Sweetie1977 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I see allot of angry guys here beause they think its still the 50's where women didnt have careers of their own and needed men well we dont anymore You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore
Cracker Jack Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 (edited) So guys on LS forums define men in general nowadays? And I did lol at your post. Hope you don't speak for real women in general. Sounds like pure gloating for no reason to me. Like, seriously? Edited June 30, 2010 by Cracker Jack
norajane Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Aw, you don't speak for all of us women. Some of us do need and want men, and not just as financial providers or sex providers. Men have a lot to offer! And we cherish the good men in our lives.
Woggle Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Good so stop getting mad when we don't treat you like it is still the 50s. Pay for your own meals and do your own heavy lifting.
SilentVoice Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Some men are very bitter but I disagree with your reasoning. I doubt men are really bitter because women don't want them to bring home the whole bacon. Just how we are no longer in the 50's neither are they.
Woggle Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Also don't get mad when you have to pay an ex alimony. I met a woman who was affiliated with my company that has to pay through the nose to her ex and I was smiling inside because she is feeling what men have felt in family court.
Jilly Bean Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Well, I do agree that women's lib has left some men out in the cold, but I'm not sure I applaud that. In many ways, I think women proclaiming they can do it all - bring home the bacon, fry it up in the pan, run a company, raise 5 kids - is so beyond unrealistic, that not only will many things suffer in a woman's life (like her kids, or her career), that she comes off AS she doesn't need/want a man. And who finds that attractive in a mate? Because if I met a guy who could do for himself all the things I enjoy doing for my man, I'd lose interest pretty quickly. Sometimes I really wish it were 1950 again.
deebeechrisyo Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore I bet you also whine about the double standard between players and sluts.
sally4sara Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I see allot of angry guys here beause they think its still the 50's where women didnt have careers of their own and needed men well we dont anymore You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore Trying to out match bitter guys by being just like them is showing ignorance isn't always bliss. Look at you for instance; you don't sound blissful at all.
Ruby Slippers Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I don't need a man, but I want one. One good thing for men after the femme revolution is that since women don't need to depend on them financially, men can be more assured that women choose them because they want them, and not because they need to be provided for.
MrNate Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I don't need a man, but I want one. One good thing for men after the femme revolution is that since women don't need to depend on them financially, men can be more assured that women choose them because they want them, and not because they need to be provided for. This is always a good point.
Woggle Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I don't need a man, but I want one. One good thing for men after the femme revolution is that since women don't need to depend on them financially, men can be more assured that women choose them because they want them, and not because they need to be provided for. If only it were that simple.
samsungxoxo Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Yes needing is different than wanting one. Would I need a man for survival? Nope because it's not like I'm a paralyzed person nor I'm I in a wheelchair. However, is there anything wrong with saying I want a man and as both my partner, best friend and husband one day. It's been my dream for as long as I can remember. This doesn't mean I won't continue my career either. I can have both a husband as well as degree in psychology.
kiss_andmakeup Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I don't need a man, but I want one. One good thing for men after the femme revolution is that since women don't need to depend on them financially, men can be more assured that women choose them because they want them, and not because they need to be provided for. Well said!
Mr White Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Not to feed the troll, but please, please tell me where did you get the delusional idea that men WANT to be burdened with the support of a SAHM??? I wouldn't marry a woman that won't contribute to the family income, and I bet my ancestors would have appreciated the extra income as well - if this was a viable arrangement in that period. Please ladies, you're not fooling anybody with this strawman argument. What men everywhere are doing is breathing a sign of relief - finally those SAHMS are getting of their behinds and getting to work. If men are upset about anything it is the double standard - which is the proclaimed expectation of equality, which in reality only applies to benefits, not to costs, yet is also accompanied with selective demands of the "good" aspects of the past.
Lizzie60 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I see allot of angry guys here beause they think its still the 50's where women didnt have careers of their own and needed men well we dont anymore You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore I haven't read the whole thread yet.. (I will later).. but I have to disagree.. of course there are angry, bitter men out there who would love to 'control' their women.. but I think there are just about as much women who are dependent on men.. who don't have a career.. who can't survive financially.. who suffer in silence rather than put their foot down.. I think there are MORE men who go after hot chicks for no string sex... women are still more traditional in that 'department'.. we're not there yet.. although it's getting better.. but I have to disagree with your generalization.
deebeechrisyo Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 If men are upset about anything it is the double standard - which is the proclaimed expectation of equality, which in reality only applies to benefits, not to costs, yet is also accompanied with selective demands of the "good" aspects of the past. Exactly. If women really wanted true equality, then every divorce-initiating wife would happily agree to only taking whatever is actually hers. And of course if she wants custody of their child, no child support needed from the husband. Yeah right!
sagetalk Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I see allot of angry guys here beause they think its still the 50's where women didnt have careers of their own and needed men well we dont anymore You have found out we are more like men then u guys thought. most of us dont want sappy roamance we dont want marriage or kids we just want to find the hottest guys to ravage us in a no strings attatched relationship So now the average joe blow guy who isnt great looking and isnt very charming is having a hard time getting women these days beause "provider" is the only thing he has going for him and its not needed anymore While you're gloating, why don't you count up all the women on this forum that get cheated on and used for sex because they want the hottest guy. Doesn't sound that great to me. Women's lib , what a joke. Men need women and women need men, and no narrow minded, sexist, group of men-hating women will ever change that. Go ahead and pick the biggest ox you can find that will feel you up on the first date, toss you around and ravage you, but don't ask the tax payers to pay for the abortions or bastard children you make with him and he runs off.
singlelife Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Women don't need men and men don't need women. But no need to get mad. Or be a hater. The goal is to enjoy one another.
Choboto Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Women don't need men and men don't need women. But no need to get mad. Or be a hater. The goal is to enjoy one another. we in fact need each other. Humans are creatures of belonging and their is no better belonging than having a lifetime partner. Only a select minority of people can be happy being alone without having a partner in their lives, but guess what? they are classified with mental disorders. As the majority of people are heterosexual, we need the opposite sex to live. only homosexuals can live without the opposite sex.
SteveC80 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Thats fine you women arent as classy or feminine as the women in my mothers and grandmothers day Listen to the women on here who think its pathetic if a guy is too romantic theyd rather have there head shoved in a toilet while having rough sex then a guy be romantic
Choboto Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Thats fine you women arent as classy or feminine as the women in my mothers and grandmothers day Listen to the women on here who think its pathetic if a guy is too romantic theyd rather have there head shoved in a toilet while having rough sex then a guy be romantic ya its why i just do what i do and **** the 'game' of dating.so many double standard and hypocrisy going on in dating; theirs no room for 'rules' and guidelines.
marsle85 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Speak for yourself. On behalf of the human race, women need men.
Recommended Posts