Stung Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 Ha ha. My son loves this song. I guess my husband is kind of a tall teddy bear type by this thread's definition: 6'2", broad shouldered, bit of a belly, lumbering gait, doesn't go to the gym--but just because we're not a gym-going couple doesn't mean we are couch potatoes. We hike, we swim, we dance, we spend a lot of time chasing kids around grassy fields and playgrounds and beaches, we have a weight set at home. We do enjoy rich food and wine, and would rather spend time with our kids and each other than at a gym. I have had shorter boyfriends before and some of them were very lean, muscular and well-defined. As long as they weren't obsessed with their fitness regimens and appearance, it was nice, they of course had enjoyable bodies. If I were single and choosing between the two phenotypes--since you said I should assume both had personalities I would find desirable, and I presume this to include intelligence and personal charisma--I think the real defining factors would be the face, the voice, and the indefinable something of chemistry. Now that I've read the thread all the way through I guess I need to clarify, I was going by the original definition of the tall teddy bear as a physical description and not what it morphed into downthread . My love for my husband doesn't well up out of my insecurities because I think I'm hotter than him, he's not a doormat NiceGuy TM and he knows how to change a tire without running around like a headless chicken :rolleyes:. Seriously, sometimes I wonder what goes through your heads.
Star Gazer Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 Ignore the womenspeak its all about womens insecurity The "teddy bear" has much less chance in the womens mind to be chased by females and think about wandering off the adonis the women will wory about cheating 24 hours a day Seeing as the majority of women prefer a Teddy Bear over an Adonis, that's obviously not true.
Recommended Posts