Modesty

[mansmochie]

Unfortunately, it seems as though when many women are left to their own devices, modesty is the first virtue thrown out the door. Who can blame them though? When a man sees half naked women walking around, he sees them as sex objects.

 

But women use sex as their weapon to get what they want. I witness on daily occasion the stupidity of men who serve women hoping that they will be sexually rewarded.

 

The only difference between friendship and a "relationship" with a woman is sex. Thus when a woman hints at providing sexual rewards for good behavior, but then denies the male, this results in aggression, frustration, etc. in the man.

 

Sexual frustration leads to aggressive behavior in men, which leads to stalking, rape, harrassment, among other sexually charged actions against women.

 

Take another example: the woman with a boyfriend or husband. She displays her body, for all men to see, to desire. Once the sexual advance is made and she says "I have a boyfriend, husband", man once again becomes sexually frustrated.

 

A woman can even drive men to fight each other over her, which further causes division and strife among men! All because of woman's sexual power.

 

So what is the solution to all of this? If a woman does not want sexual advances, why would she continue to dress in a crude manner?

 

The answer is that women, sooner or later, will be forced once again to cover themselves and behave modestly, either through their own recognition of the nature of man, or because man forces them to.

[Taramere]

Unfortunately, it seems as though when many women are left to their own devices, modesty is the first virtue thrown out the door. Who can blame them though? When a man sees half naked women walking around, he sees them as sex objects.

 

But women use sex as their weapon to get what they want. I witness on daily occasion the stupidity of men who serve women hoping that they will be sexually rewarded.

 

The only difference between friendship and a "relationship" with a woman is sex. Thus when a woman hints at providing sexual rewards for good behavior, but then denies the male, this results in aggression, frustration, etc. in the man.

 

Sexual frustration leads to aggressive behavior in men, which leads to stalking, rape, harrassment, among other sexually charged actions against women.

 

Take another example: the woman with a boyfriend or husband. She displays her body, for all men to see, to desire. Once the sexual advance is made and she says "I have a boyfriend, husband", man once again becomes sexually frustrated.

 

A woman can even drive men to fight each other over her, which further causes division and strife among men! All because of woman's sexual power.

 

So what is the solution to all of this? If a woman does not want sexual advances, why would she continue to dress in a crude manner?

 

The answer is that women, sooner or later, will be forced once again to cover themselves and behave modestly, either through their own recognition of the nature of man, or because man forces them to.

 

If male aggression frightens you so much, try covering up your own face with a niqab. That makes more sense than fretting over half of the population not dressing in accordance with your personal tastes. Be the change you want to see etc. The chances are that you have an annoying "punch me" face that needs to be covered up so that other people don't lose control of themselves and give in to the urge to punch it repeatedly.

[GooseChaser]

I think OP is greatly exaggerating the issue of immodesty. People are normally not that obnoxious.

[denise_xo]

I would like men to wear trousers and shirts with long sleeves rather than shorts and T shirts. Seeing that bare flesh without subsequently being awarded sexually makes me frustrated and aggressive. It also makes me view all men as sexual objects. All this because of a man's sexual power.

[Disillusioned]

The problem I have with going out in slacks and a nice shirt is that people misread me... I must be sending out some sort of wardrobe warning coded message nobody told me about...

[Mme. Chaucer]

 

 

Sexual frustration leads to aggressive behavior in men, which leads to stalking, rape, harrassment, among other sexually charged actions against women.

 

Of course! How women dress is responsible for stalking, rape, harassment etc. Everybody knows that!

 

Take another example: the woman with a boyfriend or husband. She displays her body, for all men to see, to desire. Once the sexual advance is made and she says "I have a boyfriend, husband", man once again becomes sexually frustrated.

 

 

 

A woman can even drive men to fight each other over her, which further causes division and strife among men! All because of woman's sexual power.

 

Maybe ... just maybe, men could be held accountable for their own actions regardless of the outfits, tasteful or not, that women wear? You know, like how we can walk by aisles and aisles of food in the grocery store when we are hungry without grabbing handfuls of snacks and devouring them on the spot (and holding the store responsible)?

 

 

So what is the solution to all of this?

 

Duh! the burka!

 

The answer is that women, sooner or later, will be forced once again to cover themselves and behave modestly, either through their own recognition of the nature of man, or because man forces them to.

 

NOT!

 

Have I just engaged with a troll?

[utterer of lies]

I would like men to wear trousers and shirts with long sleeves rather than shorts and T shirts. Seeing that bare flesh without subsequently being awarded sexually makes me frustrated and aggressive. It also makes me view all men as sexual objects. All this because of a man's sexual power.

 

*flexes muscles*

 

/evilgrin

[Taramere]

I would like men to wear trousers and shirts with long sleeves rather than shorts and T shirts.

 

I vote we restrict that rule to the fatties. Talking of which, what's the deal with so many grossly overweight men going bra-less? It's completely obscene the way some of them allow their tits to swing free.

[collegeguy_24]

*flexes muscles*

 

/evilgrin

 

This is a win!

 

 

But in all seriousness, this is obviously a troll, so turn this into a joke thread!

[Disillusioned]

I vote we restrict that rule to the fatties. Talking of which, what's the deal with so many grossly overweight men going bra-less? It's completely obscene the way some of them allow their tits to swing free.

 

That's because we're trying to find out if they appeal to less-intelligent women as much as saggy female boobs appeal to less-intelligent men.

[collegeguy_24]

I vote we restrict that rule to the fatties. Talking of which, what's the deal with so many grossly overweight men going bra-less? It's completely obscene the way some of them allow their tits to swing free.

 

You can either remedy that my making a law that all women go bra less, I doubt you will see men complain.

 

Or, you can make it law that fat men wear bras, but you might also want to build a store for them otherwise they will use it as an excuse to follow you into Victoria Secret.

[Mme. Chaucer]

Guys could be castrated. That way, we women can freely parade ourselves in French Maid suits or whatever without fear of rape. Or perhaps they could just have their eyes poked out. That way, their "parts" could still be available for use by any interested sex crazed, scantily clad women.

[Taramere]

You can either remedy that my making a law that all women go bra less, I doubt you will see men complain.

 

Or, you can make it law that fat men wear bras, but you might also want to build a store for them otherwise they will use it as an excuse to follow you into Victoria Secret.

 

It certainly wouldn't do to have men shopping for their bras there. Possibly an alternative store called "Victor's Secret"...but I was thinking more of a special section in the army surplus stores. Camouflage bras for manly men. I googled some pictures of men in bras for ideas, and I've had a brainwave for an exciting new invention.

 

Tummy bras.