Woggle Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 we in fact need each other. Humans are creatures of belonging and their is no better belonging than having a lifetime partner. Only a select minority of people can be happy being alone without having a partner in their lives, but guess what? they are classified with mental disorders. As the majority of people are heterosexual, we need the opposite sex to live. only homosexuals can live without the opposite sex. Speak for yourself. If I ever get divorced I can see myself just wacking off for life. I don't need women for anything,
Stung Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 It's a man, baby! Seriously, you guys know this is a troll, right? This screen name is so busted. Read back through it's posts...I especially like the one where he forgets which screen name he's using and starts bitching about "these broads".
dreamingoftigers Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I think men AND women are bitter today because we get told through media that we can have it all, no work and no strings attached, then our partners keep falling short of our expectations after awhile. When we become healthy people we aren't bitter people and aren't bitter towards a gender as a whole.
Mr White Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I think men AND women are bitter today because we get told through media that we can have it all, no work and no strings attached, then our partners keep falling short of our expectations after awhile. When we become healthy people we aren't bitter people and aren't bitter towards a gender as a whole. I'm a fan, you should post more .
Chrome Barracuda Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I see allot of angry guys here beause they think its still the 50's where women didnt have careers of their own and needed men well we dont anymore You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore ...This is a bunch of garbage!!! troll, what you fail to realize is that statistically, women outnumber men in areas 2-1. If you dont like us some other female will. Secondly without your little careers and trying to break the glass ceiling, whenb it comes down to having a decent relationship. it wont workout if you have that mindset. Especially if your dealing with an alpha male. you cannot wear the pants in the R at the same time. If your not willing to compromise the R is doomed. Aint no men on this board bitter. We as men can cook our own food, do our own laundry, clean our own houses. We can be self reliant and self sufficient if need be. You dont need us but in turn we dont need you. A real man wants a woman to be his equal not beneath him. ...Unless we in bed. then we can talk. lol.
Green Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I see allot of angry guys here beause they think its still the 50's where women didnt have careers of their own and needed men well we dont anymore You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore Haha the avg joe blow and below avg joe blow gets to have kids with like 5 different women. So i really don't know what you are reffering to. Most of the men who are really bitter against women have WIVES... so I really don't know where you get this idea that women have started to refuse to date men. If anything sex and getting women has become far easier since the 50's. Good so stop getting mad when we don't treat you like it is still the 50s. Pay for your own meals and do your own heavy lifting. I enjoy paying for a girls meal and lifting heavy things. Although the OP seems to be crazy. Yes needing is different than wanting one. Would I need a man for survival? Nope because it's not like I'm a paralyzed person nor I'm I in a wheelchair. Women would be paralyzed with out men. Seriously men do all the physicaly hard jobs like FIGHTING, BUILDING, REPAIRING ect. We need women too, for fun and making babies. Speak for yourself. On behalf of the human race, women need men. The truth is Men need women and women need men. I really feel sorry for the OP as I'm sure her life sux.
Hot Carl Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I wasn't bitter before. But now that the original poster has opened my eyes to a few facts of life, I'm bitter. I'm really bitter.
aerogurl87 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 ...This is a bunch of garbage!!! troll, what you fail to realize is that statistically, women outnumber men in areas 2-1. If you dont like us some other female will. Secondly without your little careers and trying to break the glass ceiling, whenb it comes down to having a decent relationship. it wont workout if you have that mindset. Especially if your dealing with an alpha male. you cannot wear the pants in the R at the same time. If your not willing to compromise the R is doomed. Aint no men on this board bitter. We as men can cook our own food, do our own laundry, clean our own houses. We can be self reliant and self sufficient if need be. You dont need us but in turn we dont need you. A real man wants a woman to be his equal not beneath him. ...Unless we in bed. then we can talk. lol. Once again Chrome speaks the truth. I'm a woman and I like having a man, not because I need one, but because I like true companionship and desire to be loved. Meaningful sex trumps one night stands and just being a f*ck buddy.
D-Lish Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Once again Chrome speaks the truth. I'm a woman and I like having a man, not because I need one, but because I like true companionship and desire to be loved. Meaningful sex trumps one night stands and just being a f*ck buddy. Second this Ag:rolleyes:
gamma1 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship There may be truth to this part. It's enough to make me bitter.
aerogurl87 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Agreed! Especially no where near as classy and elegant. This is reflected in alot of pop culture today. Lady gaga's "love game" has a line in it where it says "sex isnt good unless its rough". Its just one example of how our culture continues to change due to the masculization of woman. Lol this made me laugh because I love rough sex especially when it's preceded by a candlelit bath or shower with my SO, and me dressed to kill in some garters and thigh high stockings. Class and elegance isn't dead, it's just becoming endangered by the media which spreads lies that women must act like whores to get men.
Shakz Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 we in fact need each other. Humans are creatures of belonging and their is no better belonging than having a lifetime partner. Only a select minority of people can be happy being alone without having a partner in their lives, but guess what? they are classified with mental disorders. As the majority of people are heterosexual, we need the opposite sex to live. only homosexuals can live without the opposite sex. Well thank you very much for clearing this up for me. Because I happily live alone I could never figure out whether I was gay or just plain crazy. But now I see, thanks to your insight, there's no reason I can't be both!
gypsy_nicky Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 we in fact need each other. Humans are creatures of belonging and their is no better belonging than having a lifetime partner. Only a select minority of people can be happy being alone without having a partner in their lives, but guess what? they are classified with mental disorders. As the majority of people are heterosexual, we need the opposite sex to live. only homosexuals can live without the opposite sex. Thats whack, pure strawman. you left out the great thinkers-Isaac newton, Nikola tesla to name a few.
gypsy_nicky Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I don't need a man, but I want one. One good thing for men after the femme revolution is that since women don't need to depend on them financially, men can be more assured that women choose them because they want them, and not because they need to be provided for. this is true. Also remember that in bigger metropolitan cities (NYC) its become really hard for women to date because their standards have leveled up and there's a surplus of career/attractive men to choose from.
Ross PK Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I see allot of angry guys here beause they think its still the 50's where women didnt have careers of their own and needed men well we dont anymore You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore What about when you're older when hot guys wont want to ravish you anymore? What will you do then?
Woggle Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Another thing I noticed is that most women do not want to date men who are not strong alpha types but men are considered sexist and patriarchal if we are not attracted to today's hardened ballbusters. Men are expected to live up to our traditional roles but we dare not ask the same of women.
espec10001 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Absurd. Men need women and women need men. Otherwise we wouldn't exist! in the REAL WORLD, in REAL social interactions, you can see the social dynamic play out between men and women. They have different characteristics but they compliment each other. Like the late, great James Brown said: "This is a man's world. But it wouldn't be nothing without a woman or a girl." The fact is we are all interdependent on one another, but our media lies to us that we are somehow 'independent' from one another. This is the greatest lie that has ever been fed the American public. Truth is if you really open your eyes you see just how dependent we all are on other people!
cdubs32 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I see allot of angry guys here beause they think its still the 50's where women didnt have careers of their own and needed men well we dont anymore You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore Men don't need women anymore. All you can provide is a child and there's surrogate mother's for that now, as well as "test tube" technology. We can always adopt as well. Really, if we want sex, we just go to the bar, find the good looking girls who are drunk stupid, play some mind games with them, then take them home and ravage them. All we have to do is lie if needed saying we love them then we can just never call them again, no strings attached. I see a lot of angry women wondering why men take advantage of them. It's really because they don't have anything to offer us. Women actually require more emotional needs/support/attachment than men do. Men just need sex and our emotional needs are met. Besides, it only takes some time for these "providers" type men to realize they aren't in demand....yet. They can either go through the transformation to be a jerk/dbag that women their age really do want, or they can wait until their mid 30's and women will realize they want a decent man, and the guy will have his pick of plenty of women who are interested in a guy just like him. However, most of these women, with age, will have their looks decrease in attractiveness and only gained more weight (more weight on a woman is less attractive and less socially acceptable than more weight on a man). Therefore the man's value to women only increase with age and time. All he has to do is be patient and take advantage of as many women as he can in his younger years until he's in demand.
sally4sara Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Men don't need women anymore. M'kay..... And then this: All you can provide is a child and there's surrogate mother's for that now, as well as "test tube" technology. We can always adopt as well. Sounds a whole lot like you still need a woman to get children. Not like men are able to give birth after all. Test tube babies are still born of a woman. Surrogate babies are still born of a woman. Orphans are still born of a woman. No one person NEEDS another person (though it can be quite nice to have a good partner), but men will always need women if they want to have a child. Not going to stay true for women though. Even if they come up with male eggs, they will still need a woman to give birth. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3323846/Sperm-cells-created-from-female-embryo.html
espec10001 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 M'kay..... And then this: Sounds a whole lot like you still need a woman to get children. Not like men are able to give birth after all. Test tube babies are still born of a woman. Surrogate babies are still born of a woman. Orphans are still born of a woman. No one person NEEDS another person (though it can be quite nice to have a good partner), but men will always need women if they want to have a child. Not going to stay true for women though. Even if they come up with male eggs, they will still need a woman to give birth. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3323846/Sperm-cells-created-from-female-embryo.html I hear things like this all the time from women. Women cannot exist without men and men cannot exist without women. It's the Yin and Yang, you need both this will never change. Unless we become superhuman and become both sexes in one, men and women NEED each other. In easy times it might not seem like that, but when the going gets rough we'll all come to know.
sally4sara Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 (edited) I hear things like this all the time from women. Women cannot exist without men and men cannot exist without women. It's the Yin and Yang, you need both this will never change. Unless we become superhuman and become both sexes in one, men and women NEED each other. In easy times it might not seem like that, but when the going gets rough we'll all come to know. Did you bother reading the link? Women having baby's with other women and producing female babies. Look, its a dumb point of contention. I love having my husband and son in my life. I like my male friends. But as far as the continuation of the species goes, in a cold clinical observation, women are close to not needing men to reproduce while men will always (unless we do figure out how to come straight from a tube) need a woman for this. What is comes down to is people. People who need (or rather WANT) people. Are the luckiest people in the world. A person NEEDS other people. The gender distinction of those people is what is becoming obsolete. Many people together can do great things. If all those people were men -the species would die out. If all those people were women - it doesn't have to play out that way. But in a planet of nothing but women, I'd fully expect masculine attitudes (butchy, macho acting women) to be present because we are a species that competes. Even the male advantage of size would continue because not all women are the same size or strength. Fussing and whining about gender differences is ignoring the bigger picture. Not all people are enjoyable or pleasant to deal with. What is the point of looking to gender for the reason? And more over, what is the point of getting angry over someone not respecting your gender if who you are is a person not worth respecting? Men and women worthy of respect will find it. Men and women who are not worth the sack they were born in are not disrespected simply due to their gender. Edited June 30, 2010 by sally4sara
espec10001 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Did you bother reading the link? Women having baby's with other women and producing female babies. Look, its a dumb point of contention. I love having my husband and son in my life. I like my male friends. But as far as the continuation of the species goes, in a cold clinical observation, women are close to not needing men to reproduce while men will always (unless we do figure out how to come straight from a tube) need a woman for this. What is comes down to is people. People who need (or rather WANT) people. Are the luckiest people in the world. A person NEEDS other people. The gender distinction of those people is what is becoming obsolete. Many people together can do great things. If all those people were men -the species would die out. If all those people were women - it doesn't have to play out that way. But in a planet of nothing but women, I'd fully expect masculine attitudes (butchy, macho acting women) to be present because we are a species that competes. Even the male advantage of size would continue because not all women are the same size or strength. Fussing and whining about gender differences is ignoring the bigger picture. Not all people are enjoyable or pleasant to deal with. What is the point of looking to gender for the reason? And more over, what is the point of getting angry over someone not respecting your gender if who you are is a person not worth respecting? Men and women worthy of respect will find it. Men and women who are not worth the sack they were born in are not disrespected simply due to their gender. If this ever did happen hopefully I'll be long dead by then
Green Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Did you bother reading the link? Women having baby's with other women and producing female babies. Look, its a dumb point of contention. I love having my husband and son in my life. I like my male friends. But as far as the continuation of the species goes, in a cold clinical observation, women are close to not needing men to reproduce while men will always (unless we do figure out how to come straight from a tube) need a woman for this. What is comes down to is people. People who need (or rather WANT) people. Are the luckiest people in the world. A person NEEDS other people. The gender distinction of those people is what is becoming obsolete. Many people together can do great things. If all those people were men -the species would die out. If all those people were women - it doesn't have to play out that way. But in a planet of nothing but women, I'd fully expect masculine attitudes (butchy, macho acting women) to be present because we are a species that competes. Even the male advantage of size would continue because not all women are the same size or strength. Fussing and whining about gender differences is ignoring the bigger picture. Not all people are enjoyable or pleasant to deal with. What is the point of looking to gender for the reason? And more over, what is the point of getting angry over someone not respecting your gender if who you are is a person not worth respecting? Men and women worthy of respect will find it. Men and women who are not worth the sack they were born in are not disrespected simply due to their gender. They can all ready make babies straight from the test tube so get down from you high horse. Show me a world where women BUILD, and REPAIR and CREATE on a level men do. All I see now is the art of BS
Feelin Frisky Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I see allot of angry guys here beause they think its still the 50's where women didnt have careers of their own and needed men well we dont anymore You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore The word is ravish--not ravage. Sarah Palin made the same mistake in her letter to the Gov. of Louisiana only in reverse. She said "I'm sorry your coastline is being ravished by the oil. Maybe only guys and smart women who have other things to do than pretend they can govern or flip guys the electronic bird are capable of getting that one right (or just shuttin' up if they don't know the meaning of either).
Shakz Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 The word is ravish--not ravage. Sarah Palin made the same mistake in her letter to the Gov. of Louisiana only in reverse. She said "I'm sorry your coastline is being ravished by the oil. Maybe only guys and smart women who have other things to do than pretend they can govern or flip guys the electronic bird are capable of getting that one right (or just shuttin' up if they don't know the meaning of either). Actually, FF, I wonder if this might be less a vocabulary error and more a Freudian slip.
Recommended Posts