Woggle Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 I'm curious... how many women find it attractive when a guy likes to tell you that all women go after looks, money, etc? and blatantly says you are lying if you say differently? I don't think I'd be attracted to that kind of a guy. but.... of course, if he was handsome and rich I might make an exception. I am not on here to attract women.
Chrome Barracuda Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 I am not on here to attract women. LMAO. notice she dropped money in there too. its always about financial security, huh?
Jersey Shortie Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 ahh but that is where you're wrong JS....chemistry and attraction DO equal looks to a certain extent. I'm wrong about my own personal experiences of what I am attracted to?? I am getting sick of the continued comments that completely discredit anything women have to say. If it comes from a woman, some seem to make the correlation that it's not true. What is this BS? It's plain ignorant. What purpose do I have to lie to the men of this board? Have I ever been a poster to sugar coat my opinion to save face with the men? Someone posted a question and I answered it by what is true for me. I've dated and have had relationships with men that were not even average in looks, but were probably unattractive by mosts standards. But we had attraction and chemistry. They weren't obese or anything or disfigured but they weren't even "average". And then, I've dated very good looking men. And I've been turned off by very good looking men. What part of this don't you understand Alpha and that I have to explain for you? Now for men, yeah looks are totally tied to the level of chemistry a man will feel. Because men are more shallow when it comes to looks in women. But for me? My experiences have taught me that looks have nothing to do with my level of attraction or chemistry with men. You want to keep telling me I am wrong? well RS I would say its more like: Money/Resources Looks/Physical attributes Confidence Sexual Performance Intellect/Personality I'll put these in order where the appeal to me. Intellect/Personality ( I have an affinity for high intelligent men) Confidence Looks/Physical attributes (I almost put money/resources first but then I remembered two things. 1. A few years ago I dated a very wealthy stockbroker who offered me alot of things and I turned them down because I relized we weren't going to be good together. 2. The guy at my gym that I really like, if he was poor, I'd still date him.) Money/Resources Sexual Performance (This is important. I don't want some douche that thinks doing it like a pornstar makes good sex. But it's last because it's the last thing I would be discovering about a man).
somedude81 Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 This link tries to explain in a humorous way of what women really look for in men. http://uvtblog.com/2009/02/the-woman...scale-of-1-10/ One thing that may not be obvious is that women on average look better than men. There are a great deal more of good looking girls than there are good looking guys. For example in a room of 10 girls, 1 would be ugly, 5 would be normal and 4 would be hot. Though in a room of 10 guys, 1 would be ugly, 8 would be normal and 1 would be hot. I'd say say that hot guys are actually in more demand than hot girls are...
crimsonmike Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 I got bad news for you boys. You can blame your lack of attention from women on your looks all you want, but they don't put as much stock in it as we do. I'm no better than average. I've dated some attractive females. If you can talk to them without fumbling all over yourself and show some self confidence, they will at least talk to you. Problem is the very pretty girls tend to be bat sht crazy. Even worse than regular girls.
Chrome Barracuda Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 I got bad news for you boys. You can blame your lack of attention from women on your looks all you want, but they don't put as much stock in it as we do. I'm no better than average. I've dated some attractive females. If you can talk to them without fumbling all over yourself and show some self confidence, they will at least talk to you. Problem is the very pretty girls tend to be bat sht crazy. Even worse than regular girls. LMAO thats kinda true!
SarahRose Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 1. guy with Big dick that works well for me 2. guy with Big dick that works well for me 3. Mute guy 4. Good hygiene That's it. There is my list.
crimsonmike Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 1. guy with Big dick that works well for me 2. guy with Big dick that works well for me 3. Mute guy 4. Good hygiene That's it. There is my list. Well.........I got #4 and big hands.
Pyro Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Newsflash: men and women are both guilty of doing this. Men get a hot girl as arm candy/trophy wife and vice versa for women. Sometimes that person turns out to be dumb as rocks and those who care way too much about their appearance usually tend to be that way.
bac Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 How many of you have only picked based on looks? /QUOTE] IMO females do not choose men based only on looks even if they look for NSA. The problem is that they choose a guy based on looks coupled with several other characteristics. In other words, a guy should have looks but it is not enough to be popular with girls.
SarahRose Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 This link tries to explain in a humorous way of what women really look for in men. http://uvtblog.com/2009/02/the-woman...scale-of-1-10/ One thing that may not be obvious is that women on average look better than men. There are a great deal more of good looking girls than there are good looking guys. For example in a room of 10 girls, 1 would be ugly, 5 would be normal and 4 would be hot. Though in a room of 10 guys, 1 would be ugly, 8 would be normal and 1 would be hot. I'd say say that hot guys are actually in more demand than hot girls are... That link was hilarious. Thanks I think most guys fall into the 2 category of The terrible cat who is not good looking, no loot, no charisma, BUT thinks he’s got juice which makes him think he is a 10.
BeautifulMan Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Women will only notice you if you're handsome, powerful or display a unique talent. I'm not saying a woman wouldn't like a guy otherwise but they're not going to notice some average joe unless they're put in a similar situation with a guy. Even then you have to learn how to control her emotions.
Katherineos123 Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Id be more apt to pick you simply for the fact that your name is "Brady to Moss"
Author Brady_to_Moss Posted June 3, 2010 Author Posted June 3, 2010 Id be more apt to pick you simply for the fact that your name is "Brady to Moss" Now we are getting somewhere
donnamaybe Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Without conversation, I would notice a guy for looks, but don't PICK a guy just for his looks. I have been involved with someone before simply because he was so funny and interesting.
OceanTropic Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Quite honestly, when it comes to going on dates, I won't go out with someone im not attracted to. HOWEVER, all my past boyfriends I was not attracted to, so we were just friends. Eventually they grew on me and we began dating. My current boyfriend now I wasn't attracted to AT ALL. I was repulsed. Eventually he started getting into shape and to clean up, and we remained friends this entire time. One night we decided to hang out and go for coffee, and we ended up talking from 7pm till 6 in the morning. After that night we began dating. Did I start dating him based on his looks? No, but I did hang out with him more because he was easier on the eyes. His personality did the rest. So looks are the first impression and open doors for other great things. Besides, why would you date someone you're not attracted to? Whats the point?
brainygirl Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Women will only notice you if you're handsome, powerful or display a unique talent. I'm not saying a woman wouldn't like a guy otherwise but they're not going to notice some average joe unless they're put in a similar situation with a guy. Even then you have to learn how to control her emotions. This is so funny, and such a generalization that its not true. I thought the guy I'm seeing now was not at all good looking when I first met him. He's very tall and tends to look startled until you know how to read his expressions. I wouldn't call him powerful as he is currently laid off from his job and delivering pizzas - I DO give him props for working and doing something when he could have moved in with his parents - but that has more to do with character than power and money. Erm, unique talent, he's fun to hang out with. Has a funny sense of humor. None of these things are super rare traits that are hard to cultivate or a matter of luck.
somedude81 Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 I thought the guy I'm seeing now was not at all good looking when I first met him. He's very tall and tends to look startled until you know how to read his expressions. This him?
Engadget Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Yup I see women all the time date these jobless losers. Who have absolutely nothing going for them besides their looks. I resent this since I lost my job and am damn sexy sir.
stace79 Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 How many of you have only picked based on looks? On a scale of 1 to Giselle..i am about a 5..not that great at all which i believe is where the problems start...if a guy can feed you some BS lines and such and hes a 10..will you walk off with him rather than a 5 who isn't the best looking but can actually talk to you without shivering? Yes, many women pick a guy solely based on looks and/or income potential. But not all women are like that. If you spend much time focusing on "whoa is me, nobody likes me" then you aren't living a very happy life. Don't obsess over meeting a girlfriend. Obsess over doing the best you can with what you have (which is what we all do). Focus on doing things that bring you happiness, and other people will want to be around you because of your positive attitude. The more people you meet that way, the better your chance of meeting the right girl for you! Besides, would you want to be with a girl who doesn't love you for you anyway? When those guys start getting saggy and baggy, they'll have a very unhappy relationship!
Stung Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Women will only notice you if you're handsome, powerful or display a unique talent. I'm not saying a woman wouldn't like a guy otherwise but they're not going to notice some average joe unless they're put in a similar situation with a guy. Even then you have to learn how to control her emotions. Please elaborate.
Woggle Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Please elaborate. If a man does not keep a woman in constant emotional turmoil there is a good chance she will get bored and leave.
marsle85 Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 If a guy was really handsome, I'd expect him to be unfaithful because of the sheer number of options he must have, and it would turn me off a little. Handsome guys make me feel a little insecure; you're much more secure with a less attractive guy because he's less likely to stray. There are so many things wrong with this statement. Firstly, you're categorizing and condemning a huge part of the population because of something they cannot help, nor are encouraged by society to downplay.... because of your OWN insecurity. Secondly, targeting your insecurity; you're evaluating your personal worth whether this man stays or not, which is regardless. You are independent of him, and his choices. And thirdly! You're losing out! On cute guys! That's the tragedy!
stace79 Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 If a man does not keep a woman in constant emotional turmoil there is a good chance she will get bored and leave. I'm living proof this is wrong.
Recommended Posts