Jump to content

Predatory Mindset - The "Tucker Max" Approach


While the thread author can add an update and reopen discussion, this thread was last posted in over a month ago. Want to continue the conversation? Feel free to start a new thread instead!

Recommended Posts

Posted

The important things one needs to know about Tucker Max.

 

1. There are plenty of women who go after players like him. The notion that he's "duped" or tricked women into having sex with him is pretty offensive to women. I suppose they didn't consciously want to do it then? What's funny is that women on this board are the first to scoff at any notion of "double standards" in sexual promiscuity yet implicitly support such standards by implying that a woman who has sex with a boorish, sexually promiscuous male is automatically damaged in some way or another. Yeah, either they're all low class/psychologically messed up (in whatever sense you choose), or MAYBE they just drunkenly hooked up with some dude in the same way so many (yes, including you LS ladies) have done at some point in their lives.

 

2. He is the product of a broken and neglectful home and openly admits it.

 

3. I'm sure many of his stories are embellished, especially the dialogue. However, I have no doubt in my mind that most of what he said has occurred. If you're young, drink a lot, have a lot of confidence, can get women's attention, and are generally reckless and fun/thrill-loving, stuff like this can certainly happen to you.

Posted
or MAYBE they just drunkenly hooked up with some dude in the same way so many (yes, including you LS ladies) have done at some point in their lives.

 

Uh, I don't think so.

Posted
Uh, I don't think so.

 

So no female on this board has ever had a one night stand? Be careful when you decide to appoint yourself the spokesperson for a large group of people.

 

With that said, attacking that statement while ignoring everything else just proves you missed the point entirely.

Posted
The important things one needs to know about Tucker Max.

 

1. There are plenty of women who go after players like him. The notion that he's "duped" or tricked women into having sex with him is pretty offensive to women. I suppose they didn't consciously want to do it then? What's funny is that women on this board are the first to scoff at any notion of "double standards" in sexual promiscuity yet implicitly support such standards by implying that a woman who has sex with a boorish, sexually promiscuous male is automatically damaged in some way or another. Yeah, either they're all low class/psychologically messed up (in whatever sense you choose), or MAYBE they just drunkenly hooked up with some dude in the same way so many (yes, including you LS ladies) have done at some point in their lives.

 

2. He is the product of a broken and neglectful home and openly admits it.

 

3. I'm sure many of his stories are embellished, especially the dialogue. However, I have no doubt in my mind that most of what he said has occurred. If you're young, drink a lot, have a lot of confidence, can get women's attention, and are generally reckless and fun/thrill-loving, stuff like this can certainly happen to you.

 

There is a big difference between simply participating in casual sex and using the fact someone had casual sex with you to mock and degrade them.

 

Even I, from a broken and neglectful home, can see that. He has no excuse.

Posted

Yeah Tucker Max and Chelsea Handler same thing different gender.. Its amazing how these people can get famous and make money authoring this drivel... its rubbish.

Posted
So no female on this board has ever had a one night stand?.

What exactly is a one night stand?

Posted
So no female on this board has ever had a one night stand? Be careful when you decide to appoint yourself the spokesperson for a large group of people.

 

With that said, attacking that statement while ignoring everything else just proves you missed the point entirely.

 

I'm speaking for myself. I didn't attack. I made a statement that negated without defaming yours.

Posted (edited)
There is a big difference between simply participating in casual sex and using the fact someone had casual sex with you to mock and degrade them.

 

Even I, from a broken and neglectful home, can see that. He has no excuse.

 

I don't think he ever tried to use that (or anything else) as an excuse. He simply did what many, many people do during certain points in their lives (partying, sleeping around, and being reckless) but was the first to compile it in a completely unbowdlerized narrative. It's not high art by any means but I really never understood why he's provoked so much controversy. The reason his books and website are as popular as they are is because it celebrates the male id to a degree that is not considered politically correct. It's also just downright hilarious stuff a lot of the time. I really think any righteous indignation directed towards him is just a bad case of barking up the wrong tree.

Edited by TheBigQuestion
  • Author
Posted

After reading a couple more chapters just now while on the can, I realized that in many of the situations, the girl(s) were just as aggressive, if not more so, as him in trying to hookup. Also note that in the vast majority of cases, the girls are in college...

 

Are college campuses really that easy...? :rolleyes:

Posted
or MAYBE they just drunkenly hooked up with some dude in the same way so many (yes, including you LS ladies) have done at some point in their lives.
Some of us have never and will never "drunkenly" hook up with some stranger. Alcohol lowers inhibitions but doesn't inherently change the person you are inside. So if you're a mean or abusive drunk, this would be your natural inclination.

 

As far as predatory behaviour is concerned, if women are stupid enough to fall for it, it's on their shoulders. I've played and been played before. But never to the degree of hopping into bed with a predator.

Posted
I don't think he ever tried to use that (or anything else) as an excuse. He simply did what many, many people do during certain points in their lives (partying, sleeping around, and being reckless) but was the first to compile it in a completely unbowdlerized narrative. It's not high art by any means but I really never understood why he's provoked so much controversy. The reason his books and website are as popular as they are is because it celebrates the male id to a degree that is not considered politically correct. It's also just downright hilarious stuff a lot of the time. I really think any righteous indignation directed towards him is just a bad case of barking up the wrong tree.

 

Eh, well, a comparative would be Britney Spears. She went through a similar reckless stage, though I don't know if her conquests are/were any where near the same.

 

Would some men kick her out of bed?

 

 

:confused:

Posted
I don't think he ever tried to use that (or anything else) as an excuse. He simply did what many, many people do during certain points in their lives (partying, sleeping around, and being reckless) but was the first to compile it in a completely unbowdlerized narrative. It's not high art by any means but I really never understood why he's provoked so much controversy. The reason his books and website are as popular as they are is because it celebrates the male id to a degree that is not considered politically correct. It's also just downright hilarious stuff a lot of the time. I really think any righteous indignation directed towards him is just a bad case of barking up the wrong tree.

 

How about how he openly criticizes and insults women, people who are overweight or 'chunky', 'ugly' people, people of different race/religion/ethnicity than his own? How about how he shamelessly degrades everyone around him? While all of that may be funny if he was a stand up comic, he swears left and right that this is who he is. He is not kidding, he is just an '@$$hole'.

Posted
I don't think he ever tried to use that (or anything else) as an excuse. He simply did what many, many people do during certain points in their lives (partying, sleeping around, and being reckless) but was the first to compile it in a completely unbowdlerized narrative. It's not high art by any means but I really never understood why he's provoked so much controversy. The reason his books and website are as popular as they are is because it celebrates the male id to a degree that is not considered politically correct. It's also just downright hilarious stuff a lot of the time. I really think any righteous indignation directed towards him is just a bad case of barking up the wrong tree.

 

You are of course entitled to your own opinion, same as everybody else is.

 

Yes I understand he has had a broken and neglected home life. There are many great men however who overcome the bad things they've experienced and become productive members of society, same as women who have done the same.

 

My issue (if I'm one of the ones you consider to not appreciate him, which would be accurate since I don't) is that he is encouraging men to treat women like crap. For ages and ages, there's already men all over the world who use and abuse and throw away women, so I don't see any reason to celebrate any "male id" that treats women so disrespectfully. If you do, that's your opinion. However, I encourage you to research why men treating women disrespectfully is a problem. Yes sad to say many women enable it :( but that just shows there are a lot of things we humans need to work on, both men and women. Guys who celebrate using women are not helping any, except for maybe they revolt guys don't want to be like that (and reinforce the desire to protect women) and show girls to stay away from guys who don't care for them.

Posted
How about how he openly criticizes and insults women, people who are overweight or 'chunky', 'ugly' people, people of different race/religion/ethnicity than his own? How about how he shamelessly degrades everyone around him? While all of that may be funny if he was a stand up comic, he swears left and right that this is who he is. He is not kidding, he is just an '@$$hole'.

 

True that. I don't know why anyone would want to be like him or associated with a person such as him. There are many other ways to be a pick up artist (if one so desires) that don't necessarily involve being a raging dickhead to everyone.

Posted
Some of us have never and will never "drunkenly" hook up with some stranger. Alcohol lowers inhibitions but doesn't inherently change the person you are inside. So if you're a mean or abusive drunk, this would be your natural inclination.

 

As far as predatory behaviour is concerned, if women are stupid enough to fall for it, it's on their shoulders. I've played and been played before. But never to the degree of hopping into bed with a predator.

 

So many things wrong with this post.

 

1. Please show me where I said ALL or even MOST female posters on LS have had one night stands or random hookups? The truth is that MANY have, and if I recall, that's the word I used. Same goes for everyone else in the world. If casual sex is not something you've participated in, it serves no purpose for you to respond to this thread saying that you haven't, because I never called you out specifically, nor did I imply that all women on LS have done it.

 

What I take issue with is the fact that there were tons of people in this thread talking about how anyone who hooks up with a guy like Tucker Max is somehow damaged or simply must have something wrong with them. To me, that goes against a lot of what is frequently posted by women on LS in regards to female sexuality and double standards. What really confuses me is that most of the women in his stories do not have the time to make such an evaluation, and to most of them, it wouldn't matter, nor would it even be much of a memory.

Posted
So many things wrong with this post.

 

1. Please show me where I said ALL or even MOST female posters on LS have had one night stands or random hookups? The truth is that MANY have, and if I recall, that's the word I used. Same goes for everyone else in the world. If casual sex is not something you've participated in, it serves no purpose for you to respond to this thread saying that you haven't, because I never called you out specifically, nor did I imply that all women on LS have done it.

 

What I take issue with is the fact that there were tons of people in this thread talking about how anyone who hooks up with a guy like Tucker Max is somehow damaged or simply must have something wrong with them. To me, that goes against a lot of what is frequently posted by women on LS in regards to female sexuality and double standards. What really confuses me is that most of the women in his stories do not have the time to make such an evaluation, and to most of them, it wouldn't matter, nor would it even be much of a memory.

So many things wrong with this post.

 

or MAYBE they just drunkenly hooked up with some dude in the same way so many (yes, including you LS ladies) have done at some point in their lives.
This infers that "so many" LS ladies have done this. I'm responding by saying I haven't.

 

As far as women sleeping with Tucker Max being damaged, I would say so. Have you ever seen the little creep? Gross. :sick:

Posted
How about how he openly criticizes and insults women, people who are overweight or 'chunky', 'ugly' people, people of different race/religion/ethnicity than his own? How about how he shamelessly degrades everyone around him? While all of that may be funny if he was a stand up comic, he swears left and right that this is who he is. He is not kidding, he is just an '@$$hole'.

 

Race, religion, and ethnicity? I challenge you to find any phrase in anything he's ever written that says anything about religion, other than mentioning in passing that he's an atheist. Race and ethnicity? Other than benign putdowns that many people who are friends throw around with each other, there's really never been any of that either. The fact that you mentioned any of these 3 things proves to me that you're talking out of your ass.

Posted
So many things wrong with this post.

 

This infers that "so many" LS ladies have done this. I'm responding by saying I haven't.

 

As far as women sleeping with Tucker Max being damaged, I would say so. Have you ever seen the little creep? Gross. :sick:

 

The fact that you have or haven't is irrelevant to this conversation. The point is that many people who post here and who live in the world have done it. It's not a knock on their character, it simply is.

 

I'm certainly glad you and EricaH are not the same person, because you're putting him down for his appearance, the same thing she criticizes Tucker Max doing towards women.

Posted
The fact that you have or haven't is irrelevant to this conversation. The point is that many people who post here and who live in the world have done it. It's not a knock on their character, it simply is.

 

I'm certainly glad you and EricaH are not the same person, because you're putting him down for his appearance, the same thing she criticizes Tucker Max doing towards women.

No one is saying that ONS or casual sex is a bad thing. What I'm saying is who the hell would want to sleep with a guy like Tucker Max? I'm not just talking about his looks but his body language, how he speaks, how he moves. Sheer creepiness which is why it makes me consider women who're willing to sleep with him, somewhat desperate or so stupid, they can't read his creepy body language. And if either is the case, it's their own problem.
Posted (edited)
Race, religion, and ethnicity? I challenge you to find any phrase in anything he's ever written that says anything about religion, other than mentioning in passing that he's an atheist. Race and ethnicity? Other than benign putdowns that many people who are friends throw around with each other, there's really never been any of that either. The fact that you mentioned any of these 3 things proves to me that you're talking out of your ass.

 

The fact that you posted the bold, without allowing me to quote anything he has written to prove my point, goes to show the type of person I am debating with.

 

If you read *any* of his stories on his website, you will see exactly what I am talking about. I've read 2 stories of his, on his website, and can show you at least 8 different cases where he says something about any of the issues I listed. It seriously doesn't take a rocket scientist to be able to see the words written on his website. However, it does take a person who is able to read and comprehend the material presented. :)

 

However, the mere fact you jumped to the assumption that I didn't have any proof to back up what I had previously posted, goes to show that you: 1- didn't read any of the stories on his website, and 2- allows me to realize I no longer want to discuss this situation with you :) I'd much rather go back to 'talking out of my @$$' :)

Edited by EricaH329
Posted (edited)
Seriously. Why anyone would feel jealous of not having experienced what he did is just...beyond me. :sick:

 

You honestly impute jealousy into what I said? The word "Chimerical" comes to mind...from what planet are you?

Edited by Jonno_S
  • Author
Posted

Well, let's ignore the Tucker Max aspect of this topic and focus on simply the "predatory mindset"...that is, simply searching out the easiest women and not necessarily acting like a complete assh*le to them...

 

I'm sure it works even better if you play a stand-up guy to the insecure women...or is the arsehole really that big of a draw...?

Posted
If Tucker Max is making a living on that dumb website, I am going to fall down the stairs.

THANK YOU : Like seriously, now that is unfair .

Posted
If Tucker Max is making a living on that dumb website, I am going to fall down the stairs.

 

The ad placements alone on his website garner a comfortable living.

×
×
  • Create New...