donnamaybe Posted June 8, 2011 Posted June 8, 2011 uh.... to make sure he's not going out to meet his lover? To make sure he's sitting at home "behaving" and not communicating with his lover? To make sure he's not getting up to anything she doesn't approve of? Well, I guess that ain't workin' so good. Not sure where that idea came from...? From this: Where the BS is aware of the A, surely they would also require some kind of convincing - unless they really were that desperate that they were prepared to hang on to the M at all costs?
OWoman Posted June 8, 2011 Posted June 8, 2011 Well, I guess that ain't workin' so good. Clearly not. From this: Which was a response to this: The best way for a MP to maintain the status quo is to convince their AP they are "stuck" in their situation. It was about a MP seeking to maintain a status quo. It was not about a MP seeking to get a D.
donnamaybe Posted June 8, 2011 Posted June 8, 2011 It was about a MP seeking to maintain a status quo. It was not about a MP seeking to get a D. But what has that to do with the BS "hanging onto the M?" She can't hang onto the M unless the WS wants it that way.
OWoman Posted June 8, 2011 Posted June 8, 2011 But what has that to do with the BS "hanging onto the M?" She can't hang onto the M unless the WS wants it that way. Nope - but that was the premise of your statement: The best way for a MP to maintain the status quo is to convince their AP they are "stuck" in their situation. If the MP is seeking to maintain the status quo - ie, M plus lover, then presumably the MP is seeking to remain M as well as to continue the A, yes. My post was in direct response to the situation as posited by you. I did not challenge your assumptions, I responded as if they were valid.
donnamaybe Posted June 8, 2011 Posted June 8, 2011 I guess the conclusion, then, is that he does have things just as he wants them.
Loni Posted June 8, 2011 Posted June 8, 2011 Actually, the BW is in a MUCH better position than the OW. She owns half his assets. And why should men leave their comfy situation. If the OW doesn't rock the boat he can have the best of both worlds. A lot of men care for their wives and see no reason not to maintain the status quo if the OW lets them. If the OW is cool with that all is well. I know I wasn't which is why I dumped him. He figured out really quickly that I was serious.
endattwap Posted June 8, 2011 Posted June 8, 2011 Zyvox cod online orders order Coumadin cheap overnight buy rx Moduretic without Lariam with saturday delivery buy Betapace mastercard in Oklahoma Allegra-d online cash on delivery order Fosamax without a rx overnight shipping buy discount Lotensin online Protonix on line purchase cheap online Stromectol Paxil Cr without prescription overnight shipping buy Lovegra mastercard in Jacksonville order Alesse mastercard in Montgomery Feldene orderd online without prescription buy Calan Sr offshore no prescription fedex buy Plan B mastercard now online order Duricef pharmacy buy Ciloxan online without rx Purchase discount Cardura no rx Optivar without rx overnight shipping buy Lozol Sr without rx order Naprosyn usa cod Phoslo no doctors consult Overnight buy Oxytrol buy discount Imdur online no prescriptions needed for Depakote Fedex delivery Retrovir cheap purchase Zebeta purchase Acular online no membership overnight shipping buy Glucovance no visa without rx how to get a Augmentin rx buy Sinequan mastercard cheap without prescription overnight Carafate c.o.d order Coreg overnight cheap Renova buy fedex buy Isordil without rx needed Didronel purchased online without prescription ordering Celexa without a script purchase Cymbalta overnight delivery
OWoman Posted June 9, 2011 Posted June 9, 2011 I guess the conclusion, then, is that he does have things just as he wants them. nice try... but completely wrong! I said If the MP is seeking to maintain the status quo - ie, M plus lover, then presumably the MP is seeking to remain M as well as to continue the A, yes. My post was in direct response to the situation as posited by you. I did not challenge your assumptions, I responded as if they were valid. I did not state that I thought your assumptions WERE valid. Big difference a conditional clause makes - I thought that as a legal secretary you'd know that?
donnamaybe Posted June 9, 2011 Posted June 9, 2011 LMAO! So the WS "claims" he can't get a divorce, but he really can if he wants to. But he doesn't. But it's not his choice? Um, okay.
donnamaybe Posted June 9, 2011 Posted June 9, 2011 Actually, the BW is in a MUCH better position than the OW. She owns half his assets. And why should men leave their comfy situation. If the OW doesn't rock the boat he can have the best of both worlds. A lot of men care for their wives and see no reason not to maintain the status quo if the OW lets them. If the OW is cool with that all is well. I know I wasn't which is why I dumped him. He figured out really quickly that I was serious. Yup. That's the way it is in some cases.
OWoman Posted June 9, 2011 Posted June 9, 2011 Actually, the BW is in a MUCH better position than the OW. She owns half his assets. Only if they are married in community of property, or live in those parts of the US where that law holds. Elsewise assets are divided according to the ANC or each retains their own assets.
Recommended Posts