MrNate Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 Some more curvy women pics (true curves) http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h55.jpg http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h5.jpg http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h77.jpg http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h777.jpg http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h88.jpg #3 wins!! Look at that ass.
112233 Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 #3 wins!! Look at that ass. Nasty. Not right.
Green Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 In my honest opinion #2 is too skinny because her hip bones are jutting out. #1 is borderline on the same -- I can't see the side bone as well as on #2 because it's covered by clothing, but the front of the hip bones are jutting. That's not slender or curvy, that's bony. Just my opinion. #4 and #5 are slender but curvy, and not bony. Not going to attempt to judge #3 because all I can see is her ass (and if you like that, how on earth could you say you didn't dig Beyonce's body? I mean...) 1 and 2 I like but the girl pouring hot water or whatever is probably the hottest. Big ass girl #3 is hot but not my fav I really put her in for the ass men reading this thread about curvey women.
Lorelai Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 1 and 2 I like but the girl pouring hot water or whatever is probably the hottest. Big ass girl #3 is hot but not my fav I really put her in for the ass men reading this thread about curvey women. K, just checking man And I agree with you, honestly, about #4. She's not so thin her hip bones are sticking out, which makes her waist look narrower for her size. Maybe it's just that some girls are blessed with bone structure that allows them to be "slender" without being bony, but I honestly think a lot of women try so hard to get into a smaller size or get a perfectly flat stomach that they lose weight over the hip bones. They jut out then, and that's so unsexy IMHO it's not funny. It also *raises* the waist-to-hip ratio, often to well above the 0.7 that's ideal -- because especially if you have toned abs there's only so much waist you can lose. Like, for example, Megan Fox against Kelly Brook (Ignore the picture of Lindsay Lohan in the Kelly shot, it's the only one I found of her in a bikini) http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Megan-Fox-in-a-Bikini-2.jpg http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/skinny-vs-curvy-bikini-battle-lindsay-loha-vs-kelly-brook.jpg Megan is certainly fit -- she has very well defined abs. But the bones in the decollete are showing, and the hip bones are showing -- indicating she's a bit thinner than her bone structure would dictate. She is not curvy. I am not saying she is medically underweight, or anorexic, or anything negative -- but I think she would be more attractive with about 10 lbs or so. It would round out her hips and give her a more ideal waist-hip curve. But in other pictures from that photoshoot, she has a bit of a belly despite all of the ab work -- probably part of what motivated her to have bones showing. But while Kelly might think she's got fat thighs (nearly all women think they have fat thighs, it seems like it's just a fact of life), she's fit, you can tell she does her sit ups, and she has enough fat over her hip bones to make her figure much curvier. If she lost weight trying to get rid of the thighs, she'd lose her curves.
Leigh 87 Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 You made some good points regarding bome structure, and its correlation between thinnes vs attractiveness. It is true that some women are thinner than their bone structure, or bone size, would naturally allow. However, small boned women are also like this; there are average or large boned women who are too thin for their bone structure, yet there are also just as man naturally small boned women who are also slimmer than their bone size would naturally dictate. Megan fox is about 5 ' 4, and she has small bones to begin with. The size of her knee joints, wrists, arms, and body in general indicates that she DOES have bones that are too pronounced; although they are still on a smaller body type - which is a 5 ' 4 women with small bones. No women looks attractive to the VAST MAJORITY of men, if they are EMACIATED for their frame size; Megan Fox and the majority of celebs are also in this state. They are not nromally emaciated, but they simply are slightly under what their bone structure would allow. My area of interest career wise, is peoples bodies; finding the ideal way to eat and exercise physically, to attain the healthiest body ( which is not only superficisl, as the more optimal a body is the better it functions and achieves other things in life). I spend a lot of time considering differnt body types, and what is and what is not optimal in terms of attraction, but also in terms of HEALTH, and what is the line between being yout THINNEST weight, and WHEN the thinnes will start to impact your daily life. Most women I see these days that have small bones, are not slim for their frame; they do nto dedicate their time to a organic, chemical free, perfect diet of the perfect amount of calories that will tranform their bodies to their slimmest possible healthy weight. On the other hand, I have lots of free time, so I have invested a lot into finding the ideal diet and also on finding what the lowest weight that is acceptable on my bone structure, and findingt he right exercises method. Personally, I find small built women, with small bones, to not be enough to meet my " most attractive" crieteria. For me, the most ideal shape for me, in terms of womens bodies, is an average to tall women, who has LONG LEGS, a NARROW WAIST, and WIDE HIPS compared to her waist. My ideal body would be between 5 ' 7 ish ( I do not like super tall), 110 - 118 lbs, with a very narrow waist, and WIDE HIPS, as wide as possible when compared to the size of her waist. I also like the butt to be as curvy as possible, for the slim build ( a bubble butt that sticks out from her slender frame). She would also do yoga and Pilates, and not lift heavy weights, because I hate the 6 pack, overley developed look; I prefer nice lines on the abdominal area, that show evidence exercise anda healthy diet. I prefer that body type, to a thin but FLAT body type, that has no butt or curves. A LOT of women have THE POTENTIAL to be AS HOT as I described! However, they are not a slim weight for their build ( they are small boned, yet not slim for their build), and do not know about how to attain great skin through a clean diet, and they also do not know how much to each to attain their ideal weight for their frame, and they do not do Pilates or Yoga. Trust me. I know what it takes to get a great body, and a lot of naturally small boned women WOULD be curvy AND slim at the same time IF they knew what I know about how to go about it.
Lorelai Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 My ideal body would be between 5 ' 7 ish ( I do not like super tall), 110 - 118 lbs, with a very narrow waist, and WIDE HIPS, as wide as possible when compared to the size of her waist. I also like the butt to be as curvy as possible, for the slim build ( a bubble butt that sticks out from her slender frame). My only concern is that at that weight she would be between a 17.2 and 18.5 BMI -- 118 is the minimum weight to even be considered healthy by medical standards. 110 would be anorexia-defining. I have a very dear friend of mine that is 5'8. When she was 124 lbs (18.9 BMI) you could count her ribs, the decollete bones were showing, and her upper arms were narrower than her elbows -- and technically at that time she did not meet the qualifications for any eating disorder. She was not medically underweight for her height and still was bony. She did develop anorexia because she felt she was too fat even when her ribs were showing, however -- when she became officially medically underweight she refused to gain or maintain. She was vegan. She ran marathons until the week before she was hospitalized at the weight of 97 lbs (and the last one she ran she finished first among the women in her age group). Obviously she was eating some if she could run a marathon at a 14.7 BMI -- but not enough given her activity level. She's still in the hospital right now, but fortunately off of bedrest that she has gained to a 15.5 BMI. I love her dearly, but I knew I couldn't do anything to change her, and trying to make her change would have alienated her when she needed someone to talk to. All I could do was listen. But it hurt to see. She looked much, much better when she weighed about 135 (20.5 BMI)... and was happier, too.
Leigh 87 Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 I am sorry to hear about your friend - I wish her the very best. She may never accept or like her natural, healthy weight, but she can still be HAPPY in life. I never had severe or acute anorexia, I got down to BMI 16 ish and was not " anorexic" for long; however, I have suffered from the disordered mindset for years. I am glad she has at least one friend like you, who will hopefully be there when she DOES become weight restored. because she may never " love" what a healthy weight looks like. I was actually LESS curvy when I weighed more! Because I gain weight around the abdomin the fastest, so when I gain weight above what is slim and fit on my frame, my waist size increases easily. When I am 116 - 118 I am " slim" for my build at 5 ' 5, because I have 32 DD -or D breasts with a bubble butt - due to my shape, I have natural curves, that prevent my body from ever being " skinny" or " slight" . However, whilst I DO have too many curves in terms of butt and breasts to ever be a " beanpole", I DO look " curvier" when I am at a slim weight for my build, oposed to when I gain to an average or heavy weight for my body type. Although being curvy, be it in the breasts and butt, OR with wide hips and a narrow waist IS genetic. Some slim women have wide hips and small waists and have ample breasts for their size; although very slim women with ample breasts are rare. MOst have a C or D cup at best. Any larger on a very small framed thin women would be enhanced, or they would be a minority, like 2% of the population ( to be a D cup or over, when you have a BMI of 17 or 18) Lastly, I am aware of BMI, and I do prefer BMI's that are 20 - 18 typcially. I just prefer what those dimensions look like. I do not find muscular women as asthetically pleasing to look at. Although this is only my opinion, and I respect that it differs from others. I have a muscular build ( mesomorph), but I do not like what I look like when I go out of my way to try to lift heavy weights; when my soul aim is to be able to lift as heavy of an object as I can, and then to INCREASE that weight eventually. I end up looking stocky and I actually put on more fat in order to turn IN to the muscle, and I end up at a higher weight and get a thicker waist. To see the definition in my waist, I need to be on the slim end of what is healthy for my build. Many augue that more muscle makes you smaller, but for me, it DIMINISHES my curves, and simply gives me a thicker waist, and more stocky body all over. I like curvy, and dispell the heavily 6 pack - muscular look. In fact, I do not like very muscular womens bodies; Pilates toned and yoga clad is great, though. I do not relate or find any appeal to the girls that some of the guys have cited as " super hot". The one surrealist posted of the SUPER CURVY women, was more attractive than the very muscular ones. Give me curves over a very muscular fit women any day. Sure, marathon runner - fit can be hot to me, but not over developed muscles.
Jannah Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 Nasty. Not right. How the heck does someone's butt grow like that? :eek:
Lorelai Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 I'm sorry to hear about your own experience with an eating disorder, and I hope that you've found the happiness that we both hope my friend finds. I'm also glad that you were able to start recovering before you did damage.... she learned when she was admitted that she already had pretty severe osteopenia -- only a tiny bit away from true osteoporosis. She's *really* upset because the doctors have told her she may not be able to run even when she recovers a healthy weight unless she can start reversing the osteopenia, because of the risk of stress fractures. The conventional wisdom about gaining muscle helping you get smaller generally is in reference to people who are overweight -- if you build muscle when you're overweight, you raise your metabolism because muscle is tissue that actually burns calories just to maintain itself. Plus, since muscle weighs more than fat, a person who is the same height/weight and muscular will be smaller in total than the person who doesn't have as much muscle -- it just may be they are smaller in different places. (Oh I wish it were actually possible to spot-reduce! If so, toning the abs wouldn't create a broader waist!) Where you talk about having to gain weight to build muscle, a person who is overweight doesn't have to do that since it's already there. And yeah, where a person deposits their fat makes a difference.... for women who naturally deposit it in the hips and thighs, gaining a few pounds can emphasize the waist, but if you're more of an apple than a pear... As far as what I find too low of body fat, bottom line, to be attracted to is this: in a woman, showing bones other than the collarbone. In a man, it's veins popping out. Adding muscle won't help either situation -- just makes it even more gross to me. (And while I'm not a 50/50 confirmed bisexual, I have been with women.)
112233 Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 How the heck does someone's butt grow like that? :eek: Photoshop I hope.
Green Posted November 14, 2010 Posted November 14, 2010 How the heck does someone's butt grow like that? :eek: This guy I knew had a gf who had an ass so big she looked deformed it mad me sick. Photoshop I hope. haha you've seriously never been to the beach or something and seen a girl with a real big ass in person?
112233 Posted November 14, 2010 Posted November 14, 2010 haha you've seriously never been to the beach or something and seen a girl with a real big ass in person? I'm saying that girl would be better off with a smaller ass, and I hope she was photoshopped for her sake. You are obsessed with the beach young man.
Green Posted November 14, 2010 Posted November 14, 2010 I'm saying that girl would be better off with a smaller ass, and I hope she was photoshopped for her sake. You are obsessed with the beach young man. I'm not obsessed with anything watch your mouth with that young man crap
sagetalk Posted November 14, 2010 Posted November 14, 2010 This is my fantasy Slave Leia Girl Vampirella They are both attractive, but those outfits don't flatter them as much as other outfits could. I would say those women represent curvy as good as anything that has been posted. Most models fall into the skinny category (nothing wrong with them either ). I think for me, the pear and apple are the biggest turn offs.
Recommended Posts