quietGuy13 Posted September 3, 2011 Posted September 3, 2011 From what i've calculated in pools of people in public where there's a mix is that 80 percent of all including my self are average or below. Only 20 percent of the girls are hot and of those hot ones 50 to 80 percent are lesbian. I'm not saying hot clubs with just hot ladies. I'm saying supermarkets, or the general Downtown area. And if you live in a colege town you can expect there to be more young hot girls but like i've said,, they're all taken by college hunks or by lesbians. Just in case you didn't know, there is a Law of Hotness, created by some scientist in France. It states that for every hot girl you see you have 1/100000000 chance of her even looking at you.
carhill Posted September 4, 2011 Posted September 4, 2011 interesting can you expound on this to what exactly you think the differences are? IME, based on the variety of women I've been with, their actions and words focus more on the elemental of the man, his character, reputation, personality and belief systems as opposed to the more superficial, like how 'hot' he is or how rich or socially successful he is. The OP, while perhaps direct with his observations, appears to look at attraction in a very different way, essentially viewing a 'below average' or 'ugly' woman as a potentially better shot as a girlfriend, irrespective of the more elemental qualities she possesses. That he describes a woman in such a way is indicative of his perspective. That's very different than the attraction 'style' and parameters I've experienced with such women, or women in general for that matter. Sure, there have been a few exceptions, but rarely IME. I've probably experienced more such exceptions on LS than IRL. I would suggest seeing women with different eyes. Worth a try IMO.
AHardDaysNight Posted September 4, 2011 Posted September 4, 2011 So you're judging girls for being ugly when you're ugly yourself? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!
grkBoy Posted September 4, 2011 Posted September 4, 2011 (edited) Man or woman, if you're looking for the "hot" people (and I won't dive into if you yourself are "hot enough" to get their attention), then you need to think three words: LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION In Chicago, most of the single 20somethings are packed into a few neighborhoods near downtown. Some thought it was crazy that I bought a condo in the far NW side...simply because to them it's dull or "out in the middle of nowhere". My area is mainly full of senior citizens, middle class families, newlyweds, and Eastern Bloc immigrants. I know if I walk into the grocery store or even a gym near my home I won't see hot looking women as much as I'll see old ladies and middle-aged moms with kids. Not dissing them, but it's clear the drawback of my living location is that I don't get those eligible single women walking their dogs, shopping for groceries, etc. I walk into a grocery store in downtown near my work or in those neighborhoods where all the young, single folk are...and it's a different story. THE POINT: If you're in the barren territory and can't find any young fertile sheep...go to the grassy green fields where they congregate. I know some lament on how they live in small towns and have a horrible or nonexistent dating pool. Such is life, and it screams unfortunately that you have to go to where the pool is better...be it move or visit regularly and hope someone doesn't see you as "GU" Edited September 4, 2011 by grkBoy
Disenchantedly Yours Posted September 4, 2011 Posted September 4, 2011 Perhaps it's not a matter of there being so many below aveage looking women out there. Perhaps having a few generations of men who have been fed unrealistic images of women through mass media has made men more critical of how women look..... just a thought.
Recommended Posts