TaurusTerp Posted March 14, 2011 Posted March 14, 2011 Ok from this sentence and particurlay the bolded, I can't tell if you think drugging children is a good or bad thing. I most certainly don't think it is a good thing. And despite using the sports analogy, I don't think competition is a good thing. I disagree with the way society is going, and I think aguy who feels that he needs to compete to the extent that he is willing to take drugs to do it, is a perfect example of what is wrong with society. But hey, it's his body, his choice, just as it will be her choice, if she finds out, to either accept his choice or move on. Please explain how taking drugs to compete with other men is different from boob jobs, push up bras, heels for added height, dying your hair, on and on and on. Such hypocrisy.
NoMagicBullet Posted March 14, 2011 Posted March 14, 2011 I'm not going to bother writing what could be a lengthy essay, because it seems you're so pleased with your performance and don't want to hear any negative feedback about it. Anyway, I don't see things working out for you and this girl even if she never finds out about your pills, because: You deceived her. You used her to satisfy your own curiosity about drugs. You did this for your own ego. (Her being the beneficiary of this chemical -- something she had no say in -- is BS.) After this, I don't see how you could be honest with her and put her before your wants when it comes to sex or anything else. You wanted to see what the drugs would do, you wanted to perform better than any other guy out there -- it was all about you. ... in the event she is sleeping with anyone else (which I highly doubt), I wanted to help her understand that those other dudes can't hold a candle to me in the sack. You probably won't believe this, but many women value other things beyond a dude being good in the sack. Like honesty. all's fair in love & war after all, isn't it? lol. And in both love & war, there's a point one should ask how far one should go in debasing themselves and another person just to win.
Titania22 Posted March 14, 2011 Posted March 14, 2011 Please explain how taking drugs to compete with other men is different from boob jobs, push up bras, heels for added height, dying your hair, on and on and on. Such hypocrisy. So because women are crazy in the lengths they will go to to compete, men are now going to bring equality to the sexes, by becoming just as crazy. How is it any different a woman who says no to a man taking performance enhancing drugs, and a man saying no to a woman who has had a boob job?
Jack & Coke Posted March 16, 2011 Posted March 16, 2011 I am sure a similar argument was made yrs ago in sport for using performance enhancing drugs. Apples and oranges.
Author ConflictedGuy27 Posted March 16, 2011 Author Posted March 16, 2011 I don't see things working out for you and this girl even if she never finds out about your pills, because: You deceived her. You used her to satisfy your own curiosity about drugs. You did this for your own ego. (Her being the beneficiary of this chemical -- something she had no say in -- is BS.)... ...I may have been a bit more worried if you mentioned having a fully functional crystal ball handy; but I suppose you gave me what I paid for.
Star Gazer Posted March 16, 2011 Posted March 16, 2011 CG, I don't think it's wise to boast about what you did. You've got nowhere to go but down from here, and if she finds out you used her and deceived her, you'll hit rock bottom fast.
Gold Pile Posted March 16, 2011 Posted March 16, 2011 If you happen to fail her the 1st time, there will be no 2nd chances. I highly support using a pill the 1st time with a new lady. The pill often prevents a man from finishing, so I've been known to fake it. I take mine with an aspirin to help combat the headache. The "L" pill you mention feels the best for me, but it does turn me bright red. If you're in good shape, you can perform like a superman with these pills. Further into the relationship, I phase out the pills. If I happen to fail in getting it up (I bat about 85%) then it's no big deal cuz she knows we have had fun b4 and will again. But failure the 1st time is a nightmare.
Jack & Coke Posted March 16, 2011 Posted March 16, 2011 If you happen to fail her the 1st time, there will be no 2nd chances. I highly support using a pill the 1st time with a new lady. The pill often prevents a man from finishing, so I've been known to fake it. I take mine with an aspirin to help combat the headache. The "L" pill you mention feels the best for me, but it does turn me bright red. If you're in good shape, you can perform like a superman with these pills. Further into the relationship, I phase out the pills. If I happen to fail in getting it up (I bat about 85%) then it's no big deal cuz she knows we have had fun b4 and will again. But failure the 1st time is a nightmare. Never messed with pills, but I can't disagree with this logic at all. The OP is getting bashed, but let's be real; a piss poor performance would NOT get him back for a repeat. He gained his edge how he saw fit. Can't be mad at that.
Author ConflictedGuy27 Posted March 16, 2011 Author Posted March 16, 2011 Goldpile & Jack, you guys get it. I've said it before (heared it echoed by you two gents), and I'll say it again - you'll never see round 2 in the bedroom if round 1 wasn't worthwhile, in her opinion. I love the performance enhancing sports analogy someone used earlier. I was the Barry Bonds of doggie style, lmfao. anyway, she's spending the night on Saturday, and based on our conversations since last Saturday, she's still extremely smitten. it's no mistake I arranged for a sleep over this time around. it'll give us enough time to blur a few sessions into one night's memory. I'm almost certain what I have in mind will trump last week's initial experience. of course, no pills this time.
Author ConflictedGuy27 Posted March 16, 2011 Author Posted March 16, 2011 CG, I don't think it's wise to boast about what you did. You've got nowhere to go but down from here, and if she finds out you used her and deceived her, you'll hit rock bottom fast. nowhere to go but down, huh counselor? I do appreciate the vote of confidence. stay tuned.
Jack & Coke Posted March 16, 2011 Posted March 16, 2011 nowhere to go but down, huh counselor? I do appreciate the vote of confidence. stay tuned. Nice, looking forward to an update.
Jack & Coke Posted March 18, 2011 Posted March 18, 2011 Check this out Conflicted: http://2centtab.blogspot.com/2011/03/pq-move-of-week.html
makelemonade1974 Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Public service announcement #2: the river running doesn't always mean exactly what you think it means. Some women, myself included, never need to use lubricants. For some women, the lubricant glands respond quickly and remain responsive throughout sexual activity, a purely physical response to stimulation and friction, not even necessarily denoting strong arousal. I've had marathon multi-hour sex before and been just waiting for it to end, bored and feeling internally battered by the end, and the guy was patting himself on the back for being such a stud while I was trying not to roll my eyes. I'm assuming that's probably not the case here, since you said she called you afterwards and seems eager for a repeat performance, but it's something you might want to keep in mind in the future. Honestly two hours of penetrative sex with no oral, and apparently minimal foreplay in general, does not sound awesome or sexy to me. Also, like other women have posted before me, I wouldn't appreciate finding out that I'd been an unwitting part of somebody's sex experiment. Glad you had a good time, though. Although I've had partners that lasted about ten minutes and left me feeling like "that's it?" I'm with stung on this one. When I first met my ex, we did it like 20 times in three days to the point where we just couldn't physically deal with it anymore - ouch. Lube is probably a good thing, but more than an hour, IMO is too long. And the fact that you couldn't make it go back down afterwards is a little disturbing. Depends on the situation I guess. I'm glad you shared this story though.
NoMagicBullet Posted April 19, 2011 Posted April 19, 2011 anyway, she's spending the night on Saturday, and based on our conversations since last Saturday, she's still extremely smitten. it's no mistake I arranged for a sleep over this time around. it'll give us enough time to blur a few sessions into one night's memory. I'm almost certain what I have in mind will trump last week's initial experience. of course, no pills this time. So this was back in mid-March. What happened that Saturday? What's happened since then with this girl and your "experiment"? The lack of updates would lead us who disagree with you to believe that maybe we were right; otherwise we'd have additional positive reports by now, right? I'm sure your supporters would like to know the outcome as well.
thatone Posted April 19, 2011 Posted April 19, 2011 I felt like I had been fooled with trick candles on my birthday cake and no matter how hard I blew they wouldnt go out bahahaha, you are the winner for that analogy.
Cee Posted April 19, 2011 Posted April 19, 2011 What happened to ConflictedGuy? Is he going through his stash of Levitra with a string of women? Do tell about the outcome of the experiment.
Recommended Posts