rafallus Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/08_03/littleleague5_228x493.jpg Link to post Share on other sites
EnigmaticClarity Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 How can I not relate? I've seen girls taller than me. It does absolutely nothing for me but make me go flaccid. Control freak. Link to post Share on other sites
Emilia Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 I don't care about height. I'm 5'6'' and both my current squeeze and my last ex are the same height but then again they are also both significantly younger than me. I don't care for being protected by a man or any related nonsense. Link to post Share on other sites
Author FrustratedStandards Posted September 1, 2011 Author Share Posted September 1, 2011 Honestly, I think some women believe penis size correlates with height, but I just think a larger amount of women just like to feel really small next to their man--or be able to wear heels (that's the big one) without being taller than their man. I might be wrong, but I think I'm somewhat accurate there. Agree? Agreed. No woman wants to feel like a giant. Like I said before, she wants to be small and cuddled. I don't understand short women who insist on guys at least 6 foot. Leave the tall guys for the tall girls! I'm 5'9" and 6' is perfect. I don't like guys over 6'2" (too tall), so I don't understand why some women want a guy 10 inches taller than they are, or why a guy would want a girl this much shorter. Because shorter woman are allowed to be picky. If tall women like myself (5'10) were that picky, then we would NEVER find a guy. So we have no choice but to either date very very few guys in our entire lives, or be okay with shorter men. I often complain about that too. Leave the tall guys to us! We have more trouble finding them. I'm 6 ft. It's cool, but trust me, it hasn't transformed me into a rockstar. I think women really aren't attracted to men short men simply because it doesn't make them feel feminine. I think it's that simple. Think about how men are naturally taller than women on average. I'm sure this is something that's been going on for a loooong time. So naturally, I'm sure it's just a natural response in them. So I say, don't hate em for it. Because its just too natural for them. Instead, find a shorter girl (this is MUCH easier to accomplish, than trying to make a woman feel bad for not liking shorter men) Power to ya! I also agree with this. We need a "protector" and how safe can we feel when we can step on our man? lol And the same could be asked of women...how many women would be willing to date a guy shorter than themselves? I have plenty of times. But thats only because not one man has been taller than me. *sigh* Link to post Share on other sites
EnigmaticClarity Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 It's not easy being a tall woman. Can't you switch roles? Short men need Amazonians such as yourself to protect them from all of the monsters out in the world who like eating short people... Link to post Share on other sites
Author FrustratedStandards Posted September 1, 2011 Author Share Posted September 1, 2011 Can't you switch roles? Short men need Amazonians such as yourself to protect them from all of the monsters out in the world who like eating short people... Then who is left to protect me? I guess while women are pregnant and nurse she still has to be her mans bodyguard? There is a reason women are naturally inclined to be attracted to men who can protect them.. Link to post Share on other sites
oaks Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Again, I'm not saying that an ugly person can become hot stuff because they are confident. I am saying that some turn offs can be OVERLOOKED if there is lots of confidence. The person has to be decent of course. "Some turn offs", yes. Confidence is (to me) attractive, and in the balance of things if there are more attractions then detractions then that's great. Your thread title of "Any turn off", no. Deal breakers are still deal breakers, that's why they're called deal breakers. Link to post Share on other sites
oaks Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Men complain about the above, but how many are willing to date women taller than themselves? I'd give it a try, but I'm over 6' already so the opportunity hasn't arisen. Link to post Share on other sites
EnigmaticClarity Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Then who is left to protect me? I guess while women are pregnant and nurse she still has to be her mans bodyguard? There is a reason women are naturally inclined to be attracted to men who can protect them.. Hire a bodyguard while you're pregnant and once the baby comes, let him do the nursing. Haven't you heard? It's all the rage: http://www.unassistedchildbirth.com/miscarticles/milkmen.html Link to post Share on other sites
Elysian Powder Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/08_03/littleleague5_228x493.jpg Him: crap load of money. Her: Gold-digger who happens to be rich, already. Link to post Share on other sites
Wolf18 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 It's so funny how women become evolutionary biologists (evolutionary biology btw is a bunch of bull****) when it comes to them only wanting to date tall guys. And of course, "nature" is impersonal and unfair, so short guys should not be concerned or the slightest bit pissed off when even the 5'2 girls don't think a 5'7 guy is "tall enough". I'm sure all of these pro evolution and nature women won't take it personally when their 6'3 ken doll husband with a lot of money and spikey gelled hair that they had to be with because of nature, leaves them when on their 35th birthday for a 19 year old, because according to evolutionary biology men are constantly seeking young women to have sex with. That's nature, don't get upset. Of course, evolutionary biology doesn't apply when women are on the losing side of it. Then it's "lookism", "patriarchy", and shallow men. It's especially amusing when feminists who are always whining about how people don't want to see obese women modeling lingerie, turn around and fawn over something like a man's tall height or penis size. Link to post Share on other sites
EnigmaticClarity Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 I'm very surprised the height of a man is dominating all of these threads talking about desirable physical traits. The weight of a woman leads to more relationship discrimination than a man's height. Link to post Share on other sites
Elysian Powder Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) It's so funny how women become evolutionary biologists (evolutionary biology btw is a bunch of bull****) when it comes to them only wanting to date tall guys. And of course, "nature" is impersonal and unfair, so short guys should not be concerned or the slightest bit pissed off when even the 5'2 girls don't think a 5'7 guy is "tall enough". I'm sure all of these pro evolution and nature women won't take it personally when their 6'3 ken doll husband with a lot of money and spikey gelled hair that they had to be with because of nature, leaves them when on their 35th birthday for a 19 year old, because according to evolutionary biology men are constantly seeking young women to have sex with. That's nature, don't get upset. Of course, evolutionary biology doesn't apply when women are on the losing side of it. Then it's "lookism", "patriarchy", and shallow men. It's especially amusing when feminists who are always whining about how people don't want to see obese women modeling lingerie, turn around and fawn over something like a man's tall height or penis size. Hey, I'm still trying to figure out why so many guys assume and create long-ass topics on ''why'' women go for bad boys and hot guys, rationalizing that the women who want this type of man are damaged, suffer from low self-esteem, were abducted by aliens, or are too young to make proper decisions about whom they sleeps with. Why do people have to make everything to be so scientific? Women date tall men because height gets 'em wet; and bad boys fck young, attractive women because their johnson likes young, hot women. Bad Boys don't hover around young women due to how ''fragile'' young women are. Bad boys mess with hot women. That guy who married Demi Moore; is he being abused? Short men have a choice. Up their act or join a convent. Life is not for free, buds. Wolfy, buddy, work on your bank account Make those numbers swell up as much as possible, proceed into banging as many hot, young women as you can bang. Remember that we are all equals. Bang to your heart's content. Edited September 1, 2011 by Elysian Powder Link to post Share on other sites
AmEricanWomann Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 What's "really short"? and is it the smartest thing to judge a relationship on how someone makes you feel in their arms or chest? Sure beign rubbed up against D cups would be nice but its not one of the more imortant thigns on my list of a good parnter Really short is shorter than me or my height. I'm between 5'6 and 5'7. You can't rationalize sexual attraction. I've tried to date guys I'm not attracted to because they had good personalities and I thought the attraction would grow. It never does. How I feel in a guy's arms may not be the only thing that makes a relationship, but yes its important, because its the basis of sexual attraction for me. You may compare short men to women with small breasts, but the only way its comparable is if small breasts are a deal breaker for you and if so , then I wouldn't expect you to date small breasted women. I am simply not attracted to men that are shorter or smaller than me. Think of something that's a deal breaker for you as far as physical attraction to a woman and ask yourself would you date her if she was a really nice person? Or would you wait for someone with a great personality and with whom you had physical chemistry? Link to post Share on other sites
Woggle Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 It's so funny how women become evolutionary biologists (evolutionary biology btw is a bunch of bull****) when it comes to them only wanting to date tall guys. And of course, "nature" is impersonal and unfair, so short guys should not be concerned or the slightest bit pissed off when even the 5'2 girls don't think a 5'7 guy is "tall enough". I'm sure all of these pro evolution and nature women won't take it personally when their 6'3 ken doll husband with a lot of money and spikey gelled hair that they had to be with because of nature, leaves them when on their 35th birthday for a 19 year old, because according to evolutionary biology men are constantly seeking young women to have sex with. That's nature, don't get upset. Of course, evolutionary biology doesn't apply when women are on the losing side of it. Then it's "lookism", "patriarchy", and shallow men. It's especially amusing when feminists who are always whining about how people don't want to see obese women modeling lingerie, turn around and fawn over something like a man's tall height or penis size. I agree. I think shallowness in general from both genders is just stupid and misses the point but what's good for the gander is good for the goose. Shallowness begets shallowness. Link to post Share on other sites
Author FrustratedStandards Posted September 1, 2011 Author Share Posted September 1, 2011 I agree. I think shallowness in general from both genders is just stupid and misses the point but what's good for the gander is good for the goose. Shallowness begets shallowness. I don't think it's shallow at all. Can you help it if you're attracted to women? Can you help it if you like big breasts? No, you can't, thats why you prefer these traits. How is that shallow? What's good and what's attractive are two completely different things. Link to post Share on other sites
Woggle Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Men who like to date a walking pair of boobs are idiots as well. Link to post Share on other sites
Elysian Powder Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 I don't think it's shallow at all. Can you help it if you're attracted to women? Can you help it if you like big breasts? No, you can't, thats why you prefer these traits. How is that shallow? What's good and what's attractive are two completely different things. You can't really compare a requirement with a preference... The women are saying that the guy has to be at least 5'10'', or 6 feet and plus, the guys are saying that the woman must have teeth and hair. I don't see any guy demanding big breasts. People should just accept their nature and stop with silly insinuations of the other sex lacking the ''right'' to complain about enjoying one physical characteristic, when the majority of the members of that sex has never even seen a woman with big boobs outside of porn, and the majority of women will not date a man below a certain height. Men who like to date a walking pair of boobs are idiots as well. My johnson disagrees. Link to post Share on other sites
AHardDaysNight Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 It's not shallow to point out facts. Women act one way in general, and just the fact that they get defensive about it shows that they do, in fact, act that way! Link to post Share on other sites
AD1980 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Agreed. No woman wants to feel like a giant. Like I said before, she wants to be small and cuddled. Because shorter woman are allowed to be picky. If tall women like myself (5'10) were that picky, then we would NEVER find a guy. So we have no choice but to either date very very few guys in our entire lives, or be okay with shorter men. I often complain about that too. Leave the tall guys to us! We have more trouble finding them. I also agree with this. We need a "protector" and how safe can we feel when we can step on our man? lol I have plenty of times. But thats only because not one man has been taller than me. *sigh* Who do you need a protector from? the boogie man? And if you need a protector so badly what do you do when your single and have no male protector? go to social events in millitary gear in case of all these attackers youre worried about? Link to post Share on other sites
Elysian Powder Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Who do you need a protector from? the boogie man? And if you need a protector so badly what do you do when your single and have no male protector? go to social events in millitary gear in case of all these attackers youre worried about? Buddy, vagina is far more valuable than penis. Women can pick whoever they want. I wish they'd just admit that a tall guy gets 'em wet instead of all of this protection nonsense, but what are you gonna do about it. Plenty of women wil date someone shorter if they can't have their first pick, don't worry. Link to post Share on other sites
EnigmaticClarity Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 You can't really compare a requirement with a preference... The women are saying that the guy has to be at least 5'10'', or 6 feet and plus, the guys are saying that the woman must have teeth and hair. I don't see any guy demanding big breasts. People should just accept their nature and stop with silly insinuations of the other sex lacking the ''right'' to complain about enjoying one physical characteristic, when the majority of the members of that sex has never even seen a woman with big boobs outside of porn, and the majority of women will not date a man below a certain height. What is with you guys claiming men AREN'T shallow? Are you priests? Men reject women for a LOT more reasons than not having "teeth and hair." Weight and facial features are way up there. More men reject women due to obesity than women reject men because of height. Not sure where you're getting the idea that people haven't seen women with big boobs--they're everywhere, unless you're talking about the huge, ginormous DDD and up sizes that are generally unattractive and out of proportion with the average-sized female frame anyway. 30% of women have C cups, 10% have D, 1% DD...if those stats are anywhere near correct, a man has at least a 1 in 3 chance that his own girlfriend has sizable breasts even if we were all paired by random lottery draws. Link to post Share on other sites
Elysian Powder Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) What is with you guys claiming men AREN'T shallow? Are you priests? Men reject women for a LOT more reasons than not having "teeth and hair." Weight and facial features are way up there. More men reject women due to obesity than women reject men because of height. Not sure where you're getting the idea that people haven't seen women with big boobs--they're everywhere, unless you're talking about the huge, ginormous DDD and up sizes that are generally unattractive and out of proportion with the average-sized female frame anyway. 30% of women have C cups, 10% have D, 1% DD...if those stats are anywhere near correct, a man has at least a 1 in 3 chance that his own girlfriend has sizable breasts even if we were all paired by random lottery draws. 1) Never said that men aren't shallow, I only said that the men on this thread aren't that picky, at least to the point of demanding a woman with natural double D's. 2) Women walking around with their tits hanging don't count. These guys proximity to a woman with big breasts is just that, in the bus stop, or looking at them during the summer at the beach. Being close to a great pair of breasts like my nose is close to my mouth, is quite rare for the average man. a man has at least a 1 in 3 chance If he's at least 5'10''. Mr nate is correct. We have 200.000 year old bodies. Nothing can stop our true natures. Certain male traits evoke a feminine response in women, and women will absolutely always do whatever evokes that feminine response in them. Just as I will generally do things that elevate my testosterone and get my penis hard. It's biology really. It's really funny to see a man who evokes such biological response in women, do so on married women, bang them, and make them return to the beta husband. Edited September 1, 2011 by Elysian Powder Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetie1977 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Agreed. No woman wants to feel like a giant. Like I said before, she wants to be small and cuddled. Because shorter woman are allowed to be picky. If tall women like myself (5'10) were that picky, then we would NEVER find a guy. So we have no choice but to either date very very few guys in our entire lives, or be okay with shorter men. I often complain about that too. Leave the tall guys to us! We have more trouble finding them. I also agree with this. We need a "protector" and how safe can we feel when we can step on our man? lol I have plenty of times. But thats only because not one man has been taller than me. *sigh* I hear you lady.Some of my friends are married to short guys[not shorter then them per se but shorter then average] and they just feel no lust for these men at all but couldnt find a tall men whod settle down I urge ladies dont settle for men on the short side becasue you think its all you can get,you'll regret it when you're married to em and look at them and feel no passion or lust Hold out for those tall gems because they are SO worth it:love: Link to post Share on other sites
rafallus Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Him: crap load of money. Her: Gold-digger who happens to be rich, already. Soooooo, returning to the orginal topic: Any turn off can be fixed with wealth, power and status. At least for some females. Simple confidence won't cut it. BTW. how do you know, she's a gold digger? Link to post Share on other sites
.thumb.png.baa1266146418e391887630c93d66f5c.png)
Recommended Posts