Surrealist Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 Yeah okay those girls are hot, I have no issue with that. I just think the chick I posted does it a little more for me 'shrug'.
Andy_K Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h3-1.jpg and http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h1.jpg I'd go with the girl in Surrealist's pics over these two and http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h2-1.jpg But this one wins!
Untouchable_Fire Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 befriend her on facebook. Did you just randomly find this girl online and try to be her friend? Look she isn't that special (SEXY YES) but there are plenty of girls like her with better faces. I see them every day. You just have to aproach them in real life and ASK THEM out. That girl had an Hour glass figure in those pics so yes she was hot... Heres what I consider to be HOTTER then what u used as an example http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h3-1.jpg Not better... maybe just poor photo quality... but I don't think she is better looking. and http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h1.jpg Way too young. Looks like a 12yo with makeup. Let her grow up and she will probably be very attractive. and http://i1024.photobucket.com/albums/y307/Jiberama/h2-1.jpg I like this one.
Green Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 I'd go with the girl in Surrealist's pics over these two But this one wins! I kind of liked her the least but just put her in for people who like really big looking ass's haha. She is hot though just not my favorite. I also don't typicaly love this type of girl but was trying to emulate the type of girl he had in his pics yet with better FACES/BODIES
Surrealist Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 Okay these chicks are friends of some random chick I befriended on facebook when the demon of lust bit me and I just clicked the add friend button lol. http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash1/hs273.ash1/20058_101130763255193_100000748080477_31793_4519154_n.jpg http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs173.snc3/20058_101130766588526_100000748080477_31794_39638_n.jpg http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs173.snc3/20058_101130769921859_100000748080477_31795_7617_n.jpg http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs193.snc3/20058_100523963315873_100000748080477_12723_4240768_n.jpg
Alma Mobley Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 Okay I posted these pics on a bodybuilding forum and asked the guys there if they thought she was sexy or fat. Now I personally think this chick is sexy as &^%*! Now I agree she will possibly get too heavy in the future but right now, grrrrrrrrrrrr! Not necessarily. I have a similar body type (not quite like that -- her curve is pretty ridiculous!) and I am not overweight. (I'm 38.) Nice to see you guys having so much fun, though, LOL.
Leigh 87 Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 STEVE - I think that girl has the BEST proportions; the waist to hip ratio is INSANE. THAT is my favourite SHAPE on a women, in terms of waist to hip ratio; I like the waist to be a SMALL as possible, in comparison to the hips. What did the body building guys say about her? Look, she is blessed with a GREAT waist to hip ratio, however; she is not petite enough. To me, womens bodies look hotter when they are slender and small. I do love how the hips are just so exaggerated when compared to her waist. Slender women have different types of an hour glass shape. They do not need the fat level of that girl ( literally the fat level, I am not infering that she is indeed too fat), to attain that look. However, thin girls can have the same hip to waist ratio as that women u posted the pic of - Their hips can be just as wide when compared to their waists. They just do not have as much fat on their thighs, and breast. With hour glass figures, being slim with one is one thing, however, when you are not slim with an hour glass figure, the large breasts and additional fat on the top of the thighs give EXTRA, EXTRA emphasis on an ALREADY hour glass shape. Personally, I prefer the very small waist, and very wide hips, on a slim women, that does not have huge breasts.
Alma Mobley Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 OK, some modern curves.... I always enjoy when our erstwhile bad girl, Jennifer Tilly, gains weight. Watching her go is a pleasure in itself How about Jennifer Tilly in Bound with Gina Gershon? That was pretty hot!
Titania22 Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 I'd go with the girl in Surrealist's pics over these two But this one wins! I agree with AndyK
Untouchable_Fire Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 What did the body building guys say about her? Look, she is blessed with a GREAT waist to hip ratio, however; she is not petite enough. To me, womens bodies look hotter when they are slender and small. I do love how the hips are just so exaggerated when compared to her waist. Slender women have different types of an hour glass shape. They do not need the fat level of that girl ( literally the fat level, I am not infering that she is indeed too fat), to attain that look. However, thin girls can have the same hip to waist ratio as that women u posted the pic of - Their hips can be just as wide when compared to their waists. They just do not have as much fat on their thighs, and breast. With hour glass figures, being slim with one is one thing, however, when you are not slim with an hour glass figure, the large breasts and additional fat on the top of the thighs give EXTRA, EXTRA emphasis on an ALREADY hour glass shape. Personally, I prefer the very small waist, and very wide hips, on a slim women, that does not have huge breasts. Why do you care? Are you into women? Your desire for low body weight, petite physiques... smacks of underage girls. Personally, I find women look their best outside of their teen years. In fact for a good many their 30's seems to be the most attractive.
Titania22 Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 Why do you care? Are you into women? Your desire for low body weight, petite physiques... smacks of underage girls. Personally, I find women look their best outside of their teen years. In fact for a good many their 30's seems to be the most attractive. yes, after studying men for over 15yrs, IMO most men reach their peak attractiveness somewhere in their early 30's, i think it may follow a bell curve.
Surrealist Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 STEVE - I think that girl has the BEST proportions; the waist to hip ratio is INSANE. THAT is my favourite SHAPE on a women, in terms of waist to hip ratio; I like the waist to be a SMALL as possible, in comparison to the hips. What did the body building guys say about her? Look, she is blessed with a GREAT waist to hip ratio, however; she is not petite enough. To me, womens bodies look hotter when they are slender and small. I do love how the hips are just so exaggerated when compared to her waist. Slender women have different types of an hour glass shape. They do not need the fat level of that girl ( literally the fat level, I am not infering that she is indeed too fat), to attain that look. However, thin girls can have the same hip to waist ratio as that women u posted the pic of - Their hips can be just as wide when compared to their waists. They just do not have as much fat on their thighs, and breast. With hour glass figures, being slim with one is one thing, however, when you are not slim with an hour glass figure, the large breasts and additional fat on the top of the thighs give EXTRA, EXTRA emphasis on an ALREADY hour glass shape. Personally, I prefer the very small waist, and very wide hips, on a slim women, that does not have huge breasts. Some of the guys loved her and want to eat her - bad. Couple said she didn't really do it for them and too fat, some indifferent, but overall the response was an emphatic yes she's hot. She does have a little fat on her thighs but given her build I don't think it looks bad on her. This chick is genetics, no matter what you do you can't look like that unless you're genetically endowed to grow those proportions.
Leigh 87 Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 Why do you care? Are you into women? Your desire for low body weight, petite physiques... smacks of underage girls. Personally, I find women look their best outside of their teen years. In fact for a good many their 30's seems to be the most attractive. I am a 24 yr old women. I lust after men the most, but I would also love to have sex with a very hot women. Problem is, I have no idea how to go about even KNOWING if a women is into girls, let alone the hot ones. I think of men primarily, though. I do not know if I could actually get feelings towards a women. I simply think that the curvy, victoria secret models, OR shorter women of similar proportions as VS models, who have tiny 24 - 25 inch waists, WIDE hips, are 5 '4 - 5 - 9, and are about 110 - 117 lbs, look the most attractive. I consider a tiny waist, with large hips, to be " curvy". I am not phased about breasts at all, although I do like a little but of a butt happening, rather than a flat one.
that girl Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 (edited) However, thin girls can have the same hip to waist ratio as that women u posted the pic of - Their hips can be just as wide when compared to their waists. They just do not have as much fat on their thighs, and breast. Not really. Look at that girl's photos. Her head is nearly the same size as her waist. Her waist looks like it is about 60% of her hips. I would guess she has something like a 22 inch waist and 37 inch hips. Most women look curvy with a 10-12 inch difference between their hips and waists, but hers must be something like 15 inches. You can't have those kind of intense curves without having meat on your hips and thighs. If she lost weight, the curve between her hips and her waist would be less pronounced because she obviously carries what weight she has on her hips. Take a look at the Victoria Secret models - they HAVE to have bodies with a femine shape - a clinched in tiny waist, but with wide, feminine hips. They pad and photoshop the models. You can notice a big difference between their VS shoots and candid. Rosie Huntington-Whiteley has admitted that they put three chicken cutlets in each of her bra cups. Still a beautiful girl, but her VS look is smoke and mirrors. Gisele has curves - her shape is NOT straight up and down like a beanpole; some skinny or thin or even normal sized women have no defined waist, and have figure like a boy. On the other hand, Gisele and other thin women like her, have a clearly small, defined waist, but they also have hips that clearly are much wider than their waist size. I wouldn't call her straight up and down, but in candids she does not have very curvy hips http://hollywoodbackwash.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/Gisele-bikini-2.jpg She is very attractive, but I wouldn't call her naturally very curvy. Yes, you can be thin and have curves. But the examples being posted aren't of overweight women so I don't even know why that is coming up. Mae West, Jayne Mansfield, Jennifer Tilly, etc. are all well within the healthy weight range as far as I can see. Maybe these thread should have been called "Not at all fat, but a big rack and generous ass" but I do not understand why some people feel the need to defend slimmer women. I doubt the VS models worry that Surrealist will not like them. There is a big range in natural body types so of course different people will prefer different things. There is the very slim Kate Moss type http://www.withamymac.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/kate-moss.jpg There is the more athletic Gabby Reese type http://www.shelbystidham.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Gabby-reese.jpg There is the small but not super skinny Mila Kunis type http://static.reelmovienews.com/images/gallery/mila-kunis-pic.jpg There is the not big but not small Kate Winslet type http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_z6F498YAEPE/SVoC_uLsbRI/AAAAAAAAA1M/llqVZiAvxsw/s400/kate_winslet_hot_pictures_image.jpg There is the fuller figured Christina Hendricks type http://raisebarackobama.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/christina-hendricks-cleavage-new-york-small-02.jpg They're all reasonable women to find attractive. It doesn't have to be a contest to knock down the body type someone else likes. Edited November 12, 2010 by that girl
Surrealist Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 I doubt the VS models worry that Surrealist will not like them. What are you going on about here? They wont worry that I wont like them? So what? Is that suppose to upset me? Well it doesnt but you mentioning my name there is annoying! What is VS anyway? Very Skinny? Sure I don't prefer very skinny models as they are often underweight and bordering on anorexia, and I actually know women who compete in bodybuilding comps and get their bodyfat levels really low and for some of them, it triggers eating disorders, as I'm sure it probably does for some of those models.
Untouchable_Fire Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 I am a 24 yr old women. I lust after men the most, but I would also love to have sex with a very hot women. Problem is, I have no idea how to go about even KNOWING if a women is into girls, let alone the hot ones. I think of men primarily, though. I do not know if I could actually get feelings towards a women. I simply think that the curvy, victoria secret models, OR shorter women of similar proportions as VS models, who have tiny 24 - 25 inch waists, WIDE hips, are 5 '4 - 5 - 9, and are about 110 - 117 lbs, look the most attractive. I consider a tiny waist, with large hips, to be " curvy". I am not phased about breasts at all, although I do like a little but of a butt happening, rather than a flat one. I can understand straight... and I can understand gay... but I just don't get bisexual people. It just seems to be the favorite choice of the incredibly indecisive. I'm not all that hung up on body type to be honest. I can appreciate a great shape... but I've been around enough to kind of have a been there done that attitude. For all the chatter about body types on this thread. I've been with some women that had weight fluctuations and I never lost attraction. If I'm in love, I will naturally focus on the parts I like about her body... and just ignore the flaws.
Titania22 Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 For all the chatter about body types on this thread. I've been with some women that had weight fluctuations and I never lost attraction. If I'm in love, I will naturally focus on the parts I like about her body... and just ignore the flaws. This is a good point, women do have weight fluctuations. Just due to our cycles alone we can change cup size, depending on where we are in the month.
Untouchable_Fire Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 This is a good point, women do have weight fluctuations. Just due to our cycles alone we can change cup size, depending on where we are in the month. My most recent Xgf gained 40 pounds over 1 year... then lost it in 3 months. She lost the weight so she could get it on with another guy... Ever since I just can't handle gym obsessed women. Current GF doesn't seem to fluctuate much at all. She has a healthy appetite too.
LittleTiger Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 Good to see a thread praising curvy women instead of the usual ones praising the 'skinnies'. Anthropologists have found that it's actually the waist to hip ratio that that men are most interested in (whether they realise it or not). Apparently, the most desirable waist to hip ratio in a woman, across all cultures, is 0.7. That is, the waist measurement is exactly 70% of the hip measurement. That's because this ratio is an indication of higher fertility. So the amount of padding (assuming it isn't excessive) is not really relevant - except where a man has a preference for soft rounded curves, or harder bony curves. Kate Moss has this ratio and so did Marilyn Monroe - which 'type' is more attractive to a man is just personal preference. Both are beautiful in their own way.
Alma Mobley Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 What are you going on about here? They wont worry that I wont like them? So what? Is that suppose to upset me? Well it doesnt but you mentioning my name there is annoying! What is VS anyway? Very Skinny? Sure I don't prefer very skinny models as they are often underweight and bordering on anorexia, and I actually know women who compete in bodybuilding comps and get their bodyfat levels really low and for some of them, it triggers eating disorders, as I'm sure it probably does for some of those models. I believe she's saying that Victoria's Secret (VS) models (which Leigh referenced) are not going to lose sleep over whether you like them or not (since you indicated on this thread that you like 'curvy' women). She was not insulting you, just using you as an example.
Author irc333 Posted November 12, 2010 Author Posted November 12, 2010 This is my fantasy Slave Leia Girl Vampirella More Clear Slave Leia - You can see the curves/force is stronger in this one - Storm Trooper outfit She's on my FB friends list, we've chatted here and there, lives a good distance away though, and goes to conventions.....I usually don't get all "Gushy" or weak in the knees over most women....but this woman absolutely has me enamoured. lol She's a nice girl and definately photogenic....and of course has a boyfriend. (Yeah, you think she'd be unattached, I don't think so.
somedude81 Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 This is my fantasy Slave Leia Girl She's a little thicker than I prefer. Everybody has their own idea of what curvy means to them. For me, a perfect description of curvy is Kim Kardashian. She has an absolutely perfect amount of fat and muscle. From the front. She's 5'2, 117 lbs. Is she skinny? No. Is she thick? No.
Author irc333 Posted November 12, 2010 Author Posted November 12, 2010 Yeah, Kim would be my first choice actually. She's a little thicker than I prefer. Everybody has their own idea of what curvy means to them. For me, a perfect description of curvy is Kim Kardashian. She has an absolutely perfect amount of fat and muscle. From the front. She's 5'2, 117 lbs. Is she skinny? No. Is she thick? No.
Mme. Chaucer Posted November 12, 2010 Posted November 12, 2010 Why does she look so angry in that photo? She's annoyed with Green.
Recommended Posts