ascendotum Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Wouldn't the best place be where the ratio of F to M is the highest or more ideally, where the ratio of single (not over 60) F to M is the highest. I thought NY rated pretty highly.
EricaH329 Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 I couldn't recommend either Boston or NYC for singles. Both have very stifled social lives due to ratrace work ethic, high living expenses and elitist cliques of every stripe. Admittedly I never lived in Boston, just had friends who did, but when I visited there found attractive women few and far between. I'm wondering where you noticed this? I lived in Boston for about a year, and never once did I notice any of what you mentioned. Yes, it costs more to live there, but you also get paid more. You work the same hours. The only difference is that there are a lot more people going to college. Good colleges. I've met many wonderful, single, beautiful, intelligent women there. The most i've met in one place before. It's such a diverse area, that I can't remember meeting anyone who didn't accept others.
Pyro Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 I cant help but agree with this lol. American chicks look good & all but if u want a quality broad thats naturally fine as hell & knows how to treat u in the way u deserve, definitely hit up just about anywhere outside the US. I think Canada ain't too bad for the pickings, but theres better even further out, like DR, Brazil, Spain, Italy, to name a few. Those chicks are hottttt! nope. Have to go even further my friend. Australia is the answer.
zlatnapolja Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 Hey guys, Just out of curiosity, what city do you think is best for single 20 something males? THanks, Ray4love All women are beautiful in a way. If you want to go to very 'feminine' places, I would suggest: Eastern European, Southeastern european cities like Odessa, Split, Sarajevo, Budva, Greek Islands. Women in these places spend a lot of time on their looks. But women everywhere are beautiful In Jordan, in Egypt, in Canada, Italy, Somalia anywhere.
FlowerGirly Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 I couldn't recommend either Boston or NYC for singles. Both have very stifled social lives due to ratrace work ethic, high living expenses and elitist cliques of every stripe. Admittedly I never lived in Boston, just had friends who did, but when I visited there found attractive women few and far between. Don't know where you stayed, but this couldn't be further from the truth.:confused:
Romeofud Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 I'm wondering where you noticed this? I lived in Boston for about a year, and never once did I notice any of what you mentioned. Yes, it costs more to live there, but you also get paid more. You work the same hours. The only difference is that there are a lot more people going to college. Good colleges. I've met many wonderful, single, beautiful, intelligent women there. The most i've met in one place before. It's such a diverse area, that I can't remember meeting anyone who didn't accept others. If these women are so beautiful & intelligent, then why are they single??
EricaH329 Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 If these women are so beautiful & intelligent, then why are they single?? Some are, some aren't. And the ones that are single, are single for the same reasons the rest of us are. Just because they are beautiful and intelligent doesn't mean they don't have the same hardships the rest of us do.
FlowerGirly Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 Some are, some aren't. And the ones that are single, are single for the same reasons the rest of us are. Just because they are beautiful and intelligent doesn't mean they don't have the same hardships the rest of us do. some people just want to be contrary ...
sanskrit Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 (edited) Don't know where you stayed, but this couldn't be further from the truth.:confused: I stayed with male friends who lived in Boston for several years, top 10% type men in looks, career, who had trouble getting dates because they weren't from Boston and could not form or join social groups as they had in other cities where they had lived. We went out lots and witnessed it firsthand, found it worse than Manhattan actually, where I lived for six years. The first thing I learned about the big NE cities is that to live there and have a decent social life, you have to have a good job and work very long hours, adding stress to your life, unless you want to be in the boho set living in a warehouse as a starving artist. If you don't have a -prestige- job, a huge percentage of women in the big NE cities won't even talk to you. Fact. Second thing I learned is that a disproportionate number of -average- women there were looking for Mr. Big, a man who, for some reason was expected to select a woman who had -vastly- less to offer than he did, and for that reason, most of the people go around spewing BS about how rich, famous, well-paid, well-connected they are. I don't find this a healthy social environment. Next thing I learned was that after you had been to all the museums and parks dozens of times, the only socializing that fit into busy schedules was chichi restaurants and bars, which I found fake and tedious, not to mention very unhealthy. Organizing dates to "get out of town" was very difficult due to everyone's heavy work pace. OP if you are still around, and want some "best of all worlds" places for singles in the U.S., some places to consider are Austin, TX, St. Louis, several areas of Florida, Nashville, Charlotte, several areas in Washington/Oregon. Stay away from the NE cities, DC and California. Edited May 26, 2011 by sanskrit
fwang Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 (edited) Austin Texas, one of the best cities for singles in USA. It's easy to date somebody there. It's a college town tho. lol I never have a problem meeting new/interesting/funny person there. But maybe this city has too much fun, people tend to be single. I have a bunch of single female friends, as well as a bunch of single male friends. They are dying to date someone, but they are still single, including me. Edited May 26, 2011 by fwang
lino Posted May 27, 2011 Posted May 27, 2011 I cant help but agree with this lol. American chicks look good & all but if u want a quality broad thats naturally fine as hell & knows how to treat u in the way u deserve, definitely hit up just about anywhere outside the US. I think Canada ain't too bad for the pickings, but theres better even further out, like DR, Brazil, Spain, Italy, to name a few. Those chicks are hottttt! Agree with all except Italy... not such a great place for singles. I've never been to Canada or the Dominican republic though. I've always quite liked visiting Manchester and Newcastle in England as a single guy. nope. Have to go even further my friend. Australia is the answer. For an easy root, there's no better place than here... Especially if you have a foreign accent!
Disillusioned Posted May 27, 2011 Posted May 27, 2011 Hey guys, Just out of curiosity, what city do you think is best for single 20 something males? THanks, Ray4love Definitely NOT Los Angeles.
FlowerGirly Posted May 27, 2011 Posted May 27, 2011 If you don't have a -prestige- job, a huge percentage of women in the big NE cities won't even talk to you. Fact. Second thing I learned is that a disproportionate number of -average- women there were looking for Mr. Big, a man who, for some reason was expected to select a woman who had -vastly- less to offer than he did, and for that reason, most of the people go around spewing BS about how rich, famous, well-paid, well-connected they are. I don't find this a healthy social environment. . This isn't true and sounds almost bitter. You are generalizing a colossal number of women because of your few bad experiences.
sanskrit Posted May 27, 2011 Posted May 27, 2011 This isn't true and sounds almost bitter. You are generalizing a colossal number of women because of your few bad experiences. Yes, it's true, neener neener, and a comparison to all sorts of other cities in the U.S. and elsewhere I've been and lived, even listed some of them. Also, I had no trouble getting women in Manhattan because at that time in life I was a "Mr. Big" type in a "Mr. Big" job. Doesn't change that I found the dynamic unhealthy, unappealing and boring sooner rather than later. So much for "bitterness," but keep tossing that term around, it helps us distinguish the doctrinaire feminists on LS from the normal women here.
FlowerGirly Posted May 27, 2011 Posted May 27, 2011 Yes, it's true, neener neener, and a comparison to all sorts of other cities in the U.S. and elsewhere I've been and lived, even listed some of them. Also, I had no trouble getting women in Manhattan because at that time in life I was a "Mr. Big" type in a "Mr. Big" job. Doesn't change that I found the dynamic unhealthy, unappealing and boring sooner rather than later. So much for "bitterness," but keep tossing that term around, it helps us distinguish the doctrinaire feminists on LS from the normal women here. Oh jeez. Ok.
Recommended Posts