OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 And you can't make up false defenitions of what cheating is. Looking at porn is not cheating. defenitions, no. Definition, yes. Guess what? I define some possible elements of it as cheating within my intimate relationship --- you don't have to agree with that and I don't have to agree with you --- we're not in a relationship together nor would nor will we ever be in one, so it's of little personal consequence to either of us what we define cheating as. I hate to break it to you but a lot of women ARE turned on by porn and things like gangbangs and such. I am HARDLY atypical for liking this kind of stuff. As anti social as I am I KNOW of other females who like anal and Rocco Siffredi (male pornstar who likes it rough) in particular. I am by no means the exception; there are plenty of women who enjoy watching and don't find this kind of stuff offensive. Oh I know that aspect *in general* isn't exactly atypical (although as a female I can't relate, gang-bangs etc are not personally arousing to me). I do like anal though
dasein Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 To some porn is cheating because you give your sexual energy and attention to other women. If porn is cheating then so is reading romance novels that result in sexual fantasies, watching soap operas that result in sexual fantasies, together with any other activity in which 100% of one's energy is not devoted entirely to one's relationship partner, family concerns, friends, etc. Sure you are comfortable with your definition as typed?
norajane Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 I'm not going to argue that you should only do vanilla missionary, but when you're dreaming about getting gang banged and bukkake'd , I don't think any logical man would want you as a wife. Do you make any distinction between masturbatory fantasies and reality? You might be interested in a book called "Women on Top", written by Nancy Friday. It's a collection of fantasies sent in by women, with Ms Friday's psychological perspectives on them. I don't necessarily agree with all her analysis, but it's quite fascinating to read the fantasies. The collection of fantasies you describe so vividly can fall into the "not getting enough sexual satisfaction" category. Meaning, many women who are not sexually satisfied by their current sex life, might focus on fantasies of many men, or excess of sexual stimulation, perhaps as a way to work out her sexual frustration. Those particular fantasies are her way of wishing for more or better or more satisfying sex. Like I said, you can agree or disagree on her views, but it's kinda fascinating to read. She also wrote "Men in Love", a similar book with a long collection of men's fantasies. That was even more fascinating to read.
OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 You're a woman(seems that way anyway by looking at your profile). You are not sexually liberated what so ever. You are conservative. Missionary for 5 minutes with the lights shut off is pretty much where the line goes for women. Anything more adventorous than that is a no no. No you don't. Cool story bro. Oh hi Ely.
Floridaman Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 No they don't. If their husbands prefer porn then they won't pester their wifes for sex every day. It's a win win situation. The husbands can watch porn while the wifes take a hot bath, relax and read a book and doesn't get bothered by their husbands for sex. It's not that simplistic. Could point to two LS posters, IDreamOfTigers and DuckDuckGoose who literally had to BEG their husband's for OS... Seems their husbands prefered to MB to imaginary women on a computer screen... In DuckDuckGoose's case, her husband's excessive porn use was a major factor in his filing for divorce.
Wolf18 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 I hate to break it to you but a lot of women ARE turned on by porn and things like gangbangs and such. I am HARDLY atypical for liking this kind of stuff. As anti social as I am I KNOW of other females who like anal and Rocco Siffredi (male pornstar who likes it rough) in particular. I am by no means the exception; there are plenty of women who enjoy watching and don't find this kind of stuff offensive. Women are by nature masochistic and submissive. This is respectable and a part of our instincts as humans. But sometimes women disgust me with just how low they're willing to go just to get some scumbag like rocco off lol. I have to also agree with prez that women who claim to love anal and all that nonesense are probably just saying that to be popular with men/please their dirtbag boyfriend (any man who wants to do something as painful as put it in your ass probably respects you less than even I do). I bet if the schlong fit in their ear they'd start saying "I LOVE AUDIAL SEX OHHH YAAA BABY".
TheBigQuestion Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Women are by nature masochistic and submissive. This is respectable and a part of our instincts as humans. But sometimes women disgust me with just how low they're willing to go just to get some scumbag like rocco off lol. I have to also agree with prez that women who claim to love anal and all that nonesense are probably just saying that to be popular with men/please their dirtbag boyfriend (any man who wants to do something as painful as put it in your ass probably respects you less than even I do). I bet if the schlong fit in their ear they'd start saying "I LOVE AUDIAL SEX OHHH YAAA BABY". Orly? Provided that the following conditions are met: 1. There is enough lube. 2. The woman is sufficiently aroused and relaxed. 3. The respective sizes of the parts involved are similar, anal sex is not any more painful than regular sex. There are MANY women who find the act pleasurable. Many find the orgasm they receive from it more intense than orgasms from regular sex. The main reason it has a reputation for being painful is because a lot of people have no clue what they're doing and do it just plain wrong. You can be disgusted and against it all you want (I personally don't see the big deal), but you might want to actually learn about it before speaking about it.
Duckduckgoose Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Wives of porn addicts suffer a lot. Or ex-wives.
Wolf18 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Orly? Provided that the following conditions are met: 1. There is enough lube. 2. The woman is sufficiently aroused and relaxed. 3. The respective sizes of the parts involved are similar, anal sex is not any more painful than regular sex. There are MANY women who find the act pleasurable. Many find the orgasm they receive from it more intense than orgasms from regular sex. The main reason it has a reputation for being painful is because a lot of people have no clue what they're doing and do it just plain wrong. You can be disgusted and against it all you want (I personally don't see the big deal), but you might want to actually learn about it before speaking about it. I'm so sorry, I just never understood the argument that the anus is for penetration that sodomites make... I mean Buttslamming-Americans (I'm sure butt pirates will soon be a protected minority in America). Maybe you ought to actually try it out with a real life girl instead of going by the interviews Seymour Butts in his auditions and see if it hurts. They do it only because men pressure them or because they are perverts themselves who get off on being violated in unnatural ways. Did you know women can orgasm from a myriad of different things? Even men if you havent changed your oil in a while. Just because some people get off on getting it in an area that's clearly not meant for sex doesn't make it legitimate or any less repulsive. Some sickos can probably orgasm from nailing their penis to a chopping block , do you see any big deal in that? Evidence that the anus isn't for "sex" (sodomy isn't even sex) is the myriad of illnesses and conditions that come from practicing it. Men who like to sodomize things probably have a marked homosexual streak, no surprise considering the average modern American man is a ****ing panty-waist.
OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 (edited) I'm so sorry, I just never understood the argument that the anus is for penetration that sodomites make... I mean Buttslamming-Americans (I'm sure butt pirates will soon be a protected minority in America). Maybe you ought to actually try it out with a real life girl instead of going by the interviews Seymour Butts in his auditions and see if it hurts. They do it only because men pressure them or because they are perverts themselves who get off on being violated in unnatural ways. Did you know women can orgasm from a myriad of different things? Even men if you havent changed your oil in a while. Just because some people get off on getting it in an area that's clearly not meant for sex doesn't make it legitimate or any less repulsive. Some sickos can probably orgasm from nailing their penis to a chopping block , do you see any big deal in that? Evidence that the anus isn't for "sex" (sodomy isn't even sex) is the myriad of illnesses and conditions that come from practicing it. Men who like to sodomize things probably have a marked homosexual streak, no surprise considering the average modern American man is a ****ing panty-waist. TheBigQuestion is right. You have a lot to learn, Wolfy. And you really shouldn't try speaking for what women feel and or genuinely enjoy --- it certainly does enhance pleasure and is awesomely intense, in a good way. For me. Whatevs, I got no shame. It's awesome. And men can be perfectly straight but enjoy penetrating a woman's rectum (and or having their own rectum/prostrate stimulated). You're so hell-bent about using condoms and idolizing them, it would protect your penis from feces (which the penis RARELY gets infected from anal sex anyway LOL, even unprotected [the bigger concern is VB for the woman heh, but precautions can prevent that too]) the same way it would protect it from an oozing disease of an infected and or "frequented" vagina. I'm sure one day you will shed your ignorance and immaturity heh. (as for the oral copulation associated with sodomy, are you against that too? Or just the anal / animal references? 'Cause I think I'm also perfectly okay with having my mouth "defiled" or my mouth "defiling" my lover's penis too... and vice versa, lawl ('cept swap penis for clit). Mouths weren't apparently "meant for sex" either, oh freaking wows). Edited November 1, 2011 by OnyxSnowfall
somedude81 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 You're so hell-bent about using condoms and idolizing them, it would protect your penis from feces (which the penis RARELY gets infected from anal sex anyway LOL, even unprotected [the bigger concern is VB for the woman heh, but precautions can prevent that too]) the same way it would protect it from an oozing disease of an infected and or "frequented" vagina. Actually, the majority of HIV infections are caused/transmitted by unprotected anal sex. That area is simply not designed to accommodate a penis. I have nothing against anal sex or the people who do it. Personally I haven't tried it and have no interest in it. I'd only do it if the woman brings it up.
OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 (edited) Actually, the majority of HIV infections are caused/transmitted by unprotected anal sex. That area is simply not designed to accommodate a penis. I have nothing against anal sex or the people who do it. Personally I haven't tried it and have no interest in it. I'd only do it if the woman brings it up. Gasp, yeah...... HIV. Anal sex does carry a higher risk for HIV as opposed to most other sexual activities. Although it isn't the feces that transmits the infection (though blood can be present in it which does). I believe it's more risky with anal sex because it's easier to tear the area up Alas I was thinking Wolfy was afraid of feces and the penis getting infected by it or something Lol (like Ely thought :X [i suppose hepatitis is a possibility]). But thanks for calling it out heh - it's definitely a concern in regards to anal sex. Edited November 1, 2011 by OnyxSnowfall
somedude81 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Gasp, yeah...... HIV. Anal sex does carry a higher risk for HIV as opposed to most other sexual activities. Although it isn't the feces that transmits the infection (though blood can be present in it which does). I believe it's more risky with anal sex because it's easier to tear the area up Alas I was thinking Wolfy was afraid of feces and the penis getting infected by it or something Lol (like Ely thought :X). But thanks for calling it out heh - it's definitely a concern in regards to anal sex. Yes, it's definitely the blood caused by skin rupture when proper lubrication isn't used. I think feces just leads to a smelly dick
OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Yes, it's definitely the blood caused by skin rupture when proper lubrication isn't used. I think feces just leads to a smelly dick Lol. But it can be washed I promise it doesn't *always* leave a lingering and faint odor
somedude81 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Lol. But it can be washed I promise it doesn't *always* leave a lingering and faint odor Heh, I'm not the one who'll have to smell it. Oh God this thread is bad now
OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Heh, I'm not the one who'll have to smell it. Oh God this thread is bad now LoL One begins drawing happy associations with things that bring it happiness, even if they were formerly associated as being repugnant --- The aroma becomes kind of endearing, it's all good
OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Did you know women can orgasm from a myriad of different things? Even men if you havent changed your oil in a while. Just because some people get off on getting it in an area that's clearly not meant for sex doesn't make it legitimate or any less repulsive. Some sickos can probably orgasm from nailing their penis to a chopping block , do you see any big deal in that? Evidence that the anus isn't for "sex" (sodomy isn't even sex) is the myriad of illnesses and conditions that come from practicing it. Men who like to sodomize things probably have a marked homosexual streak, no surprise considering the average modern American man is a ****ing panty-waist. I'm rephrasing this ****, 'cause I have partook in perfect retardation. There are plenty of illnesses and "conditions" associated with exchanging bodily fluids period. If two people are "clean" and they engage in anal sex, "infections" are not inevitable. Oral and vaginal intercourse can transmit their fair share of STD's as well... but again, if the people are clean then... Alas, STD's are definitely one reason I personally prefer monogamy and have preferred to find a man interested in monogamy... (plus I dislike condoms and I like semen, gasp, something else you probably don't think a female can genuinely like eh? )
somedude81 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Ok, I'm going to stop now. And now I know why the snow is onyx colored...
OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Ok, I'm going to stop now. And now I know why the snow is onyx colored... LOL :bunny:
Wolf18 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 TheBigQuestion is right. You have a lot to learn, Wolfy. And you really shouldn't try speaking for what women feel and or genuinely enjoy --- it certainly does enhance pleasure and is awesomely intense, in a good way. For me. Whatevs, I got no shame. It's awesome. IF you were a woman[/Quote] I'm not a woman but I have a sphincter. If women actually enjoy being sodomized (I've never met one, just heard "a friend of a friend knows a girl that likes it in the butt" type of stuff) that doesn't make it any less disgusting. There's nothing to learn , I don't like having e.coli on my dick and I'm far from a germophobe (I've worked with my hands my whole life) but I wouldn't even want to even share a bed with a woman who is fixated on her anus (and feces by association). And men can be perfectly straight but enjoy penetrating a woman's rectum (and or having their own rectum/prostrate stimulated).[/Quote] Maybe "straight" by technicality. Michael Jackson was probably straight by technicality too. No man likes to wallow in feces. You're so hell-bent about using condoms and idolizing them, it would protect your penis from feces (which the penis RARELY gets infected from anal sex anyway LOL, even unprotected [the bigger concern is VB for the woman heh, but precautions can prevent that too]) the same way it would protect it from an oozing disease of an infected and or "frequented" vagina. [/Quote] Number 1 a real man doesn't use condoms. What the hell is the point, condoms are a hassle. If I'm knocking boots with a random woman I will, but if I have a girlfriend I'm not going to use condoms. Any time your body is in contact with feces, you are doing something unnatural and unhealthy. Hepititis, e.coli, etc all come from this kind of foul "sexuality". In fact, there is a direct correlation between anal "sex" and anal cancer Do you get vaginal cancer from having sex? Hmmm....maybe nature's on to something! I'm sure one day you will shed your ignorance and immaturity heh.[/Quote] Yes I'm ignorant. I don't have an ass hole. I wouldn't say you are ignorant, I would say you and the people who put it in your pooper are just warped. Both you and your partner(s) know what the ass does and is for, and yet you still get some sort of sexual pleasure from it. I think it's mostly mental, you know it's "Taboo" and something wrong (although nowadays it's celebrated). (as for the oral copulation associated with sodomy, are you against that too?[/Quote] Do you mean....tossing salad? Or just the anal / animal references? 'Cause I think I'm also perfectly okay with having my mouth "defiled" or my mouth "defiling" my lover's penis too... and vice versa, lawl ('cept swap penis for clit). Mouths weren't apparently "meant for sex" either, oh freaking wows). Oral is something that i'm not completely against But then again , mouths don't defecate (unless you're an american politician).
OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Number 1 a real man doesn't use condoms. What the hell is the point, condoms are a hassle. If I'm knocking boots with a random woman I will, but if I have a girlfriend I'm not going to use condoms. Well, can't say I blame you, I don't like them either. In fact, there is a direct correlation between anal "sex" and anal cancer Do you get vaginal cancer from having sex? Hmmm....maybe nature's on to something! The last I knew of... a form of cervical, vaginal, and or vulva cancer is largely transmitted sexually (HPV 16, 18?)... Yes I'm ignorant. I don't have an ass hole. I wouldn't say you are ignorant, I would say you and the people who put it in your pooper are just warped. Both you and your partner(s) know what the ass does and is for, and yet you still get some sort of sexual pleasure from it. I think it's mostly mental, you know it's "Taboo" and something wrong (although nowadays it's celebrated). A part of it is psychological, but there are definite real sensations as well. Do you mean....tossing salad? Toss ittt. Oral is something that i'm not completely against But then again , mouths don't defecate (unless you're an american politician). ... well, I give you the latter... regardless, diseases can be transmitted through oral, heh. Whether or not a strand of e-coli has been presently introduced into the area
Wolf18 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 I'm rephrasing this ****, 'cause I have partook in perfect retardation. There are plenty of illnesses and "conditions" associated with exchanging bodily fluids period. If two people are "clean" and they engage in anal sex, "infections" are not inevitable. Oral and vaginal intercourse can transmit their fair share of STD's as well... but again, if the people are clean then... Alas, STD's are definitely one reason I personally prefer monogamy and have preferred to find a man interested in monogamy... (plus I dislike condoms and I like semen, gasp, something else you probably don't think a female can genuinely like eh? ) So you take it in the butt, like to toss salad, and gargle with semen. Remind me not to share any drinks with you
OnyxSnowfall Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 (edited) So you take it in the butt, like to toss salad, and gargle with semen. Remind me not to share any drinks with you Hey, I use mouth wash (besides semen), brush and floss :( Also, there's plenty of other "natural" ... substances and organisms that inhabit (or can otherwise inhabit) the human mouth regardless lol :X, that would probably make you not want to share drinks with people... even if they didn't have as filthy of mouths Edited November 1, 2011 by OnyxSnowfall
Wolf18 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 The last I knew of... a form of cervical, vaginal, and or vulva cancer is largely transmitted sexually (HPV 16, 18?)...[/Quote] HPV is by and large, a very mild "STD". It's being trumped up because big pharm wants to sell its vaccination. Nobody doubts that you can catch STD's through vaginal sex if you're promiscuous and not careful. I'm sorry Onyx if you can't fathom why I think anus' are dirtier than vagina's, then we're speaking on two way different wavelengths. I'm of the old fashioned line of thinking that says that your hiney is for waste disposal. Nothing about a woman taking a **** turns me on whatsoever, and I certainly don't want to be upturning mud all over the place with my tusk like a boar on a rainy day in alabama.
Wolf18 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Hey, I use mouth wash (besides semen), brush and floss :( Also, there's plenty of other "natural" ... substances and organisms that inhabit (or can otherwise inhabit) the human mouth regardless lol :X, that would probably make you not want to share drinks with people... even if they didn't have as filthy of mouths I'm not a germophobe and have always shared drinks. I only draw the line when it comes to people who eat poop and semen, I know, I'm a real prude.
Recommended Posts