flying Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 New England and upper New York state have nothing in common. Yup, that was my point - sorry if I was unclear. I was agreeing with you, tincanman.
socalnative Posted October 15, 2010 Posted October 15, 2010 Ive noticed that if you type in "gender superiority" on google the majority of the posts are either saying that neither gender is superior (which is what I believe), but many of them say that females are superior and it even seems like lots of men believe women are better. I know America (compared to the rest of the world) basically hates men and humiliates them but I thought people were smart enough to separate media and courtroom biased with the real world. Do you or most people you know truly believe one gender is better than the other? Men are better during times of war. Women are better during times of peace. End of debate. Ok, look at first, the real differences. Size. Strength. That better enables war, fighting, building (construction workers, anybody), and sports. Things of that nature. Now, ask yourself. Of those things, which are essential to life? War? Essential? Only if you're on the side defending itself. But, war is not essential. It only destroys life. Yet it happens, and when it does, it is REAL. IMO, war happens because, well, I'm studies have been done on group and group size, that the more people, the more 'teams' need to form. So, at some point, will a team form an opposing philosophical vision? Of course. So, wars will happen... unless earth has a population of, 80. That would be nice if we only had 80 people, nice for ME, if that included myself along with 79 others I personally know. That's the problem. WE ALL WANT THAT. We all secretly want there to only be 80 people existing on Earth, and we know them all, and happen to be the best looking of them all, and that, a good 50% of them are of the opposite sex. So we would be kings and queens. Well, folks.. the world really did start at 80 people!!!! Who was more important-the man or woman?? Women..w/o her, no baby. Man, w/o him, also no baby, but.. what about that sense to explore? What about protecting the clan? So.. as primitive man were blossiming, maybe.. the men kinda did have some valid importance? But in times of peace, true peace.. life become much more liberal, and that's what we are at now. And then, women become more dominant, because now, life is back to men just wantin to hit that and women to go out for a night of fun. That's all they want.. FUN! Women are what makes us have a reason for living. FUN. Women are Laughter. Women are music, dancing, style, art, color, taste, sweet, soft, sexy, hot, they are the ingredients of that amaziing food you eat. Men are the tools. Men are the bowls, the mixers. Women are the fruts and the spices. They are why men make music. Men didn't make music just to make music. They do it for the girls. Even the ones who don't admit it and pretend they studyed classica jazz for 14 years, they admit they it has 'helped' in their sexual or romantic ventures. If it hasn't, they admit looks matter, and they never had it nor the confidence. But that really has nothing to do with the fact that for most guys who voluntarily choose to make music, they are doing it for the women. So, look inside your car right now, or your dvd player. If any movie or song was done by a guy who got into that to get girls.. throw it away. Because without women, you wouldn't have that song or movie..
Recommended Posts