Choboto Posted June 11, 2010 Posted June 11, 2010 if your not physically attracted to someone it doesnt matter how ****in great their personality is. same on the flip side. it just happens that you see looks before personality. you find phsyical attraction then go for the mental link. if i found a women 'ugly' and repulsed by her, why i get to know her?
TaurusTerp Posted June 11, 2010 Posted June 11, 2010 Somehow I found hot or not again and it reminded me of this thread. Somebody was asking what the differences between 6 & 7 are etc. Here are my representations of the scale 4 5 also 5 6 also 6 can be called cute 7 also 7 8 also 8 9 also 9 another 9 again 9 there were tons of 9's. 10 Obviously this boils down to my personal preferences but I think it can give an idea of what the ranges are. There was one other 10 I saw but I didn't think to grab her link since I wasn't collecting them at the time. Its crazy how much we disagree on these.
torranceshipman Posted June 11, 2010 Posted June 11, 2010 Theres nothing wrong with it, just ignore the women speak. The difference is many guys are perfectly find with dating a 2/10 or 3/10. For women 18-30, it's unthinkable to even talk to a man unless he is a 8/10+, or "HOT". Who cares if hes abusive, a druggie, lives with his parents, no job, as long as hes "HOT" and I can show him off to my friends, its worth!! ( ) You didn't mention short
torranceshipman Posted June 11, 2010 Posted June 11, 2010 Uh, Marilyn would not fall under the umbrella of "heavier." At 5'5 140 (the heaviest weight I've seen given) she is about 10lbs overweight but definitely not fat. If Marilyn was 160lbs back then, she would have been considered fat, just like she would be now. As for the scale. 5 is average. 7-10 is where the attractive women lye. Tina Fey is at least a 7, getting into 8 territory. Who cares? My God, the amount of effort it even takes to work out where someone fits on a scale - I am way too lazy for that.
somedude81 Posted June 11, 2010 Posted June 11, 2010 Its crazy how much we disagree on these. I realize that people have different tastes. When I was going through the pictures, I actually tended to rate the pictures lower than the resulting average. Though my 8's and 9's where usually spot on with the majority. Who cares? My God, the amount of effort it even takes to work out where someone fits on a scale - I am way too lazy for that. It didn't take any effort to rate people, just the state of mind of wanting to rate. And no I don't use the 1-10 scale on girls in real life. I have a somewhat subconscious instantaneous 1-4 scale. 1. No 2. Maybe 3. Yes 4. OMG!
marsle85 Posted June 19, 2010 Posted June 19, 2010 Somehow I found hot or not again and it reminded me of this thread. Somebody was asking what the differences between 6 & 7 are etc. Here are my representations of the scale 4 5 also 5 6 also 6 can be called cute 7 also 7 8 also 8 9 also 9 another 9 again 9 there were tons of 9's. 10 Obviously this boils down to my personal preferences but I think it can give an idea of what the ranges are. There was one other 10 I saw but I didn't think to grab her link since I wasn't collecting them at the time. Wow. I was shocked by this. Your 10 is a solid 8 for me. Most of your 9's circle around 7. And so forth. I think your prettiest subject is: 9
Taramere Posted June 19, 2010 Posted June 19, 2010 Somehow I found hot or not again and it reminded me of this thread. Somebody was asking what the differences between 6 & 7 are etc. Here are my representations of the scale 4 5 also 5 6 also 6 can be called cute 7 also 7 8 also 8 9 also 9 another 9 again 9 there were tons of 9's. 10 Obviously this boils down to my personal preferences but I think it can give an idea of what the ranges are. I think your idea of beauty might depart quite significantly from a lot of other male notions. Edit. You say that most people on this hot or not thing agreed with your ratings? I'm puzzled. I don't live in an area noted for its beautiful women, but I see plenty of girls far prettier than your 9s and 10s on the street every day. I would have thought a 9 or 10 would be in the top 10% of women beauty wise.
threebyfate Posted June 19, 2010 Posted June 19, 2010 So how is the 1 to 10 scale any worse?If this is what makes you happy, go for it. I do recommend that you and your guy pals get some official Olympic 1 - 10 signs. When a girl walks by, your little posse can flash your cards and then, a total score or median average can be calculated per girl. Good luck and have fun. The chicks will dig you for it!
somedude81 Posted June 19, 2010 Posted June 19, 2010 When I made that post I was using a 1-10 scale mindset of ranking real, normal girls. I'm not so shallow that I only put celebrities and models as a 10. Also as I mentioned in my post, I know that my tastes are my own. It's not surprising at all that people see attractiveness in different ways. I spent about 20 minutes on that post going through pictures. After one votes, the next screen shows the average votes. I actually tended to rate people 1-2 points lower than the average. It was very difficult going through the pictures trying to find girls that would qualify as a 10. The one I found and linked was the only girl I saw that I thought qualified. There are tons of amazingly beautiful women who go to my school and I as I mentioned before, I don't rank them 1-10. I have my automic 1-4 scale of 1. No 2. Maybe 3. Yes 4. OMG! No thinking required, as it just goes with my gut instinct.
SincereOnlineGuy Posted June 21, 2010 Posted June 21, 2010 What's wrong with the "1 to 10" scale? Nothing at all is wrong with the scale itself. HOW the (assessment) is presented is often problematic and offensive. Were there something significant wrong with the scale itself you wouldn't have m-m-m-m-m-most couples comprised of two individuals who are considerably near to one another ON that scale. Were the mating game as random as most who despise the "1-to-10 scale" suggest it is, or want it to be, then the majority of couples would instead be as mix-matched as Sandra Bullock and that lowlife guy she was dating.
Recommended Posts