Nexus One Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Regarding baldness, it's a modern phenomenon. Baldness did not exist in prehistoric men. I think men were a lot less stressed in those times and perhaps food has something to do with it too. So I guess men have to try to remove stress from their lives and eat like cavemen. That doesn't necessarily mean lots of meat. Back in those times only 20% of a man's diet was meat, the other 80% were gathered fruits, vegetables, berries and nuts. Men did the hunting for meat, women did the gathering. Problem is, when you put a piece of meat in your mouth these days, you're putting a lot of medication in your mouth. They feed animals so much food to make them grow, that they have to medicate them in order to keep them alive. That medication is what you ingest too when you eat the meat of those animals, even though you don't need that medication, that also is bound to have some effects on humans. Then there's fine dust in the air created by cars and factories. Also tap water isn't entirely clean. The filters in the water treatment plants can't filter estrogen (female hormone) out of the water for example, so men who drink tap water ingest female hormone, causing all sorts of problems like man-boobs and in some nations they also add Fluoride to the tap water, for dental reasons they say, but from a chemical perspective Fluoride is a level 4 toxin, it is highly damaging to humans. That's why it says on your toothpaste not to swallow the toothpaste. Yet they put it in the f*cking tap water in some countries.
anne1707 Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Regarding baldness, it's a modern phenomenon. Baldness did not exist in prehistoric men. I think men were a lot less stressed in those times and perhaps food has something to do with it too. Ermm. Maybe that was because the average age was, I don't know, 20.
ThsAmericanLife Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 It's perfectly normal. I could talk, how I would never date a girl with breasts smaller than D, waist wider than xx cm, etc. etc. then there comes girl who doesn't meet that criteria, yet turns me on, and whole talk is too cheap. Same with women claiming "I would never date a guy under 6', without six-pack and dong must be at least 6''". Then a different guy comes there, he doesn't fit those requirements, yet... kaboom. Talk becomes cheap again. Exactly....
udolipixie Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 That's the average in most Countries, I think. So what? Jon Bon Jovi is like 5'8''. Tom Cruise is shorter. James Dean was 5'6''. They were poor/middle-class before becoming rich and famous. It seems women aren't the ones saying the most fluff about height not being important but men.
Nexus One Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Ermm. Maybe that was because the average age was, I don't know, 20. With an emphasis on average, that doesn't mean men weren't able to reach old age.
Nikki Sahagin Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Well women prefer taller men and men prefer shorter women as a generalisation. Just as men generally prefer slim women whilst women prefer a more athletic build. This doesn't mean short men or chubby women are doomed. People can fall for someone that they never thought they would.
ThsAmericanLife Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 I've never had a problem with bald men. In fact, some of the sexiest men I've ever seen or been with had little or no hair. Would prefer they just shave their heads rather than do the comb over or 'bozo the clown' look though. FYI... baldness in men is associated with high testosterone levels.... so you ladies with high libidos need to make a bald man part of your search criteria. :p:p:p
anne1707 Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 With an emphasis on average, that doesn't mean men weren't able to reach old age. What? Like 23? As for stress - how about having to catch your dinner before it caught you?
Nexus One Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 As for stress - how about having to catch your dinner before it caught you? That's exercise. Running lowers stress levels.
anne1707 Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 That's exercise. Running lowers stress levels. Not for the sabre toothed tiger
Elysian Powder Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 It seems women aren't the ones saying the most fluff about height not being important but men. Some men like to put their lack of success with a top model on exterior factors. It's just an excuse to not work on themselves. Women will date any man, regardless of how short he is, if he's a good catch. Visit Holland, somedude. 6 feet tall women dating 5'8'' Spanish men.
Nexus One Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Not for the sabre toothed tiger Saber tooth tigers only lived in North and South America, prehistoric men killed them all, with they spear and bare f*cking hands.
anne1707 Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Saber tooth tigers only lived in North and South America, prehistoric humans killed them all. See. Now that must have been stressful for them
Nexus One Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 See. Now that must have been stressful for them Perhaps a different type of stress than your average 9-5 office job.
udolipixie Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 I've never had a problem with bald men. In fact, some of the sexiest men I've ever seen or been with had little or no hair. Would prefer they just shave their heads rather than do the comb over or 'bozo the clown' look though. FYI... baldness in men is associated with high testosterone levels.... so you ladies with high libidos need to make a bald man part of your search criteria. :p:p:p High libido from a guy doesn't mean sexual satisfaction. Bald guys having higher testosterone is bs.
anne1707 Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Perhaps a different type of stress than your average 9-5 office job. It's a cat eat cat world out there.
triphopper414 Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Receding hair line Acne Acne scars obesity (chubby can be cute on a guy) poor hygiene and grooming I am usually not a fan of facial hair but it is growing on me. As long as they keep it trimmed, I can deal with it.
OliveOyl Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 I think when you're my age (50) the list changes. Asking for a guy who has a full head of hair, is very youthful, and in great shape... as well as either no kids or ex in the picture, etc.... is going to significantly reduce the dating pool. Like down to 2%. And I can't say I'd be the perfect match for that 2% anyway. The three things that age men the most are balding, gray hair, and overweight. My physical turn-off would be a guy that has all three. I can deal with balding if he's not overweight, or slightly overweight if he has a full head of hair. But a guy that looks like an old man at 50 is a turn-off. Other turn-offs for me are: - small, effeminate hands; - the combination of tall AND skinny - man-boobs - poor posture (VERY aging)
madjac74 Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Other turn-offs for me are: - small, effeminate hands; - the combination of tall AND skinny - man-boobs - poor posture (VERY aging) Hahaha moobs! I love it! * Fupa's * cankles * caveman feet * walks/stands like an ogre * bushy vaginas
O'Malley Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Besides the obvious complete lack of exercise and good hygiene: 1. 'Cocky' or arrogant body language 2. Excessive weightlifting or tanning 3. I prefer a leaner body type, but I'm aware that most people's genetics overall doesn't favor that long term without some rigorous exercise or diet. 4. Small or more rounded facial features -- I prefer roman noses, long jawlines, high foreheads. 5. Clean shaven; I find beards or sideburns extremely attractive (but loathe soul patches) I could talk, how I would never date a girl with breasts smaller than D, waist wider than xx cm, etc. etc. then there comes girl who doesn't meet that criteria, yet turns me on, and whole talk is too cheap. Definitely; I've met any number of guys who didn't fit into the parameters of my 'ideal' physical type, but their personalities overall just made them far more desirable. Chemistry and criteria are subjective things. Shallow is a pattern of behavior, as Zengirl said, which repeatedly focuses on rigid physical standards to the exclusion of mental and emotional attributes.
PJKino Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 1. Age (no one over 21) 2. Bald/thinning hair/receding hairline 3. Fat/obese 4. Bad face- messed up nose, yellow/brown teeth, thin lips, facial hair, bad skin 5. Size- short aka under 5'10'' & not measuring up down there So if u met a good guy you liked and he was only 5'9 would you not date him because of an inch?
udolipixie Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 So if u met a good guy you liked and he was only 5'9 would you not date him because of an inch? Define this 'good guy' that I 'like' does he fill all the rest of my top 5 & does he fill every other requirement/standard/wish/hope I have? If not then yes I'd pass on him because there's always more 5'10'' guys around. It is the average.
PJKino Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 (edited) If not then yes I'd pass on him because there's always more 5'10'' guys around. It is the average. i dunno im saying if you met a 5'9 guy you clicked with and he was in decent shape had a handsome face would you not give him a chance becasue hes not once more inch off the ground? Can you really tell a huge difference physically if a man is 5'10 instead of 5'9? does being a mere inch taller really make a person that much more attractive? or are you just going by stats and dont want to be seen with somebody who statistically is a little "below average" Edited August 30, 2011 by PJKino
udolipixie Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 i dunno im saying if you met a 5'9 you clicked with and he was in decent shape had a handsome face would you not give him a chance becasue hes not once more inch off the ground? Can you rally tell a huge difference physically if a man is 5'10 instead of 5'9? does being a mere inch taller really make a person that much more attractive? or are you just going by stats and dont want to be seen with somebody who statistically is a little "below average" So you're saying he's not my ideal in every other way. Then yes I'm saying I wouldn't give him a chance. It's like having a basket of apples and most are juicy but there's one less juicy I go with the juicy one not the less juicy one. Yes I can tell the difference. What's up with this belief people can't measure mentally? Nothing to do with status just my preference.
ThsAmericanLife Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 High libido from a guy doesn't mean sexual satisfaction. Bald guys having higher testosterone is bs. well, if his parts don't work, then half of the tool box is out of commission. I'd prefer the whole tool box in action... without the need for Viagra. ... and do a google search on the testosterone thing. It is not BS. ... you don't have to like bald men... but then you might be missing out. Just sayin'...
Recommended Posts