish, negating, or denying this truth. In fact in the response you oh s o quoted I even stated that even with he many guys who don't generally there would likely be a few women who were last resorts or grenades for fellow friends. Anyways, you cant say "many folks do this" and then expect people to surmise that "many people also do the opposite of this". If you do not state the latter, why would people be expected to draw such a conclusion? Thus I provided that alternate conclusion...feel me? Hmm...seems you have little faith in people being logical or I have more faith in people being logical. Toss up. To me most behaviors have an opposite so I would think most people will conclude there's an opposite behavior. To me many doesn't imply the majority or the general behavior so there would be people who do the opposite. Do recall: I put "Many guys wouldn't sleep with a gal they found unattractive or had little attraction for." If I thought many guys wouldn't sleep with a gal they found unattractive or had little attraction I would but most guys wouldn't do such a thing. If I thought no guys would sleep with a gal they didn't find unattractive or had little attraction for I would put no guys would do such a thing.
BetheButterfly Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Is it ? I don't know what is so "sexy" about a French accent, seriously. In my opinion it's the gayest sounding accent in the world, especially when the men speak it. If a French male talked to me like that, I would dry up faster than a cactus in the desert. I don't think the French accent is particularly sexy, though I understand why other people would think so. To me, the Spanish accent is sexy. My husband has an extremely sexy accent!!! Last week I talked with a very nice elderly French gentleman. He had a sweet little dog with him and we instantly became kindred spirit friends. We talked about dogs and horses and nature and God and France and I really liked his accent and his friendly, courteous demeanor. So, while to me, the French accent is interesting and has a nice sound, especially when accompanied by a nice person, I see why other people would consider the French accent to be sexy, if that's what they were looking for.
Koaks Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 French are cowards! So is this pretty boy...ehm..playboy...i think he should date FrustratedStandards for ES.... 1
EmpoweredWoman Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 People need to stop over analysing. The guys posting are just jealous, like I am. This guy is obviously a sexual magnet which is something every male poster here would love to be. So do your thing ES, get your groove on. My only concern is 1. You usually don't do this and 2. When you're sleeping with someone extremely attractive, you are more than likely going to catch some sort of feelings from them. Which are 2 things that could hurt you by banging this dude. I just don't want ES to get hurt by this and I'm happy that she's able to come off a rough break up and bag a hottie already! You go girl! You sound like an effeminate bitch. What kind of man utters the words "Get your groove on" ? Who cares about being a sexual magnet. I'm not a chick magnet, but who says I'm willing to take up a homosexual profession like modeling to do it, even if i had the looks? That is like the morons who say they wish they were male porn stars. In real life, male porn stars are nothing but pieces of ****/sexual objects. Roles and jobs where women dominate, are dominated by women for a reason: they are humiliating and require no human dignity, but pay really well. In other words, only whores do them. Modeling is one of those jobs. The fact that women would consider a male model to be something to worship instead of something to be disgusted by (from a spiritual point of view) just shows how warped 21st century "wimmin" are. **** the bisexual French model, **** the shallow/soulless 2 legged vagina OP, and most importantly, **** you, you ****in fagot.
Koaks Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 OP is a shallow, cold sore covered, FAT human female with STD's.
kaylan Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) My point was that it was a bit irrelevant to provide the other side of things as I didn't attempt to portray my statement as the end all be all or negate/diminish the other side of things that many men do sleep with women they find unattractive or have little attraction towards. Why is it pointless? Simply because you say it is? Look, youre statement can come off a certain way to some people, hence theres no reason that the other side of things shouldnt be presented. Its an open discussion so if the other side of things can be presented, then they should be. My point was just to show people that men do the exact opposite of what you pointed out. It allows for a more complete world view to those reading. Plain and simple. So taking my comment and stating the other side saying women don't really seem to know men at all was a bit inapplicable there to me.When your original statement is incomplete and doesnt reference the other side of things, you will in fact have some guys believing you dont know us well. And based on the posts of some women on this forum, I feel confident standing behind my position that a good bit of women dont know men very well. And based on your posting history, this is applicable to you in my opinion...so it is what it is. I believe the sheer bulk of men and women dont understand the opposite sex as well as they think, myself included. Egh.. Where did I claim you said my assertion was completely wrong? Where did I claim you were making statements about what I think?You clearly missed what I was getting at. Because I never said anything about you being wrong, then it was pointless to make that whole distinction between "many" and "most", especially when my post added onto what you were saying by using the word "and" as a preface. I was stating that if I thought this other side didn't existed I wouldn't have phrased my statement in the way I did. Nothing about you making statements about what I think. Seems you're doing the insinuations about what I meant. With the way you worded you statement, you cant expect everyone to surmise that you were in fact acknowledging the other side of things. You need to in fact show us that you recognize the other side, you cant simply assume people will see that...especially when you say things like "many guys do this or that" I really think you'd be best suited to take that advice yourself. You just seem to be truly missing the ball completely and having trouble understanding what I am saying. As I said in my response to you my statement wasn't diminish, negating, or denying this truth. In fact in the response you oh s o quoted I even stated that even with he many guys who don't generally there would likely be a few women who were last resorts or grenades for fellow friends.Where did I say you were diminishing, negating or denying anything? I was simply saying you should acknowledge the other side of things with your original statement, especially when you say "many men do or dont do X" Hmm...seems you have little faith in people being logical or I have more faith in people being logical. Toss up. To me most behaviors have an opposite so I would think most people will conclude there's an opposite behavior. To me many doesn't imply the majority or the general behavior so there would be people who do the opposite. Do recall:Yes most behaviors have an opposite...but my point was, that on a discussion forum, if you present an opinion such as "many men/women do this or that" plenty of folks reading that statement will recognize that you are not acknowledging the other side of things. Unless you state your recognition of the other side of the argument, people cant and wont know that you recognize it. Folks are not mind readers. We can only know what you present to us in regards to your own opinions. Again, the entire point of my post from before, was just to point out that many guys sleep with women they find unattractive. I was not arguing that many guys sleep only with women they do find attractive. Again, I was simply completing the chain by providing male insight into the opposite behavior which you did not touch on. Again: Anyways, you cant say "many folks do this" and then expect people to surmise that "many people also do the opposite of this". If you do not state the latter, why would people be expected to draw such a conclusion? Thus I provided that alternate conclusion...feel me? Also, given how many men there are out there, saying "many" doesnt mean much on either side of the coin since "many" can be 1% of the male population and still be a lot of people. So allow me to amend my previous post. I believe the majority of men would have sex with a woman they found unattractive if they really wanted to get off So thats all I really have to say on the matter. If you decide to provide a rebuttal, I preemptively redirect you to post #99 (this entire post). Because any reply you do provide will only garner a rewording of my already stated response. Theres no need to go back and forth regurgitating our positions. tootlez Edited March 26, 2012 by kaylan
udolipixie Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Unless you state your recognition of the other side of the argument, people cant and wont know that you recognize it. Again, I was simply completing the chain by providing male insight into the opposite behavior which you did not touch on. This is why I suggested reading comprehension to you. I did include the other side when I stated with the many men who generally don't sleep with there would likely be last resorts and grenades for fellow friends In fact in one of my posts you quote in your respond I state I included the other side. I didn't say pointless I stated irrelevant as I wasn't saying that many men don't sleep with gals they find unattractive or have little attraction for. I can see how my statement could come off to people a certain way if I stated most, the majority, or all men do this as it would suggest the opposite behavior is uncommon or too few to be significant. I can see how my statement could come off to people a certain way if I tried to diminish, negate, or deny the opposite. I can see how my statement could come off to people a certain way if I hadn't included the other side in my response that many men who generally don't sleep with there would likely still be last resorts and grenades for fellow friends. I can see how my statement could come off if people only read that one statement seems I as I don't think people just read one statement in a response and that's it. With the way I included the other side in my response with that many men who generally don't sleep with there would likely be last resorts and grenades for fellow friends I can expect everyone who read my response and understood it to surmise that I was in fact acknowledging the other side of things. As I stated it seems either you have have little faith in people being logical or I have more faith in people being logical. Toss up. Where did I claim you were stating that I was diminishing, negating or denying anything? Little tip: Unless I state that "You're saying I'm etc" I'm not saying you're doing anything. :lmao: I said I wasn't diminishing, negating, or denying the other side and in fact included it to show that taking my comment to say women don't know men at all and showing the other side was irrelevant to me. All I have to say if one is not attempt to portray a statement as the end all be all or negate/diminishing the other side of things and included the other side of things it's a bit irrelevant to me to be redundant and state the other side of things. As well as taking my comment and stating the other side saying women don't really seem to know men at all was a bit inapplicable there to me. tootlez
kaylan Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) *Yawn* Reread your original statement which I quoted(the one I first quoted by you), then refer back to post 99. Edited March 26, 2012 by kaylan
udolipixie Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 *Yawn* Youre still not getting it. Reread your original statement which I quoted(the one I first quoted by you), then refer back to post 99. Yawn you're still not getting it. It's that reading comprehension of yours. Reread the response the statement was in. Stating that I didn't include the other side and etc when I did. Even stating that I didn't include the other side when quoting me saying I did. Do you just read one line and assume what the person included/excluded? I can totally get how you came to your point if you do so.
kaylan Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Youre still not getting it. Your first statement did not include the other side of the argument, hence why I responded the way I originally did. Again, reread your original statement which I quoted(the one I first quoted by you), then refer back to post 99.
ThaWholigan Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 This one is gonna go on for a while I think ............................... 1
udolipixie Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Youre still not getting it. Your first statement did not include the other side of the argument, hence why I responded the way I originally did. Again, reread your original statement which I quoted(the one I first quoted by you), then refer back to post 99. You're still not getting it. I know the response my first statement was in did include the other side. I can see how my statement could come off if people only read that one statement rather than the response the statement was. Hence why I stated taking my comment and stating the other side saying women don't really seem to know men at all was a bit inapplicable there to me. As I didn't attempt to portray a statement as the end all be all or negate/diminish the other side of things and included the other side of things. Quite amusing to see you state I didn't include something when I did..nope you were saying just the statement but that I hadn't presented it at all. Base off of one statement rather than the response. So.. Do you just read one line and assume what the person included/excluded? I can totally get how you came to your point if you do so.
somedude81 Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 This one is gonna go on for a while I think ............................... That's why I walked away I made my point and I'm happy with that. There was nothing to gain nor was it an issue that I even cared about. Now I just wish I was a model and having women post threads about how excited they are that they get to sleep with me. That's the life.
kaylan Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) Keywords just about. The man in question is far above average and hot. More difficult as in being in the range of attractiveness he likes and him having options that most likely exceed her attraction. Many guys wouldn't sleep with a gal they found unattractive or had little attraction for. Many hot guys wouldn't sleep with a gal they consider just attractive when they have far more attractive options. Perhaps it is exciting for her to have an extremely attractive guy to fling about. Most people do enjoy sex and would prefer having an attractive partner and in this case the attractiveness is far above standard attractiveness. Getting him into an exclusive relationship is an accomplishment if she considers it one. You and her many have different opinions on what's an accomplishment. If she only wants a fling getting it may be an accomplishment for her. Where exactly is the other side of the argument? You never stated that plenty of attractive guys would sleep with a girl they found unattractive, for the sole purpose of getting off. I stated this because I was simply providing the other side when you didnt. I dont see what this was ever a big deal. You left it out, I provided it. No issue here. Its an open discussion. You made a statement about guys, in which turn I replied and made a statement about male behavior. No biggie Case and point. Edited March 26, 2012 by kaylan
ThaWholigan Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 That's why I walked away I made my point and I'm happy with that. There was nothing to gain nor was it an issue that I even cared about. Now I just wish I was a model and having women post threads about how excited they are that they get to sleep with me. That's the life. True. I think once I get my diet&workout sorted out I might do a little bit of that, maybe some extra/acting work. My dad's in the biz so I can probably get contacts . When I'm rich I'll hire you a personal trainer
udolipixie Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) Where exactly is the other side of the argument? I think most of those gals the guy was attracted to and for the ones that weren't they were just there last resort or grenades for their fellow friends. Yay reading comprehension. You never stated that plenty of attractive guys would sleep with a girl they found unattractive, for the sole purpose of getting off. I stated this because I was simply providing the other side when you didnt. I dont see what this was ever a big deal. Egh if people read the thread they'd see my posts stating the other side. Posts that came before yours I posted in #71 & #75 you posted #83 quoting #71 to take my statement and say women don't understand men at all. Hence why I stated irrelevant and redundant to me. You left it out, I provided it. No issue here. Its an open discussion. Your reading comprehension left it out. You even overlooked the last resort and grenade for fellow friends when you quoted me saying so in your responses. You made a statement about guys, in which turn I replied and made a statement about male behavior. No biggie I didn't state it was a biggie. I stated taking my comment and stating the other side saying women don't really seem to know men at all was a bit inapplicable there to me. Case and point. Edited March 26, 2012 by udolipixie
kaylan Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) Yay reading comprehension. Egh if people read the thread they'd see my posts stating the other side. Posts that came before yours. Hence why I stated irrelevant and redundant to me. Your reading comprehension left it out. You even overlooked the last resort and grenade for fellow friends when you quoted me saying so in your responses. I didn't state it was a biggie. I stated taking my comment and stating the other side saying women don't really seem to know men at all was a bit inapplicable there to me. Case and point. Again, In a real life conversation, if person A said "many guys do this" and person B replied "many guys also do the opposite", person A would not be protesting with person B's observation. Again, you said ""I think most of those gals the guy was attracted to and for the ones that weren't they were just there last resort or grenades for their fellow friends."" Thats not the opposite of what you said about "many men doing X", and its not the the same thing I said. What you said does not equal my position that many guys sleep with women they find unattractive just to get off. All you simply did was point out that if a guy did sleep with an unattractive girl here or there, that he was in fact desperate. My position was that many guys do this often just to get off. And also that most have done this at some point in there life. Comprehension is apparently not your friend. Again, person A provides one side, person B then cleans up by providing the other side. Points are made...end of discussion. Also, the way you speak in this thread and others gives me plenty of reason to think you dont understand men as well as you think. Edited March 26, 2012 by kaylan
Star Gazer Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Kaylan: You've taken yet another thread completely off topic with your incessant need to pick apart other people's opinions. Your recent posts have NOTHING to do with the OP and are simply designed at hurling insults at another poster. Move along already. 6
udolipixie Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Again, In a real life conversation, if person A said "many guys do this" and person B replied "many guys also do the opposite", person A would not be protesting with person B's observation. I'm not protesting your observation. If you're implying that I am please show me where I protested this? I stated taking my comment and stating the other side saying women don't really seem to know men at all was a bit inapplicable there to me. I stated saying I didn't present the other side was false as I did and didn't portray a statement as the end all be all or negate/diminishing the other side of things. Again, you said ""I think most of those gals the guy was attracted to and for the ones that weren't they were just there last resort or grenades for their fellow friends."" Again I said that in #71 and was questioned about it with the other side responding with #75 applying the other side to my statement all on the same page. Again those with reading comprehension will on the same page & right below my post will see a post questioning it with the other side and me responding and presenting the other side and applying it to those that generally don't operate that way. Thats not the opposite of what you said about "many men doing X", and its not the the same thing I said. What you said does not equal my position that many guys sleep with women they find unattractive just to get off. All you simply did was point out that if a guy did sleep with an unattractive girl here or there, that he was in fact desperate. My position was that many guys do this often just to get odd. What I said acknowledges that even guys who . So logically: A behavior has an opposite. The person isn't negating or dimishing the opposite. The person is not attempting to make their statement the end all be all. The person doesn't state most or the majority of guys do this just many so it's not as if the person is stating the amount of guys who do the possite is few or insifgnificant. The person even recognizes the other side in the guys who generally don't operate that way. Hmmm... seems logical reasoning is not your friend.
Recommended Posts